Search

Objective Pivotal trial have shown that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab had better outcomes. However, data on ocrelizumab in clinical practice are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the preliminary safety profile and effectiveness of ocrelizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) in a real‐world clinical setting. Methods We conducted a retrospective study including consecutive patients from nine public hospitals in south‐eastern Spain who received ocrelizumab after it was approved. Results A total of 228 MS patients were included (144 with relapsing–remitting MS [RRMS], 25 secondary progressive MS [SPMS], and 59 primary progressive MS [PPMS]). Median follow‐up period was 12 months (range, 1‐32). No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) status at year 1 was achieved in 91.2% of the relapsing MS (RMS) population, while disability progression was detected in 37.5% of the PPMS patients (median follow‐up period, 19 months). The most common adverse events reported were infusion‐related reactions and infections, with the most common infections being urinary tract infections followed by upper respiratory infections and COVID‐19. Interpretation The preliminary results in our real‐world setting show that ocrelizumab presented excellent results in suppressing disease activity with a favorable and consistent safety profile.

ObjectiveThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide since December 2019. Neurologic symptoms have been reported as part of the clinical spectrum of the disease. We aimed to determine whether neurologic manifestations are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and to describe their main characteristics.MethodsWe systematically reviewed all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital in a Spanish population during March 2020. Demographic characteristics, systemic and neurologic clinical manifestations, and complementary tests were analyzed.ResultsOf 841 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (mean age 66.4 years, 56.2% men), 57.4% developed some form of neurologic symptom. Nonspecific symptoms such as myalgias (17.2%), headache (14.1%), and dizziness (6.1%) were present mostly in the early stages of infection. Anosmia (4.9%) and dysgeusia (6.2%) tended to occur early (60% as the first clinical manifestation) and were more frequent in less severe cases. Disorders of consciousness occurred commonly (19.6%), mostly in older patients and in severe and advanced COVID-19 stages. Myopathy (3.1%), dysautonomia (2.5%), cerebrovascular diseases (1.7%), seizures (0.7%), movement disorders (0.7%), encephalitis (n = 1), Guillain-Barré syndrome (n = 1), and optic neuritis (n = 1) were also reported, but less frequent. Neurologic complications were the main cause of death in 4.1% of all deceased study participants.ConclusionsNeurologic manifestations are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In our series, more than half of patients presented some form of neurologic symptom. Clinicians need to maintain close neurologic surveillance for prompt recognition of these complications. The mechanisms and consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 neurologic involvement require further studies.

Resumen: Objetivos: Comprobar si han existido variaciones en la etiología del ictus isquémico en los últimos años e investigar las posibles causas que lo justifiquen. Pacientes y métodos: Análisis de los antecedentes epidemiológicos y factores de riesgo vascular de los pacientes diagnosticados de ictus isquémico en el Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA) entre 2009 y 2014. La clasificación etiológica del ictus isquémico se realizó según los criterios TOAST. Se compararon los resultados con los de la clásica Stroke Data Bank (SDB) y se contrastaron ambas series con otros registros hospitalarios publicados en el periodo que las separa. Resultados: Se analiza a 1.664 pacientes, 58% varones, mediana de edad 74 años. Según la clasificación etiológica los resultados obtenidos son (CHUA/SDB): aterotrombóticos (12%/9%), lacunares (13%/25%), cardioembólicos (32%/19%), causa infrecuente (3%/4%) e indeterminados (40%/44%). El 63% de los pacientes del CHUA era mayor de 70 años, en la SDB solo el 42% superaba esa edad. En ambos registros el subtipo cardioembólico era más prevalente en mayores de 70 años. La HTA no tratada era más frecuente en la SDB (SDB = 31% vs. CHUA = 10%). El análisis de otras bases de datos muestra una tendencia progresiva a escala mundial al aumento en la prevalencia del ictus cardioembólico. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio muestra tanto en nuestro centro como a escala mundial una disminución del porcentaje de ictus lacunares y un aumento del de cardioembólicos respecto a la SDB. Estas diferencias pudieran justificarse por el envejecimiento de los pacientes, el mejor control de la HTA actualmente y mayor capacidad para detectar arritmias cardioembólicas en las Unidades de Ictus. Abstract: Objectives: We aimed to determine whether the aetiology of ischaemic stroke has changed in recent years and, if so, to ascertain the possible reasons for these changes. Patients and methods: We analysed the epidemiological history and vascular risk factors of all patients diagnosed with ischaemic stroke at Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA) from 2009 to 2014. Ischaemic stroke subtypes were established using the TOAST criteria. Our results were compared to data from the classic Stroke Data Bank (SDB); in addition, both series were compared to those of other hospital databases covering the period between the two. Results: We analysed 1664 patients (58% were men) with a mean age of 74 years. Stroke aetiology in both series (CHUA, SDB) was as follows: atherosclerosis (12%, 9%), small-vessel occlusion (13%, 25%), cardioembolism (32%, 19%), stroke of other determined aetiology (3%, 4%), and stroke of undetermined aetiology (40%, 44%). Sixty-three percent of the patients from the CHUA and 42% of the patients from the SDB were older than 70 years. Cardioembolic strokes were more prevalent in patients older than 70 years in both series. Untreated hypertension was more frequent in the SDB (SDB = 31% vs CHUA = 10%). The analysis of other databases shows that the prevalence of cardioembolic stroke is increasing worldwide. Conclusions: Our data show that the prevalence of lacunar strokes is decreasing worldwide whereas cardioembolic strokes are increasingly more frequent in both our hospital and other series compared to the SDB. These differences may be explained by population ageing and the improvements in management of hypertension and detection of cardioembolic arrhythmias in stroke units. Palabras clave: Base de Datos de Ictus, Etiología del ictus, Subtipos de ictus, TOAST, Factores de riesgo vascular, Fibrilación auricular, Keywords: Stroke Data Bank, Stroke aetiology, Stroke subtypes, TOAST, Vascular risk factors, Atrial fibrillation

Objective We report the findings from the Spanish Society of Neurology's NeuroCOVID-19 Registry. Methods We performed a multicentre study of patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19. Participating physicians reported demographic, clinical, and paraclinical data and judged the involvement of COVID-19 in causing neurological symptoms. Results A total of 233 cases were submitted, including 74 different combinations of manifestations. The most frequently reported were stroke (27%), neuromuscular symptoms (23.6%), altered mental status (23.6%), anosmia (17.6%), headache (12.9%), and seizures (11.6%). The mean age of patients was 61.1 years, with 42.1% being women; a higher proportion of women was recorded among patients with altered mental status, anosmia, and headache. The onset of symptoms differed within categories. Onset of anosmia occurred a mean (standard deviation) of 2.9 (2.5) days after the first general symptom, whereas neuromuscular symptoms appeared after 13.9 (10.1) days. Neurological symptoms were persistent in 33% of patients. General symptoms were present in 97.7% of patients, and results from general laboratory studies were abnormal in 99.4% of patients. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis findings were abnormal in 62.7% of the cases in which this test was performed (n = 51), but positive results for SARS-CoV-2 were only found in one case. Conclusions The neurological manifestations of COVID-19 are diverse. Anosmia, myalgia, and headache occur earlier in the course of the disease. Altered mental status, neuromuscular symptoms, and stroke are associated with greater severity. COVID-19 must be incorporated into most clinical and radiological differential diagnoses. COVID-19 may cause persistent and disabling neurological symptoms., Highlights • NeuroCovid-19 is polymorph: Authors reported >70 different combinations of neurological syndromic presentations. • The timing of the neurological symptoms differ: from the early onset (anosmia, headache, myalgia) to later stages (altered mental status, seizures, stroke, neuromuscular symptoms). • Some neurological symptoms might persist, as headache or anosmia; while other may cause persistent disability, as stroke or polyneuropathies. • Cerebrospinal fluid was frequently abnormal but direct isolation of SARS-CoV-2 occurred only in 1/233 cases. • Neurologists must be prepared to face the various neurological syndromes that may be associated with Covid-19 infection.

HIGHLIGHTS • The first case of multiple sclerosis (MS) shortly after COVID-19 is presented. • Viral infections strongly relate to MS onset and its relapses. • SARS-CoV-2 can play a role in the triggering of demyelinating diseases. • Systemic immune response against SARS-CoV-2 could reach CNS leading to demyelination., SARS-CoV-2 infection can produce neurological features. The most common are headache, anosmia and dysgeusia but patients may also develop other central nervous system (CNS) injuries. We present a patient affected by Covid-19 who initially consulted for decreased visual acuity. The MRI showed inflammation in the right optic nerve and demyelinating lesions in the CNS. We speculate that an immune mechanism induced by SARS-CoV-2, which can activate lymphocytes and an inflammatory response, plays a role in the clinical onset of the disease. This pathogen may be associated with either the triggering or the exacerbation of inflammatory/demyelinating disease.

Background Alemtuzumab is a treatment for highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). Immunosuppression is considered a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection and there is still lack of evidence to guide MS practice. Methods/results We describe the clinical and immunological evolution of two MS patients under alemtuzumab treatment who were affected by COVID-19, one of them only one week after receiving her last dose, and both recovered without sequelae. Conclusion In selected patients (young, without comorbidities, and with high activity), MS itself could be more dangerous than COVID-19, so we should consider continuing MS treatment as previously planned, including alemtuzumab.

El infarto medular es una entidad infrecuente cuyo diagnóstico es eminentemente clínico, aunque requiere de la realización de pruebas complementarias para descartar otra patología espinal. La mayoría de los pacientes refieren dolor intenso adyacente a nivel del infarto, generalmente precediendo de forma inmediata a los síntomas neurológicos. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 53 años que acude a Urgencias por una clínica que sugería un síndrome medular agudo, siendo rápidamente diagnosticada de un infarto medular, evitando pruebas invasivas al objetivar en la RM el signo de los "ojos de búho".

Periodic Lateralized Epileptiform Discharges (PLEDs) are usually seen in the context of destructive structural lesions of the cortex, more frequently in acute ischemic stroke and less common in tumours and meningoencephalitis, specially herpes simplex virus. Its origin and prognosis are uncertain but it is known that PLEDs are linked to epilectic seizures, including status epilepticus. We report on a 75-year old woman with pneumococcal meningoencephalitis who presented altered level of consciousness, acute focal deficits, convulsive seizures and PLEDs in left hemisphere. The finding of PLEDs on the electroencephalogram is related to focal lesions of heterogeneous origin, which up to date, have not been documented in pneumococcal infections of the central nervous system. Our case highlights the importance of identifying and addressing any modifiable etiologic factors of PLEDs.