Search

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rational combination of TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 and Aurora A kinase inhibitor alisertib in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to conduct a phase I dose escalation trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.Experimental Design:TNBC cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with alisertib, TAK-228, or the combination and evaluated for changes in proliferation, cell cycle, mTOR pathway modulation, and terminal cellular fate, including apoptosis and senescence. A phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with escalating doses of alisertib and TAK-228 using a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).Results:The combination of TAK-228 and alisertib resulted in decreased proliferation and cell-cycle arrest in TNBC cell lines. Treatment of TNBC PDX models resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition and increased apoptosis with the combination. In the phase I dose escalation study, 18 patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled. The MTD was alisertib 30 mg b.i.d. days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle and TAK-228 2 mg daily, continuous dosing. The most common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, rash, mucositis, and alopecia.Conclusions:The addition of TAK-228 to alisertib potentiates the antitumor activity of alisertib in vivo, resulting in increased cell death and apoptosis. The combination is tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors and should be evaluated further in expansion cohorts with additional pharmacodynamic assessment.

Pharmacodynamic effects of alisertib and TAK-228 in patient tissue samples

PDF file, 84KB.

PDF file, 70KB, Platelet P-AKT Inhibition.

PDF file, 36KB.

PDF file, 54KB, Mutational Status for Arm 1.

Purpose: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of PX-866 in patients with incurable cancers.Experimental Design: This was a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study. Drug was administered orally once per day either on an intermittent (arm 1; days 1–5 and 8–12 of a 28-day cycle) or continuous (arm 2; days 1–28 of a 28-day cycle) schedule. Additional patients were treated at the arm 2 MTD in a food effects substudy.Results: Eighty-four patients were treated in the arm 1 (n = 51), arm 2 (n = 20), and food effects (n = 13) cohorts. The most frequent study drug–related adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (69.0%), with diarrhea being the most common (48.8%). The MTD was 12 and 8 mg for arm 1 and 2, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) consisted of grade III diarrhea (n = 3) and grade III elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST; n = 1). The pharmacokinetics profile was dose proportional, with no evidence of drug accumulation. PX-866–associated inhibition of platelet pAKTSER473 was observed at the arm 2 MTD. The best response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was stable disease in 22% of evaluable patients in arm 1, 53% in arm 2, and 11% in the food effects cohort. Eight patients were on study for 4 or more months.Conclusions: This first-in-human study shows that PX-866, an irreversible small-molecule inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), was well tolerated and was associated with prolonged stable disease, particularly when using a continuous dosing schedule. Clin Cancer Res; 18(15); 4173–82. ©2012 AACR.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to characterize niraparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with normal hepatic function (NHF) versus moderate hepatic impairment (MHI). Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors were stratified by NHF or MHI (National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria [bilirubin > 1.5–3 × upper limit of normal and any aspartate aminotransferase elevation]). In the PK phase, all patients received one 300 mg dose of niraparib. In the extension phase, patients with MHI received niraparib 200 mg daily; patients with NHF received 200 or 300 mg based on weight (max), area under the curve to last measured concentration (AUClast) and extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf). Safety was assessed in both phases. Exposure–response (E–R) modeling was used to predict MHI effects on exposure and safety of niraparib doses ≤ 200 mg or 300/200 mg or 200/100 mg weight/platelet regimens. Results In the PK phase (NHF, n = 9; MHI, n = 8), mean niraparib Cmax was 7% lower in patients with MHI versus NHF. Mean exposure (AUClast, AUCinf) was increased by 45% and 56%, respectively, in patients with MHI without impacting tolerability. In the extension phase (NHF, n = 8; MHI, n = 7), the overall safety profile was consistent with previous trials. In patients with MHI, E–R modeling predicted niraparib 200 mg reduced Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia incidence, whereas a 200/100 mg regimen yielded exposures below efficacy-associated levels in 15% of patients. Conclusion These findings support adjusting the 300 mg niraparib starting dose to 200 mg QD in patients with MHI. Trial registration NCT03359850; registered December 2, 2017

Aims The histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat has activity in various cancers. Because belinostat is metabolized by the liver, reduced hepatic clearance could lead to excessive drug accumulation and increased toxicity. Safety data in patients with liver dysfunction are needed for this drug to reach its full potential in the clinic. Methods We performed a phase 1 trial to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of belinostat in patients with advanced cancer and varying degrees of liver dysfunction. Results Seventy-two patients were enrolled and divided into cohorts based on liver function. In patients with mild dysfunction, the MTD was the same as the recommended phase 2 dose (1000 mg/m2 /day). Belinostat was well tolerated in patients with moderate and severe liver dysfunction, although the trial was closed before the MTD in these cohorts could be determined. The mean clearance of belinostat was 661 mL/min/m2 in patients with normal liver function, compared to 542, 505 and 444 mL/min/m2 in patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic dysfunction. Although this trial was not designed to assess clinical activity, of the 47 patients evaluable for response, 13 patients (28%) experienced stable disease. Conclusion While a statistically significant difference in clearance indicates increased belinostat exposure with worsening liver function, no relationship was observed between belinostat exposure and toxicity. An assessment of belinostat metabolites revealed significant differences in metabolic pathway capability in patients with differing levels of liver dysfunction. Further studies are needed to establish formal dosing guidelines in this patient population.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rational combination of TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 and Aurora A kinase inhibitor alisertib in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to conduct a phase I dose escalation trial in patients with advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: TNBC cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with alisertib, TAK-228, or the combination and evaluated for changes in proliferation, cell cycle, mTOR pathway modulation, and terminal cellular fate, including apoptosis and senescence. A phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with escalating doses of alisertib and TAK-228 using a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results: The combination of TAK-228 and alisertib resulted in decreased proliferation and cell-cycle arrest in TNBC cell lines. Treatment of TNBC PDX models resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition and increased apoptosis with the combination. In the phase I dose escalation study, 18 patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled. The MTD was alisertib 30 mg b.i.d. days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle and TAK-228 2 mg daily, continuous dosing. The most common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, rash, mucositis, and alopecia. Conclusions: The addition of TAK-228 to alisertib potentiates the antitumor activity of alisertib in vivo, resulting in increased cell death and apoptosis. The combination is tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors and should be evaluated further in expansion cohorts with additional pharmacodynamic assessment.

PURPOSE: The ability to predict and detect clinical and subclinical nephrotoxicity early in the course of therapy has the potential to improve long-term outcomes in cancer patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetic parameters could serve as predictors of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Participants [n=13] were treated with a one-hour cisplatin infusion [30–75 mg/m(2)]. Blood was collected pre-dose and up to 6 h post-dose. Urinary biomarkers [KIM-1, calbindin, clusterin, GST-pi, β2M, albumin, NGAL, osteopontin, clusterin, MCP-1, cystatin C and TFF3] were measured at baseline, day 3 and day 10. Total and unbound platinum concentrations were measured using ICP/MS. Noncompartmental analysis was performed and correlation and regression analyses evaluated the relationships between platinum pharmacokinetics and nephrotoxicity. RESULTS: Peak platinum urinary concentrations correlated with urinary levels of KIM-1, calbindin, clusterin, GST-pi, β2M, albumin, NGAL, osteopontin, clusterin, cystatin C and TFF3 at day 10. Unbound platinum plasma concentrations at 2 h also correlated with urinary clusterin, β2M, cystatin C, NGAL, osteopontin, and TFF3 at day 3. Regression analyses suggested 2 h total plasma platinum concentrations greater than 2,000 ng/ml and peak urinary platinum concentrations above 24,000 ng/ml may serve as potential approximations for elevated risk of nephrotoxicity. Platinum area under the plasma concentration time curve was associated with serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSIONS: Peak plasma and urinary platinum concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters were associated with risk of subclinical cisplatin-induced kidney injury as assessed using novel urinary biomarkers. Future studies will examine these relationships in larger clinical populations of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury.

PURPOSE: This phase 1 study evaluated the effect of hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Patients were dosed according to hepatic function classified by modified National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria and group assignment [normal (A1 and A2), mild (B), moderate (C1 and C2), or severe (D)]. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints included area under the concentration–time curve as daily exposure (AUC(daily)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) at steady state. Safety endpoints included types, incidence, seriousness, and relationship to crizotinib of adverse events. RESULTS: The AUC(daily) and C(max) in patients with normal liver function were 7107 ng h/mL and 375.1 ng/mL (A1) and 5422 ng h/mL and 283.9 ng/mL (A2), respectively. The AUC(daily) and C(max) ratios of adjusted geometric means for Groups B, C2, and D versus Group A1 were 91.12 and 91.20, 114.08 and 108.87, and 64.47 and 72.63, respectively. Any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 75% of patients; grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 25%, including fatigue (6%), hyponatremia (5%), and hyperbilirubinemia (3%). CONCLUSIONS: No adjustment to the approved 250 mg twice daily (BID) dose of crizotinib is recommended for patients with mild hepatic impairment. The recommended dose is 200 mg BID for patients with moderate hepatic impairment, and the dose should not exceed 250 mg daily for patients with severe hepatic impairment. Adverse events appeared consistent among the hepatic impairment groups.

This phase I study evaluates the safety, MTD, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary anticancer activity of enavatuzumab, a humanized IgG1 antibody to the TWEAK receptor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Patients received escalating doses of enavatuzumab given intravenously over 60 minutes every 2 weeks. Blood was obtained for PK and biomarker assessment. Three patients were enrolled per dose level in a standard 3+3 design with response assessment by RECIST version 1.0, every 8 weeks. Thirty patients were enrolled at 6 dose levels ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 (G4) lipase, G3 bilirubin, and G4 amylase elevations. There was no apparent correlation of liver or pancreatic enzyme elevation with drug exposure or the presence of liver metastases. Enavatuzumab exhibited a two-compartment linear PK model. Estimated systemic clearance was 23 to 33 mL/h with an elimination half-life of 7 to 18 days. The predicted target efficacious peak and trough concentrations occurred at 1.0 mg/kg following the second dose. There were no objective responses; 4 patients had stable disease. The MTD of enavatuzumab is 1.0 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks. Higher doses were not tolerated due to hepatopancreatic lab abnormalities. Further evaluation of the mechanisms of the liver and pancreatic enzyme toxicities is needed before embarking on further single-agent or combination strategies. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(1); 215–21. ©2017 AACR.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin malignancy. Deregulated hedgehog signaling plays a central role in BCC development; therefore hedgehog inhibitors have been approved to treat locally advanced or metastatic BCC. However, the development of resistance to hedgehog inhibitors is the major challenge in effective treatment of this disease. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of a natural agent silibinin to overcome resistance with hedgehog inhibitors (Sant-1 and GDC-0449) in BCC cells. Silibinin (25–100 μM) treatment for 48 hrs strongly inhibited growth and induced death in ASZ001, Sant-1 resistant (ASZ001-Sant-1) and GDC-0449 resistant (ASZ001-GDC-0449) BCC cells. Furthermore, colony forming ability of ASZ001, ASZ001-Sant-1 and ASZ001-GDC-0449 cells was completely inhibited by silibinin treatment. Molecular analysis showed that silibinin treatment decreased the level of phosphorylated-EGFR (Tyrosine-1173) and total EGFR in ASZ001-Sant-1 cells; key signaling molecules responsible for BCC resistance towards hedgehog inhibitors. Further, silibinin treatment decreased the phosphorylated-Akt (Serine-473), phosphorylated-ERK1/2 (Threonine 202/Tyrosine 204), cyclin D1 and Gli-1 level but increased the SUFU expression in ASZ001-Sant-1 resistant cells. Silibinin treatment of ASZ001-Sant-1 resistant cells also decreased bcl-2 but increased cleaved caspases 3 and PARP cleavage, suggesting induction of apoptosis. Together, these results support silibinin use to target hedgehog inhibitors resistant BCC cells.

The success of cisplatin-containing regimens to treat solid tumors is limited, in part, by nephrotoxicity. In rodents, several urinary proteins have emerged that are sensitive indicators of cisplatin-induced kidney injury. We sought to characterize time-dependent changes in the urinary concentrations of 12 proteins, including kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), calbindin, beta 2-microglobulin (β2M), and trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) after cisplatin therapy. Urine was collected at baseline, 3 days (range, 2-5 days), and 10 days (range, 9-11 days) from 57 patients with solid tumors receiving outpatient cisplatin therapy (≥25 mg/m2 ). Serum creatinine was largely unchanged after cisplatin infusion. However, compared with baseline values, several novel biomarkers were significantly increased in the urine, including β2M, which was threefold higher by day 3 (P < 0.0001). Urinary KIM-1 and TFF3 were elevated twofold by day 10 (P = 0.002 and P = 0.002, respectively), whereas calbindin levels were increased eightfold (P < 0.0001). We report novel time-dependent changes in the urinary excretion of noninvasive markers of subclinical kidney injury after cisplatin treatment.

Graphical abstract, Highlights • KIM-1, calbindin, and TFF3 are increased in urine of patients prescribed cisplatin. • KIM-1 concentrations remain elevated with subsequent cisplatin treatment cycles. • Calbindin concentrations increased only during initial cycles of cisplatin chemotherapy. • TFF3 increased similarly on both cycles and returned to baseline in between., Proteins secreted into urine following tubular injury are being increasingly used as biomarkers of clinical and subclinical nephrotoxicity. In the present study, we sought to characterize the time-dependent urinary excretion of three promising biomarkers, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), calbindin, and trefoil factor 3 (TFF3), during two different chemotherapy cycles in 27 patients with solid tumors prescribed the anticancer drug cisplatin (≥25 mg/m2). Urinary biomarkers were evaluated at Days 3 and 10 during an initial and a subsequent cycle of cisplatin chemotherapy. Longitudinal analyses compared the mean difference estimations for biomarker concentrations during and across the initial and subsequent cycles of cisplatin treatment. Traditional biomarkers including serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and blood urea nitrogen were unchanged during and across both cycles of cisplatin therapy. In response to the initial cycle, urinary KIM-1 concentrations increased from baseline and remained elevated through a subsequent cycle of cisplatin chemotherapy. By comparison, urinary levels of calbindin were elevated 10 days after the initial cisplatin treatment, but largely unchanged by cisplatin exposure in a subsequent cycle. Early elevations in urinary TFF3 at 3 days after cisplatin administration were observed consistently in both the initial and subsequent cycle of cisplatin treatment. In conclusion, the longitudinal assessment of biomarker performance in the same cohort of oncology patients reveals different patterns of urinary excretion between initial and subsequent cycles of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. These data add novel cycle-dependent insight to the growing literature addressing the ability of urinary biomarkers to detect subclinical renal injury in patients receiving cisplatin.

Purpose: With an aging US population, the number of patients who need cancer treatment will increase significantly by 2020. On the basis of a predicted shortage of oncology physicians, nonphysician health care practitioners will need to fill the shortfall in oncology patient visits, and nurse practitioners and physician assistants have already been identified for this purpose. This study proposes that appropriately trained oncology pharmacists can also contribute. The purpose of this study is to estimate the supply of Board of Pharmacy Specialties–certified oncology pharmacists (BCOPs) and their potential contribution to the care of patients with cancer through 2020. Methods: Data regarding accredited oncology pharmacy residencies, new BCOPs, and total BCOPs were used to estimate oncology residencies, new BCOPs, and total BCOPs through 2020. A Delphi panel process was used to estimate patient visits, identify patient care services that BCOPs could provide, and study limitations. Results: By 2020, there will be an estimated 3,639 BCOPs, and approximately 62% of BCOPs will have completed accredited oncology pharmacy residencies. Delphi panelists came to consensus (at least 80% agreement) on eight patient care services that BCOPs could provide. Although the estimates given by our model indicate that BCOPs could provide 5 to 7 million 30-minute patient visits annually, sensitivity analysis, based on factors that could reduce potential visit availability resulted in 2.5 to 3.5 million visits by 2020 with the addition of BCOPs to the health care team. Conclusion: BCOPs can contribute to a projected shortfall in needed patient visits for cancer treatment. BCOPs, along with nurse practitioners and physician assistants could substantially reduce, but likely not eliminate, the shortfall of providers needed for oncology patient visits.

Nephrotoxicity is a dose limiting side effect associated with the use of cisplatin in the treatment of solid tumors. The degree of nephrotoxicity is dictated by the selective accumulation of cisplatin in renal tubule cells due to: (1) uptake by organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) and copper transporter 1 (CTR1); (2) metabolism by glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and γ-glutamyltransferase 1 (GGT1); and (3) efflux by multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1). The purpose of this study was to determine the significance of single nucleotide polymorphisms that regulate the expression and function of transporters and metabolism genes implicated in development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cisplatin treated patients. Changes in the kidney function were assessed using novel urinary protein biomarkers and traditional markers. Genotyping was conducted by the QuantStudio 12K Flex Real-Time PCR System using a custom open array chip with metabolism, transport, and transcription factor polymorphisms of interest to cisplatin disposition and toxicity. Traditional and novel biomarker assays for kidney toxicity were assessed for differences according to genotype by ANOVA. Allele and genotype frequencies were determined based on Caucasian population frequencies. The polymorphisms rs596881 (SLC22A2/OCT2), and rs12686377 and rs7851395 (SLC31A1/CTR1) were associated with renoprotection and maintenance of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Polymorphisms in SLC22A2/OCT2, SLC31A1/CTRI, SLC47A1/MATE1, ABCC2/MRP2, and GSTP1 were significantly associated with increases in the urinary excretion of novel AKI biomarkers: KIM-1, TFF3, MCP1, NGAL, clusterin, cystatin C, and calbindin. Knowledge concerning which genotypes in drug transporters are associated with cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity may help to identify at-risk patients and initiate strategies, such as using lower or fractionated cisplatin doses or avoiding cisplatin altogether, in order to prevent AKI.

Heart failure is a common, costly, and debilitating syndrome that is associated with a highly complex drug regimen, a large number of comorbidities, and a large and often disparate number of healthcare providers. All of these factors conspire to increase the risk of heart failure exacerbation by direct myocardial toxicity, drug-drug interactions, or both. This scientific statement is designed to serve as a comprehensive and accessible source of drugs that may cause or exacerbate heart failure to assist healthcare providers in improving the quality of care for these patients.

Purpose: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of PX-866 in patients with incurable cancers. Experimental Design: This was a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study. Drug was administered orally once per day either on an intermittent (arm 1; days 1–5 and 8–12 of a 28-day cycle) or continuous (arm 2; days 1–28 of a 28-day cycle) schedule. Additional patients were treated at the arm 2 MTD in a food effects substudy. Results: Eighty-four patients were treated in the arm 1 (n = 51), arm 2 (n = 20), and food effects (n = 13) cohorts. The most frequent study drug–related adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (69.0%), with diarrhea being the most common (48.8%). The MTD was 12 and 8 mg for arm 1 and 2, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) consisted of grade III diarrhea (n = 3) and grade III elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST; n = 1). The pharmacokinetics profile was dose proportional, with no evidence of drug accumulation. PX-866–associated inhibition of platelet pAKTSER473 was observed at the arm 2 MTD. The best response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was stable disease in 22% of evaluable patients in arm 1, 53% in arm 2, and 11% in the food effects cohort. Eight patients were on study for 4 or more months. Conclusions: This first-in-human study shows that PX-866, an irreversible small-molecule inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), was well tolerated and was associated with prolonged stable disease, particularly when using a continuous dosing schedule. Clin Cancer Res; 18(15); 4173–82. ©2012 AACR.

Background: MLN0128 is an oral inhibitor of mTOR kinase and mTORC1/2 signaling. Alisertib is an oral inhibitor of Aurora A kinase. Senescence and upregulation of genes in the PI3K/AKT/mTor pathway have been observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft models treated with alisertib, with greater tumor growth inhibition demonstrated in combination with MLN0128 as compared to each agent alone. An investigator-initiated trial was developed to evaluate the combination of MLN0128 and alisertib in patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by an expansion cohort in metastatic TNBC and other selected cancers. The goals of this ongoing study are to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of the combination. Results of dose escalation are presented here. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy were treated orally at escalating doses with the combination of MLN0128 daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib twice daily (BID) on days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was conducted according to a standard 3+3 design. Key eligibility criteria included HgbA1c Citation Format: S. Lindsey Davis, Elaine T. Lam, Bradley R. Corr, Cindy L. O'Bryant, Ashley Glode, Nichole Adler, Todd M. Pitts, John J. Tentler, Anna Capasso, Kyrie Dailey, Natalie J. Serkova, Colin D. Weekes, Daniel L. Gustafson, Christopher H. Lieu, Wells A. Messersmith, Stephen Leong, S. Gail Eckhardt, Jennifer R. Diamond. A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A083.

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of the combination of gefitinib, capecitabine, and celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were treated with escalating doses of gefitinib once daily, capecitabine twice daily (14 of 28 days), and celecoxib twice daily. Plasma samples for biomarkers were obtained at baseline and weekly for the first 2 cycles. Pharmacokinetic variables were correlated with toxicity and presence of biological effect. Tumor biopsies from 5 patients were analyzed for changes in tumor metabolic activity by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was done as a correlate in 6 patients at the MTD. Thirty-nine patients received 168 cycles of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicities observed included nausea, dehydration and nausea, diarrhea, and stomatitis. The MTD was 250 mg/d gefitinib (days 1-14) and 2,000 mg/m2/d capecitabine divided twice daily (days 8-21) every 28 days. Celecoxib was eliminated due to concerns of increased risk for cardiovascular toxicity, although no patients in this study had cardiac events. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma had a confirmed partial response. Fourteen of 39 (36%) patients maintained prolonged stable disease for a median of 4 months (range, 3-24 months). [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan and metabolomic analyses revealed differences in metabolic response to gefitinib versus capecitabine. The combination of gefitinib and capecitabine is well tolerated and appears to have activity against certain advanced solid tumors, providing a rationale for further evaluation in advanced solid malignancies. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(12):3685–94]

This study evaluated the safety, toxicity, pharmacological properties and biological activity of PI-88, a heparanase endoglycosidase enzyme inhibitor, with fixed weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies.This was a phase I study to determine the maximal-tolerated dose of escalating doses of PI-88 administered subcutaneously for 4 days per week, along with docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) given on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day schedule.Sixteen patients received a total of 42 courses of therapy. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed despite escalation to the highest planned dose level of PI-88 (250 mg/day). Frequent minor toxicities included fatigue (38%), dysgeusia (28.5%), thrombocytopenia (12%), diarrhea (14%), nausea (12%), and emesis (10%) in the 42 courses. No significant bleeding complications were observed. One patient developed a positive anti-heparin antibody test/serotonin releasing assay with positive anti-platelet factor 4/PI-88 antibodies and grade 1 thrombocytopenia in cycle 5, and was withdrawn from the study without any sequelae. PI-88 plasma concentrations (mirrored by APTT) and urinary elimination were linear and dose-proportional. Docetaxel did not alter the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of PI-88, nor did PI-88 affect docetaxel PK. No significant relationship was determined between plasma or urine FGF-2, or plasma VEGF levels and PI-88 dose/response. Although no objective responses were observed; 9 of the 15 evaluable patients had stable disease for greater than two cycles of therapy.PI-88 administered at 250 mg/day for 4 days each week for 3 weeks with docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days, was determined to be the recommended dose level for phase II evaluation. This combination was well tolerated without severe toxicities or PK interactions.

This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacological properties and biological activity of the combination of the lonafarnib, a farnesylproteintransferase (FTPase) inhibitor, with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies.This was a single institution study to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of escalating lonafarnib (75-125 mg po BID) with gemcitabine (750-1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15) and fixed cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 28 days. Due to dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in initial patients, these patients were considered "heavily pre-treated" and the protocol was amended to limit prior therapy and re-escalate lonafarnib in "less heavily pre-treated patients" on 28-day and 21-day schedules. Cycle 1 and 2 pharmacokinetics (PK), and farnesylation of the HDJ2 chaperone protein and FPTase activity were analyzed.Twenty-two patients received 53 courses of therapy. Nausea, vomiting, and fatigue were frequent in all patients. Severe toxicities were observed in 91% of patients: neutropenia (41%), nausea (36%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (23%) and vomiting (23%). Nine patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity. DLTs of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue limited dose-escalation on the 28-day schedule. The MTD was established as lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) in heavily pre-treated patients. The MTD in the less heavily pre-treated patients could not be established on the 28-day schedule as DLTs were observed at the lowest dose level, and dose escalation was not completed on the 21-day schedule due to early study termination by the Sponsor. No PK interactions were observed. FTPase inhibition was not observed at the MTD, however HDJ-2 gel shift was observed in one patient at the 100 mg BID lonafarnib dose. Anti-cancer activity was observed: four patients had stable disease lasting2 cycles, one subject had a complete response, and another had a partial response, both with metastatic breast cancer.Lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1 on a 28-day schedule was established as the MTD. Lonafarnib did not demonstrate FTPase inhibition at these doses. Despite the observed efficacy, substantial toxicity and questionable contribution of anti-tumor activity of lonafarnib to gemcitabine and cisplatin limits further exploration of this combination.

Background Cilengitide, an antiangiogenic agent that inhibits the binding of integrins alpha(nu)beta(3) and alpha(nu)beta(5) to the extracellular matrix, was studied at two dose levels in cancer patients to determine the optimal biological dose. Patients and methods The doses of cilengitide were 600 or 1200 mg/m(2) as a 1-h infusion twice weekly every 28 days. A novel dose escalation scheme was utilized that relied upon the biological activity rate. Results Twenty patients received 50 courses of cilengitide with no dose-limiting toxic effects. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile revealed a short elimination half-life of 4 h, supporting twice weekly dosing. Of the six soluble angiogenic molecules assessed, only E-selectin increased significantly from baseline. Analysis of tumor microvessel density and gene expression was not informative due to intrapatient tumor heterogeneity. Although several patients with evaluable tumor biopsy pairs did reveal posttreatment increases in tumor and endothelial cell apoptosis, these results did not reach statistical significance due to the aforementioned heterogeneity. Conclusions Cilengitide is a well-tolerated antiangiogenic agent. The biomarkers chosen in this study underscore the difficulty in assessing the biological activity of antiangiogenic agents in the absence of validated biological assays.

BACKGROUND To evaluate the toxicity and pharmacological and biological properties of the farnesyl protein transferase (FPTase) inhibitor, tipifarnib (R115777, ZARNESTRAtrade mark) and capecitabine administered for 14 days every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced cancers received twice daily tipifarnib (100-500 mg) and capecitabine (1000-1125 mg/m(2)) for 14 days every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetics of tipifarnib, capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were determined. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed for farnesylation of the HDJ2 chaperone protein and FPTase activity. RESULTS Forty-one patients received 185 courses of treatment. Diarrhea and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were dose limiting at 300 mg tipifarnib/1125 mg/m(2) capecitabine b.i.d. When the capecitabine dose was fixed at 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d., neutropenia was dose limiting at 400 and 500 mg b.i.d. of tipifarnib. Capecitabine did not affect the pharmacology of tipifarnib at 100-300 mg b.i.d., although tipifarnib significantly increased the C(max) of 5-FU at 400 mg b.i.d. HDJ2 farnesylation and FPTase activity decreased between 200 and 400 mg b.i.d. doses of tipifarnib, without a dose-response relationship. Five patients demonstrated partial remissions and 11 patients maintained prolonged stable disease. CONCLUSIONS Tipifarnib and capecitabine are well tolerated at 300 mg/1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d., respectively, resulting in biologically relevant plasma concentrations and antitumor activity. The recommended dose for further disease-focused studies is 300 mg b.i.d. tipifarnib and 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. capecitabine, given for 14 days every 3 weeks.

Purpose: PI-88 is a mixture of highly sulfated oligosaccharides that inhibits heparanase, an extracellular matrix endoglycosidase, and the binding of angiogenic growth factors to heparan sulfate. This agent showed potent inhibition of placental blood vessel angiogenesis as well as growth inhibition in multiple xenograft models, thus forming the basis for this study. Experimental Design: This study evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of PI-88 (80-315 mg) when administered s.c. daily for 4 consecutive days bimonthly (part 1) or weekly (part 2). Results: Forty-two patients [median age, 53 years (range, 19-78 years); median performance status, 1] with a range of advanced solid tumors received a total of 232 courses. The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg/d. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of thrombocytopenia and pulmonary embolism. Other toxicity was generally mild and included prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time and injection site echymosis. The pharmacokinetics were linear with dose. Intrapatient variability was low and interpatient variability was moderate. Both AUC and Cmax correlated with the percent increase in activated partial thromboplastin time, showing that this pharmacodynamic end point can be used as a surrogate for drug exposure. No association between PI-88 administration and vascular endothelial growth factor or basic fibroblast growth factor levels was observed. One patient with melanoma had a partial response, which was maintained for >50 months, and 9 patients had stable disease for ≥6 months. Conclusion: The recommended dose of PI-88 administered for 4 consecutive days bimonthly or weekly is 250 mg/d. PI-88 was generally well tolerated. Evidence of efficacy in melanoma supports further evaluation of PI-88 in phase II trials.

Purpose: Exisulind (sulindac sulfone, FGN-1, Aptosyn) is a sulindac metabolite that induces apoptosis via inhibition of cyclic GMP-phosphodiesterase. This agent demonstrated tumor growth inhibition in rodent models of colon, breast, prostate, and lung carcinogenesis. In an orthotopic model of human non–small-cell lung cancer, the combination of exisulind and docetaxel prolonged survival in athymic nude rats, forming the basis of this phase I combination study. Experimental Design: This study evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of combining exisulind (150–250 mg) given orally twice daily and docetaxel (30–36 mg/m2) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. Results: Twenty patients with a range of advanced solid tumors (median age, 59 years; age range, 35–77 years; median performance status, 1) received a total of 70 courses. Observed adverse events were mild to moderate, and there was no dose-limiting toxicity at any level. Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities were present in 10 of the 70 cycles (10%) and included nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Neutropenia was present in four cycles in patients treated with a docetaxel dose of 36 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic analysis did not demonstrate a clear effect of exisulind on docetaxel pharmacokinetics and vice versa. Relationships were evident between the plasma concentration of exisulind and the development of grade 2 or greater toxicities. One third of patients maintained stable disease for 3 to 12 cycles, but no objective responses were observed. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel (36 mg/m2, weekly) and exisulind (500 mg/d) was reasonably well tolerated, and it is undergoing phase II testing in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer.

In the last 15 years there has been a major shift in the laws governing medical use of cannabis in the United States. Corresponding with this change there has been escalating interest in the role that cannabis, commonly referred to as marijuana, and cannabinoids play in the care of patients with cancer. This review will examine cannabis' and cannabinoids' current and potential roles in cancer care. Specifically, we will examine five areas of cannabis medicine: (1) pharmacologic properties of cannabis; (2) its potential role in the development of human cancers, particularly smoking-related malignancies; (3) cannabinoids' potential as anti-cancer therapies; (4) cannabis and cannabinoids in the palliation of common cancer-associated symptoms; (5) current legal status of cannabis for medical purposes in the United States.

Purpose To evaluate the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary anticancer activity of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated once weekly with escalating doses of ramucirumab. Blood was sampled for PK studies throughout treatment. The effects of ramucirumab on circulating vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), soluble VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, tumor perfusion, and vascularity using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were assessed. Results Thirty-seven patients were treated with 2 to 16 mg/kg of ramucirumab. After one patient each developed dose-limiting hypertension and deep venous thrombosis at 16 mg/kg, the next lower dose (13 mg/kg) was considered the MTD. Nausea, vomiting, headache, fatigue, and proteinuria were also noted. Four (15%) of 27 patients with measurable disease had a partial response (PR), and 11 (30%) of 37 patients had either a PR or stable disease lasting at least 6 months. PKs were characterized by dose-dependent elimination and nonlinear exposure consistent with saturable clearance. Mean trough concentrations exceeded biologically relevant target levels throughout treatment at all dose levels. Serum VEGF-A increased 1.5 to 3.5 times above pretreatment values and remained in this range throughout treatment at all dose levels. Tumor perfusion and vascularity decreased in 69% of evaluable patients. Conclusion Objective antitumor activity and antiangiogenic effects were observed over a wide range of dose levels, suggesting that ramucirumab may have a favorable therapeutic index in treating malignancies amenable to VEGFR-2 inhibition.

Purpose: To evaluate the toxicity profile, pharmacologic, and biological properties of 3-pyridylmethyl N-{4-[(2-aminophenyl)carbamoyl]benzyl}carbamate (MS-275), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, when administered orally on three different dosing schedules. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid malignancies and lymphomas were treated on three dose schedules: once every other week, twice weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days, and once weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days. First-cycle plasma pharmacokinetics and peripheral blood mononuclear cell histone acetylation were determined. Results: Twenty-seven patients received ≥149 courses of treatment. Hypophosphatemia and asthenia were dose limiting on the weekly and twice-weekly dosing schedules; there was no dose-limiting toxicity on the every other week schedule. Pharmacokinetic variables revealed dose-dependent and dose-proportional increases. Two of 27 patients showed partial remissions, including one patient with metastatic melanoma who had a partial response and has remained on study for >5 years. Six patients showed prolonged disease stabilization. Levels of histone H3 and H4 acetylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells increased qualitatively but with a high degree of interpatient variation. Conclusions: MS-275 is well tolerated at doses up to 6 mg/m2 every other week or 4 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest and results in biologically relevant plasma concentrations and antitumor activity. Twice-weekly dosing was not tolerable due to asthenia, and further evaluation of this schedule was halted. The recommended dose for further disease-focused studies is 4 mg/m2 given weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days or 2 to 6 mg/m2 given once every other week.

Purpose: To evaluate the toxicity, pharmacological, and biological properties of the combination of bortezomib, etoposide, and carboplatin in adults with advanced solid malignancies. Patients and methods: Patients received escalating doses of bortezomib, etoposide, and carboplatin every 21 days. Surrogate markers of angiogenesis were evaluated. Results: Twenty-four patients received 64 courses of therapy. The most common treatment-related adverse events were myelosuppression. Dose-limiting grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed when bortezomib was given on days 1, 4, 8, 11. With revised dosing, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib 0.75 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8), etoposide 75 mg/m(2) (days 1-3), and carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1) was well tolerated, and are the recommended doses for further studies with this combination. No objective responses were observed, however stable disease was noted for greater or equal to four cycles in nine highly refractory patients.

Purpose: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) play a fundamental role in cancer development and progression. S-3304 is a potent, orally active, noncytotoxic inhibitor of MMPs, primarily MMP-2 and MMP-9, that prolongs survival in mice xenografts and is well tolerated in healthy volunteers. Experimental Design: The aims of this phase I clinical trial were to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, pharmacokinetic profile, and intratumoral MMP inhibitory activity of single-agent S-3304 in advanced and refractory solid tumors. MMP activity was determined by film in situ zymography (FIZ). Patients had tumor biopsies before and after S-3304 administration and were also evaluated for response and survival. Results: Four dose levels were explored [DL1-DL4 or 800, 1,600, 2,400, and 3200 mg twice daily (BID), respectively], and 32 patients were enrolled. Toxicities were mostly gastrointestinal. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, but dose escalations beyond DL4 were impractical (number of capsules needed). S-3304 steady-state concentrations were reached by day 8, and day 1 mean Cmax and AUC0-8 increases were less than dose proportional. After S-3304 administration, 17 of 18 patients experienced inhibition of MMP activity by FIZ. Strong mean inhibition of MMP activity was observed in DL1 to DL3. The negative mean inhibitory activity calculated for DL4 was due to one patient with a 397% MMP activity increase. Conclusion: S-3304 is safe, well tolerated, and achieves plasma concentrations above those required to inhibit MMP-2 and MMP-9. Its intratumoral MMP inhibitory activity has been shown using FIZ, which is useful as a biomarker with this and other MMP inhibitors.

Background: TWEAK receptor (TweakR, TNFRSF12A, CD266) is a member of the TNF receptor superfamily and is expressed on a range of solid tumors. Enavatuzumab is a humanized IgG1 antibody to TweakR that exhibits anti-tumor activity in preclinical models through two mechanisms: direct signaling through TweakR and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Methods: This phase I, multicenter study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of enavatuzumab, given intravenously over 60 minutes on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Pts with advanced solid tumors; ECOG ≤1; adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function; no brain metastasis; no history of cirrhosis or pancreatitis; no recent history of acute cholecystitis; and not on immunosuppressive drugs were enrolled. Cohorts of 3–6 pts were treated at escalating dose levels of enavatuzumab ranging from 0.1 mg/kg to 1.5 mg/kg. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade (G) 3 AST or ALT lasting >14 days or associated with clinical hepatitis and/or bilirubin ≥G2; G3 amylase or lipase lasting >14 days; ≥G3 bilirubin; any G4 AST, ALT, amylase, or lipase; acute pancreatitis; ≥G3 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities; G4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or G3 CRS despite premedication. MTD was defined as the highest dose level with 0/3 or ≤1 of 6 pts experiencing a first-cycle DLT. PK sampling was performed on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1), C1D2, C1D8, Day 15 of all cycles, C1D16, C2D1, and C3D1. Response was assessed by RECIST every 8 weeks. Results: Thirty pts [12 male, 18 female; median age 64.5 (range 36–82)] were enrolled at 6 dose levels: 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/kg. Tumor types included colorectal (15); pancreas (4); ovarian (4); and tongue, cervical, prostate, endometrial, breast, hepatocellular, and thyroid (1 each). Sixteen pts had liver metastases. DLTs included G4 lipase and G3 bilirubin in 1 of 6 pts at the 1.0 mg/kg level and G4 lipase and G4 amylase in 1 pt at the 1.5 mg/kg level. Grade 3/4 toxicities in ≥5% of subjects included fatigue, pneumonia, hyponatremia, hypoxia, dyspnea, and elevated AST, ALT, GGT, lipase, and amylase. There was no apparent correlation of liver or pancreatic enzyme elevation with tumor type or presence of liver metastases. Of the disease evaluable pts, 11 had disease progression as their best response and 2 had stable disease (2 and 4 month duration). Enavatuzumab followed a two-compartment linear PK model. The estimated clearance was 23–33 mL/hr and elimination half-life was 7–18 days. The mean Cmax after the first dose was 2.0 mcg/mL and 28.1 mcg/mL for the 0.1 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Mean Css was reached following the second dose and was within the target efficacious peak and trough levels for the 1.0 mg/kg cohort. Conclusions: The MTD for this first-in-class drug was reached at 1.0 mg/kg. Six of 7 pts at 1.0 mg/kg and 1 of 1 pts at 1.5 mg/kg had ≥G3 liver and/or pancreatic enzyme elevations; therefore higher doses are not being tested. The mechanisms of liver and pancreatic enzyme toxicity are currently being investigated and preclinical studies are ongoing to assess potential combination strategies. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C18.

Background: Belinostat (B) is a low molecular weight, synthetic hydroxamic acid derivative that inhibits class I and II histone deacetylases. Bortezomib (Bz) is a potent, selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome. In preclinical studies, synergistic antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects were observed with the combination, providing the rationale for this study. Methods: This phase 1 study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of the combination of B and Bz. Each 21-day treatment cycle consists of B (600–1000 mg/m2) IV daily over 30 minutes on days 1–5 and Bz (0.7–1.5 mg/m2) IVP over 3–5 seconds on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (days 2, 5, 8 and 11, cycle 1 only). Results: To date, 26 patients have been enrolled (median age 59 [range 27–72]; median PS 1 [range 0–1]). Twenty-two patients were evaluable for toxicity and received a total of 58 treatment cycles (median 2 [range 1–6]). Four patients, 2 at dose level (DL) 3 (B: 600 mg/m2)/Bz: 1.3 mg/m2) and 2 at DL 5 (B: 1000 mg/m2)/Bz: 1.5 mg/m2) experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). At DL 3, the DLTs were grade (gr) 3 dehydration and gr 4 thrombocytopenia. The exact relationship of the gr 3 dehydration and study combination is unclear as the patient had uncontrolled constipation and decreased oral intake as a result of a change in pain medications on cycle 1 day 1. This cohort was expanded to 9 pts to further determine tolerability of the study combination. No other DLTs were identified and dose escalation continued. At DL 5, DLTs included gr 4 thrombocytopenia and gr 4 fatigue. Most adverse events (AEs) have been mild to moderate. Gr 1–2 AEs (number of cycles) include anorexia (8), acute infusion reaction (5), fatigue (14), nausea (19), neutropenia (1), pain (12), phlebitis (6), thrombocyctopenia (11), and vomiting (12). Gr 3 AEs (occurring after course 1) include anorexia, dehydration, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, hypoalbuminemia, and elevation of alkaline phosphatase. Analysis of B PK demonstrates no statistical differences in the parameters between days 1 (B only) and 2 (B + Bz) for AUC, Cmax, clearance, or t1/2. Likewise, increasing Bz doses have no effect on B PK, whereas doses of B from 600 to 1000 mg/m2 result in dose-proportional increases in drug exposure. Four patients have maintained stable disease for 4–6 cycles of therapy. Conclusions: Belinostat and bortezomib is a reasonable combination with a tolerable toxicity profile and no evidence of pharmacological interactions. Accrual is ongoing at the MTD, DL 4 (B: 1000 mg/m2)/Bz: 1.3 mg/m2). Additional biological assessments are planned in an expanded cohort of patients. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B238.