Search

Purpose To investigate the initial clinical value of fluorine 18 (18F) fluorocholine (FCH) dynamic positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging by comparing its parameters with clinical-pathologic findings in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) who plan to undergo radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and informed written consent was obtained from all subjects for this HIPAA-compliant study. Twelve men (mean age ± standard deviation, 61.7 years ± 8.4; range, 46-74 years) with untreated intermediate- to high-risk PCa characterized according to Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) underwent preoperative FCH dynamic PET/MR imaging followed by radical prostatectomy between April and November 2015. PET/MR imaging parameters including average and maximum K1 (delivery rate constant) and standardized uptake values (SUVs) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 scores were measured and compared with clinical-pathologic characteristics. For statistical analysis, the Spearman rank correlation and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed. Results Of the PET parameters, maximum SUV of primary tumors showed significant correlations with several clinical-pathologic parameters including serum prostate-specific antigen level (ρ = 0.71, P = .01), pathologic stage (ρ = 0.59, P = .043), and postsurgical CAPRA score (ρ = 0.72, P = .008). The overall PI-RADS score showed significant correlations with pathologic tumor volume (ρ = 0.81, P < .001), percentage of tumor cells with Gleason scores greater than 3 (ρ = 0.59, P = .02), and postsurgical CAPRA score (ρ = 0.58, P = .046). The high-risk postsurgical CAPRA score patient group had a significantly higher maximum SUV than did the intermediate-risk group. Combined PET and MR imaging showed improved sensitivity (88%) for prediction of pathologic extraprostatic extension compared with that with MR imaging (50%) and PET (75%) performed separately. Conclusion Maximum SUVs and PI-RADS scores from FCH PET/MR imaging show good correlation with clinical-pathologic characteristics, such as postsurgical CAPRA score, which are related to prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk PCa. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Simple Summary: The 18F-FDG PET parameters reflecting the intensity and distribution of glucose uptake by the tumor are associated with prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We developed and evaluated an imaging-based model utilizing these 18F-FDG PET-derived features for predicting the five-year survival in NSCLC patients after curative surgery. The PET-based risk score constructed using the LASSO logistic method outperformed the predictive performances of individual 18F-FDG PET parameters. The PET-based risk score was an independent prognostic factor for clinical variables. Additionally, it demonstrated better predictive performance when combined with clinical variables. The FDG PET-based imaging model could aid in risk stratification for personalized adjuvant treatment and follow-up management of NSCLC patients after surgery. The aim of our retrospective study is to develop and assess an imaging-based model utilizing 18F-FDG PET parameters for predicting the five-year survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after curative surgery. A total of 361 NSCLC patients who underwent curative surgery were assigned to the training set (n = 253) and the test set (n = 108). The LASSO regression model was used to construct a PET-based risk score for predicting five-year survival. A hybrid model that combined the PET-based risk score and clinical variables was developed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance was determined by the area under the curve (AUC). The individual features with the best predictive performances were co-occurrence_contrast (AUC = 0.675) and SUL peak (AUC = 0.671). The PET-based risk score was identified as an independent predictor after adjusting for clinical variables (OR 5.231, 95% CI 1.987–6.932; p = 0.009). The hybrid model, which integrated clinical variables, significantly outperformed the PET-based risk score alone in predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.771 vs. 0.696, p = 0.022), a finding that was consistent in the test set. The PET-based risk score, especially when integrated with clinical variables, demonstrates good predictive ability for five-year survival in NSCLC patients following curative surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown efficacy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) therapy. However, data is still limited regarding neoadjuvant immunotherapy for operable ESCC. Materials and Methods Patients with clinical stage T2 or T3 and N0 ESCC received three cycles of nivolumab therapy every two weeks before surgical resection. The primary endpoint is major pathologic responses (MPR) rate (= 10% of residual viable tumor [RVT]). Results Total 20 patients completed the planned nivolumab therapy. Among them, 17 patients underwent surgery as protocol, showing MPR in two patients (MPR rate, 11.8%), including one pathologic complete response, on conventional pathologic response evaluation. Pathologic response was re-evaluated using the immune-related pathologic response criteria based on immune-related RVT (irRVT). Three patients were classified as immunologic major pathologic response (iMPR; = 10% irRVT, iMPR rate: 17.6%), five as pathologic partial response (> 10% and < 90% irRVT), and nine as pathologic nonresponse (= 90% irRVT). The combined positive score (CPS) for PD-L1 in the baseline samples was predictable for iMPR, with the probability as 37.5% in CPS = 10 (3/8) and 0% in CPS < 10 (0/9). Conclusion Although the efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab therapy was modest in unselected ESCC patients, further researches on neoadjuvant immunotherapy are necessary in patients with PD-L1 expressed ESCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]