Search

Multiple sclerosis is the most common chronic demyelinating neurodegenerative central nervous system disease among young adults. Considering its extent in a relatively young population, multiple sclerosis determines a significant socioeconomic burden to the society due to the cost of disease modifying treatment and a lower working capacity of patients and their caregivers. It is important to control neuroinflammation in the central nervous system caused by the pathologic activity of immune cells by considering a high efficacy treatment early in the disease course in order to prevent accumulation of neurological damage and to improve long term outcomes. According to the newest clinical studies, anti-CD20 therapies have proven their effectiveness and safety in active relapsing multiple sclerosis treatment: since 2018, ocrelizumab, and, since 2023, ofatumumab have both been available as treatment options in Lithuania. Because of its high potency and safety, as well as the specific mechanism of action, ofatumumab is effective in lower doses, and, after initial training at a health care facility, it can be self-administered through subcutaneous injection. This article reviews the efficacy, safety data and treatment indications of the latest available anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cladribine is a disease-modifying drug used for the treatment of the highly active relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis. Cladribine is a purine nucleoside analogue which selectively targets lymphocyte subpopulations involved in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis, and therefore it is classified as an immune reconstitution therapy drug. Two short courses of cladribine tablets given over two years significantly reduce the multiple sclerosis relapse rate and disability progression. For most patients, the effect persists in the third and the fourth year. This makes cladribine convenient for patients with multiple comorbidities, difficulties in adhering to their prescribed treatment regimen, those planning a pregnancy, or those for whom long-term immunosuppression is undesirable. Cladribine tablets are denoted by good safety characteristics, with the most prominent adverse effect being lymphopenia, which does not lead to an increased risk of infections other than Herpes zoster. However, in clinical practice, there are a number of issues related both to the initial administration of cladribine tablets and the strategy of treatment in different clinical situations during the first-to-fourth years of treatment, and particularly after the fourth year. Although there are no contraindications for additional courses of cladribine tablets, the product information does not provide detailed guidance on their continued use. During more than five years after the approval of the medicinal product, the new clinical trial data and the Real-World Evidence (RWE) on the efficacy and safety of cladribine tablets have become available, based on which, several national and international expert panels, as well as the Lithuanian Association of Neurologists, have issued guidance on the use of cladribine tablets reviewed in this article. Upon reactivation of the disease, additional courses of cladribine tablets or other disease-modifying therapies may be prescribed, depending on various factors related to the severity of the relapse, patient characteristics, and previously used medications. If the patient’s condition remains stable after the fourth year, extension of the treatment-free period with the structured monitoring approach could be appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) is a relatively new and highly effective treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS). Uncertainty regarding the development of autoimmune disorders (ADs) after some therapies remains. The aim of this study was to assess new AD development after IRT in MS patients and to describe the nature of those ADs and the time to onset. A total of 179 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (37 after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), 19 after alemtuzumab (ALE) and 123 after cladribine (CLA) treatment) over a ten year period were included in the study. ADs were observed in 6 patients (16.2%) after AHSCT, 8 patients (42.1%) after ALE and 2 patients (1.6%) after CLA treatment. ADs developed earlier after ALE infusions, but later after AHSCT except for cytopenias. Neurologists should be attentive to the development of secondary ADs after ALE and AHSCT in MS patients., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Approximately half of patients with multiple sclerosis (PWMS) experience sleep disorders or changes in the circadian rhythm, that may further promote the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. As the prevalence of chronotypes among PWMS remains unclear, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of chronotypes among Lithuanian PWMS; to assess the relationship of chronotypes with depression, anxiety, and fatigue symptoms; and to compare these results with those of healthy controls., Methods: We enrolled 101 PWMS and 100 healthy controls. We included 130 (64.7%) and 71 (35.3%) women and men, respectively. The median age of all respondents was 39 [interquartile range (IQR) 20.75] years. Participants were assessed using general questionnaire, Horne-Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire (SFQ). Chronotypes were identified based on the total MEQ score., Results: The average MEQ scores of the PWMS and control groups were 54 (IQR 15.0) and 53.5 (IQR 13), respectively, which indicated the intermediate chronotype. There was no significant between-group difference in the prevalence of chronotypes ( p  = 0.893). In both groups, individuals with moderate evening and intermediate chronotypes showed higher average HADS depression scores ( p  = 0.022). Further, in both groups, the individuals with the evening chronotype showed the highest average HADS anxiety scores ( p  = 0.001). The PWMS group had a higher average SFQ score than the control group ( p  < 0.001). High SFQ scores were more common among PWMS who had the intermediate ( p  < 0.001) and morning chronotypes ( p  = 0.011). The fatigue level was higher among healthy individuals with the evening chronotype ( p  < 0.001)., Conclusion: The most common chronotype for PWMS and healthy controls was the intermediate chronotype. Further, in both groups, higher HADS depression and anxiety scores were associated with the evening chronotype. Fatigue was more commonly found in healthy controls with the evening, and in PWMS - with intermediate and morning chronotypes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Jonušaitė, Sakalauskaitė-Juodeikienė, Kizlaitienė, Giedraitienė, Sereikė, Liutkienė, Kaubrys and Jatužis.)

Objectives: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is frequently associated with aquaporin-4 autoantibodies (AQP4-Ab); however, studies of NMO in Lithuania are lacking. Therefore, the main objective of our study is to assess positivity for AQP4-Ab in patients presenting with inflammatory demyelinating central nervous system (CNS) diseases other than typical multiple sclerosis (MS) in Lithuania., Materials and Methods: Data were collected from the two largest University hospitals in Lithuania. During the study period, there were 121 newly diagnosed typical MS cases, which were included in the MS registry database. After excluding these typical MS cases, we analyzed the remaining 29 cases of other CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases, including atypical MS (n = 14), acute transverse myelitis, TM (n = 8), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, ADEM (n = 3), clinically isolated syndrome, CIS (n = 2), atypical optic neuritis, ON (n = 1), and NMO (n = 1). We assessed positivity for AQP4-Ab for the 29 patients and evaluated clinical, laboratory, and instrumental differences between AQP4-Ab seropositive and AQP4-Ab seronegative patient groups., Results: AQP4-Ab test was positive for three (10.3%) patients in our study, with initial diagnoses of atypical MS (n = 2) and ADEM (n = 1). One study patient was AQP4-Ab negative despite being previously clinically diagnosed with NMO. There were no significant clinical, laboratory, or instrumental differences between the groups of AQP4-Ab positive (3 [10.3%]) and negative (26 [89.7%]) patients., Conclusions: AQP4-Ab test was positive for one-tenth of patients with CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases other than typical MS in our study. AQP4-Ab testing is highly recommended for patients presenting with not only TM and ON but also an atypical course of MS and ADEM., (© 2018 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

BACKGROUND With the advent of numerous new-generation disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS), the discrimination between relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) has become a problem of high importance. The aim of our study was to find a simple way to accurately discriminate between RRMS and SPMS that is applicable in clinical practice as a composite marker, using the linear measures of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the results of cognitive tests. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 88 MS patients in the study: 43 participants had RRMS and 45 had SPMS. A battery consisting of 11 tests was used to evaluate cognitive function. We used 11 linear MRI measures and 7 indexes to assess brain atrophy. RESULTS Four cognitive tests and 3 linear MRI measures were able to distinguish RRMS from SPMS with the AUC >0.8 based on ROC analysis. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed to identify the best set of cognitive and MRI markers. The model, using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and Huckman Index, showed the highest predictive ability: AUC=0.921 (p<0.001). We constructed a simple remission-progression index from the same 3 variables, which discriminated well between RRMS and SPMS: AUC=0.920 (p<0.001), maximal Youden Index=0.702, cut-off=1.68, sensitivity=79.1%, and specificity=91.1%. CONCLUSIONS The composite remission-progression index, using the RAVLT test, DSST test, and MRI Huckman Index, is highly accurate in discriminating between RRMS and SPMS., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interests The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

BACKGROUND Assessment of cognitive impairment (CI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is very useful, but it requires time-consuming expert evaluation with specialized materials. The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) was created as a brief and specific instrument for the evaluation of CI. The aims of this study were to assess the cognitive status of MS patients by using the Lithuanian version of BICAMS, to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the Lithuanian version of BICAMS, and to measure the impact of CI on disability and duration of MS. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 50 MS patients and 20 cognitively normal control subjects, matched for age, gender, and level of education. Cognitive functions were assessed by the BICAMS tests, which include the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised, and the California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd edition. RESULTS MS patients performed significantly worse than controls on the 3 neuropsychological tests of BICAMS (p<0.001). Younger and intellectually employed persons performed significantly better on these tests than older persons, manual workers, or unemployed persons (p<0.05). MS patients with higher disability scores tended to perform worse on the tests (p<0.05), but we found no relationship between BICAMS test scores and the duration of the disease or relapse rate (p>0.05). Test-retest reliability was excellent for all 3 subtests (r>0.8, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that BICAMS is a valid and acceptable cognitive assessment tool that can be recommended for routine use in Lithuania for assessing patients with MS.