Search

Background: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators represent targeted therapies directly acting on the CFTR channel. The triple therapy Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) has been demonstrated to improve lung function and quality of life in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. However, the effects of ELX/TEZ/IVA on sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and respiratory muscle strength are poorly studied. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ELX/TEZ/IVA in patients with CF and severe lung disease on cardiorespiratory polygraphy parameters, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) measures. Methods: patients with CF aged ≥ 12 who started treatment in a compassionate use program were retrospectively studied through the evaluation of nocturnal cardiorespiratory polygraphy parameters, MIP and MEP; and six-minute walk test (6MWT) at baseline and at months 3, 6, and 12 of treatment. Results: Nine patients (mean age 30.3 ± 6.5 years) with severe CF (mean baseline ppFEV1 34.6 ± 5.1%) were evaluated. A significant improvement in nocturnal oxygenation measured by mean SpO2 (92.4 vs. 96.4%, p < 0.05), time spent with SpO2 ≤ 90% (−12.6, −14.6, −15.2 min from baseline at months 3, 6, and 12, respectively, p < 0.05), and respiratory rate (RR) was shown, at month 12 and across the time points compared with baseline, as well as in respiratory muscle strength, although only the change in MEP was significant. Conclusions: We provide further evidence on the efficacy of the CFTR modulators ELX/TEZ/IVA, adding information about their effect on the respiratory muscles’ performance and cardiorespiratory polygraphy parameters in CF patients with severe lung disease.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused more than 52.775.271 million confirmed cases, 1.293.106 deaths, globally, and afflicted 208 countries, areas, or territories; and almost three months have passed since the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a pandemic. Despite the dramatic and global impact of the Coronavirus, the knowledge about the SARS-CoV-2 infection has been improved remarkably. Herein, we provided the rationale for SARS-CoV-2 infection as endothelial dysfunction rather than respiratory disease. Accordingly, we strongly invited the researchers to look beyond pulmonary injury and shift their attention from respiratory disease to endothelial disorder. This strategy could be particularly relevant to identifying therapeutic weapons stabilizing the endothelium rather than the lungs.