Search

The unique antibacterial properties of Fe-protoporphyrin (haemin) on Staphylococcus aureus, compared to Co-protoporphyrin (Co-PP), Mg-protoporphyrin (Mg-PP) and Zn-protoporphyrin (Zn-PP) are described. Only haemin (20 microM) exhibits a strong light-independent antibacterial effect on S. aureus; the other metalloporphyrins, Co-PP, Mg-PP or Zn-PP, have no antibacterial effect in the dark. Only light photosensitization of Mg-PP-treated cells resulted in the inhibition of the bacterial growth, while Co-PP or Zn-PP were photodynamically inactive. A notable effect of haemin on inactivation of S. aureus was the induction of immediate ion fluxes as determined by X-ray microanalysis (XRMA) of fast-frozen cells. A marked efflux of K (96%) and Cl (94%) was expressed immediately as determined by X-ray microanalysis of S. aureus cells treated with haemin for 5 min. Only 48% loss of Na was detected in the cells under these treatment conditions, while P content was increased by 150%. Electron microscopy analysis revealed the appearance of a mesosome-like structure connected to the new septa, filamentous chromosome and arrays of aggregated ribosomes in the cytoplasm. We propose that haemin has multiple cellular targets for its oxidative effect in S. aureus.

The mechanism of inactivation of Staphylococcas aureus cells by hemin is described. Protection experiments by sulfhydryl reagents such as cysteine, mercaptoethanol, glutathione or thioglycolate in their reduced form prevent S. aureus bacteria from inactivation by hemin (1.5 × 10−5 M). The treatment of bacteria by hemin in the presence of one of those reagents (1 × 10−2 M) showed that the growth rate and viability of the culture remained unchaged. On the other hand sulfhydryl reagents did not prevent the binding of hemin to the bacteria. When cysteine or glutathione were introduced to a culture after exposure to hemin it could neither reverse the damage done to the cells nor shorten the time of the culture's recovery. Another type of protection was obtained by addition of serum albumin which prevented hemin molecules from binding to the bacterial envelopes. Furthermore, when albumin was introduced after the bacteria were treated by hemin it prevented further damage to the survivors and thus shortened the time required for recovery. None of the singlet oxygen quenchers or hydroxyl radical scavengers could protect the bacteria from hemin inactivation. The mechanism by which hemin affects S. aureus is assumed to be by oxidizing a major system within the cell.