Search

Copyright of ORL.ro is the property of MEDICHUB MEDIA, S.R.L. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis is a condition with increasing prevalence, with high risk of morbidity and mortality, due to embolic complications. In the majority of the cases, thrombosis involves more than one venous segment, most frequently being affected the subclavian vein, followed by internal jugular vein, brachiocephalic vein and basilic vein. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients without risk factors for thrombosis is called primary deep venous thrombosis and includes idiopathic thrombosis and effort thrombosis. Deep venous thrombosis of upper extremity is called secondary when there are known risk factors and it is encountered mainly in older patients, with many comorbidities. The positive diagnosis is established only after paraclinical and imaging investigations, ultrasonography being the most useful diagnostic method. The most important complication, with high risk of death, is pulmonary embolism. Treatment consists in anticoagulant therapy, for preventing thrombosis extension and pulmonary embolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of ORL.ro is the property of MEDICHUB MEDIA, S.R.L. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of ORL.ro is the property of MEDICHUB MEDIA, S.R.L. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Vitamin K antagonists represented for more than 50 years the only oral anticoagulant treatment option, though encumbered by numerous food and drug interactions, with direct impact on the safety and efficacy of this treatment. The frequent complications of anticoagulant treatment with vitamin K antagonists led to the need for the emergence of new oral anticoagulants (NOAC). The main NOACs used today are dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. NOAC have a number of advantages over antivitamin K anticoagulants: fewer drug interactions, no food interactions, rapid onset of the anticoagulant action, rapid clearance, no need for INR monitoring. NOAC therapy must be individualized according to patient age, comorbidities and medical history, renal function, concomitant medications. Given that clinical experience with NOAC is still limited in practice, physicians (including family physicians) must monitor these patients and need to pay attention and report any side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arterial hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with increasing incidence and prevalence. Diagnosis of resistant hypertension may be established when the values of blood pressure are ≥ 140/90 mmHg, despite lifestyle changes and treatment with three antihypertensive drugs from different therapeutic classes, one being a diuretic. One common comorbidity in patients with resistant hypertension is obstructive sleep apnea. Obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 , is a common risk factor linking the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) with resistant hypertension. The diagnosis of OSAS in patients with resistant hypertension is made by polysomnography. For the confirmation of diagnosis of resistant hypertension it is necessary the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, which allows the exclusion of false cases of resistant hypertension, white coat or masked hypertension. Treatment of OSAS with CPAP (continuos positive airway pressure) offers improvement of blood pressure values and better control of resistant hypertension, reducing the cardiovascular risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anticoagulant therapy is very important in preventing thromboembolic complications in a broad category of patients. When a bleeding event appears in anticoagulated patients, we should take into consideration the circumstances and the moment when the anticoagulant treatment should be resumed in patients who have an indication for temporary or permanent anticoagulation. This decision is often difficult. It should be weighted very carefully, on one hand, the thromboembolic risk of the patient, on the other hand the risk of recurrence of the recent bleeding event. The decision to resume the anticoagulant therapy depends also on the severity of the bleeding event, as well as the source of bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: The fully-covered, lumen apposing metal stents are designed for one step placement, facilitating the direct endoscopic necrosectomy into the walled-off pancreatic necrosis. However, the prediction of the number of necrosectomy sessions in these patients is not known. This study evaluated the association between the proportion of solid necrotic material inside walled-off necrosis, as assessed during the endosonography placement of a lumen apposing metal stent, and the number of necrosectomies subsequently required. Methods: Patients from three tertiary medical centers with symptomatic walled off pancreatic necrosis (pain, infection, gastric/biliary obstruction) at more than 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis were retrospectively analysed. Proportion of solid necrotic debris was estimated during endosonography procedure of lumen apposing metal stents placement. Necrosectomy was performed when obstruction or inflammation occurred subsequently. Lumen apposing metal stents were removed after clearance of necrotic content. Results: In 46 patients with successful lumen apposing metal stents placement, necrosectomy was performed in 39 patients (72.78%). Performance of 3 or more necrosectomies was significantly associated with more than 50% pancreatic necrosis (p=0.032), but not with walled-off pancreatic necrosis size or location. Necrotic infection during lumen apposing metal stents stenting was associated with hypoalbuminemia, but not with necrosectomy requirement. Clinical success after a median follow-up of 13.37 months was 87%. Conclusions: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis with more than 50% solid necrotic content were associated with more necrosectomy procedures, requiering longer endoscopy time, intravenous sedations, and higher costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]