Search

Individual oncogenic KRAS mutants confer distinct differences in biochemical properties and signaling for reasons that are not well understood. KRAS activity is closely coupled to protein dynamics and is regulated through two interconverting conformations: state 1 (inactive, effector binding deficient) and state 2 (active, effector binding enabled). Here, we use 31P NMR to delineate the differences in state 1 and state 2 populations present in WT and common KRAS oncogenic mutants (G12C, G12D, G12V, G13D, and Q61L) bound to its natural substrate GTP or a commonly used nonhydrolyzable analog GppNHp (guanosine-5-[(β,γ)-imido] triphosphate). Our results show that GppNHp-bound proteins exhibit significant state 1 population, whereas GTP-bound KRAS is primarily (90% or more) in state 2 conformation. This observation suggests that the predominance of state 1 shown here and in other studies is related to GppNHp and is most likely nonexistent in cells. We characterize the impact of this differential conformational equilibrium of oncogenic KRAS on RAF1 kinase effector RAS-binding domain and intrinsic hydrolysis. Through a KRAS G12C drug discovery, we have identified a novel small-molecule inhibitor, BBO-8956, which is effective against both GDP- and GTP-bound KRAS G12C. We show that binding of this inhibitor significantly perturbs state 1-state 2 equilibrium and induces an inactive state 1 conformation in GTP-bound KRAS G12C. In the presence of BBO-8956, RAF1-RAS-binding domain is unable to induce a signaling competent state 2 conformation within the ternary complex, demonstrating the mechanism of action for this novel and active-conformation inhibitor.

RAS proteins cycling between the active-form (GTP-bound) and inactive-form (GDP-bound) play a key role in cell signaling pathways that control cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. Mutations at codon 12, 13, and 61 in RAS are known to attenuate its GTPase activity favoring the RAS active state and constitutively active downstream signaling. This hyperactivation accounts for various malignancies including pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancers. Active KRAS is found to exist in equilibrium between two rapidly interconverting conformational states (State1-State2) in solution. Due to this dynamic feature of the protein, the 1H-15N correlation cross-peak signals of several amino acid (AA) residues of KRAS belonging to the flexible loop regions are absent from its 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectrum within and near physiological solution pH. A threonine to serine mutation at position 35 (T35S) shifts the interconverting equilibrium to State1 conformation and enables the emergence of such residues in the 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectrum due to gained conformational rigidity. We report here the 1HN, 15N, and 13C backbone resonance assignments for the 19.2 kDa (AA 1-169) protein constructs of KRAS-GppNHp harboring T35S mutation (KRAST35S/C118S-GppNHp) and of its oncogenic counterpart harboring the Q61L mutation (KRAST35S/Q61L/C118S-GppNHp) using heteronuclear, multidimensional NMR spectroscopy at 298 K. High resolution NMR data allowed the unambiguous assignments of 1H-15N correlation cross-peaks for all the residues except for Met1. Furthermore, 2D 1H-15N HSQC overlay of two proteins assisted in determination of Q61L mutation-induced chemical shift perturbations for select residues in the regions of P-loop, Switch-II, and helix α3.

Individual oncogenic KRAS mutants confer distinct differences in biochemical properties and signaling for reasons that are not well understood. KRAS activity is closely coupled to protein dynamics and is regulated through two interconverting conformations: state 1 (inactive, effector binding deficient) and state 2 (active, effector binding enabled). Here, we use 31P NMR to delineate the differences in state 1 and state 2 populations present in WT and common KRAS oncogenic mutants (G12C, G12D, G12V, G13D, and Q61L) bound to its natural substrate GTP or a commonly used nonhydrolyzable analog GppNHp (guanosine-5'-[(β,γ)-imido] triphosphate). Our results show that GppNHp-bound proteins exhibit significant state 1 population, whereas GTP-bound KRAS is primarily (90% or more) in state 2 conformation. This observation suggests that the predominance of state 1 shown here and in other studies is related to GppNHp and is most likely nonexistent in cells. We characterize the impact of this differential conformational equilibrium of oncogenic KRAS on RAF1 kinase effector RAS-binding domain and intrinsic hydrolysis. Through a KRAS G12C drug discovery, we have identified a novel small-molecule inhibitor, BBO-8956, which is effective against both GDP- and GTP-bound KRAS G12C. We show that binding of this inhibitor significantly perturbs state 1-state 2 equilibrium and induces an inactive state 1 conformation in GTP-bound KRAS G12C. In the presence of BBO-8956, RAF1-RAS-binding domain is unable to induce a signaling competent state 2 conformation within the ternary complex, demonstrating the mechanism of action for this novel and active-conformation inhibitor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]