7 results on '"Hun-Chul Kim"'
Search Results
2. Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls
- Author
-
Young-Hoon Kim, Kee-Yong Ha, Kee-Won Rhyu, Hyung-Youl Park, Chang-Hee Cho, Hun-Chul Kim, Hyo-Jin Lee, and Sang-Il Kim
- Subjects
lumbar vertebrae ,intervertebral disc ,spinal fusion ,minimally invasive surgery ,interbody fusion ,Medicine - Abstract
Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an effective and popular surgical procedure for the management of various spinal pathologies, especially degenerative diseases. Currently, LIF can be performed with posterior, transforaminal, anterior, and lateral approaches by open surgery or minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. In general, posterior LIF is a well-established procedure with good fusion rates and low complication rates but is limited by the possibility of iatrogenic injury to the neural structures and paraspinal muscles. Transforaminal LIF is frequently performed using an MIS technique and has an advantage of reducing these iatrogenic injuries. Anterior LIF (ALIF) can restore the disk height and sagittal alignment but has inherent approach-related challenges such as visceral and vascular complications. Lateral LIF and oblique LIF are performed using an MIS technique and have shown postoperative outcomes similar to ALIF; however, these approaches carry a risk of injury to psoas, lumbar plexus, and vascular structures. Herein, we provide a detailed description of the surgical procedures of each LIF technique. We shall then consider the pearls and pitfalls, as well as propose surgical indications and contraindications based on the available evidence in the literatures.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Simple and Reliable Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameter to Predict Postoperative Ambulatory Function in Patients With Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression
- Author
-
Young Min Heo, Kee-Yong Ha, Chang-Hee Cho, Sang Il Kim, Young Hoon Kim, Hun-Chul Kim, and Hyung-Youl Park
- Subjects
Prognostic factor ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Ambulatory Status ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Spine metastasis ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Spinal cord compression ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Ambulatory ,medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Surgery ,In patient ,Neurology (clinical) ,Radiology ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable imaging parameter to predict postoperative ambulatory status in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Methods: Sixty-three patients with MESCC underwent spine surgery because of neurologic deficits were included. On preoperative axial MRI, the cord compression ratio was analyzed for postoperative ambulatory status. The relationship between other imaging features, such as fracture of the affected vertebra and increased T2 signal intensity of the spinal cord at the compression level, and the postoperative ambulatory status were also analyzed. Results: Cord compression ratio and increased T2 signal change of the spinal cord were significantly different between the postoperative ambulatory group and the non-ambulatory group. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value was 0.84. In the multivariate regression analysis, only a cord compression ratio of more than 0.84 was significantly associated with postoperative ambulatory status (odds ratio = 10.80; 95% confidence interval = 2.79-41.86; P = .001). Interobserver/intraobserver agreements were strong for the cord compression ratio, however those agreements were weak for increased T2 signal intensity. Conclusions: On preoperative MRI, the cord compression ratio may predict postoperative ambulatory status in patients with MESCC. The measurement of this imaging parameter was simple and reliable. This imaging predictor may be helpful for both clinicians and patients.
- Published
- 2021
4. Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls
- Author
-
Hun-Chul Kim, Chang-Hee Cho, Kee-Yong Ha, Hyung-Youl Park, Kee-Won Rhyu, Young Hoon Kim, Hyo-Jin Lee, and Sang Il Kim
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,endocrine system ,Interbody fusion ,medicine.medical_treatment ,lcsh:Medicine ,Lumbar vertebrae ,Review Article ,Lumbar interbody fusion ,Minimally invasive surgery ,medicine ,Sagittal alignment ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,reproductive and urinary physiology ,Lumbar plexus ,Iatrogenic injury ,business.industry ,Open surgery ,lcsh:R ,Intervertebral disc ,Surgery ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Spinal fusion ,embryonic structures ,business - Abstract
Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an effective and popular surgical procedure for the management of various spinal pathologies, especially degenerative diseases. Currently, LIF can be performed with posterior, transforaminal, anterior, and lateral approaches by open surgery or minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. In general, posterior LIF is a well-established procedure with good fusion rates and low complication rates but is limited by the possibility of iatrogenic injury to the neural structures and paraspinal muscles. Transforaminal LIF is frequently performed using an MIS technique and has an advantage of reducing these iatrogenic injuries. Anterior LIF (ALIF) can restore the disk height and sagittal alignment but has inherent approach-related challenges such as visceral and vascular complications. Lateral LIF and oblique LIF are performed using an MIS technique and have shown postoperative outcomes similar to ALIF; however, these approaches carry a risk of injury to psoas, lumbar plexus, and vascular structures. Herein, we provide a detailed description of the surgical procedures of each LIF technique. We shall then consider the pearls and pitfalls, as well as propose surgical indications and contraindications based on the available evidence in the literatures.
- Published
- 2020
5. Predictors of Postoperative Loss of Cervical Lordosis after Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
- Author
-
Joonghyun Ahn, Chang-Hee Cho, Kee-Yong Ha, Sang-Il Kim, Hyung-Youl Park, Hun-Chul Kim, Jun-Seo Yang, and Young-Hoon Kim
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Cerclage Clamping Using Cerclage Passer for Reduction of Anterior and Posterior Column Fracture
- Author
-
Ki-Chul Park, Hun Chul Kim, Hae Won Jeong, Kyung Sik Min, and Hyun Joong Cho
- Subjects
030222 orthopedics ,Pelvic brim ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Periosteum ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Acetabular fracture ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,medicine.disease ,Iliac crest ,Greater sciatic notch ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,medicine ,Internal fixation ,business ,Reduction (orthopedic surgery) ,Fixation (histology) - Abstract
Purpose: Both column and T-shaped acetabular fractures are frequently presented with difficulty in reduction. Incomplete reduction may cause traumatic arthritis in the hip joint, resulting in inferior clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to introduce our wiring technique and to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of such technique. Materials and Methods: Eight patients who underwent our proposed technique for having acetabular fracture with displaced quadrilateral plate between March 2013 and December 2014 were enrolled. All patients were followed-up more than 1 year. The wire passer was set up from an anterolateral aspect of the iliac crest to the greater sciatic notch, between the abductor muscle and the periosteum. The quadrilateral plate of acetabular fracture was reduced with wiring. Internal fixation was added to the pelvic brim. An analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes was performed. Results: Reduction was performed within the 3 mm intra-articular step-off in all patients. The mean duration of union was 11.8 weeks (9–15 weeks). Five patients (62.5%) showed excellent results, and radiologically, three patients (37.5%) showed good results, and seven patients (87.5%) showed better than good results. Conclusion: The cerclage wiring fixation technique using a large cerclage passer instrument can be a useful and safe reduction method in some cases of acetabular fractures.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The Change of the Ulnar Variance in Accordance with the Wrist Position in Ulnocarpal Impaction Syndrome
- Author
-
Wan Sun Choi, Chang Hun Lee, Kwang Hyun Lee, and Hun Chul Kim
- Subjects
Orthodontics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Impaction ,Significant difference ,Ulna ,Osteoarthritis ,Wrist ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,body regions ,Lunate ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Forearm ,Medicine ,business ,Brachial plexus - Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the change of the ulnar variance (UV) as forearm rotation in patients with ulnocarpal impaction syndrome (UIS). Methods: Twenty patients who suffered from ulnar side pain of the wrist and had abnormal lesions at ulno-basal side of the lunate in the radiologic examinations were included in this study. Their UVs in six wrist position (neutral, supination, pronation, neutral and grip, supination and grip, pronation and grip) were measured by the method of perpendiculars. UVs and the maximum change of UV in patients with UIS were compared with those of control group statistically. Results: There were statistically significant differences in UVs of all forearm rotation and grip status. The maximum change of UV was in supination position to pronation and grip status for all cases. The mean maximum change of UV in patients with UIS was 2.03±1.03 mm, and that of control group was 1.86 ±0.86 mm. But there was no significant difference between them. The ulnar shortening osteotomy was performed for thirteen UIS patients, and one patient with osteoarthritis at distal radio-ulnar joint was operated with Darrach procedure. Six patients underwent conservative treatment. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the maximum change of UV as forearm rotation between UIS patients and control group.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.