1. Thyroid FNA terminology: The case for a single unified international system for thyroid FNA reporting
- Author
-
David N. Poller, Béatrix Cochand-Priollet, and Pierpaolo Trimboli
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Histology ,Cytodiagnosis ,Biopsy, Fine-Needle ,education ,Thyroid Gland ,MEDLINE ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,Pathology and Forensic Medicine ,Terminology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Terminology as Topic ,Humans ,Medicine ,Medical physics ,Thyroid Neoplasms ,Thyroid Nodule ,Thyroid.FNA ,business.industry ,Thyroid ,General Medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,business ,Strengths and weaknesses - Abstract
Use of reporting terminologies for thyroid FNA cytology enables standardisation and international alignment of the reporting of thyroid cytology results which is essential. There are currently three major internationally recognised systems; Bethesda (TBS), UK RCPath (Thy) and the Italian (TIR). A fourth system, the Japanese terminology, has diagnostic categories identical to TBS but with different nomenclature. The aim of this review is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the TBS, UK RCPath and the TIR systems and to make the case for international terminology harmonisation and standardisation.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF