Search

Plants respond to water stress with a variety of physiological and biochemical changes, but their response vary between species, varieties and cultivars. The present study focused on changes of bio-functional phytochemicals (phenolic compounds, chlorophyll, carotenoids, dietary fiber) in commercial cultivars and old, traditional varieties of lettuce under different water regimes (water-deficit, well-watered and water-logged). Results revealed lettuce varieties and cultivars with a different response behavior to water stress. Biomass production under drought conditions was reduced significantly. Carotenoid and chlorophyll contents decreased in both water extremes, while total phenols were accumulated under limited water availability. Dietary fiber content was not influenced by different water regimes. Water stress reduces biomass production and led to a change of phytochemicals in lettuce, however, old and traditional varieties did not show a different water stress adaptation compared to commercial cultivars.

The response of plants to stress such as UV-radiation or drought highly depends on the species, cultivar, plant organ, developmental stage, and furthermore, is influenced by ecophysiological interactions. Drought stress as well as UV irradiation are the most adverse factors for plant growth and productivity. In the present study, the interactive effect of UV-B and drought stress on biomass, primary and secondary metabolites, and mediated enzyme activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL, EC 4.3.1.5) was investigated in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). It was found that biomass production decreased in response to both stressors, while dry matter, total phenolic contents and the flavonol quercetin were not significantly affected by UV-B and drought stress, neither solely nor in combination. In contrast, anthocyanins and luteolin accumulated only in response to drought stress. However, the precursor amino acid proline as well as the activity of PAL increased under conditions of increased UV-B and water deficit. Thus, the present results deduce that both stressors acted either synergistically or to some extent antagonistically in terms of inducing plant protective mechanisms.