Search

Background Supportive care improves outcomes in many cancers. In the pivotal STORM study selinexor, a first-in-class, oral, selective exportin 1 inhibitor, and low-dose dexamethasone proved to be an effective treatment for patients with triple-class refractory myeloma. We conducted a post-hoc analysis to test the hypothesis that increased utilization of supportive care measures in a sub-cohort of the STORM study prolonged treatment duration with- and improved efficacy of- selinexor. Materials and Methods The STORM protocol included specific recommendations for dose modifications and supportive care to mitigate selinexor most common adverse events (AEs) including nausea, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. The Tisch Cancer Center at Mount Sinai School of Medicine (MSSM) incorporated additional supportive care strategies within the framework of the STORM protocol. Results Of 123 patients enrolled in STORM, 28 were enrolled at MSSM. The overall response rate was 26.2% in the overall STORM population and 53.6% in the MSSM cohort. Moreover, duration of response, progression free survival, and overall survival were longer in the MSSM cohort. AEs and dose modification events were similar in the 2 groups. The MSSM cohort had more dose reductions (67.9% vs. 50.5%), and higher use of multiple antiemetic agents (71.4% vs. 50.1%) and romiplostim (32.1% vs. 6.3%), but less discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs (3.6% vs. 25.3%). Conclusion These results suggests that in addition to more frequent dose reductions, prompter and more aggressive supportive care may have contributed to the low discontinuation rate, longer duration therapy, and greater efficacy rates observed in the MSSM cohort. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02336815).

Introduction We aimed to characterize real-world utilization of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) in women with ovarian cancer (OC). Methods This retrospective observational study of claims data from US MarketScan® Commercial/Medicare Supplemental databases included women with OC initiating olaparib, niraparib, or rucaparib from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019. Patients were observed from first outpatient prescription until at least 30 days’ follow-up. Clinical events of interest (CEIs), based on adverse reactions in PARPi prescribing information, were identified from claims using ICD-9/10 codes. Other outcomes included dose modification, persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost. Results Overall, 303, 348, and 162 women with OC received olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, respectively. During follow-up, risk of any CEI was higher with niraparib versus olaparib (odds ratio 3.36 [95% confidence interval 2.00–5.65]) and niraparib versus rucaparib (2.09 [1.10–3.95]), with no significant difference between rucaparib and olaparib (1.61 [0.93–2.79]). PARPi dose decreases were observed in 21.1%, 35.1%, and 30.2% of olaparib-, niraparib-, and rucaparib-treated patients, respectively. Persistence (no treatment gaps of more than 90 days) was significantly higher (P

Background Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm affecting >100,000 people in the United States annually. Patients (pts) with PV are at risk for thromboembolic events (TEs), premature death, and high symptom burden. Hydroxyurea (HU) is recommended for high-risk pts with PV; however, up to 40% of pts become resistant and/or intolerant to the drug (Demuynck T, et al. Ann Hematol. 2019;98:1421-1426). Ruxolitinib (RUX), a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, is currently the only FDA-approved treatment option for pts with PV who are resistant to or intolerant of HU. We conducted a retrospective chart review to characterize the reasons pts were switched from HU to RUX and to describe the real-world dosing patterns of RUX in pts with PV. Methods This retrospective medical chart review was conducted at US community hematology/oncology practices in the Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network. Eligible pts were ≥18 y old, initiated RUX therapy during the index period (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016), were previously treated with HU for ≥3 mo, and were seen at least twice during the 6 mo following RUX initiation. Data were collected for the 12 mo prior to RUX initiation (including near the time of HU discontinuation), near the time of RUX initiation (index), and up to the last provider visit. Pt and clinical characteristics were collected, including blood counts, symptoms, TEs, cardiovascular disease risk factors, phlebotomy, and HU and RUX treatment patterns. Target enrollment was 250 pts; interim results are presented here. Results Providers identified 99 pts for inclusion; mean (SD) age was 64 (9.9) y, 56% were male, and 68% had high-risk PV (ie, age ≥60 y and/or history of TE). All pts had been tested for the JAK2V617F mutation, and 99% were positive. At the time of HU discontinuation, 28% of pts had reached an HU dose of ≥2 g/d; median (range) HU treatment duration was 9.7 (3.6-182.4) mo. Causes of HU discontinuation were resistance (63%), intolerance (17%), resistance and intolerance (11%), and other reasons (9%; Table). The most frequent reasons for HU discontinuation due to resistance were hematocrit (Hct) ≥45% (79%), symptoms (45%), leukocytosis (32%), thrombocytosis (31%), and splenomegaly (22%). The most frequent intolerance signs and symptoms were nausea (43%), stomatitis (25%), fever (18%), and skin ulcers (14%). With respect to the RUX starting dose, 44 pts (44%) initiated RUX at the US package insert-recommended dose of 10 mg twice daily (BID); median (range) treatment duration for these pts was 26.4 (3.2-52.0) mo (Table). During the first 6 mo of RUX treatment, dose modification was noted in 19 pts (43%) who initiated at 10 mg BID (dose increase, n=13 [30%]; dose decrease, n=5 [11%]; dose interruption, n=1 [2%]). The most common reasons for dose increase were continued need for phlebotomy (39%) and symptoms (39%). Five pts required a dose reduction; the most common reason was low hemoglobin levels (n=3). Overall, pts starting at 10 mg BID had more dose modifications in the first 6 mo of RUX treatment (43%), with fewer dose modifications needed after 6 mo (25%). Hct control (Hct Conclusions In this interim analysis of real-world data pertaining to pts with PV who discontinued HU and were subsequently treated with RUX, the most common resistance events leading to HU discontinuation were Hct ≥45%, uncontrolled symptoms, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, and splenomegaly. Discontinuations due to intolerance were most commonly attributed to nausea, stomatitis, fever, and skin ulcers. Of pts who were switched from HU to RUX, the duration of HU treatment was shorter and the proportion of pts treated with HU doses of ≥2 g/d was higher than has been reported for all pts discontinuing HU, irrespective of their next line of therapy (Grunwald MR, et al. ASH Annual Meeting 2017. Poster 1633). Less than half of pts initiated RUX at the recommended dose of 10 mg BID; 41% of pts dosed in accordance with the recommended starting dose experienced dosing modifications (primarily dose increases); however, the majority of pts who discontinued RUX had no dosing modifications during their treatment. Results from the entire cohort of 250 pts will be presented. Disclosures Altomare: Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy. Nguyen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parasuraman:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paranagama:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kish:Cardinal Health: Employment. Lord:Cardinal Health: Employment, Equity Ownership. Colucci:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership.

OBJECTIVE Updated vancomycin guidelines suggest dose adjustment based on area under the curve in a 24-hour period (AUC24). This study aims to determine whether a pharmacist managed vancomycin protocol that incorporates maximum dosing paired with trough monitoring can achieve appropriate vancomycin AUC24 exposures. METHODS A retrospective review was performed evaluating vancomycin usage from October 2018 through September 2019 at a children's hospital. Patients with less than 4 doses or lack a trough concentration were excluded. Vancomycin AUC24 were estimated using 2 calculations: 1) the Le method, incorporating age and serum creatinine, and 2) the trapezoidal method based upon population data and patient-specific trough. Target AUC24 ranges were assessed. AUC24 goals were 400 to 600 mg·hr/L, but due to known variations between calculations, a variance of 20 mg·hr/L was allowed for each end of the goal. Secondary analyses included evaluations of efficacy and toxicity. RESULTS Two-hundred twenty-three patients were included. Initial doses were estimated to meet AUC24 goals in only 63%. After trough-based dose modification, 81% achieved a therapeutic AUC24. Using the trapezoidal method, therapeutic concentrations were found in 51% of patients based on the initial dose and 77% after dose modification. Only 6.3% of patients had kidney injury with only 1 of those patients having any calculated AUC24 > 600 mg·hr/L and none above 620 mg·hr/L. No clinical failures were identified. CONCLUSIONS Increased initial dosing in infants and children is needed to result in AUC24 exposures recommended in the guidelines. Maximum dosing paired with trough monitoring may be an alternative to AUC24 monitoring in areas that are unable to perform AUC24 calculations. Prospective data are needed to validate these conclusions.

BACKGROUND/AIM Niraparib is effective against epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but with adverse effects. In this study, we retrospectively investigated niraparib maintenance treatment feasibility in Korean patients newly diagnosed with EOC. PATIENTS AND METHODS The medical records of 35 patients were reviewed. Data on the baseline clinical characteristics were collected, and adverse effects were described. RESULTS Sixteen patients underwent treatment suspension or dose reduction. There was no significant difference in adverse effects (A/E) due to the interval between adjuvant chemotherapy conclusion and niraparib initiation. The two groups had similar International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages. The number of patients with a history of bevacizumab use was higher in the dose modification group than in the standard dose group. CONCLUSION Niraparib use must be considered in those previously treated with bevacizumab. There is a need for prospective research on lower dose (

Yueyue Liu, Qian Zhang, Chao Lu, Wei Hu Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Chao Lu; Wei HuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax + 86-551 63806057Email 765385306@qq.com; huwei@ahmu.edu.cnPurpose: Pyrotinib, an irreversible human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), is a epidermal growth factor receptor double-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for treating HER2-positive breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole on the safety and pharmacokinetics of pyrotinib in Chinese healthy adults.Patients and Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, self-control study. Eighteen healthy adults were included in this trial. They received a single 80 mg dose of pyrotinib orally on days 1 and 9, and a 200 mg once-daily dose of itraconazole on days 6 through 22. Blood samples were obtained, and the drug concentration was detected using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.Results: Compared with pyrotinib alone, the exposure to pyrotinib co-administered with itraconazole substantially increased, and the Cmax and AUC0-t increased by 2.78- and 10.8-fold, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported in this trial, and no participant dropped out of the trial because of adverse events.Conclusion: The exposure to pyrotinib was substantially affected by the action of itraconazole. The concomitant use of pyrotinib with itraconazole might require dose modification of pyrotinib. All treatments were well tolerated in healthy participants.Clinical Trial Registry: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.prosearch.dhtml, CTR20191866.Keywords: drug–drug interaction, itraconazole, pharmacokinetics, pyrotinib, safety

Aim Few real-world studies have reported detailed management and dose adjustment strategies of adverse events (AEs) of ovarian cancer (OC) patients treated with the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. This case series aimed to describe olaparib AEs in Chinese OC patients in real-life settings and to explore dose modification strategies. Methods We conducted a detailed examination of the clinical records of OC patients who were treated with olaparib at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit in Hong Kong from September 2015 to December 2019, including baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, AEs, and management strategies, particularly dose modifications. Results Nineteen patients were included, with a median olaparib treatment duration of 12 (range: 3-30) months. For recurrent platinum-sensitive cases (n = 16), the median progression-free survival was 16.0 months (95% confidence interval: 9.5-22.5). Eighteen (95%) patients experienced AE(s) of any grade, including four (21%) who experienced grade ≥3 AE(s). The most common AEs were as follows: nonhematologic fatigue (68%), nausea (42%), vomiting (26%), decreased appetite (26%), dyspepsia (21%), dizziness (21%), anemia (37%), neutropenia (26%), and thrombocytopenia (21%). Four specific cases involving anemia, lower limb lymphedema, myeloid neoplasm, and erythema nodosum are discussed separately. Eight patients required dose interruption or reduction due to AEs, of which five patients attempted and tolerated dose re-escalation. Conclusion In this study, most AEs were mild, but rare AEs were observed. In OC patients, olaparib AE management with dose reductions followed by re-escalations was feasible, including for anemia.

Obesity and its related comorbidities can negatively influence the outcomes of certain infectious diseases. Specific dosing recommendations are often lacking in the product label for patients with obesity that leads to unclear guidance in practice. Higher rates of therapeutic failure have been reported with some fixed dose antibiotics and pragmatic approaches to dose modification are limited for orally administered agents. For i.v. antimicrobials dosed on weight, alternate body size descriptors (ABSDs) have been used to reduce the risk of overdosing. These ABSDs are mathematical transformations of height and weight that represent fat-free weight and follow the same principles as body surface area (BSA)-based dosing of cancer chemotherapy. However, ABSDs are rarely studied in pivotal phase III studies and so can risk the underdosing of antimicrobials in patients with obesity when incorrectly applied in the real-world setting. Specific case examples are presented to highlight these risks. Although general principles may be considered by clinicians, a universal approach to dose modification in obesity is unlikely. Studies that can better distinguish human body phenotypes may help reduce our reliance on height and weight to define dosing. Simple and complex technologies exist to quantify individual body composition that could improve upon our current approach. Early evidence suggests that body composition parameters repurposed from medical imaging data may improve upon height and weight as covariates of drug clearance and distribution. Clinical trials that can integrate human body phenotyping may help us identify new approaches to optimal dose selection of antimicrobials in patients with obesity.

Background: The CALGB 40603 and BrighTNess studies found that adding high dose carboplatin every 3 weeks to the standard neoadjuvant DD AC - paclitaxel regimen in TNBC increased the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate to 54-58% but with the cost of increased treatment related toxicities resulting in decreased completion of the full course of treatment. Our hypothesis is by changing the high dose carboplatin every 3 weeks to low dose weekly carboplatin, it will retain the same benefit in pathologic response rate and minimize the treatment related toxicities, which in turn permits the full course of neoadjuvant treatment given to patients. Patients and Methods: This multi-center study was conducted through the WON (NCT03301350). Eligible TNBC patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy received weekly carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 12 doses, followed by dose dense doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with granulocyte growth factor support for 4 cycles. A one-week break was added before DD AC after the first 22 patients in order to minimize prolonged cytopenia. Primary end point was pCR. Secondary endpoints were frequency of dose modification and treatment related toxicities. Results: Accrual target was 50 with 80% power to detect a 20% difference using a one-sided binomial test at an alpha significance level of 0.025, but study was terminated earlier. Twenty-nine eligible patients consented for the study from November 2017 to February 2020. Median age was 52 year-old (range, 33-80). Twenty-eight patients received the study regimen. Three were removed due to early study termination and one (3.8%) died from grade 5 neutropenic sepsis after the last cycle of DD AC before surgery. Thus, 24 patients were evaluable for the primary outcome and 26 were evaluable for dose modification and toxicity outcomes. Eight patients (33%) achieved pCR and another 4 patients (17%) had minimal (ypT1aN0) residual disease. Of 26 patients, 24 (92%) were able to receive the full course of treatment +/- dose modification. One patient required the discontinuation of weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel completely due to severe infusion reaction and one did not finish the treatment before the study was terminated. Eight patients (31%) required dose delay with 5 of them during the weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel treatment. Seven patients (27%) also required dose reduction with 5 of them during the weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel treatment. Seventeen patients (65%) experienced severe adverse event (grade 3 or 4) with the majority of events (12/17) relating to grade 3-4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever. Conclusion: Although our study showed a lower pCR rate of 33% in compare to the previous CALGB 40603 (54%) and BrighTNess (58%) studies, we demonstrated that the majority of patients (92%) were able to receive the full course of study treatment. This weekly carboplatin with paclitaxel - AC regimen was used in the recent Keynote 522 study as the backbone chemotherapy to combine with check-point inhibitor immunotherapy in TNBC. However, any dosing schedules of carboplatin, weekly or every 3 weeks, add substantially to grade 3 or 4 toxicity of paclitaxel - AC. Aggressive supportive care management is needed when carboplatin is used. Citation Format: Yee Chung Cheng, Ruth O'Regan, Lubna N Chaudhary, Sailaja Kamaraju, Harvey Einhorn, Emmanuel Sampene, Marialane Pigsley, Mark E Burkard, Christopher R Chitambar, Kari B Wisinski. A phase II study of neoadjuvant weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (DD AC)in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): Wisconsin oncology network (WON) study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS13-51.

Liumei Shou,1,2,* Tianyu Shao,2,* Fangmin Zhao,2 Shuyi Chen,1 Qunwei Chen,1 Qijin Shu1 1Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2The First Clinical Medicine College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qijin ShuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-13605706566Fax +86-571-6707-2196Email shuqjhz@163.comBackground: Multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) treatment plays an important role in cancer therapy, but still suffers from a high incidence of hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR), leading to MKIs dose modification or termination. Thus, there is a high need for therapeutic strategy for HFSR.Patients and Methods: This prospective analysis included twenty patients, who were continuously administered with MKIs treatment and presented with a grade 3 HFSR during January 2018 to December 2019. All the patients were treated with the Shouzu Ning Decoction (SND) twice a day, in addition to the MKIs treatment. Grading of HFSR was assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Pain intensity was evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Quality of life was assessed using the Hand–Foot Quality of Life Scale (HF-QoLS).Results: The median time from MKIs initiation to onset of grade 3 HFSR was 26.2 days. Following the SND treatment, seventeen (17/20) patients displayed grade 2 HFSR with a median time of 5.1 days. Among whom, seven (7/17) finally transformed to grade 1 with a median time of 9.9 days. While all of the grade 1 patients (7/7) had local recurrence, and retreatment of the SND was effective. In addition, after the SND treatment, the score of NRS and HF-QoLS decreased to 1.60 ± 1.14 (P < 0.01) and 26.75 ± 11.76 (P < 0.01), respectively.Conclusion: The SND treatment could alleviate symptoms, relieve pain and improve quality of life in HFSR patients. The SND treatment was proved to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for MKIs-associated grade 3 HFSR patients for the first time. Indeed, further randomized controlled trails with large-scale, multi-center are require to fully determine the clinical application of the SND in MKIs-associated HFSR.Keywords: hand-foot skin reaction, multi-kinase inhibitors, Shouzu Ning Decoction, efficacy, safety

Fixed-duration venetoclax plus rituximab (VenR) has a manageable safety profile and improves survival in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We present data from the phase III MURANO study on the impact of venetoclax modification or premature discontinuation on outcomes in patients with R/R CLL. Timedependent Cox proportional hazards regression models, stratified by 17p deletion and risk status, evaluated the impact of venetoclax discontinuation/ modification on investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Analyses were performed retrospectively (without type-1 error control) in intention-to-treat patients from the VenR arm of MURANO. Overall, 140 of 194 (72%) patients in the VenR arm completed 2 years of therapy; 54 of 194 (28%) patients prematurely discontinued treatment. Inferior PFS was observed in patients prematurely discontinuing venetoclax for any reason (disease progression excluded; P

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting dose modifications to reduce serious treatment-related adverse events of antineoplastic therapy is limited and frequently based on clinical trial protocols, which are not always generalisable to community patients. eviQ is an online resource with treatment protocols and recommendations for dose modification formulated by expert opinion and evidence-based review. Original recommended haematological thresholds to delay treatment were: neutrophil count

Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by an esophagectomy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, but remains a great challenge for elderly patients. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Methods From December 2007 to October 2017, forty esophageal cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Ten patients received standard doses of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 for 1-4 days, during the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy. Eighteen patients received modified doses of cisplatin 16-18 mg/m2 and 5-FU 600-800 mg/m2. Twelve patients received lower doses of cisplatin 10-12 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400-600 mg/m2. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), tumor response rate and treatment compliance. Results The 3-year OS rate was 28.8% The 3-year OS rates for patients receiving standard, modified and lower doses were 12.5%, 53.8% and 0.0%, respectively (p=0.05). There were 87.5% of patients completing the scheduled radiotherapy dose, along with 2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. The response rate (clinical complete response and partial response rate) was 70.0%. Multivariate analysis revealed that no statistical difference was found in the overall survival among these 3 groups of chemotherapy dosage. The treatment response was the only independent prognostic factor regarding overall survival (p Conclusion Definitive chemoradiotherapy with dose modification is a feasible, safe and reasonable treatment for elderly esophageal cancer patients. Achieving a better compliance to chemoradiotherapy through an optimal dose modification of chemotherapy may provide better clinical outcomes and would be the treatment goal for elderly esophageal cancer patients.

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib, through a bridging study to METEOR, in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Methods This phase II, open-label, single-arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03339219) included adult Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and measurable disease who had received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients received cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily while there was clinical benefit, or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end-point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1. Secondary end-points included clinical benefit rate (complete or partial response, or ≥8-week stable disease), progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Results Of the 35 patients enrolled, 68.6%, 22.9% and 8.6% had previously received one, two and three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors, respectively. The median duration of cabozantinib exposure was 27.0 weeks (range 5.1-43.0 weeks). The objective response rate was 20.0% (90% confidence interval 9.8-34.3%), and the clinical benefit rate was 85.7% (95% confidence interval 69.7-95.2%). The 6-month estimated progression-free survival was 72.3% (95% confidence interval 53.3-84.6%); the median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. All patients reported adverse events, which were manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification; two patients (5.7%) discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions The results showed that findings from METEOR can be extrapolated, and that cabozantinib 60 mg/day is a viable treatment option in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Long-term combination treatment with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone is important to achieve a curative effect in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In this study, the plasma concentration of lenalidomide was measured at 3 h after oral administration, when the drug is in the elimination phase and can be easily measured in outpatients, to identify factors that may lead to the discontinuation of this combination therapy. Patients were assigned to continuation or discontinuation of therapy groups, and the baseline characteristics of patients, lenalidomide concentration, and concentration/dose (C/D) ratios reflecting oral clearance were compared between the two groups. The efficacy and severity of adverse events were also compared. The results showed that patients who discontinued or modified treatment had low plasma concentrations of lenalidomide and C/D ratios, indicating high oral clearance of lenalidomide. The estimated creatinine clearance rate was negatively correlated with the C/D ratio. The plasma concentrations of lenalidomide were independent from kidney function and differed significantly among patients. Taken together, the results indicate that low plasma concentrations of lenalidomide and low C/D ratios may lead to discontinuation of combination therapy in patients with MM. This suggests that early measurement of lenalidomide plasma continuation would help to prevent discontinuation of therapy or a delay in modifying the dose of lenalidomide.

Background Numerous medications used in older adults require dose modification or should be avoided in individuals with impaired kidney function. Purpose To assess medical students' and physicians' knowledge of drug prescribing recommendations in older patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Patients and Methods A survey comprising a list of 64 drugs conducted in 183 medical students (Students), and 138 post-graduate trainees in internal medicine (Physicians). The respondents were asked to classify each drug into one of three categories: 1) no renal precautions; 2) dose should be reduced; and 3) medication should be avoided. Results A range of 16.9-68.3% students and 14.5-81.2% physicians correctly classified drugs in the category "No renal precautions." Drugs requiring dose reduction were correctly classified by 6-67.2% students, and 24.6-85.5% physicians. For drugs that should be avoided in subjects with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2, the range was 6-44.8% in the Students, and 8.7-76.1% in the Physicians. The Physicians did better than the Students by classifying five drugs that do not require renal precautions, 12 drugs requiring dose reduction, and six medications that should be avoided. The Students had a higher percentage of correct answers for seven drugs in the category "no renal precautions," and one drug requiring dose reduction. Conclusion Medical students and post-graduate trainees in internal medicine have poor knowledge of drug prescribing recommendations in older patients with renal impairment.

Introduction/Background* In the NOVA trial of niraparib maintenance treatment (MT) in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC), dose reduction due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 66.5% of patients initiating niraparib at 300 mg. Based on NOVA RADAR analysis, subsequent individualised starting dose (ISD) recommends patients with baseline bodyweight Methodology In NORA, adults with PSROC and complete/partial response to most recent platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomised 2:1 to niraparib or placebo MT of 28-day cycles. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). First 16 patients started treatment at 300 mg, before ISD was implemented. Dose interruption ≤28 days and dose reduction were permitted. Niraparib-treated patients with stabilised dosing at Cycle 4 were analysed, with descriptive statistics summarising TEAEs and descriptive PFS analysis by dose levels at the beginning of Cycle 4. Result(s)* During Month 1/2, platelet count decrease caused dose interruption and reduction in 32.8%/36.2% and 22.0%/23.6% of patients, respectively; neutrophil count decrease caused dose interruption and reduction in 9.0%/12.1% and 8.5%/9.2% of patients, respectively. These percentages decreased from Month 3 and remained low through Months 4–6 (figure 1). Anaemia-related dose interruption/reduction occurred in ≤10% of patients. Most patients’ stabilised doses at Cycle 4 were 100 mg (n=74) or 200 mg (n=78). These two groups had comparable baseline characteristics and showed similar PFS (figure 2) from Cycle 4 onward through 12 months, regardless of germline BRCA mutation status. Conclusion* Platelet count decrease and neutrophil count decrease were the major TEAEs necessitating niraparib dose modification. Early dose modification helped maintain safety and tolerability in Chinese patients receiving niraparib MT without compromising efficacy.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are extremely vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and show an impaired immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We analyzed factors related to vaccination efficiency in KTRs. In a multicenter prospective observational study (NCT04743947), IgG antibodies levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 subunit and their neutralization capacity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were analyzed in 225 KTRs and compared to 176 controls. After the vaccination, 56 (24.9%) KTRs became seropositive of whom 68% had neutralizing antibodies. This immune response was significantly lower compared to controls (239 [78-519] BAU/ml versus 1826 [560-3180] BAU/ml for KTRs and controls, p

Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase enzymes catalyze the conversion of isocitrate to alpha-ketoglutarate. Mutated IDH enzymes generate the "oncometabolite" 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), which inhibits TET2 function. IDH2 mutations have been reported in 9% to 19% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. Inhibition of the mutant IDH2 enzyme led to decreased 2-HG levels and induced myeloid differentiation in IDH2 mutant AML. Enasidenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH2, was approved in 2017, after a successful phase I/II trial showing an overall response rate (ORR) of 40.3% in relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, with 19.3% of patients achieving complete remission (CR). A Phase III trial is currently ongoing. It targets the mutant IDH2 variants R140Q, R172S, and R172K; at an approved dose of 100 mg oral daily dose. At higher doses the drug was less tolerated, however, few subjects received dose modification at the 650 mg daily dose group; these events did not qualify as a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). In this descriptive study, we are reporting a case series of R/R AML, with an IDH2 mutation, that are treated with escalated dose enasidenib. Method: This case series is based on retrospective observations of patients with R/R IDH2 mutant AML since January 2017, who are treated with enasidenib. We are reporting two cases treated with an escalated dose of 200 mg daily. We included patients with intermediate to poor-risk AML, who received at least one prior line of therapy, started on standard dose enasidenib (100 mg daily) for a minimum of 6 months and followed until disease relapse or death. We excluded patients who are primarily resistant to enasidenib (AML risk stratification and response evaluation by ELN-Leukemia NET. IDH2 mutations were identified by a local diagnostic laboratory that is regulated under CLIA through PCR which is validated to detect 10% or more mutant allele frequency. To quantify IDH2 variant frequency, confirmatory testing was performed via ARUP next-generation sequencing panel (NGS). Results: Here we report the descriptive outcomes of 2 cases from a single institution, who were treated with escalated dose enasidenib (200 mg oral daily) for R/R AML with an IDH2 mutation. The first case describes a 65-year-old female diagnosed with poor-risk AML in the setting of pancytopenia with bone marrow evaluation consistent with the background of erythroid and granulocytic dysplasia, with normal karyotype analysis. The patient has treated with induction chemotherapy and 2 cycles consolidation that was complicated with bacterial infections, prolonged hospitalization, and profound deconditioning led to stopping treatment. After 18 months of surveillance, repeat bone marrow evaluation for new-onset pancytopenia revealed relapsed AML with evidence of IDH2 mutation at codon 140, with a variant frequency of 36.9% by NGS. The case was started on enasidenib at 100 mg oral daily dose. After 6 months of therapy, the patient continued to be cytopenic, repeated bone marrow evaluation showed residual AML with IDH2 variant frequency of 27.6%. The decision was made to increase the enasidenib dose to 200 mg daily. With follow up for another 5 months on the escalated dose, the patient achieved hematologic complete response (hCR) with normalization of peripheral platelet count and ANC. [Figures 1-2] The patient maintained hCR for another 5 months on 200 mg enasidenib daily until she died from COVID-19 infection. The second case describes a 59-year-old female with poor-risk AML in the setting of leukocytosis, with bone marrow evaluation consistent with the background of megakaryocytic dysplasia and karyotype analysis positive for monosomy 7. The patient was treated with induction chemotherapy and failed to respond. Repeat bone marrow evaluation showed primary refractory disease with positive IDH2 mutation at codon 140 with a variant frequency of 40.7%. Treatment with 100 mg enasidenib was started. The patient maintained a partial response for 6 months, then peripheral blasts counts started to gradually increase. The decision was made to increase enasidenib dose to 200 mg daily, which improved peripheral blasts within one month of escalated dose therapy. [Figure 3] The patient maintained a response to therapy for another 3 months before she relapsed. Conclusion: Our limited data showed that initial response to standard dose enasidenib could potentially be optimized by dose escalation to 200 mg daily. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background In the EMBRACA phase III study (NCT01945775), talazoparib was associated with a significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCT) in germline BRCA1/2‐mutated HER2‐negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Herein, the safety profile of talazoparib is explored in detail. Materials and Methods Overall, 412 patients received ≥1 dose of talazoparib (n = 286) or PCT (n = 126). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated, including timing, duration, and potential overlap of selected AEs. The relationship between talazoparib plasma exposure and grade ≥3 anemia was analyzed. Time‐varying Cox proportional hazard models assessed the impact of dose reductions on PFS. Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with common AEs and health resource utilization (HRU) were assessed in both treatment arms. Results The most common AEs with talazoparib were hematologic (195 [68.2%] patients) and typically occurred within the first 3–4 months of receiving talazoparib. Grade 3‐4 anemia lasted approximately 7 days for both arms. Overlapping grade 3‐4 hematologic AEs were infrequent with talazoparib. Higher talazoparib exposure was associated with grade ≥3 anemia. Permanent discontinuation of talazoparib due to hematologic AEs was low (, Talazoparib is a viable option for patients with germline BRCA‐mutated advanced breast cancer. This article presents detailed safety analyses for talazoparib, as a follow‐up to reported results from the EMBRACA trial, to highlight patterns of toxicity compared with chemotherapy and to outline guidelines for management of talazoparib toxicity in clinical practice via dose modifications and/or standard supportive care.

In light of the recommendation of folic acid supplementation in chronic hemolytic anemia, with possible supratherapeutic dosing and associated side effects, we performed this study to investigate serum folate levels in children with chronic hemolytic anemia. Phase 1 was a cross-sectional study of 134 patients in the Pediatric Hematology service, documenting daily dosage and performing serum folate levels. In phase 2, we reduced the dose to 1 mg for 148 patients and repeated the testing after six months. We found very high serum folate levels with Phase 1, with 93.2% above the upper level of normal. In Phase 2, values remained high with 42.5% above the acceptable upper limit. Doses of folic acid given to sickle cell and thalassemia patients exceed their actual needs. This should be re-evaluated to strike a balance between benefit and harm, with close monitoring of serum folate levels.

Background Low body mass index (BMI) is suspected of being associated with low transdermal fentanyl (TDF) blood levels and worse pain relief. Clinical pain data to support this claim are lacking. Methods Using a Chronic Pain Registry, we identified 901 cancer patients who received TDF at outpatient pain service clinics of our cancer center from 7/1/2011 to 12/1/2016. Of these, 240 patients had a BMI measure, pain intensity, and pain relief scores documented within 30 days of a TDF order. We examined associations between BMI, TDF dose, Worst and Least pain scores, and pain relief scores using standard statistical tests. Results In cancer patients receiving TDF, low BMI (, Low body mass index (BMI) is suspected of being associated with low transdermal fentanyl (TDF) blood levels and worse pain relief. Of the 240 patients who reported patient‐reported outcomes, whereas on TDF, patients with lowest BMI trended toward better pain relief on the lowest TDF doses. When predicting percent pain relief, we found no basis for avoiding TDF or modifying its dose in cancer patients with low BMI and cachexia.

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of lipegfilgrastim, a glycopegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, used as primary (PP) or secondary prophylaxis (SP) on chemotherapy (CT) treatment modifications, as well as the incidence of CT-induced neutropenic events in adult patients receiving cytotoxic CT with or without biological therapy (BT) for solid and hematological tumors, in routine clinical practice. Other objectives were to characterize the population of lipegfilgrastim-treated cancer patients and safety assessment. Methods: This phase 4, prospective, observational study was conducted at 15 centers from Belgium and Luxembourg, between 2015 and 2017. Results: Of 139 patients, 82.7% had breast cancer and 54.7% were treated with dose-dense regimens. Most received lipegfilgrastim as PP (82.0%) and were at high-risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) (68.3%). FN and grade III/IV neutropenia were reported for 7.9% and 22.3% patients. Among 123 evaluated patients, CT/BT dose modifications were recorded for 33.3% (PP) and 52.4% (SP) of patients receiving lipegfilgrastim; dose reductions, followed by dose delays, were more frequent than omissions. Among 45 patients with dose modifications, FN was reported for 8.8% and 9.1% patients and grade IV neutropenia for 17.6% and 18.2% of patients when lipegfilgrastim was applied for PP and SP, respectively. Adverse events related to lipegfilgrastim occurred for 55 (39.6%) patients; bone pain and back pain were more frequent. Lipegfilgrastim-related serious adverse events were reported for 9 (6.5%) patients. Conclusion: Use of lipegfilgrastim in real-world settings resulted in limited CT dose modifications and low incidences of neutropenic events, with no new safety concerns arising.

Objective: The applicability of the linear quadratic (LQ) model to local control (LC) modeling after hypofractionated radiotherapy to treat lung cancer is highly debated. To date, the differences in predicted outcomes between the LQ model and other radiobiological models, which are characterized by additional dose modification beyond a certain transitional dose (dT), have not been well established. This study aims to compare the outcomes predicted by the LQ model with those predicted by two other radiobiological models in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Computer tomography (CT) simulation data sets for 20 patients diagnosed with stage Ⅰ primary NSCLC were included in this study. Three radiobiological models, including the LQ, the universal survival curve (USC) and the modified linear quadratic and linear (mLQL) model were employed to predict the tumor control probability (TCP) data. First, the dT values for the USC and mLQL models were determined. Then, the biologically effective dose (BED) and the predicted TCP values from the LQ model were compared with those calculated from the USC and mLQL models. Results: The dT values from the USC model were 29.6 Gy, 33.8 Gy and 44.5 Gy, whereas the values were 90.2 Gy, 84.0 Gy and 57.3 Gy for the mLQL model for 1-year, 2-year and 3-year TCP prediction. The remarkable higher dT values obtained from the mLQL model revealed the same dose-response relationship as the LQ model in the low- and high-dose ranges. We also found that TCP prediction from the LQ and USC models differed by less than 3%, although the BED values for the two models were significantly different. Conclusion: Radiobiological analysis reveals small differences between the models and suggested that the LQ model is applicable for modeling LC using SBRT to treat lung cancer, even when an extremely high fractional dose is used.

We herein report the first case in which an escalated dose of sunitinib was effective, even after dose reduction. A 64-year-old man with gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the small intestine discontinued adjuvant imatinib because of interstitial pneumonia. After two years, peritoneal recurrence was detected. Sunitinib was started at 50 mg/day for 4 weeks every 6 weeks, after which the dosage was reduced to 37.5 mg/day because of grade 1 gastritis, stomatitis, and a fever. Four months later, computed tomography showed progressive disease. As the adverse events were well-controlled by medication, we escalated the dose to 50 mg/day and achieved a partial response.

Purpose The effects of chemotherapy dose intensity on survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed dose delays/reduction, relative dose intensity (RDI), and the association between chemotherapy intensity and survival in advanced NSCLC. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults with advanced lung cancer who received first-line myelosuppressive platinum-based chemotherapy (January 2007–December 2010) in ~ 230 US Oncology Network community practices. Dose delays ≥ 7 days, dose reductions ≥ 15%, and RDI relative to standard regimens were described. Overall survival (OS) was measured using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard (PH) models. Results Among 3866 patients with advanced NSCLC, 32.4% experienced dose delays ≥ 7 days, 50.1% experienced dose reductions ≥ 15%, and 40.4% had RDI

Although dose reduction of S-1 is recommended for patients with impaired renal function, dose modification for such patients has not been prospectively evaluated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-fluorouracil, 5-chloro-2,4 dihydroxypyridine and oteracil potassium, and to review the recommended dose modification of S-1 in patients with renal impairment. We classified patients receiving S-1 into 4 groups according to their renal function, as measured using the Japanese estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation. The daily S-1 dose was adjusted based on the patient's eGFR and body surface area. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. A total of 33 patients were enrolled and classified into 4 groups as follows: 10 patients in cohort 1 (eGFR ≥ 80 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), 10 patients in cohort 2 (eGFR = 50-79 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), 10 patients in cohort 3 (eGFR = 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), and 3 patients in cohort 4 (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Those in cohorts 3 and 4 treated with an adjusted dose of S-1 showed a similar area under the curve for 5-fluorouracil (941.9 ± 275.6 and 1043.5 ± 224.8 ng/mL, respectively) compared with cohort 2 (1034.9 ± 414.3 ng/mL). Notably, while there was a statistically significant difference between cohort 1 (689.6 ± 208.8 ng/mL) and 2 (P = 0.0474) treated with an equal dose of S-1, there was no significant difference observed in the toxicity profiles of the cohorts. In conclusion, dose adjustment of S-1 in patients with impaired renal function using eGFR is appropriate and safe.

Background Regorafenib at the standard intermittent dosing schedule proved effective in the GRID trial for refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, this dosing schedule requires frequent dose reduction, and the progression of GISTs or tumor-related symptoms during the off-treatment period has also been noted in some patients. Therefore, we conducted this phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous dosing schedule. Methods Patients with measurable, metastatic, or recurrent GISTs who failed to respond to both imatinib and sunitinib were eligible for this study. Regorafenib 100 mg p.o. daily was administered continuously. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR: complete response plus partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]) lasting for at least 12 weeks using RECIST version 1.1. Results The best response was PR in 2 (8%), SD in 16 (64%), and progressive disease in 6 (24%) patients. DCR lasting for at least 12 weeks was 64% (16 of 25). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9–8.6), and the 1-year survival rate was 64.5%. Ten patients (40%) experienced grade 3–4 toxicities, including hand-foot skin reaction (n = 4, 16%) and elevation of alanine aminotransferase (n = 2, 8%). Only six patients (24%) needed dose modification with a relative dose intensity of 95.0% for eight cycles in all patients. Conclusion Regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous schedule might be an alternative treatment in patients with GISTs after failure of imatinib and sunitinib. Clinical trial identification number. NCT02889328 Implications for Practice Regorafenib at the standard intermittent dosing schedule proved effective in the GRID trial for refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, this dosing schedule requires frequent dose reduction, and the progression of GISTs or tumor-related symptoms during the off-treatment period has been noted in some patients. This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous dosing schedule. With good efficacy and acceptable safety profiles, regorafenib at a lower, continuously administered dose might be an alternative treatment in patients with GISTs after imatinib and sunitinib. Rechallenge of regorafenib may slow the disease progression.