Search

The size of a data structure (i.e., the number of elements in it) is a widely used property of a data set. However, for concurrent programs, obtaining a correct size efficiently is non-trivial. In fact, the literature does not offer a mechanism to obtain a correct (linearizable) size of a concurrent data set without resorting to inefficient solutions, such as taking a full snapshot of the data structure to count the elements, or acquiring one global lock in all update and size operations. This paper presents a methodology for adding a concurrent linearizable size operation to sets and dictionaries with a relatively low performance overhead. Theoretically, the proposed size operation is wait-free with asymptotic complexity linear in the number of threads (independently of data-structure size). Practically, we evaluated the performance overhead by adding size to various concurrent data structures in Java$-$a skip list, a hash table and a tree. The proposed linearizable size operation executes faster by orders of magnitude compared to the existing option of taking a snapshot, while incurring a throughput loss of $1\%-20\%$ on the original data structure's operations., Comment: Code: https://github.com/galysela/ConcurrentSize

Non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM) offers byte-addressable persistence at speeds comparable to DRAM. However, with caches remaining volatile, automatic cache evictions can reorder updates to memory, potentially leaving persistent memory in an inconsistent state upon a system crash. Flush and fence instructions can be used to force ordering among updates, but are expensive. This has motivated significant work studying how to write correct and efficient persistent programs for NVRAM. In this paper, we present FliT, a C++ library that facilitates writing efficient persistent code. Using the library's default mode makes any linearizable data structure durable with minimal changes to the code. FliT avoids many redundant flush instructions by using a novel algorithm to track dirty cache lines. The FliT library also allows for extra optimizations, but achieves good performance even in its default setting. To describe the FliT library's capabilities and guarantees, we define a persistent programming interface, called the P-V Interface, which FliT implements. The P-V Interface captures the expected behavior of code in which some instructions' effects are persisted and some are not. We show that the interface captures the desired semantics of many practical algorithms in the literature. We apply the FliT library to four different persistent data structures, and show that across several workloads, persistence implementations, and data structure sizes, the FliT library always improves operation throughput, by at least $2.1\times$ over a naive implementation in all but one workload.

Safe lock-free memory reclamation is a difficult problem. Existing solutions follow three basic methods (or their combinations): epoch based reclamation, hazard pointers, and optimistic reclamation. Epoch-based methods are fast, but do not guarantee lock-freedom. Hazard pointer solutions are lock-free but typically do not provide high performance. Optimistic methods are lock-free and fast, but previous optimistic methods did not go all the way. While reads were executed optimistically, writes were protected by hazard pointers. In this work we present a new reclamation scheme called version based reclamation (VBR), which provides a full optimistic solution to lock-free memory reclamation, obtaining lock-freedom and high efficiency. Speculative execution is known as a fundamental tool for improving performance in various areas of computer science, and indeed evaluation with a lock-free linked-list, hash-table and skip-list shows that VBR outperforms state-of-the-art existing solutions., LIPIcs, Vol. 209, 35th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2021), pages 35:1-35:18

Linearizability is the de facto consistency condition for concurrent objects, widely used in theory and practice. Loosely speaking, linearizability classifies concurrent executions as correct if operations on shared objects appear to take effect instantaneously during the operation execution time. This paper calls attention to a somewhat-neglected aspect of linearizability: restrictions on how pending invocations are handled, an issue that has become increasingly important for software running on systems with non-volatile main memory. Interestingly, the original published definition of linearizability includes a typo (a symbol is missing a prime) that concerns exactly this issue. In this paper we point out the typo and provide an amendment to make the definition complete. We believe that pointing this typo out rigorously and proposing a fix is important and timely.

We consider durable data structures for non-volatile main memory, such as the new Intel Optane memory architecture. Substantial recent work has concentrated on making concurrent data structures durable with low overhead, by adding a minimal number of blocking persist operations (i.e., flushes and fences). In this work we show that focusing on minimizing the number of persist instructions is important, but not enough. We show that access to flushed content is of high cost due to cache invalidation in current architectures. Given this finding, we present a design of the queue data structure that properly takes care of minimizing blocking persist operations as well as minimizing access to flushed content. The proposed design outperforms state-of-the-art durable queues. We start by providing a durable version of the Michael Scott queue (MSQ). We amend MSQ by adding a minimal number of persist instructions, fewer than in available durable queues, and meeting the theoretical lower bound on the number of blocking persist operations. We then proceed with a second amendment to this design, that eliminates accesses to flushed data. Evaluation shows that the second amendment yields substantial performance improvement, outperforming the state of the art and demonstrating the importance of reduced accesses to flushed content. The presented queues are durably linearizable and lock-free. Finally, we discuss the theoretical optimal number of accesses to flushed content., Code: https://github.com/galysela/DurableQueues

The recent availability of fast, dense, byte-addressable non-volatile memory has led to increasing interest in the problem of designing and specifying durable data structures that can recover from system crashes. However, designing durable concurrent data structures that are efficient and also satisfy a correctness criterion has proven to be very difficult, leading many algorithms to be inefficient or incorrect in a concurrent setting. In this paper, we present a general transformation that takes a lock-free data structure from a general class called traversal data structure (that we formally define) and automatically transforms it into an implementation of the data structure for the NVRAM setting that is provably durably linearizable and highly efficient. The transformation hinges on the observation that many data structure operations begin with a traversal phase that does not need to be persisted, and thus we only begin persisting when the traversal reaches its destination. We demonstrate the transformation's efficiency through extensive measurements on a system with Intel's recently released Optane DC persistent memory, showing that it can outperform competitors on many workloads.

Non-volatile memory is expected to co-exist or replace DRAM in upcoming architectures. Durable concurrent data structures for non-volatile memories are essential building blocks for constructing adequate software for use with these architectures. In this paper, we propose a new approach for durable concurrent sets and use this approach to build the most efficient durable hash tables available today. Evaluation shows a performance improvement factor of up to 3.3x over existing technology.

Dynamic programming languages such as Python and Ruby are widely used, and much effort is spent on making them efficient. One substantial research effort in this direction is the enabling of parallel code execution. While there has been significant progress, making dynamic collections efficient, scalable, and thread-safe is an open issue. Typical programs in dynamic languages use few but versatile collection types. Such collections are an important ingredient of dynamic environments, but are difficult to make safe, efficient, and scalable. In this paper, we propose an approach for efficient and concurrent collections by gradually increasing synchronization levels according to the dynamic needs of each collection instance. Collections reachable only by a single thread have no synchronization, arrays accessed in bounds have minimal synchronization, and for the general case, we adopt the Layout Lock paradigm and extend its design with a lightweight version that fits the setting of dynamic languages. We apply our approach to Ruby's Array and Hash collections. Our experiments show that our approach has no overhead on single-threaded benchmarks, scales linearly for Array and Hash accesses, achieves the same scalability as Fortran and Java for classic parallel algorithms, and scales better than other Ruby implementations on Ruby workloads.

State teleportation is a new technique for exploiting hardware transactional memory (HTM) to improve existing synchronization and memory management schemes for highly-concurrent data structures. When applied to fine-grained locking, a thread holding the lock for a node launches a hardware transaction that traverses multiple successor nodes, acquires the lock for the last node reached, and releases the lock on the starting node, skipping lock acquisitions for intermediate nodes. When applied to lock-free data structures, a thread visiting a node protected by a hazard pointer launches a hardware transaction that traverses multiple successor nodes, and publishes the hazard pointer only for the last node reached, skipping the memory barriers needed to publish intermediate hazard pointers. Experimental results show that these applications of state teleportation can substantially increase the performance of both lock-based and lock-free data structures.

Dynamic memory allocation is ubiquitous in today's runtime environments. Allocation and deallocation of objects during program execution may cause fragmentation and foil the program's ability to allocate objects. Robson [1971] has shown that a worst-case scenario can create a space overhead within a factor of log n of the space that is actually required by the program, where n is the size of the largest possible object. Compaction can eliminate fragmentation, but is too costly to be run frequently. Many runtime systems employ partial compaction, in which only a small fraction of the allocated objects are moved. Partial compaction reduces some of the existing fragmentation at an acceptable cost. In this article we study the effectiveness of partial compaction and provide the first rigorous lower and upper bounds on its effectiveness in reducing fragmentation at a low cost.

Two settings are traditionally considered for secure multiparty computation, depending on whether or not a majority of the parties are assumed to be honest. Existing protocols that assume an honest majority provide “full security” (and, in particular, guarantee output delivery and fairness) when this assumption holds, but are completely insecure if this assumption is violated. On the other hand, known protocols tolerating an arbitrary number of corruptions do not guarantee fairness or output delivery even if only a single party is dishonest. It is natural to wonder whether it is possible to achieve the “best of both worlds”: namely, a single protocol that simultaneously achieves the best possible security in both the above settings. Here, we rule out this possibility (at least for general functionalities) and show some positive results regarding what can be achieved.

Two major efficiency parameters for garbage collectors are the throughput overheads and the pause times that they introduce. Highly responsive systems need to use collectors with as short as possible pause times. Pause times have decreased significantly over the years, especially through the use of concurrent garbage collectors. For modern concurrent collectors, the longest pause is typically created by the need to atomically scan the runtime stack. All practical concurrent collectors that we are aware of must obtain a snapshot of the pointers on each thread's runtime stack, in order to reclaim objects correctly. To further reduce the duration of the collector pauses, incremental stack scans were proposed. However, previous such methods employ locks to stop the mutator from accessing a stack frame while it is being scanned. Thus, these methods introduce potentially long and unpredictable pauses for a mutator thread. In this work we propose the first concurrent, incremental, and lock-free stack scanning mechanism for garbage collectors, that allows high responsiveness and support for programs that employ fine-grain synchronization to avoid locks. Our solution can be employed by all concurrent collectors that we are aware of, it is lock-free, it imposes a negligible overhead on the program execution, and it supports intra-stack references as found in languages like C#.

Garbage collectors are notoriously hard to verify, due to their low-level interaction with the underlying system and the general difficulty in reasoning about reachability in graphs. Several papers have presented verified collectors, but either the proofs were hand-written or the collectors were too simplistic to use on practical applications. In this work, we present two mechanically verified garbage collectors, both practical enough to use for real-world C# benchmarks. The collectors and their associated allocators consist of x86 assembly language instructions and macro instructions, annotated with preconditions, postconditions, invariants, and assertions. We used the Boogie verification generator and the Z3 automated theorem prover to verify this assembly language code mechanically. We provide measurements comparing the performance of the verified collector with that of the standard Bartok collectors on off-the-shelf C# benchmarks, demonstrating their competitiveness.

Multithreaded applications with multigigabyte heaps running on modern servers provide new challenges for garbage collection (GC). The challenges for “server-oriented” GC include: ensuring short pause times on a multigigabyte heap while minimizing throughput penalty, good scaling on multiprocessor hardware, and keeping the number of expensive multicycle fence instructions required by weak ordering to a minimum.We designed and implemented a collector facing these demands building on the mostly concurrent garbage collector proposed by Boehm et al. [1991]. Our collector incorporates new ideas into the original collector. We make it parallel and incremental; we employ concurrent low-priority background GC threads to take advantage of processor idle time; we propose novel algorithmic improvements to the basic mostly concurrent algorithm improving its efficiency and shortening its pause times; and finally, we use advanced techniques, such as a low-overhead work packet mechanism to enable full parallelism among the incremental and concurrent collecting threads and ensure load balancing.We compared the new collector to the mature, well-optimized, parallel, stop-the-world mark-sweep collector already in the IBM JVM. When allowed to run aggressively, using 72% of the CPU utilization during a short concurrent phase, our collector prototype reduces the maximum pause time from 161 ms to 46 ms while only losing 11.5% throughput when running the SPECjbb2000 benchmark on a 600-MB heap on an 8-way PowerPC 1.1-GHz processors. When the collector is limited to a nonintrusive operation using only 29% of the CPU utilization, the maximum pause time obtained is 79 ms and the loss in throughput is 15.4%.

A uniform generation procedure for NP is an algorithm that, given any input in a fixed NP-language, outputs a uniformly distributed NP-witness for membership of the input in the language. We present a uniform generation procedure for NP that runs in probabilistic polynomial time with an NP-oracle. This improves upon results of M. Jerrum et al. (1986, Theoret. Comput. Sci.43, 169–188), which either require a ΣP2 oracle or obtain only almost uniform generation. Our procedure utilizes ideas originating in the works of M. Sipser, and L. Stockmeyer (respectively, 1983, in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Symposium on the Theory of Computing, ACM, New York), and Jerrum et al. (1986).

We extend state-of-the-art lock-free linked lists by building linked lists with special care for locality of traversals. These linked lists are built of sequences of entries that reside on consecutive chunks of memory. When traversing such lists, subsequent entries typically reside on the same chunk and are thus close to each other, e.g., in same cache line or on the same virtual memory page. Such cache-conscious implementations of linked lists are frequently used in practice, but making them lock-free requires care. The basic component of this construction is a chunk of entries in the list that maintains a minimum and a maximum number of entries. This basic chunk component is an interesting tool on its own and may be used to build other lock-free data structures as well.

Parallel platforms are becoming ubiquitous with modern computing systems. Many parallel applications attempt to avoid locks in order to achieve high responsiveness, aid scalability, and avoid deadlocks and livelocks. However, avoiding the use of system locks does not guarantee that no locks are actually used, because progress inhibitors may occur in subtle ways through various program structures. Notions of progress guarantee such as lock-freedom, wait-freedom, and obstruction-freedom have been proposed in the literature to provide various levels of progress guarantees.In this paper we formalize the notions of progress guarantees using linear temporal logic (LTL). We concentrate on lock-freedom and propose a variant of it denoted bounded lock-freedom, which is more suitable for guaranteeing progress in practical systems. We use this formal definition to build a tool that checks if a concurrent program is bounded lock-free for a given bound. We then study the interaction between programs with progress guarantees and the underlying system (e.g., compilers, runtimes, operating systems, and hardware platforms). We propose a means to argue that an underlying system supports lock-freedom. A composition theorem asserts that bounded lock-free algorithms running on bounded lock-free supporting systems retain bounded lock-freedom for the composed execution.

Two major efficiency parameters for garbage collectors are the throughput overheads and the pause times that they introduce. Highly responsive systems need to use collectors with as short as possible pause times. Pause lengths have decreased significantly during the years, especially through the use of concurrent garbage collectors. For modern concurrent collectors, the longest pause is typically created by the need to atomically scan the runtime stack. All practical concurrent collectors that we are aware of must obtain a snapshot of the pointers on each thread's runtime stack, in order to reclaim objects correctly. To further reduce the length of the collector pauses, incremental stack scans were proposed. However, previous such methods employ locks to stop the mutator from accessing a stack frame while it is being scanned. Thus, these methods introduce a potential long and unpredictable pauses for a mutator thread. In this work we propose the first concurrent, incremental, and lock-free stack scanning for garbage collectors, allowing high responsiveness and support for programs that employ fine-synchronization to avoid locks. Our solution can be employed by all concurrent collectors that we are aware of, it is lock-free, it imposes a negligible overhead on the program execution, and it supports the special in-stack references existing in languages like C#.

Concurrent garbage collection is highly attractive for real-time systems, because offloading the collection effort from the executing threads allows faster response, allowing for extremely short deadlines at the microseconds level. Concurrent collectors also offer much better scalability over incremental collectors. The main problem with concurrent real-time collectors is their complexity. The first concurrent real-time garbage collector that can support fine synchronization, STOPLESS, has recently been presented by Pizlo et al. In this paper, we propose two additional (and different) algorithms for concurrent real-time garbage collection: CLOVER and CHICKEN. Both collectors obtain reduced complexity over the first collector STOPLESS, but need to trade a benefit for it. We study the algorithmic strengths and weaknesses of CLOVER and CHICKEN and compare them to STOPLESS. Finally, we have implemented all three collectors on the Bartok compiler and runtime for C# and we present measurements to compare their efficiency and responsiveness.

Optimizing programs for modern multiprocessor or vector platforms is a major important challenge for compilers today. In this work, we focus on one challenging aspect: the SIMD ALIGNMENT problem. Previously, only heuristics were used to solve this problem, without guarantees on the number of shifts in the obtained solution.We study two interesting and realistic special cases of the SIMD ALIGNMENT problem and present two novel and efficient algorithms that provide optimal solutions for these two cases. The new algorithms employ dynamic programming and a MIN-CUT/MAX-FLOWalgorithm as subroutines.We also discuss the relation between the SIMD ALIGNMENT problem and the MULTIWAY CUT and NODE MULTIWAY CUT problems; and we show how to derive an approximated solution to the SIMD ALIGNMENT problem based on approximation algorithms to these two known problems.

Reference counting is a classical garbage collection method. Recently, a series of papers have extended the basic method to drastically reduce its notorious overhead and extend the basic method to run concurrently and efficiently on a modern computing platform. In this paper we investigate the use of prefetching to further improve the efficiency of the reference-counting collector. We propose potential prefetching opportunities for the advanced reference-counting collector and report an implementation of a collector that employs such prefetching. The proposed prefetch instructions were inserted into the Jikes reference-counting collector obtaining an average reduction of 8.7% of the memory management overheads.

In the setting of multiparty computation, a set of parties wish to jointly compute a function of their inputs, while preserving security in the case that some subset of them are corrupted. The typical security properties considered are privacy, correctness, independence of inputs, guaranteed output delivery and fairness. Until now, all works in this area either considered the case that the corrupted subset of parties constitutes a strict minority, or the case that a half or more of the parties are corrupted. Secure protocols for the case of an honest majority achieve full security and thus output delivery and fairness are guaranteed. However, the security of these protocols is completely compromised if there is no honest majority. In contrast, protocols for the case of no honest majority do not guarantee output delivery, but do provide privacy, correctness and independence of inputs for any number of corrupted parties. Unfortunately, an adversary controlling only a single party can disrupt the computation of these protocols and prevent output delivery. In this paper, we study the possibility of obtaining general protocols for multiparty computation that simultaneously guarantee security (allowing abort) in the case that an arbitrary number of parties are corrupted and full security (including guaranteed output delivery) in the case that only a minority of the parties are corrupted. That is, we wish to obtain the best of both worlds in a single protocol, depending on the corruption case. We obtain both positive and negative results on this question, depending on the type of the functionality to be computed (standard or reactive) and the type of dishonest majority (semi-honest or malicious).

We study the computational difficulty of deciding whether two matrices generate equivalent linear codes, i.e., codes that consist of the same codewords up to a fixed permutation on the codeword coordinates. We call this problem code equivalence. Using techniques from the area of interactive proofs, we show on the one hand, that under the assumption that the polynomial-time hierarchy does not collapse, code equivalence is not NP-complete. On the other hand, we present a polynomial-time reduction from the graph isomorphism problem to code equivalence. Thus if one could find an efficient (i.e., polynomial-time) algorithm for code equivalence, then one could settle the long-standing problem of determining whether there is an efficient algorithm for solving graph isomorphism.

A reference-counting garbage collector cannot reclaim unreachable cyclic structures of objects. Therefore, reference-counting collectors either use a backup tracing collector infrequently, or employ a cycle collector to reclaim cyclic structures. We propose a new concurrent cycle collector, i.e., one that runs concurrently with the program threads, imposing negligible pauses (of around 1ms) on a multiprocessor. Our new collector combines the state-of-the-art cycle collector [5] with the sliding-views collectors [20, 2]. The use of sliding views for cycle collection yields two advantages. First, it drastically reduces the number of cycle candidates, which in turn, drastically reduces the work required to record and trace these candidates. Therefore, a large improvement in cycle collection efficiency is obtained. Second, it eliminates the theoretical termination problem that appeared in the previous concurrent cycle collector. There, a rare race may delay the reclamation of an unreachable cyclic structure forever. The sliding-views cycle collector guarantees reclamation of all unreachable cyclic structures. The proposed collector was implemented on the Jikes RVM and we provide measurements including a comparison between the use of backup tracing and the use of cycle collection with reference counting. To the best of our knowledge, such a comparison has not been reported before.

We consider the problem of extending oblivious transfers: Given a small number of oblivious transfers “for free,” can one implement a large number of oblivious transfers? Beaver has shown how to extend oblivious transfers given a one-way function. However, this protocol is inefficient in practice, in part due to its non-black-box use of the underlying one-way function.

History independent data structures, presented by Micciancio, are data structures that possess a strong security property: even if an intruder manages to get a copy of the data structure, the memory layout of the structure yields no additional information on the data structure beyond its content. In particular, the history of operations applied on the structure is not visible in its memory layout. Naor and Teague proposed a stronger notion of history independence in which the intruder may break into the system several times without being noticed and still obtain no additional information from reading the memory layout of the data structure.

We define and construct simulatable commitments. These are commitment schemes such that there is an efficient interactive proof system to show that a given string c is a legitimate commitment on a given value v, and furthermore, this proof is efficiently simulatable given any proper pair (c, v). Our construction is provably secure based on the Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption. Using simulatable commitments, we show how to efficiently transform any public coin honest verifier zero knowledge proof system into a proof system that is concurrent zero-knowledge with respect to any (possibly cheating) verifier via black box simulation. By efficient we mean that our transformation incurs only an additive overhead (both in terms of the number of rounds and the computational and communication complexity of each round), and the additive term is close to optimal (for black box simulation): only Ω(log n) additional rounds, and Ω(log n) additional public key operations for each round of the original protocol, where n is a security parameter, and Ω(log n) can be any superlogarithmic function of n independent of the complexity of the original protocol. The transformation preserves (up to negligible additive terms) the soundness and completeness error probabilities, and the new proof system is proved secure based on the DDH assumption, in the standard model of computation, i.e., no random oracles, shared random strings, or public key infrastructure is assumed.

We study an incorporation of generations into a modern reference counting collector. We start with the two on-the-fly collectors suggested by Levanoni and Petrank: a reference counting collector and a tracing (mark and sweep) collector. We then propose three designs for combining them so that the reference counting collector collects the young generation or the old generation or both. Our designs maintain the good properties of the Levanoni-Petrank collector. In particular, it is adequate for multithreaded environment and a multiprocessor platform, and it has an efficient write barrier with no synchronization operations. To the best of our knowledge, the use of generations with reference counting has not been tried before. We have implemented these algorithms with the Jikes JVM and compared them against the concurrent reference counting collector supplied with the Jikes package. As expected, the best combination is the one that lets the tracing collector work on the young generation (where most objects die) and the reference counting work on the old generation (where many objects survive). Matching the expected survival rate with the nature of the collector yields a large improvement in throughput while maintaining the pause times around a couple of milliseconds.

We consider zero knowledge interactive proofs in a richer, more realistic communication environment. In this setting, one may simultaneously engage in many interactive proofs, and these proofs may take place in an asynchronous fashion. It is known that zero-knowledge is not necessarily preserved in such an environment; we show that for a large class of protocols, it cannot be preserved. Any 4 round (computational) zero-knowledge interactive proof (or argument) for a non-trivial language L is not black-box simulatable in the asynchronous setting.

The number of communication rounds is a classic complexity measure for protocols; reducing round complexity is a major goal in protocol design. However, when the communication time is inconstant, and in particular, when one of the parties intentionally delays its messages, the round complexity measure may become meaningless. For example, if one of the rounds takes longer than the rest of the protocol, then it does not matter if the round complexity is bounded by a constant or by a polynomial. In this paper, we propose a complexity measure called responsive round complexity. Loosely speaking, a protocol has responsive round complexity m with respect to Party A, if it makes the following guarantee. If A's longest delay in responding to a message in a run of the protocol is t, then, in that run, the overall communication time is at most mċ t. The logic behind this definition is that if a party responds quickly to a message, whether it has a good connection or it just chooses not to delay its messages, then this party deserves to get an overall quicker running time. Responsive round complexity is particularly interesting in a setting where a party may gain something by delaying its messages. In this case, the delaying party does not deserve the same response time as another party that behaves nicely. We demonstrate the significance of responsive round complexity by presenting a new protocol for concurrent zero-knowledge. The new protocol is a black-box concurrent zero knowledge proof for all languages in NP with round complexity O(log2 n) but responsive round complexity O(log n). While the round complexity of the new protocol is similar to what is known from previous works, its responsive round complexity is a significant improvement: all known concurrent zero-knowledge protocols require O(log2 n) rounds. Furthermore, in light of the known lower bounds, the responsive round complexity of this protocol is basically optimal.

Java uses garbage collection (GC) for the automatic reclamation of computer memory no longer required by a running application. GC implementations for Java Virtual Machines (JVM) are typically designed for single processor machines, and do not necessarily perform well for a server program with many threads running on a multiprocessor. We designed and implemented an on-the-fly GC, based on the algorithm of Doligez, Leroy and Gonthier [13, 12] (DLG), for Java in this environment. An on-the-fly collector , a collector that does not stop the program threads, allows all processors to be utilized during collection and provides uniform response times. We extended and adapted DLG for Java (e.g., adding support for weak references) and for modern multiprocessors without sequential consistency, and added performance improvements (e.g., to keep track of the objects remaining to be traced). We compared the performance of our implementation with stop-the-world mark-sweep GC. Our measurements show that the performance advantage for our collector increases as the number of threads increase and that it provides uniformly low response times.

History independent data structures, presented by Micciancio, are data structures that possess a strong security property: even if an intruder manages to get a copy of the data structure, the memory layout of the structure yields no additional information on the history of operations applied on the structure beyond the information obtainable from the content itself. Naor and Teague proposed a stronger notion of history independence in which the intruder may break into the system several times without being noticed and still obtain no additional information from reading the memory layout of the data structure. An open question posed by Naor and Teague is whether these two notions are equally hard to obtain. In this paper we provide a separation between the two requirements for comparison-based algorithms. We show very strong lower bounds for obtaining the stronger notion of history independence for a large class of data structures, including, for example, the heap and the queue abstract data structures. We also provide complementary upper bounds showing that the heap abstract data structure may be made weakly history independent in the comparison based model without incurring any additional (asymptotic) cost on any of its operations. (A similar result is easy for the queue.) Thus, we obtain the first separation between the two notions of history independence. The gap we obtain is exponential: some operations may be executed in logarithmic time (or even in constant time) with the weaker definition, but require linear time with the stronger definition.

Generational collectors are well known as a tool for shortening pause times incurred by garbage collection and for improving garbage collection efficiency. In this paper, we investigate how to best use generations with on-the-fly collectors. On-the-fly collectors run concurrently with the program threads and induce very short program pauses. Thus, the motivation for incorporating generations is focused at improving the throughput; pauses do not matter, since they are already very short. We propose a new collection approach, denoted age-oriented collection, for exploiting the generational hypothesis to obtain better efficiency. This approach is particularly useful when reference counting is used to collect the old generation, yielding a highly efficient and non-obtrusive on-the-fly collector. Finally, an implementation is provided demonstrating how the age-oriented collector outperforms both the non-generational and the generational collectors' efficiency.