Search

Australia and New Zealand have achieved excellent community control of COVID‐19 infection. In light of the imminent COVID‐19 vaccination roll out in both countries, representatives of all adult and paediatric allogeneic bone marrow transplant and cellular therapy (TCT) centres as well as representatives from autologous transplant only centres in Australia and New Zealand collaborated with infectious diseases specialists with expertise in TCT on this consensus position statement regarding COVID‐19 vaccination in TCT patients in Australia and New Zealand. It is our recommendation that TCT patients, should have expedited access to high‐efficacy COVID‐19 vaccines given that these patients are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID‐19 infection. We also recommend prioritising vaccination of TCT healthcare workers and household members of TCT patients. Vaccination should not replace other public health measures in TCT patients given the effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccination in TCT patients is unknown. Furthermore, given the limited available data, prospective collection of safety and efficacy data of COVID‐19 vaccination in this patient group is a priority.

An Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTR) Study of the Trends and Outcomes of Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in Hodgkin Lymphoma between 2009-2019: Relapse remains the most common cause of death post transplantation Introduction: Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is an eminently curable disease, with 80% of cases achieving cure with first line therapies. There are a subset of patients who relapse and require salvage therapy including autologous stem cell transplant and more recently novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the PD-1 inhibitors. The latter are less toxic and achieve durable responses but are not considered curative for most (LaCasce et al., 2019). In Australia BV and PD-1 inhibitors were approved in December 2013 and September 2017 respectively. Allogeneic HSCT offers a graft vs lymphoma (GVL) effect that may contribute to long term survival in some patients (Peggs et al., 2005). The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) has seen improved outcomes with an OS of 67% (59-74%) and Progression Free Survival (PFS)of 45% (35-56%) (Rashidi et al., 2016) Patients and methods: Data was collected through the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR) for patients receiving a first allogeneic transplant for HL between 2009 and 2019. The Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate OS and PFS with log rank test for comparison. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify associations with OS. We divided the patients into 5 year cohorts to compare transplant outcomes over time. Results: A total of 149 patients from 16 sites in Australia and New Zealand were included. The median age at time of transplant was 31 years (range 19-61) and the majority were male (60%). Seventy-five percent of patients had undergone previous autologous HSCT with data missing for 22%. Median follow up was 75 months (range 4.7-137.1). Forty five percent of patients were in complete remission (CR), 34% in partial remission and 15% relapsed/primary refractory (RR) at the time of HSCT with information missing in 4%. The majority of donors were matched unrelated donors (47%) and sibling donors were used for 37% of patients, haploidentical in 11% and umbilical cord blood in 5%. Reduced intensity conditioning was used in 86% of patients and in vivo T cell depletion with ATG or alemtuzumab was used in 27%. Acute GVHD occurred in 53/149 (30%) of which 31% was grade III-IV. In patients who survived beyond 100 days, the incidence of chronic GVHD was 38%, of which 53% was preceded by some form of aGVHD. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days was 8% with 5/12 of these patients dying from aGVHD. Two-year OS and PFS were 75% and 49% respectively. A period effect was not detected with no significant difference in OS (p=0.8) nor PFS (0.2) based on transplant year (figure 1a & 1b). Multivariate analysis of factors associated with OS identified age at transplant of >40 (HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.71-6.15, p The numbers of HSCT performed each year are illustrated in figure 1c, with a larger proportion of patients in CR from 2014 onward. Post-transplant relapse occurred in 38% of patients (figure 1d)with a median time to relapse of 8.5 months (range 0.2 -42). Forty-eight percent (27/56) of patients who relapsed post HSCT were in CR at the time of HSCT. Of those who relapsed, 37% died due to progressive disease with no evidence of chronic GVHD. Relapse was the most common cause of death (37%) Conclusion: Although the rates of HSCT for HL in Australia and New Zealand have not varied over the past decade despite the availability of novel agents, there is a larger proportion of patients in CR prior to transplant. Survival outcomes for HL post HSCT are comparable to those reported internationally. Despite a higher percentage of patients transplanted in CR in later years, relapse post HSCT remains the major cause of death. Further studies to examine strategies to prevent or treat relapse of HL post-allograft are needed. Disclosures Sharplin: Novartis: Other: FUnded to attend Australian Haematology Conference . Di Ciaccio:Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel and accomodation grant. Spencer:AbbVie, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Servier and Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene, Janssen and Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Greenwood:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hamad:Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Introduction A majority of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will be cured with frontline chemoimmunotherapy, however a significant number of patients will relapse. Although autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) may lead to sustained survival in some relapsing patients, long term survival with relapsed DLBCL is approximately 25% (Larouche et al., J Clin Oncol 2010;28(12):2094). Allogeneic HCT (alloHCT) is a potential treatment strategy in some DLBCL patients with relapsed disease. We performed a retrospective national registry study to examine alloHCT practice and outcomes for DLBCL in Australia and New Zealand in the modern era. Methods Data was collected through the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR) for patients receiving an alloHCT for DLBCL between January 2009 and December 2019. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with comparisons between the transplant periods 2009-2014 and 2015-2019 performed using the log-rank test. Both univariate and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to determine significant risk factors for transplant outcome. The following risk factors were analysed for impact on outcomes: age, transplant before 2015, previous autoHCT, remission status at transplant, use of myeloablative conditioning (MAC), haploidentical donor (HD) and use of T cell depletion (TCD). Results A total of 154 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 52 years (range 19-71) and 68% were male. Disease status at transplant was complete remission (CR) in 49%, partial response in 31% and stable or progressive disease in 17% (missing data in 3%). Fifty-five per cent had undergone a previous autoHCT. Approximately equal proportions of donors were HLA-matched siblings or matched unrelated (45% and 46% respectively) and 9% were HDs. MAC was utilised in 26%, and TCD in 24% (alemtuzumab in 3%, anti-thymocyte globulin in 21%) (data missing in 12%). The median times to neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were 16 and 18 days respectively. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1-year and 5-years was 20% (95%CI 7-30%) and 26% (95%CI: 13-38%). The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease was 15% (95%CI 5-31%). The 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) was 56% (95%CI 46-65%) (figure 1). The median duration of follow up for the cohort was 3.98 years (range 0-9.64 years). Median overall survival (OS) post-transplant was 4.01 years, with 5-year OS of 47% (95%CI 38-56%) and 10-year OS of 40% (95%CI 26-54%) (figure 2). The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS) was 45% (95%CI 26-50%) (figure 3). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 21% at 1 year and 32% at four years, however relapses were not seen after this point, suggesting a subpopulation with durable remissions (figure 4). On univariate analysis, TCD was associated with both reduced incidence of cGVHD (HR 0.35 95%CI 0.19-0.66, p=0.012) and increased NRM (HR 2.10 95%CI 0.88-4.99 p=0.043). These associations were maintained on multivariate analysis (MVA) (HR 0.29 95%CI 0.16-0.76, p=0.011; HR 2.19 95%CI 1.02-4.70, p=0.045) (figures 5, 6). TCD did not impact on RFS. The vast majority of TCD was given in unrelated donor alloHCTs. CR at time of transplant was associated with improved RFS on univariate analysis (HR 1.65 95%CI 1.04-2.64, p=0.034), however this association was not seen on MVA. No other analysed risk factors impacted OS, RFS, NRM, CIR or GVHD rates on either univariate or MVA. An average of 14 alloHCTs were performed each year, with a trend towards increasing annual numbers over time. There was a significant increase in the proportion of haploidentical transplants between 2009 and 2019 (p=0.003), though total numbers were low (n=14). There was no significant change over time for the use of MAC, TCD, nor in OS, RFS or NRM. Conclusion There has been an increase in the rates of alloHCT with HDs for DLBCL in Australia and New Zealand over the past decade. Survival and relapse rates are relatively favourable compared to the published literature, with sustained remissions observed (5 and 10-year OS of 47% and 40% respectively). TCD is associated with reduced cGVHD rates, as well as increased NRM. Ongoing reporting of alloHCT outcomes in DLBCL is important given the emerging role of novel therapies such as bispecific monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. Figure 1 Disclosures Di Ciaccio: Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel and accomodation grant. Greenwood:Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Spencer:Celgene, Janssen and Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Servier and Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Consultancy. Arthur:Royal North Shore Hospital: Current Employment. Hamad:Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria.

Background: The Townsville Hospital is a tertiary hospital in North Queensland with one of the largest regional transplant centres in Australia, performing primarily autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) for various haematological malignancies. Aims: This single-centre, retrospective, observational study aims to describe the activity and outcomes of autologous HSCT at The Townsville Hospital between 2003 and 2017 to verify safety standards. Methods: Patient-level data were collected, including demographics, frequency and indication for transplant, conditioning, current clinical status and cause of death. Key outcomes included overall survival, non-relapse mortality, incidence of therapy-related neoplasm and causes of death. Progression-free survival in the multiple myeloma (MM) subgroup was also assessed. Results: There were 319 autologous HSCT in 286 patients, with a median age of 58 years (range 14-71 years); 62% of patients were male. Indications for transplantation were: MM 53.7%, non-Hodgkin lymphoma 29.4%, Hodgkin lymphoma 5.0% and other 11.9%. Causes of death were: disease progression/relapse (65.2%), second malignancy (17.0%), infection (9.8%) and other (8.0%). Non-relapse mortality was 1.2% (95% confidence interval 0.4-3.0) and 3.2% (1.7-5.7) at 100 days and 1 year, respectively, post-HSCT. Overall survival at 2 years was 81.0% (73.8-86.4) for MM and 69.6% (58.8-78.1) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The median progression-free survival in the MM cohort was 3.3 years. Conclusion: The Townsville Hospital transplant centre provides an important transplant service in regional Queensland, with outcomes comparable to national data. We reported a relatively high rate of second malignancy as a cause of death.

Aim: Although allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) remains the only curative option for myelofibrosis, novel therapeutic agents, the application of new prognostic scoring systems and the emergence of molecular genetic analysis have lead to a new management landscape in myelofibrosis. In view of these recent advances, we aimed to review national practice in transplanting myelofibrosis patients and its outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTRR) data on patients who underwent alloSCT for myelofibrosis at Australian/New Zealand transplant centres between 2006 and 2017. Participating centres completed an online questionnaire and responses were reviewed centrally by the ABMTRR. Results: 142 patients underwent alloSCT for myelofibrosis, primary (n=94) or secondary (n=48) (Table 1). 52% had HLA-identical sibling donors and 45% had matched unrelated donors (UD). Median follow-up was 51.8 months (range: 3.1-148). Cytogenetic abnormalities were identified in 29% of 120 patients who were tested pretransplant. JAK2 mutation testing was performed in 74% of patients whilst other mutations (CALR, MPL, EZH2, IDH, SRSF2, ASXL1) were rarely tested (1.4-8.4%). Only 4.2% of patients had next generation sequencing. Before transplant, 16% had splenectomy or splenic irradiation and 54 patients (38%) received JAK 1/2 inhibitors (JAKi), of whom 92.5% had Ruxolitinib. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 20 (range: 10-43) days whereas median platelet recovery time was 28 (range: 13-230) days. 9 patients (6.3%) had primary graft failure and 11 patients (7.7%) had secondary graft failure. 60% had chimerism studies using cytogenetic or molecular techniques at 3 months post transplant; 63% of those assessed achieved complete (≥95%) donor chimerism. CMV reactivation was detected in 32% and 10% had sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD was 21.4% and grade III-IV acute GvHD was 8.7%. The cumulative incidences of limited and extensive chronic GvHD at 5 years were 11.1% and 18.1% respectively. Overall survival (OS) was 67% at 1 year and 57% at 5 years. GvHD free progression free survival was 54% at 1 year and 42% at 5 years (Figure 1). The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 16% at 100 days and 25% at 1 year. In multivariate analysis, use of an UD was a significant independent unfavourable risk factor for OS (HR 2.26, 95%CI 1.17- 4.33, p=0.015) and NRM (HR 3.02, 95%CI 1.36-6.71, p=0.007), while splenic irradiation/splenectomy resulted in shortened neutrophil (HR 1.88, 95%CI 1.00-3.54, p=0.05) and platelet recovery time (HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.12-4.05, p=0.02). Use of UD significantly increased the incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD in multivariate analysis (HR 5.66, 95%CI 1.99-16.11, p=0.001) whereas use of antithymoglobulin or alemtuzumab significantly reduced it (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.79, p=0.017). Neither use of JAKi prior to alloSCT nor presence of JAK2 mutation had a significant impact on OS or NRM. 9 patients underwent a second alloSCT for myelofibrosis and median length of time from the first transplant was 22 (range: 1-132) months. 4 patients were transplanted for disease relapse and 3 patients for graft failure. For the second transplant cohort, NRM at day 100 and 1 year were 11.1% (95% CI, 0.4%-40.6%) and 33.3% (95% CI, 6.6%-64%) respectively, while 1-year and 5-year OS were 66.6% (95% CI, 42%-100%) and 44.4% (95% CI, 21.4%-92.2%). Conclusion: Survival rates in alloSCT for myelofibrosis in this Australasian cohort were comparable to international studies. There is a rise in the numbers of patients treated with JAKi pretransplant (Figure 2). Although this does not appear to have any effect on transplant outcomes, reduced symptom burden associated with increasing use of pre-transplant JAKi may increase the numbers of patients considered eligible for alloSCT. Although splenectomy/splenic irradiation had a positive impact on engraftment, it did not improve the survival outcomes. Our results show a negative influence of UD on OS and NRM, possibly related to an increased incidence of acute GVHD in the UD group. In light of the rise in utilization of alloSCT in the management of myelofibrosis, there is a need for further prospective studies incorporating molecular testing and the new comprehensive clinical-molecular myelofibrosis transplant scoring system. Disclosures Spencer: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Haemalogix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Secura Bio: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Specialised Therapeutics Australia: Consultancy, Honoraria. Purtill:MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel for speaking and advisory boards; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel for speaking and advisory boards; Janssen: Honoraria. Browett:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Achillion: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding. Szer:Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Prevail Therapeutics: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding. Ritchie:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Imago: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Greenwood:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gottlieb:Merck: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; University of Sydney: Employment; Haemalogix P/L: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with a five year survival rate of less than 5%, which is associated with late presentation. In recent years, research into nanomedicine and the use of nanoparticles as therapeutic agents for cancers has increased. This article describes the latest developments in the use of nanoparticles, and evaluates the risks and benefits of nanoparticles as an emerging therapy for pancreatic cancer. The Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used. Studies were extracted by searching the Embase, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 18 March 2016 with no language restrictions. Clinical trials involving the use of nanoparticles as a therapeutic or prognostic option in patients with pancreatic cancer were considered. Selected studies were evaluated using the Jadad score for randomised control trials and the Therapy CA Worksheet for intervention studies. Of the 210 articles found, 10 clinical trials including one randomised control trial and nine phase I/II clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. These studies demonstrated that nanoparticles can be used in conjunction with chemotherapeutic agents increasing their efficacy whilst reducing their toxicity. Increased efficacy of treatment with nanoparticles may improve the clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer, although the long-term side effects are yet to be defined. The study registration number is CRD42015020009.