Search

Purpose: This study evaluated the methods and clinical effects of multidisciplinary collaborative treatment for occlusal reconstruction in patients with old jaw fractures and dentition defects., Methods: Patients with old jaw fractures and dentition defects who underwent occlusal reconstruction at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University from January 2018 to December 2022 were enrolled. Clinical treatment was classified into 3 phases. In phase I, techniques such as orthognathic surgery, microsurgery, and distraction osteogenesis were employed to reconstruct the correct 3-dimensional (3D) jaw position relationship. In phase II, bone augmentation and soft tissue management techniques were utilized to address insufficient alveolar bone mass and poor gingival soft tissue conditions. In phase III, implant-supported overdentures or fixed dentures were used for occlusal reconstruction. A summary of treatment methods, clinical efficacy evaluation, comparative analysis of imageological examinations, and satisfaction questionnaire survey were utilized to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy in patients with traumatic old jaw fractures and dentition defects. All data are summarized using the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation and compared using independent sample t-tests., Results: In 15 patients with old jaw fractures and dentition defects (an average age of 32 years, ranging from 18 to 53 years), there were 7 cases of malocclusion of single maxillary fracture, 6 of malocclusion of single mandible fracture, and 2 of malocclusion of both maxillary and mandible fractures. There were 5 patients with single maxillary dentition defects, 2 with single mandibular dentition defects, and 8 with both maxillary and mandibular dentition defects. To reconstruct the correct 3D jaw positional relationship, 5 patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla, 3 underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible, 4 underwent open reduction and internal fixation for old jaw fractures, 3 underwent temporomandibular joint surgery, and 4 underwent distraction osteogenesis. All patients underwent jawbone augmentation, of whom 4 patients underwent a free composite vascularized bone flap (26.66%) and the remaining patients underwent local alveolar bone augmentation. Free gingival graft and connective tissue graft were the main methods for soft tissue augmentation (73.33%). The 15 patients received 81 implants, of whom 11 patients received implant-supported fixed dentures and 4 received implant-supported removable dentures. The survival rate of all implants was 93.82%. The final imageological examination of 15 patients confirmed that the malocclusion was corrected, and the clinical treatment ultimately achieved occlusal function reconstruction. The patient satisfaction questionnaire survey showed that they were satisfied with the efficacy, phonetics, aesthetics, and comfort after treatment., Conclusion: Occlusal reconstruction of old jaw fractures and dentition defects requires a phased sequential comprehensive treatment, consisting of 3D spatial jaw correction, alveolar bone augmentation and soft tissue augmentation, and implant-supported occlusal reconstruction, achieving satisfactory clinical therapeutic efficacy., (Copyright © 2024 Chinese Medical Association. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Surgeons are always in a dilemma for the management of paediatric facial fractures due to distinctive nature of growing facial skeleton. The ultimate treatment goal for paediatric fractures should be as conservative as possible with least invasive surgical approach that will access the fracture and least invasive surgical fixation that will allow stable reduction and will prevent any growth disturbances. We are presenting a case of 4- year old with panfacial fracture managed according to this principle using transmucosal titanium plates with acylic splint for sagittal split of palate., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To explore the role and mechanism of drug delivery systems using growth factor combined with gelatin sponge on accelerating the healing of jaw fracture and to seek better treatment of accelerating the maxillofacial fracture., Methods: About 100 μg recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 was completely dissolved in 1 mL recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and the solution (40 μL) was dropped in gelatin sponge (0.5 cm×0.5 cm×1.0 cm). Then, it was freeze dried and prepared into bFGF/BMP/gelatin sponge delivery systems. The mandibular fracture model on two sides were prepared in 12 New Zealand rabbits and randomly divided into two groups. The left side was the control group, which was only fixed with titanium plates. The right side was the experimental group, in which bFGF/BMP/gelatin sponge delivery systems were put under the titanium plates. General observation, X-ray, and histological examination were taken at 2, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery., Results: After 2 weeks, more fibrous tissues were seen between the fracture ends in the experimental group than in the control group. After 4 weeks, fibrous fracture callus were seen in the fracture gap in the experimental group. The ingrowths of fibrous tissue and blood vessels were seen in the control group. The fracture healing of the experimental group was significantly faster than the control group at 2 and 4 weeks. After 12 weeks, the experimental and control groups all healed completely., Conclusions: bFGF/BMP/gelatin sponge can accelerate and improve fracture healing; thus, it has better clinical application prospect.

Background/aims: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a standard surgical procedure in jaw trauma and in orthognathic surgery. Insertion of screws is a significant risk for accidental tooth root injury with varying outcomes. Contrary evidences are found in literature due to a variety of study designs. This study was undertaken to address the lacunae and possibly estimate the difference in occurrence of tooth damage during or after ORIF between trauma and planned osteotomies., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, the data of ORIF in either trauma or orthognathic surgery fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected and analyzed., Results: There were 1632 patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria and formed the study group, of which 663 were in orthognathic surgery, of whom 210 had bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. In the trauma group, 358 patients had fractures involving both jaws whereas 272 had maxilla alone and 339 had mandibular fractures alone. On comparing the outcome, of the 9073 screws studied, 93.40% were not involved in any contact with the teeth, 6.3% were in category of potential hits (near apices or the root surfaces), and only 0.28% had evidence of root damage with the screws. It is observed that molar and premolar had a significant difference in terms of the type of surgery (P ≤ 0.05) whereas canine (P = 0.75) and incisor (P = 0.67) showed no statistical difference., Conclusion: ORIF when used as mentioned is a safe way for the management of fractures. The incidence of root injury is not uncommon but can be avoided with careful planning and execution.

Intermaxillary fixation (IMF) screws were first introduced to achieve IMF as a kind of bone borne appliance for jaw fractures in 1989. Because this method can overcome many disadvantages associated with tooth borne appliance, IMF screws have been popularly used for jaw fractures since then. From March 2011 to February 2014, we treated 168 cases with single or multiple jaw fractures by open reduction and a total of 705 IMF screws were intraoperatively applied in all the cases to achieve IMF and maintain dental occlusion as an adjuvant to open reduction. The numbers, implantation sites and complications of IMF screws were retrospectively analyzed. In our experience, we found that IMF screws were important to assist open reduction of jaw fractures but their roles should be objectively assessed and the reliability of open reduction and internal rigid fixation must be emphasized. Much attention should be paid when implanting.

Background: Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) has been one of the most popular treatments for odontoid fractures. However, the true efficacy of AOSF remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to provide the pooled rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid fractures., Methods: We searched studies that discussed complications after AOSF for type II or type III odontoid fractures. A proportion meta-analysis was done and potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis., Results: Of 972 references initially identified, 63 were eligible for inclusion. 54 studies provided data regarding non-union. The pooled non-union rate was 10% (95% CI: 7%-3%). 48 citations provided re-operation information with a pooled proportion of 5% (95% CI: 3%-7%). Infection was described in 20 studies with an overall rate of 0.2% (95% CI: 0%-1.2%). The main approach related complication is postoperative dysphagia with a pooled rate of 10% (95% CI: 4%-17%). Proportions for the other approach related complications such as postoperative hoarseness (1.2%, 95% CI: 0%-3.7%), esophageal/retropharyngeal injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%-1.1%), wound hematomas (0.2%, 95% CI: 0%-1.8%), and spinal cord injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%-0.2%) were very low. Significant heterogeneities were detected when we combined the rates of non-union, re-operation, and dysphagia. Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that old age was significantly predictive of non-union. Subgroup comparisons showed significant higher non-union rates in age ≥ 70 than that in age ≤ 40 and in age 40 to <50. Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any examined variables influencing the re-operation rate. Meta-regression analysis showed age had a significant effect on the dysphagia rate., Conclusions/significances: This study summarized the rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid fractures. Elderly patients were more likely to experience non-union and dysphagia.

Objective: To explore the biological features and clinical efficacies of absorbable plates and screws for rigid internal fixation., Methods: From June 2006 to June 2010, 201 FIXSORB(TM)-MX absorbable plates were used in 57 patients, including 41 males and 16 females aged from 11 - 81 years. And 185 plates were used in 53 patients of maxillofacial fracture and 16 plates in 4 undergoing orthognathic operations with rigid internal fixation., Results: All wounds healed primarily and there were no major complications. Forty-five cases were followed up for an average period of 12 months (range: 3 - 36). No obvious adverse effect and absorbable implants rejection were observed. The fracture lines were in the right position in 56 cases., Conclusion: As a kind of fine material for internal fixation with strong elasticity and strength, absorbable plate shall be widely used clinically.

Old malunited jaw fractures of nine patients who underwent orthognathic surgery for occlusal reconstruction were clinically evaluated. Early surgery on fractures of the jaw is the optimal treatment when due attention must be paid to occlusion. Since occlusal revision surgery subsequent to inaccurate diagnosis and inappropriate surgery is certainly very difficult and often unsuccessful, surgeons need to pay special attention to this situation.

The restoration of the edentulous atrophic anterior maxillary ridge has proved difficult. The absence of both gingival and bony alveolar tissue contributes to these problems. Numerous techniques to address these issues have been described. We report a case of a patient who sustained multiple facial injuries as a consequence of an accident, including the loss of the maxillary incisor teeth and associated alveolus. This patient underwent fixed implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation, following the use of distraction osteogenesis in the reconstruction of the edentulous atrophic anterior maxillary ridge.

A basic understanding of midface fractures is essential for those involved in the initial evaluation, emergency and general management, diagnosis, specialty consultation, and maxillofacial surgery of patients with fractures of the maxilla. To achieve the goal of restoring proper form and function to the upper jaw and face, one must be able to recognize, diagnose, and treat maxillary fractures. This requires knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the midface, as well as modalities of evaluation and treatment. Each of these topics are summarized in this paper.