Search

Purpose Notch signaling dysregulation is implicated in the development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Tarextumab is a fully human IgG2 antibody that inhibits Notch2/3 receptors. Patients and methods Aphase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial evaluated the activity of tarextumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic PDAC. Patients were stratified based on ECOG performance score and Ca 19-9 level and randomized 1:1 to nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine with either tarextumab or placebo. Based on preclinical and phase Ib results suggesting a positive correlation between Notch3 gene expression and tarextumab anti-tumor activity, patients were also divided into subgroups of low, intermediate, and high Notch3 gene expression. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in all and in patients with the three Notch3 gene expression subgroups (≥25th, ≥50% and ≥75% percentiles); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 12-month OS, overall response rate (ORR), and safety and biomarker investigation. Results Median OS was 6.4 months in the tarextumab group vs 7.9 months in the placebo group (HR = 1.34 [95% CI = 0.95, 1.89], P = .0985). No difference observed in OS in the Notch3 gene expression subgroups. PFS in the tarextumab-treated group (3.7 months) was significantly shorter compared with the placebo group (5.5 months) (hazard ratio was 1.43 [95% CI = 1.01, 2.01]; P = .04). Grade 3 diarrhea and thrombocytopenia were more common in the tarextumab group. Conclusions The addition of tarextumab to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine did not improve OS, PFS, or ORR in first-line metastatic PDAC, and PFS was specifically statistically worse in the tarextumab-treated patients. Clinical trial registry no NCT01647828.

Background Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a prevalent concern among breast cancer survivors (BCS), yet few accessible interventions exist. This study evaluated a targeted eHealth intervention, “FoRtitude,” to reduce FoR using cognitive behavioral skills training and telecoaching. Methods BCS (N = 196) were recruited from an academic medical center and 3 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program community sites, had stage 0-III breast cancer, were 1-10 years postprimary treatment, with moderate to high FoR and familiarity with the internet. Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, participants were independently randomly assigned to 3 cognitive behavioral skills (relaxation, cognitive restructuring, worry practice) vs an attention control condition (health management content [HMC]) and to telecoaching (motivational interviewing) vs no telecoaching. Website content was released across 4 weeks and included didactic lessons, interactive tools, and a text-messaging feature. BCS completed the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks. Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory scores over time were compared using mixed-effects models. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results FCRI scores [SD] decreased statistically significantly from baseline to postintervention (T0 = 53.1 [17.4], T2 = 41.9 [16.2], P Conclusions BCS experienced statistically significant reductions in FoR postintervention, but improvements were comparable between CBT and attention controls. Telecoaching improved adherence and retention. Future research is needed on optimal integration of CBT and HMC, dose, and features of eHealth delivery that contributed to reducing FoR. In the COVID-19 era, remote delivery has become even more essential for reaching survivors struggling with FoR.

Introduction Multimodality therapy has curative potential in locally advanced NSCLC. Mediastinal nodal sterilization (MNS) after induction chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can serve as an intermediate marker for efficacy. NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0229 demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of combining full-dose radiation (61.2 Gy) with chemotherapy followed by resection and chemotherapy. On the basis of that experience and evidence that EGFR antibodies are radiosensitizing, we explored adding panitumumab to CRT followed by resection and consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC with a primary end point of MNS. Methods Patients with resectable locally advanced NSCLC were eligible if deemed suitable for trimodality therapy before treatment. Surgeons were required to demonstrate expertise after CRT and adhere to specific management guidelines. Concurrent CRT consisted of weekly carboplatin (area under the curve = 2.0), paclitaxel (50 mg/m2), and 60 Gy of radiation therapy delivered in 30 fractions. There was a 2:1 randomization in favor of panitumumab at 2.5 mg/kg weekly for 6 weeks. The mediastinum was pathologically reassessed before or at the time of resection. Consolidation chemotherapy was weekly carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2 every 21 days for two courses. The study was designed to detect an improvement in MNS from 52% to 72%. With use of a 0.15 one-sided type 1 error and 80% power, 97 patients were needed. Results The study was opened in November 2010 and closed in August 2015 by the Data Monitoring Committee after 71 patients had been accrued for futility and excessive toxicity in the experimental arm. A total of 60 patients were eligible: 19 patients (86%) who received CRT and 29 (76%) who received CRT plus panitumumab and underwent an operation. With regard to postoperative toxicity, there were three grade 4 adverse events (13.6%) and no grade 5 adverse events (0%) among those who received CRT versus six grade 4 (15.8%) and four grade 5 adverse events (10.5%) among those who received CRT plus panitumumab. The MNS rates were 68.2% (95% confidence interval: 45.1–86.1) and 50.0% (95% confidence interval: 33.4–66.6) for CRT and CRT plus panitumumab, respectively (p = 0.95). Conclusion The addition of panitumumab to CRT did not improve MNS. There was an unexpectedly high mortality rate in the panitumumab arm, although the relationship to panitumumab is unclear. The control arm had outcomes similar to those in NRG Oncology RTOG 0229.

Objectives The ECOG‐ACRIN Cancer Research Group trial E2511 recently demonstrated a potential benefit for the addition of veliparib to cisplatin‐etoposide (CE) in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) in a phase II randomized controlled trial. Secondary trial endpoints included comparison of the incidence and severity of neurotoxicity, hypothesized to be lower in the veliparib arm, and tolerability of the addition of veliparib to CE. Physician‐rated and patient‐reported neurotoxicity was also compared. Materials and Methods Patients randomized to veliparib plus CE (n = 64) or placebo plus CE (n = 64) completed the 11‐item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity (questionnaire pre‐treatment, end of cycle 4 [ie 3 months after randomization] and 3 months post‐treatment [ie 6‐months]). Adherence analysis was based on treatment forms. Results and Conclusion No significant differences in mean or magnitude of change in neurotoxicity scores were observed between treatment arms at any time point. However, patients in the placebo arm reported worsening neurotoxicity from baseline to 3‐months (M difference = −1.5, P = .045), compared to stable neurotoxicity in the veliparib arm (M difference = −0.2, P = .778). Weakness was the most common treatment‐emergent (>50%) and moderate to severe (>16%) symptom reported, but did not differ between treatment arms. The proportion of adherence to oral therapy in the overall sample was 75%. Three percent of patients reported clinically significant neurotoxicity that was not captured by physician assessment. Neurotoxicity scores were not different between treatment arms. The addition of veliparib to CE appeared tolerable, though weakness should be monitored. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01642251., We examined patient‐reported tolerability of the addition of a PARP inhibitor, veliparib, to cisplatin‐etoposide for treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer in randomized controlled trial E2511. The addition of veliparib to cisplatin‐etoposide was tolerable according to a patient‐reported outcome and adherence. Future studies should assess whether veliparib may have a protective effect against chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy.

Background: Outcomes for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who fail to achieve complete response (CR) or relapse after front-line therapy are poor with lack of prospective outcomes data. Objectives: COMPLETE is a prospective registry of 499 patients enrolled at academic and community sites in the United States detailing patient demographics, treatment and outcomes for patients with aggressive T cell lymphomas. We report results for patients with primary refractory and relapsed disease. Methods: Primary refractory disease was defined as an evaluable best response to initial treatment (induction ± maintenance or consolidation/transplant) other than CR, and included a partial response, progressive disease, or no response/stable disease. Relapsed disease was defined as an evaluable best response to initial treatment of CR, followed by disease progression at a later date, irrespective of time to progression. Patients were included in the analysis if initial treatment began within 30 days of enrollment and treatment duration was ≥4 days. Results: Of 420 evaluable patients, 97 met the definition for primary refractory and 58 with relapsed disease. In the second-line setting, relapsed patients received single-agent therapies more often than refractory patients (52 vs. 28%; p = 0.01) and were more likely to receive single-agent regimens (74 vs. 53%; p = 0.03). The objective response rate to second-line therapy was higher in relapsed patients (61 vs. 40%; p = 0.04) as was the proportion achieving a CR (41 vs. 14%; p = 0.002). Further, relapsed patients had longer overall survival (OS) compared to refractory patients, with a median OS of 29.1 versus 12.3 months. Conclusions: Despite the availability of newer active single agents, refractory patients were less likely to receive these therapies and continue to have inferior outcomes compared to those with relapsed disease. PTCL in the real world remains an unmet medical need, and improvements in front-line therapies are needed.

BACKGROUND Long-term survival in patients with aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is generally poor, and there currently is no clear consensus regarding the initial therapy used for these diseases. Herein, the authors analyzed treatment patterns and outcomes in a prospectively collected cohort of patients with a new diagnosis of nodal PTCL in the United States. METHODS Comprehensive Oncology Measures for Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Treatment (COMPLETE) is a prospective multicenter cohort study designed to identify the most common prevailing treatment patterns used for patients newly diagnosed with PTCL in the United States. Patients with nodal PTCL and completed records regarding baseline characteristics and initial therapy were included in this analysis. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of a total of 499 patients enrolled, 256 (51.3%) had nodal PTCL and completed treatment records. As initial therapy, patients received doxorubicin-containing regimens (41.8%), regimens containing doxorubicin plus etoposide (20.9%), other etoposide regimens (15.8%), other single-agent or combination regimens (19.2%), and gemcitabine-containing regimens (2.1%). Survival was found to be statistically significantly longer for patients who received doxorubicin (log-rank P = .03). After controlling for disease histology and International Prognostic Index, results demonstrated a trend toward significance in mortality reduction in patients who received doxorubicin compared with those who did not (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.05 [P = .09]). CONCLUSIONS To the authors' knowledge, there is no clear standard of care in the treatment of patients with PTCL in the United States. Although efforts to improve frontline treatments are necessary, anthracyclines remain an important component of initial therapy for curative intent. Cancer 2017;123:1174–1183. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Background The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the first complete remission (CR1) of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) is not well defined. This study analyzed the impact of ASCT on the clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed PTCL in CR1. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, aggressive PTCL were prospectively enrolled into the Comprehensive Oncology Measures for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Treatment (COMPLETE) study, and those in CR1 were included in this analysis. Results Two hundred thirteen patients with PTCL achieved CR1, and 119 patients with nodal PTCL, defined as anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or PTCL not otherwise specified, were identified. Eighty-three patients did not undergo ASCT, whereas 36 underwent consolidative ASCT in CR1. At the median follow-up of 2.8 years, the median overall survival was not reached for the entire cohort of patients who underwent ASCT, whereas it was 57.6 months for those not receiving ASCT (P = .06). ASCT was associated with superior survival for patients with advanced-stage disease or intermediate-to-high International Prognostic Index scores. ASCT significantly improved overall and progression-free survival for patients with AITL but not for patients with other PTCL subtypes. In a multivariable analysis, ASCT was independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.89). Conclusions This is the first large prospective cohort study directly comparing the survival outcomes of patients with nodal PTCL in CR1 with or without consolidative ASCT. ASCT may provide a benefit in specific clinical scenarios, but the broader applicability of this strategy should be determined in prospective, randomized trials. These results provide a platform for designing future studies of previously untreated PTCL.

Purpose Veliparib, a poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitor, potentiated standard chemotherapy against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in preclinical studies. We evaluated the combination of veliparib with cisplatin and etoposide (CE; CE+V) doublet in untreated, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). Materials and Methods Patients with ES-SCLC, stratified by sex and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, were randomly assigned to receive four 3-week cycles of CE (75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3) along with veliparib (100 mg orally twice per day on days 1 through 7) or placebo (CE+P). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Using an overall one-sided 0.10-level log-rank test, the study had 88% power to demonstrate a 37.5% reduction in the PFS hazard rate. Results A total of 128 eligible patients received treatment on protocol. The median age was 66 years, 52% of patients were men, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 for 29% of patients and 1 for 71%. The respective median PFS for the CE+V arm versus the CE+P arm was 6.1 versus 5.5 months (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [one-sided P = .06]; stratified HR, 0.63 [one-sided P = .01]), favoring CE+V. The median overall survival was 10.3 versus 8.9 months (stratified HR, 0.83; 80% CI, 0.64 to 1.07; one-sided P = .17) for the CE+V and CE+P arms, respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% versus 65.6% (two-sided P = .57) for CE+V and CE+P, respectively. There was a significant treatment-by-strata interaction in PFS: Male patients with high lactate dehydrogenase levels derived significant benefit (PFS HR, 0.34; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.51) but there was no evidence of benefit among patients in other strata (PFS HR, 0.81; 80% CI, 0.60 to 1.09). The following grade ≥ 3 hematology toxicities were more frequent in the CE+V arm than the CE+P arm: CD4 lymphopenia (8% v 0%; P = .06) and neutropenia (49% v 32%; P = .08), but treatment delivery was comparable. Conclusion The addition of veliparib to frontline chemotherapy showed signal of efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC and the study met its prespecified end point.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare illness-related anxiety among participants in the Rituximab Extended Schedule or Retreatment Trial (RESORT) randomly assigned to maintenance rituximab (MR) versus rituximab re-treatment (RR). A secondary objective was to examine whether the superiority of MR versus RR on anxiety depended on illness-related coping style. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 253) completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures at random assignment to MR or RR (baseline); at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after random assignment; and at rituximab failure. PRO measures assessed illness-related anxiety and coping style, and secondary end points including general anxiety, worry and interference with emotional well-being, depression, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients were classified as using an active or avoidant illness-related coping style. Independent sample t tests and linear mixed-effects models were used to identify treatment arm differences on PRO end points and differences based on coping style. Results Illness-related anxiety was comparable between treatment arms at all time points (P > .05), regardless of coping style (active or avoidant). Illness-related anxiety and general anxiety significantly decreased over time on both arms. HRQoL scores were relatively stable and did not change significantly from baseline for both arms. An avoidant coping style was associated with significantly higher anxiety (18% and 13% exceeded clinical cutoff points at baseline and 6 months, respectively) and poorer HRQoL compared with an active coping style (P < .001), regardless of treatment arm assignment. Conclusion Surveillance until RR at progression was not associated with increased anxiety compared with MR, regardless of coping style. Avoidant coping was associated with higher anxiety and poorer HRQoL.

Clinical management of microinvasive breast cancer (Tmic) remains controversial. Although metastases are infrequent in Tmic carcinoma patients, surgical treatment typically includes lymph node sampling. The objective of this study was to determine the rate and predictors of lymph node metastases, recurrence, and survival in a large series of Tmic breast carcinomas. Consecutive cases of Tmic were identified within our health care system from 2001 to 2015. We reviewed results of lymph node sampling and other pathologic factors including hormone receptor/HER2 status, associated in situ tumor size/grade, margin status, number of invasive foci, surgical/adjuvant therapies, and recurrence/survival outcomes. In this cohort, 294 Tmic cases were identified with mean follow-up of 4.6 years. Of 260 patients who underwent axillary staging, lymph node metastases were identified in 1.5% (all of which were ductal type). All Tmic cases with positive lymph node metastases had associated DCIS with size > 5 cm (5.3-8.5 cm) compared to a median DCIS tumor size of 2.5 cm (0.2-19.0 cm) for the entire cohort. No lymph node metastases were seen with microinvasive lobular carcinoma. During the follow-up period, there were no regional/distant recurrences or breast cancer-associated deaths in a mean follow-up period of 4.6 years. Two patients developed subsequent ipsilateral breast cancer (DCIS) in a different quadrant than the original Tmic. Clinical behavior of microinvasive breast cancer in this series is similar to DCIS. Lymph node metastases are uncommon and were only seen with ductal type microinvasive carcinoma. Our data suggest limited benefit for routine node sampling and support management of Tmic similar to DCIS, particularly for patients with DCIS

Objective To examine the tolerability and antitumor activity of trebananib plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan in recurrent platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Methods In this open-label phase 1b study, patients received trebananib 10mg/kg or 15mg/kg IV QW plus PLD 50mg/m 2 (cohorts A1 and A3, respectively) or topotecan 4mg/m 2 (cohorts B1 and B3, respectively). Endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; primary); treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), overall response rate, anti-trebananib antibodies, and pharmacokinetics (secondary). Results 103 patients were enrolled. One patient in A1 and B1 had DLTs. Across all cohorts, the most common AEs were nausea, fatigue, and peripheral edema. Across both trebananib plus PLD cohorts (A1/A3), grade 4 AEs were pulmonary embolism, disease progression, and anemia. Two patients had grade 5 intestinal perforation (n=1) and sudden death (n=1). Across both trebananib plus topotecan cohorts (B1/B3), grade 4 AEs were neutropenia, hypokalemia, decreased granulocyte count, chest pain, dyspnea, decreased neutrophil count, and pulmonary embolism. Two patients had grade 5 disease progression. One patient had grade 5 pleural effusion associated with progressive disease. Confirmed objective response rates were 36.0% (A1), 34.8% (A3), 16.7% (B1), and 0.0% (B3). Median progression-free survival duration (months) was 7.4 (A1), 7.1 (A3), 3.5 (B1), and 3.1 (B3), respectively. No drug–drug interactions were apparent. Conclusions Trebananib 10mg/kg and 15mg/kg IV QW plus PLD or topotecan appear to have acceptable toxicity profiles in recurrent platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Antitumor activity was evident across all cohorts.

This clinical trial evaluated whether topotecan in combination with bevacizumab improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced, refractory non--small-cell lung cancer in a second-line setting.Patients aged 18 years old and older received topotecan (4.0 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15, and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 as intravenous infusions on a 28-day treatment cycle. Available tumor specimens were analyzed for ISG15 gene expression as a biomarker of response to topotecan.Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study, with a median age of 62.5 years and a median of 3 (range, 1-7) prior treatment regimens. Almost half (n = 18, 42.9%) of the patients received prior bevacizumab therapy. PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.8 months), and overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-15.5 months). Response rates were as follows: 14.3% partial response, 54.8% stable disease, and 28.6% progressive disease. Hematologic toxicities included grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 7, 16.7%), neutropenia (n = 4, 9.5%), and anemia (n = 2, 4.8%). One toxic death occurred due to pulmonary hemorrhage, and one patient experienced a grade 4 pulmonary embolism. Grade 3 nonhematologic adverse events were uncommon (8%). There was a trend for improved median PFS, 3.5 months vs. 1.8 months (P = .26), in patients with high ISG15 expression.Bevacizumab in combination with topotecan as a salvage therapy for metastatic non--small-cell lung cancer is well tolerated and is worthy of further investigation.

Long-term survival in patients with aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is generally poor, and there currently is no clear consensus regarding the initial therapy used for these diseases. Herein, the authors analyzed treatment patterns and outcomes in a prospectively collected cohort of patients with a new diagnosis of nodal PTCL in the United States.Comprehensive Oncology Measures for Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Treatment (COMPLETE) is a prospective multicenter cohort study designed to identify the most common prevailing treatment patterns used for patients newly diagnosed with PTCL in the United States. Patients with nodal PTCL and completed records regarding baseline characteristics and initial therapy were included in this analysis. All statistical tests were 2-sided.Of a total of 499 patients enrolled, 256 (51.3%) had nodal PTCL and completed treatment records. As initial therapy, patients received doxorubicin-containing regimens (41.8%), regimens containing doxorubicin plus etoposide (20.9%), other etoposide regimens (15.8%), other single-agent or combination regimens (19.2%), and gemcitabine-containing regimens (2.1%). Survival was found to be statistically significantly longer for patients who received doxorubicin (log-rank P = .03). After controlling for disease histology and International Prognostic Index, results demonstrated a trend toward significance in mortality reduction in patients who received doxorubicin compared with those who did not (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.05 [P = .09]).To the authors' knowledge, there is no clear standard of care in the treatment of patients with PTCL in the United States. Although efforts to improve frontline treatments are necessary, anthracyclines remain an important component of initial therapy for curative intent. Cancer 2017;123:1174-1183. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Background: Motexafin gadolinium (MGd) disrupts redox-dependent pathways by inhibiting oxidative stress-related proteins leading to apoptosis. MGd selectively targets tumor cells, disrupting energy metabolism and repair mechanisms, rendering cells more prone to apoptosis. Preclinical studies with MGd and pemetrexed show significant tumor growth delay in lung cancer cell lines. Methods: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1, who had received one previous platinum containing regimen and normal organ function were treated with MGd 15 mg/kg and pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 q21days. Patients were allowed to receive more than one regimen if the initial treatment was in the adjuvant or curative setting and administered >12 months earlier. The primary end point was to demonstrate a 40% rate of 6-month progression free survival (PFS). Results: Seventy-two patients (30 women, 42 men), performance status 0/1 (30/42), and a median age of 63 years were enrolled. Most patients (96%) were current or former smokers. All histologic types were represented (squamous/adenocarcinoma/other: 28%, 42%, 31%). Number of prior regimens: 1: 69%; 2: 26%, and >2: 4%. Median number of cycles administered was (range) 2 (1–12). Toxicity: grade 3/4 neutropenia was noted in 8.3% with febrile neutropenia in 1.4%, thrombocytopenia in 8.3%, fatigue in 9.7%, and pneumonia in 11.1%. There were no complete responses, 8.1% had partial response, 56.5% had stable disease, and 35.5% had progressive disease as their best response. Twenty-three percent of patients were progression free at 6 months and the median PFS was 2.6 months with an overall survival of 8.1 months. Conclusions: The combination of MGd and pemetrexed was well tolerated with toxicity similar to that of pemetrexed alone. However, the study did not achieve its end point of 40% 6-month PFS. The response rate, PFS, and overall survival did not seem markedly different than prior phase II and phase III studies of pemetrexed alone. Consequently, there are no further plans for development of this combination.

Acquired pure megakaryocytic aplasia is a rare disorder defined by severe thrombocytopenia with no other hematologic abnormalities and absent, or severely decreased marrow megakaryocytes. The etiology may be immune suppression of megakaryocyte development. Two patients are described who both responded rapidly to a combination of antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine and who remain in remission 13-20 months after discontinuation of cyclosporine. This regimen is well described for treatment of aplastic anemia and may also be effective for acquired pure megakaryocytic aplasia.

We present a case of a patient who developed all manifestations of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-HUS) acutely following treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL, Sezary syndrome) with deoxycoformycin (pentostatin). Symptoms and signs included severe thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia; hallucinations, confusion and disorientation; oliguric acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis; and fever. No other etiology for these symptoms and signs was present. Complete recovery followed treatment for one month with plasma exchange and glucocorticoids. During the succeeding 20 months she has remained well and her CTCL remains stable on no further treatment. This case and two previously published cases suggest that acute and severe TTP-HUS may be a dose-dependent toxicity of deoxycoformycin (pentostatin).

Background: Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a highly aggressive B-cell lymphoma that is largely curable with intensive therapy. Previously, a single-center study of 30 patients demonstrated that DA-EPOCH-R based therapy was highly effective in adults with BL (N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1915-1925). We set out to validate these results in a multi-center study and assess if a risk-adapted approach using DA-EPOCH-R is effective. Methods: Patients had newly diagnosed BL, age 18 years or older and HIV negative or positive. Low-risk (LR) patients (normal LDH, ECOG P.S. 0-1, stage I or II disease and a maximum tumor size < 7cm) received 3 cycles of DA-EPOCH-R (with no intrathecal prophylaxis) and all other patients (classified as high risk (HR)) received 6 cycles (with IT prophylaxis days 1 and 5 on cycles 3-6). Results: 77 patients were enrolled. Characteristics include median (range) age 45 (19-78) years; male sex 63 (82%); stage III or IV disease 49 (64%); elevated LDH 41 (53%); CNS involvement 7 (10%); HIV positive 20 (26%). Eleven (14%) and 66 (86%) were classified as LR and HR respectively. There were 2 deaths on treatment in the HR arm secondary to infection. Other toxicities were similar to previous reports of DA-EPOCH-R. At a median follow-up time of 25 months, time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 92% (95% CI: 82.9-96.8%), 87% (95% CI: 76.2-93%) and 88% (95% CI: 77.1-93.8%) respectively for all patients. TTP, PFS and OS were not significantly different for HR versus LR disease, HIV positive versus negative and age over versus under 40y. Conclusions: In a multicenter setting, both LR and HR patients have excellent outcomes with 3 and 6 cycles of therapy respectively. Risk group, HIV status and age are not associated with outcome (see table). Accrual to this study continues ([NCT01092182][1]). | | | TTP | PFS | OS | | ------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------ | | Patients | N=77 | 92% | 87% | 88% | | LR HR p | 11 66 | 100% 91% 0.35 | 100% 85% 0.22 | 100% 86% 0.24 | | HIV - HIV + p | 57 20 | 96% 84% 0.1 | 88% 84% 0.66 | 90% 83% 0.53 | | Age under 40 Age over 40 p | 35 42 | 94% 91% 0.83 | 90% 84% 0.45 | 93% 83% 0.24 | Table. ![Figure 1.][2] Figure 1. Disclosures Link: Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding. Kahl: Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy. Bartlett: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Colgene: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Insight: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; MERC: Research Funding; Dynavax: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; LAM Theapeutics: Research Funding. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01092182&atom=%2Fbloodjournal%2F126%2F23%2F342.atom [2]: pending:yes

Background: Comprehensive Oncology Measures for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Treatment (COMPLETE) is the largest registry of prospectively treated PTCL patients in the United States. Patients are enrolled at the initial diagnosis of PTCL and within 30 days of starting treatment. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, therapy delivered as induction or salvage, and outcomes are collected. Methods: For this report, we examined baseline characteristics and induction treatment patterns for patients with the 3 most common subtypes of PTCL: PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL). Only data from locked records are reported. Locked records are those that have been reviewed and digitally signed by the treating investigator. Results: Five hundred patients were enrolled from February 2010 until January 2014. As of July 2014, there were 257 locked baseline records and 188 locked treatment records for patients with a diagnosis of PTCL-NOS, ALCL or AITL. The mean age of these patients was 60 (range: 51-70). Most were male (66%) and white (78%). At study entry, 234 (91%) had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, 190 (74%) had Ann Arbor stage of III/IV, and 120 (47%) had one or more B symptoms. Half of the patients had extranodal disease. Mean international prognostic index (IPI) score was 2 (range 0-5). For staging, a PET/CT was the most common radiographic method used (58% of patients), and for pathologic diagnosis, on average, 10 phenotypic and ~1 genetic markers were assessed. For baseline characteristics reported here, patients treated at academic centers had more extranodal disease, a higher IPI score and tended to have more advanced disease compared to patients treated in the community. The primary intent of initial therapy was a cure for 89% of patients and 60% received an anthracycline or anthracycline plus etoposide-containing regimen. A minority of patients (21%) participated in a clinical trial for PTCL. Further details on induction therapy can be found in the table below. Table Initial Treatment Characteristics Total Academic Community Initial Treatment Approach* N=188 n=158 n=30 Induction chemotherapy (CT) alone 125 (66%) 102 (65%) 23 (77%) Induction CT + consolidation or maintenance 11 (6%) 10 (6%) 1 (3%) Stem cell transplant 36 (19%) 33 (21%) 3 (10%) Local radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy 10 (5%) 7 (4%) 3 (10%) Observation/best supportive care 6 (3%) 6 (4%) 0 (0%) Induction Regimens N=186 n=154 n=32 CHOP/CHOP-like 76 (41%) 56 (36%) 20 (63%) CHOP/CHOP-like + etoposide 37 (20%) 30 (20%) 7 (22%) Gemcitabine-based regimen 6 (3%) 6 (4%) 0 (0%) Platinum-based regimen 5 (3%) 5 (3%) 0 (0%) Other 62 (33%) 57 (37%) 5 (15%) Number of Cycles of Induction CT Median, Inter-Quartile Range (Cycles) 5 (2-6) 5 (2-6) 5 (1-6) Type of Transplant Performed N=36 n=33 n=3 Autologous 34 (94%) 31 (94%) 3 (100%) Allogeneic 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 0 (0%) *5 patients received CNS prophylaxis with selected treatments shown above CHOP=cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, and vincristine Conclusions: Early results from the first prospective US-based registry of newly diagnosed patients with PTCL-NOS, ALCL and AITL show that beyond CHOP-based therapy, there is little consensus on initial management of these patients. These data strongly support the need to develop evidence-based approaches for this rare and heterogeneous group of patients. Disclosures Pinter-Brown: Spectrum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Foss:spectrum: Research Funding; seattle genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Carson:Spectrum: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Horwitz:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Kiowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Rosen:Allos: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gisselbrecht:Spectrum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hsi:Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Allos: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Abbott: Research Funding; Cellerant Therapeutics: Research Funding; BD Biosciences: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Advani:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy. Smith:Allos/Spectrum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kahl:Allos : Research Funding. Park:Teva: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Janssen: Travel funding, Travel funding Other.

Abstract 430 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antitumor antibiotic that binds DNA (producing double stranded DNA breaks). CD22 is expressed in the majority of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), and inotuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in heavily pretreated patients. Thus, inotuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy is being further investigated in patients with indolent B-cell NHLs that are refractory to rituximab alone, rituximab in combination with chemotherapy, or radioimmunotherapy (RIT). Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with indolent B-cell NHL who have relapsed or are refractory to rituximab and chemotherapy, or anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) as measured by overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients are eligible for this trial if they have CD22-positive indolent B-cell NHL (defined as follicular not transformed, marginal zone and small lymphocytic lymphoma [SLL]) that has progressed after 2 or more systemic therapies, and have exhibited no response or progressed within 6 months from completion of the most recent rituximab or rituximab-containing therapy, or within 12 months of the completion of RIT. Patients receive inotuzumab ozogamicin at1.8 mg/m2 every 28 days for 4 to 8 cycles, with dose and/or frequency adjusted based on toxicities. Results: We report preliminary data for 43 patients, including 35 patients with follicular, 3 with marginal zone and 3 with SLL, and with a median duration of follow-up of 4.5 months (range 1.0–10.0). Median age was 62 years (range 45–84), and 42% were male. 8% had 1 prior anticancer regimen, 33% had 2, 18% had 3, 43% had 4 or more. Based on the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, 12%, 29%, and 59% of the follicular lymphoma patients were low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively. The most common (≥20%) treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), all grades, were thrombocytopenia (65%), neutropenia (53%), elevated AST (48%), leukopenia (40%), nausea (40%), fatigue (35%), lymphopenia (35%), decreased appetite (33%), and elevated alkaline phosphatase (25%). Common grade 3/4 AEs (>5% of subjects) were all hematologic (thrombocytopenia [48%], neutropenia [28%], lymphopenia [12.5%]). Eight serious AEs (SAEs) have been reported, including 2 cases of pyrexia, and single events of hydronephrosis (known lymphoma) leading to sepsis and death, upper abdominal pain (suspected splenic infarct), pneumonia, abdominal distension, urinary retention, and abnormal hepatic function. Eleven (26%) patients discontinued treatment due to AEs, mostly laboratory abnormalities that failed to recover to grade 1 or better within the protocol-specified allowed dose delay period, including 7 (18%) due to thrombocytopenia, 4 (10%) due to neutropenia, and 1 patient each due to increased GGT, decreased platelet count, hyperbilirubinemia, and pneumonia. An ORR of 53% has been observed, with an ORR of 66% in follicular lymphoma patients. Seven patients (19%) achieved a CR. Of the 11 patients who discontinued treatment early due to AEs (with a median number of cycles received 2), 8 (73%) attained a clinical response. PFS rate at 6 months was 0.59 (95% CI 0.38, 0.75), with a PFS rate at 6 months for follicular lymphoma patients of 0.67 (95% CI 0.44, 0.83). Three deaths have been reported, due to disease progression, sepsis, and aspiration pneumonia (non-neutropenic), respectively, and all >30 days from the last dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin. Conclusion: Inotuzumab ozogamicin in this indolent B-cell NHL patient population has a similar safety profile to that previously reported for monotherapy, with hematologic, gastrointestinal and hepatic laboratory abnormalities being the most common. Inotuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy demonstrates definite clinical activity in indolent B-cell NHL that is refractory to rituximab alone, rituximab in combination with chemotherapy, or RIT. Disclosures: Goy: Allos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hua:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Volkert:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vandendries:Pfizer Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.