Search

Background Physician burnout is intimately associated with institutional losses, substance abuse, depression, suicidal ideation, medical errors, and lower patient satisfaction scores. Objectives By directly sampling all US plastic and reconstructive surgery residents, this study examined burnout, medical errors, and program-related factors. Methods Cross-sectional study of data collected from current US plastic and reconstructive surgery residents at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited programs during the 2018 to 2019 academic year. Previously validated survey instruments included the Stanford Professional Fulfillment and Maslach Burnout Indices. Additional data included demographics, relationship status, program-specific factors, and admission of medical errors. Results A total of 146 subjects responded. Residents from each postgraduate year (PGY) in the first 6 years were well represented. Overall burnout rate was 57.5%, and on average, all residents experienced work exhaustion and interpersonal disengagement. No relation was found between burnout and age, gender, race, relationship status, or PGY. Burnout was significantly associated with respondents who feel they matched into the wrong program, would not recommend their program to students, do not feel involved in program decisions, reported increasing hours worked in the week prior, feel that they take too much call, reported making a major medical error that could have harmed a patient, or reported making a lab error. Conclusions This study directly examined burnout, self-reported medical errors, and program suitability in US plastic and reconstructive residents based on validated scales and suggests that burnout and some medical errors may be related to program-specific, modifiable factors, not limited to, but including, involvement in program-related decisions and call structure.

Background: Upper extremity injuries represent one of the most common pediatric conditions presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. We aim to describe the epidemiology, trends, and costs of pediatric patients who present to US EDs with upper extremity injuries. Methods: Using the National Emergency Department Sample, we identified all ED encounters by patients aged

Background Historically, surgery was developed through the visual work of artist-scientists, yet visual art in modern surgical education is rare. The aim of this review is to evaluate the existing literature of learner creation of visual art as an educational tool in surgery and to discuss its potential in augmenting surgical learning. Method A systematic review of surgical educational interventions involving learner drawing, painting, and sculpting was conducted in 2020. Results Our search yielded 388 unique articles, and 12 met inclusion criteria. Seven articles described drawing and sculpting courses designed to develop judgement or aesthetic sense, and five described initiatives to teach or assess surgical anatomy or knowledge. Common goals included the measurement and observation of live models to enhance judgement of proportions, understanding of three-dimensional (3D) anatomical structure, hand-eye coordination, and communicative drawing ability for patient education and medical documentation. Notable outcomes included improved retention of anatomy, correlation of drawing and image labeling with in-service exam scores, and correlation of procedural drawing with ability to perform the same procedure in a simulation. Conclusions Our review suggests that all surgical disciplines could benefit from artistic training through improved visual communication and deeper understanding of 3D anatomy. Such benefits can be translated into Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies to guide surgical residency programming. We propose that visual art serves as an educational tool to improve perceptual skill and anatomical understanding in the modern surgeon; however more research is needed to clarify the best modality for incorporation.

Background:. Childhood opioid consumption is potentially deleterious to cognitive development and may predispose children to later addiction. Opioids are frequently prescribed for outpatient surgery but may not be necessary for adequate pain control. We aimed to reduce opioid prescriptions for outpatient pediatric skin and soft tissue lesion excisions using quality improvement (QI) methods. Methods:. A multidisciplinary team identified drivers for opioid prescriptions. Interventions were provider education, improving computer order set defaults, and promoting non-narcotic pain control strategies and patient-family education. Outcomes included percentage of patients receiving opioid prescriptions and patient-satisfaction scores. Data were retrospectively collected for 3 years before the QI project and prospectively tracked over the 8-month QI period and the following 18 months. Results:. The percentage of patients receiving an opioid prescription after outpatient skin or soft tissue excision dropped significantly from 18% before intervention to 6% at the end of the intervention period. Patient-reported satisfaction with pain control improved following the QI intervention. Satisfaction with postoperative pain control was independent of closure size or receipt of a postoperative opioid prescription. Intraoperative use of lidocaine or bupivacaine significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative opioid prescription in both bivariate and multivariate analyses. Results were maintained at 18 months after the conclusion of the QI project. Conclusion:. Raising provider awareness, educating patients on expected postoperative pain management options, and prioritizing non-narcotic medications postoperatively successfully reduced opioid prescription rates in children undergoing skin and soft tissue lesion excisions and simultaneously improved patient-satisfaction scores.

Introduction Mohs surgery and reconstruction has enabled tissue-preserving resection of cutaneous malignancies. The goal of our case series evaluation is to present reconstructive techniques and functional outcomes in patients undergoing digit-sparing treatment for primary melanoma. Materials and Methods A chart review was performed to identify consecutive patients undergoing Mohs surgery and reconstruction for melanoma of the digits. Quality of life (QOL) survey was performed to assess function after the procedure. Results Thirty-two patients (13 hand, 19 foot, Age: 65.03 +/–17.78 years) who were undergoing Mohs surgery were identified. No recurrence was identified with an average follow-up of 16.1 months (1–95 months). The average defect size was 5.79 +/–4.54 cm 2. Reconstruction was performed 0–4 days after resection. The most common techniques included full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) (N = 7), collagen matrix + FTSG (N = 4), and volar advancement flap (N = 7). The reconstructive technique choice appears correlated with defect size (p = 0.0125). Neuro-QOL upper extremity survey results showed a difference that approached statistical significance between patients who underwent digit-sparing treatment (n = 7) versus direct to amputation controls (n = 5) (p = 0.072). No survey differences between digit-sparing treatment (n = 10) and amputation (n = 8) were identified in the lower extremity (p = 0.61). Conclusion Our results show digit-sparing treatment can confirm clear surgical margins and a trend toward improvement in upper extremity function compared with immediate amputation.

Author(s): Diamond, Shawn; Lundy, Jonathan B; Weber, Erin L; Lalezari, Shadi; Rafijah, Gregory; Leis, Amber; Gray, Benjamin L; Lin, Ines C; Gupta, Ranjan | Abstract: PurposeLimited data exist regarding volumetric trends and management of upper-extremity emergencies during periods of social restriction and duress, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We sought to study the effect of shelter-in-place orders on emergent operative upper-extremity surgery.MethodsAll patients undergoing emergent and time-sensitive operations to the finger(s), hand, wrist, and forearm were tracked over an equal number of days before and after shelter-in-place orders at 2 geographically distinct Level I trauma centers. Surgical volume and resources, patient demographics, and injury patterns were compared before and after official shelter-in-place orders.ResultsA total of 58 patients underwent time-sensitive or emergent operations. Mean patient age was 42 years; mean injury severity score was 9 and median American Society of Anesthesiologist score was 2. There was a 40% increase in volume after shelter-in-place orders, averaging 1.4 cases/d. Indications for surgery included high-energy closed fracture (60%), traumatic nerve injury (19%), severe soft tissue infection (15%), and revascularization of the arm, hand, or digit(s) (15%). High-risk behavior, defined as lawlessness, assault, and high-speed auto accidents, was associated with a significantly greater proportion of operations after shelter-in-place orders (40% vs 12.5%; P l .05). Each institution dedicated an average of 3 inpatient beds and one intensive care unit-capable bed to upper-extremity care daily. Resources used included an average of 115 minutes of daily operating room time and 8 operating room staff or personnel per case.ConclusionsHand and upper-extremity operative volume increased after shelter-in-place orders at 2 major Level I trauma centers across the country, demanding considerable hospital resources. The rise in volume was associated with an increase in high-risk behavior.Type of study/level of evidenceTherapeutic IV.

As the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation continues to expand, new upper extremity transplant candidates are being considered. We recently evaluated a bilateral amputee who had a mid-forearm amputation and a contralateral metacarpal hand amputation. In the latter limb, a "partial" hand transplant that preserved the majority of the patient's existing hand, including a partially severed thumb with intact thenar muscle function, was proposed. The feasibility of this partial hand transplant was studied in fresh-frozen cadaver limbs. This report details the proposed approach, the cadaveric dissections, and the lessons learned from these dissections. Issues of osteosynthesis, microvascular planning, and intrinsic muscle recovery are discussed, all of which are critical considerations for partial hand transplant candidates. Ultimately, the partial hand approach was felt to be inferior to a more conventional distal forearm transplant in this particular candidate. Practical, functional, and ethical implications of such decision are presented.

Background: Hand conditions commonly present to the emergency department (ED), yet data are lacking regarding the magnitude of hand-related conditions in the emergency setting. The purpose of this study is to describe the burden and quantify the health care resource utilization of hand conditions seen in EDs across the United States. Methods: Using the National Emergency Department Sample, we identified all ED encounters by patients at least 18 years of age that were associated with a hand condition in 2009 to 2012. The primary outcomes were prevalence, etiology, and associated health care charges for specific categories of hand conditions. Results: The final sample included 34.4 million ED encounters associated with a common hand condition generating $180.4 billion in health care charges. The volume of hand-related presentations varied in a predictable and cyclical manner, peaking in July and waning in December of each year. Trauma was the most common etiology (77.5%) predominantly due to falls (26.2%) and lacerations (19.7%). Over 4 years, the volume of ED encounters rose (5% increase, P < .001) and as did the resulting health care charges (24.6% increase, P < .001). Conclusions: Our study confirms that hand-related conditions contribute significantly to ED volume and consume a growing quantity of health care resources in the United States. The volume of patients presenting to EDs with hand-related conditions fluctuates cyclically throughout the year. Open wounds are the most common cause of presentation and mostly occur in young adults, followed by joint pain, contusions, and fractures.

Background: Unexplained wrist pain is a common presentation in children. To our knowledge, no studies have explored the clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic workup of pediatric patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 307 consecutive wrist MRIs ordered at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. Demographic data and the indication for imaging were recorded and grouped into admitting categories. The final impression of each MRI was scored with regard to potential impact on future treatment (0 = normal, 1 = minimal, 2 = moderate, 3 = high). Patients who went on to wrist surgery within 1 year were noted. Results: In our cohort, 27% of all studies were normal, including 34% of those with pain. Although pain was the most common category, MRI was most useful in the delineation of a mass/cyst, evaluating for infection and evaluating arthropathy. Compared with all other categories, patients with pain were 3.6 times more likely to have a normal study and 4.6 times more likely to have a clinical score less than or equal to 1. Given an admitting diagnosis of pain, females were 1.7 times more likely to present for an MRI and 2.4 times more likely to have a normal MRI. The Spearman correlation revealed no linear relationship between age and MRI outcome. In all, 13% of patients went on to have surgery within 1 year of MRI. Conclusions: At our pediatric institution, the majority of wrist MRIs were ordered for wrist pain. Given our data, wrist MRI is not an ideal screening tool in children, particularly in those with wrist pain, and should only be used to exclude or confirm a specific diagnosis.

Background: Recent attention has sought to standardize hand surgery training in the United States. This study analyzes the variability in operative hand experience for orthopedic and general surgery residents. Methods: Case logs for orthopedic and general surgery residency graduates were obtained from the American Council of Graduate Medical Education (2006-2007 to 2014-2015). Plastic surgery case logs were not available for comparison. Hand surgery case volumes were compared between specialties with parametric tests. Intraspecialty variation in orthopedic surgery was assessed between the bottom and top 10th percentiles in procedure categories. Results: Case logs for 9605 general surgery residents and 5911 orthopedic surgery residents were analyzed. Orthopedic surgery residents performed a greater number of hand surgery cases than general surgery residents ( P < .001). Mean total hand experience ranged from 2.5 ± 4 to 2.8 ± 5 procedures for general surgery residents with no reported cases of soft tissue repairs, vascular repairs, and replants. Significant intraspecialty variation existed in orthopedic surgery for all hand procedure categories (range, 3.3-15.0). Conclusions: As the model for hand surgery training evolves, general surgeons may represent an underutilized talent pool to meet the critical demand for hand surgeon specialists. Future research is needed to determine acceptable levels of training variability in hand surgery.

Background: Index finger (IF) pollicization is the standard treatment for severe congenital thumb hypoplasia. The procedure requires a supple and anatomically normal IF. No guidelines exist for IF pollicization in patients who have concomitantly underdeveloped IF, specifically when the digit has only 2 phalanges and 1 interphalangeal joint. Methods: We present a case of a 20-month-old boy with congenital type IV thumb hypoplasia who also had biphalangeal IF. We proposed an IF pollicization operation that required significant modifications to the traditional procedure. Results: Preoperative planning and intraoperative execution are described. The modifications to the traditional procedure included: (1) removal of proximal third of IF metacarpal; (2) creation of a de novo thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint by fibrous union whereby the IF CMC joint cartilaginous components are maintained and the remaining distal IF metacarpal is translocated down and secured to this cartilage (in contrast to the traditional use of IF metacarpophalangeal joint as a de novo thumb CMC joint); (3) preservation of IF joints at their “natural” position and function; (4) maintenance of intrinsic muscles at their original distal insertion sites; and (5) important adjustments to skin incision. Conclusions: Pollicization of biphalangeal IF can be executed in a safe and efficient manner. Early recovery has shown promising signs. Long-term results, including the de novo thumb CMC joint function, remain to be evaluated.

BACKGROUND To improve access to breast reconstruction for mastectomy patients, the United States enacted the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act in January of 1999. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of this legislation on patients with different insurance plans. METHODS Women aged ≥18 years who underwent mastectomy for cancer were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2000-2009) and were classified according to their immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) status. Trends in rates of IBR were described for each insurance category. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, race, estimated household income, and Elixhauser comorbidity index was performed to evaluate the relation between insurance status and IBR. RESULTS In total, 168,236 patients were identified who underwent a mastectomy during the study interval. Across the 10-year study period, rates of IBR increased 4.2-fold in Medicaid patients, 2.9-fold in Medicare patients, 2.6-fold in privately insured patients, and 2.1-fold in self-pay patients (P

The purpose of this study was to examine current attitude of hand surgeons toward the Affordable Care Act (ACA). An electronic survey was sent to members of American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) to examine their attitude toward the Affordable Care Act. 974 ASSH members responded to the survey (33% response rate). The majority of respondents were male (89%), trained in orthopedic surgery (81%), and in private practice (75%). 41% of respondents rated their knowledge of the ACA as average. Respondents disagreed that the ACA would improve healthcare in the United States (median 2, mean 2.06, scale 1-5), while agreeing that the ACA would decrease reimbursements specific to hand surgery (median 4, mean 4.11).