Search

Purpose: Targeted therapies that use the signaling path-characterize the function of human FKBP7 and explore its ways involved in prostate cancer are required to overcome role in cancer. We discovered that FKBP7 was upregulated chemoresistance and improve treatment outcomes for men. in human prostate cancers and its expression correlated Molecular chaperones play a key role in the regulation of with the recurrence observed in patients receiving doce-protein homeostasis and are potential targets for overcom-taxel. FKBP7 silencing showed that FKBP7 is required to ing chemoresistance. maintain the growth of chemoresistant cell lines and Experimental Design: We established 4 chemoresistant chemoresistant tumors in mice. Mass spectrometry analysis prostate cancer cell lines and used image-based high-content revealed that FKBP7 interacts with eIF4G, a component of siRNA functional screening, based on gene-expression signa-the eIF4F translation initiation complex, to mediate the ture, to explore mechanisms of chemoresistance and identify survival of chemoresistant cells. Using small-molecule new potential targets with potential roles in taxane resistance. inhibitors of eIF4A, the RNA helicase component of The functional role of a new target was assessed by in vitro and eIF4F, we were able to kill docetaxel- and cabazitaxel-in vivo silencing, and mass spectrometry analysis was used to resistant cells. identify its downstream effectors. Conclusions: Targeting FKBP7 or the eIF4G-containing Results: We identified FKBP7, a prolyl-peptidyl isomer-eIF4F translation initiation complex could be novel thera-ase overexpressed in docetaxel-resistant and in cabazitaxel-peutic strategies to eradicate taxane-resistant prostate cancer resistant prostate cancer cells. This is the first study to cells. Fil: Garrido, Marine F.. Inserm; Francia Fil: Martin, Nicolas J.-P.. Inserm; Francia Fil: Bertrand, Matthieu. Inserm; Francia Fil: Gaudin, Catherine. Institut Anti-cancer Gustave Roussy; Francia Fil: Commo, Fred Eric. Inserm; Francia Fil: Kalaany, Nassif El. Inserm; Francia Fil: Al Nakouzi, Nader. University of British Columbia; Canadá Fil: Fazli, Ladan. University of British Columbia; Canadá Fil: Nery, Elaine Del. Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Francia Fil: Camonis, Jacques. Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Francia Fil: Perez, Franck. Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Francia Fil: Lerondel, Stéphanie. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia Fil: Le Pape, Alain. Inserm; Francia Fil: Compagno, Daniel Georges. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina Fil: Gleave, Martin. University of British Columbia; Canadá Fil: Loriot, Yohann. Inserm; Francia Fil: Desaubry, Laurent. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia Fil: Vagner, Stephan. Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Francia Fil: Fizazi, Karim. Institut Anti-cancer Gustave Roussy; Francia Fil: Chauchereau, Anne. Inserm; Francia

// Christophe Massard 1, 2, * , Marianne Oulhen 2, 3, * , Sylvestre Le Moulec 4 , Nathalie Auger 5 , Stephanie Foulon 6 , Aurelie Abou-Lovergne 1 , Fanny Billiot 2, 3 , Alexander Valent 5 , Virginie Marty 7 , Yohann Loriot 1, 2 , Karim Fizazi 1, 2 , Philippe Vielh 2, 3, 5, # , Francoise Farace 2, 3, # 1 Gustave Roussy, Universite Paris-Saclay, Department of Medicine, F-94805, Villejuif, France 2 INSERM, U981 “Identification of Molecular Predictors and New Targets for Cancer Treatment”, F-94805, Villejuif, France 3 Gustave Roussy, Universite Paris-Saclay, “Circulating Tumor Cells” Translational Platform, AMMICA CNRS UMS3655 – INSERM US23, F-94805, Villejuif, France 4 Hopital d’Instruction des Armees du Val de Grâce, Department of Oncology, F-75005, Paris, France 5 Gustave Roussy, Universite Paris-Saclay, Department of Biopathology, F-94805, Villejuif, France 6 Gustave Roussy, Universite Paris-Saclay, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, F-94805, Villejuif, France 7 Gustave Roussy, Universite Paris-Saclay, “Histo Cytopathology” Translational Platform, AMMICA CNRS UMS3655 – INSERM US23, F-94805, Villejuif, France * These authors contributed equally to the study # These authors contributed equally to the study Correspondence to: Francoise Farace, email: francoise.farace@gustaveroussy.fr Keywords: prostate cancer, biopsy, circulating tumor cells, androgen receptor, TMPRSS2-ERG translocation Received: March 24, 2016 Accepted: June 17, 2016 Published: July 04, 2016 ABSTRACT Molecular characterization of cancer samples is hampered by tumor tissue availability in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. We reported the results of prospective PETRUS study of biomarker assessment in paired primary prostatic tumors, metastatic biopsies and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Among 54 mCRPC patients enrolled, 38 (70%) had biopsies containing more than 50% tumour cells. 28 (52%) patients were analyzed for both tissue samples and CTCs. FISH for AR -amplification and TMPRSS2-ERG translocation were successful in 54% and 32% in metastatic biopsies and primary tumors, respectively. By comparing CellSearch and filtration (ISET)-enrichment combined to four color immunofluorescent staining, we showed that CellSearch and ISET isolated distinct subpopulations of CTCs: CTCs undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, CTC clusters and large CTCs with cytomorphological characteristics but no detectable markers were isolated using ISET. Epithelial CTCs detected by the CellSearch were mostly lost during the ISET-filtration. AR -amplification was detected in CellSearch-captured CTCs, but not in ISET-enriched CTCs which harbor exclusively AR gain of copies. Eighty-eight percent concordance for ERG -rearrangement was observed between metastatic biopsies and CTCs even if additional ERG -alteration patterns were detected in ISET-enriched CTCs indicating a higher heterogeneity in CTCs. Molecular screening of metastatic biopsies is achievable in a multicenter context. Our data indicate that CTCs detected by the CellSearch and the ISET-filtration systems are not only phenotypically but also genetically different. Close attention must be paid to CTC characterization since neither approach tested here fully reflects the tremendous phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity present in CTCs from mCRPC patients.

Background Our prior Systemic Treatment Options for Cancer of the Prostate systematic reviews showed improved survival for men with metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer when abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone/prednisone (AAP) or docetaxel (Doc), but not zoledronic acid (ZA), were added to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Trial evidence also suggests a benefit of combining celecoxib (Cel) with ZA and ADT. To establish the optimal treatments, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out based on aggregate data (AD) from all available studies. Methods Overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival data from completed Systemic Treatment Options for Cancer of the Prostate reviews of Doc, ZA and AAP and from recent trials of ZA and Cel contributed to this comprehensive AD-NMA. The primary outcome was OS. Correlations between treatment comparisons within one multi-arm, multi-stage trial were estimated from control-arm event counts. Network consistency and a common heterogeneity variance were assumed. Results We identified 10 completed trials which had closed to recruitment, and one trial in which recruitment was ongoing, as eligible for inclusion. Results are based on six trials including 6204 men (97% of men randomised in all completed trials). Network estimates of effects on OS were consistent with reported comparisons with ADT alone for AAP [hazard ration (HR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.71], Doc (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68–0.87), ZA + Cel (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.97), ZA + Doc (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.94), Cel (HR = 0.94 95% CI 0.75–1.17) and ZA (HR = 0.90 95% CI 0.79–1.03). The effect of ZA + Cel is consistent with the additive effects of the individual treatments. Results suggest that AAP has the highest probability of being the most effective treatment both for OS (94% probability) and failure-free survival (100% probability). Doc was the second-best treatment of OS (35% probability). Conclusions Uniquely, we have included all available results and appropriately accounted for inclusion of multi-arm, multi-stage trials in this AD-NMA. Our results support the use of AAP or Doc with ADT in men with metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer. AAP appears to be the most effective treatment, but it is not clear to what extent and whether this is due to a true increased benefit with AAP or the variable features of the individual trials. To fully account for patient variability across trials, changes in prognosis or treatment effects over time and the potential impact of treatment on progression, a network meta-analysis based on individual participant data is in development.

Background Evidence suggests that ATB and gut microbiota composition are associated to anti-PD-1 outcomes in RCC patients. Network analysis of the gut microbiota represents a novel tool to determine “guilds” of bacterial communities. Methods Here, we investigated guilds’ relationships with prior exposure to ATB, TKI [axitinib (axi), sunitinib (suni) or other] and clinical outcomes of RCC patients treated with nivolumab (nivo). Results Considering prior exposure to ATB (n = 11, 22%), axi (n = 13, 19%), suni (n = 49, 71%) or other TKI (n = 20, 29%), n = 36 (52%) patients were NR and 33 (48%) R to nivo. Cross-validation of overall fecal microbiota composition stratified RCC patients with different predictive power (ATB=84%; axi=81%; suni=69%; outcome=49%). Network analysis revealed six guilds (G1 to G6). G1-G2 behaved in an opposite way and topologically separated by negative correlations. G1-G2 were both related to NR, while G1 was dominated by species related to ATB. Conversely G2 was mainly represented by species related to no ATB (X2=8.98, P = 0.0027) and more susceptible to prior TKI exposure (where axi and suni behaved in an opposite way) compared to the other guilds (X2=10.68, P = 0.0011). G4 was mainly inhabited by species related to other TKI (no axi and no suni). Random forest analysis found definite bacterial species able to drive the stratification into guilds of the global RCC network, such as Akkermansia muciniphila for R and Dorea formicigenerans for no ATB. Conclusions We show that ATB and suni are the most powerful external features able to drive fecal microbiota compositional shifts in RCC patients treated with nivo. Analysis of the gut microbiota using bacterial communities guilds provides a novel theranostic approach to stratify RCC patients. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure L. Albiges: Honoraria (self): Novartis, BMS, Amgen, Ipsen, Roche, Pfizer, Astellas, Merck. K. Fizazi: Advisory / Consultancy: Participation to advisory boards/honorarium for: Astellas, AAA, Bayer, Clovis, Curevac, Incyte, Janssen, MSD, Orion, Sanofi. B. Escudier: Advisory / Consultancy: IPSEN, BMS, AZ, Novartis, Roche, Oncorena. L. Zitvogel: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS, AstraZeneca,; Research grant / Funding (self): Incyte, GSK, Transgene, Innovate Biopharma, Pilege; Advisory / Consultancy: Everimmune. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Validation of vimentin and Ki67 staining using the CellSearch platform. Figure S2. Prognostic impact of total CTC in two cohorts of patients with CRPC. Figure S3. Prognostic impact of vimentin/Ki67 CTC proportions and their presence in the unfavourable subgroup. Important validation work performed to justify subsequent experiments and conclusions. Figure S1. details the optimisation on CellSearch of Vimentin and Ki67 antibodies. Figure S2. shows that prognostic analysis of total CTC (regardless of vimentin and Ki67 measurements) is consistent with previous reports. Figure S3. shows that there is no prognostic significance of KI67 or vimentin CTC in the unfavourable prognosis subgroup, and that proportion of Ki67- or vimentin-CTC is less prognostically important than their presence or absence. (PDF 1030 kb)

Germ cell tumour is the most frequent malignant tumour type in young men with a 100% rise in the incidence every 20 years. Despite this, the high sensitivity of germ cell tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy, together with radiation and surgical measures, leads to the high cure rate of > or = 99% in early stages and 90%, 75-80% and 50% in advanced disease with 'good', 'intermediate' and 'poor' prognostic criteria (IGCCCG classification), respectively. The high cure rate in patients with limited metastatic disease allows the reduction of overall treatment load, and therefore less acute and long-term toxicity, e.g. organ sparing surgery for specific cases, reduced dose and treatment volume of irradiation or substitution of node dissection by surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy according to the presence or absence of vascular invasion. Thus, different treatment options according to prognostic factors including histology, stage and patient factors and possibilities of the treating centre as well may be used to define the treatment strategy which is definitively chosen for an individual patient. However, this strategy of reduction of treatment load as well as the treatment itself require very high expertise of the treating physician with careful management and follow-up and thorough cooperation by the patient as well to maintain the high rate for cure. Treatment decisions must be based on the available evidence which has been the basis for this consensus guideline delivering a clear proposal for diagnostic and treatment measures in each stage of gonadal and extragonadal germ cell tumour and individual clinical situations. Since this guideline is based on the highest evidence level available today, a deviation from these proposals should be a rare and justified exception

The first ESMO Consensus Conference on prostate cancer was held in Zurich, Switzerland, on 17-19 November 2011, with the participation of a multidisciplinary panel of leading professionals including experts in methodological aspects. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared clinically relevant questions about prostate cancer in four areas for discussion as follows: diagnosis and staging, management of early localized disease, management of advanced localized disease and systemic disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the Consensus Conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question. The recommendations detailed here are based on an expert consensus after careful review of published data. All participants have approved this final update.

Early human tolerance following total body irradiation (TBI) according to the dose received is still poorly known. Thirteen selected patients were prospecti­ vely evaluated for clinical side effects during the first 10 hours following a 2 Gy TBI prior to bone marrow transplantation. All of them but one were treated for haematological malignancies and were in clinical remission at the date of TBI. There were 10 males and 3 females, with a median age of 43 y (range 16-61) and a good performance status (WHO 0-1). They received granisetron (3 mg) injec­ ted intravenously 1 h before the time of TBI in order to prevent nausea and vomiting. The main symptoms consisted in drowsiness (69 %), headache (62 %), xerostomia (62 %), nausea and vomiting (46 %), anorexia (38 %), parotid gland pain (23 %) and abdominal pain (8 %). Their intensity was always moderate, except for 2 patients who experimented severe vomiting. The incidence rate and the time-course of the symptoms of the prodromal phase may proved to be helpful for early clinical evaluation and triage of victims of an accidental irra­ diation. In particular, absence of fever at the 6 th h after TBI supports the assumption of an estimated exposure dose below 2 Gy.

2-¹⁸fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been recommended in international guidelines in the evaluation of postchemotherapy seminoma residuals. Our trial was designed to validate these recommendations in a larger group of patients.FDG-PET studies in patients with metastatic seminoma and residual masses after platinum-containing chemotherapy were correlated with either the histology of the resected lesion(s) or the clinical outcome.One hundred and seventy seven FDG-PET results were contributed. Of 127 eligible PET studies, 69% were true negative, 11% true positive, 6% false negative, and 15% false positive. We compared PET scans carried out before and after a cut-off level of 6 weeks after the end of the last chemotherapy cycle. PET sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value were 50%, 77%, 91%, and 25%, respectively, before the cut-off and 82%, 90%, 95%, and 69% after the cut-off. PET accuracy significantly improved from 73% before to 88% after the cut-off (P=0.032).Our study confirms the high specificity, sensitivity, and NPV of FDG-PET for evaluating postchemotherapy seminoma residuals. When carried out at an adequate time point, FDG-PET remains a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in this clinical setting and spares patients unnecessary therapy.

Background: This prospective randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy of low-dose regimen of cisplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide alternated with vinblastine and hleomycin (CISCA/VB) with the original CISCA/VB regimen in patients with disseminated non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT) and a predicted favorable outcome. Patients and methods: One hundred and twenty-five patients with disseminated NSGCT and a predicted favorable outcome according to the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center classification [testicular primary and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) serum level

Metastases from prostatic adenocarcinoma (prostate cancer) are characterized by their predilection for bone and typical osteoblastic features. An in vitro model of bone metastases from prostate cancer was developed using a bicompartment coculture system of mouse osteoblasts and human prostate cancer cells. In this model, the bone-derived prostate cancer cell lines MDA PCa 2a and MDA PCa 2b induced a specific and reproducible increase in osteoblast proliferation. Moreover, these cells were able to induce osteoblast differentiation, as assessed by increased alkaline phosphatase activity, Osteocalcin expression, and calcified matrix formation. This osteoblastic reaction was confirmed in vivo by intrafemoral injection of MDA PCa 2b cells into severe combined immunodeficiency disease mice. In contrast, the highly undifferentiated, bone-derived human prostate cancer cell line PC3 did not produce an osteoblastic reaction in vitro and induced osteolytic lesions in vivo. The osteoblast differentiation induced by MDA PCa 2b cells was associated with up-regulation of the osteoblast-specific transcriptor factor Cbfa1. Moreover, treatment of osteoblasts with conditioned medium obtained from MDA PCa 2b cells resulted in up-regulation of Cbfa1 and Osteocalcin expression. In support of the differentiation studies, a microarray analysis showed that primary mouse osteoblasts grown in the presence of MDA PCa 2b cells showed a shift in the pattern of gene expression with an increase in mRNA-encoding Procollagen type I and Osteopontin and a decrease in mRNA-encoding proteins associated with myoblast differentiation, namely myoglobin and myosin light-chain 2. Taken together, these findings suggest that the bone-derived prostate cancer cells MDA PCa 2a and MDA PCa 2b promote differentiation of osteoblast precursors to an osteoblastic phenotype through a Cbfa1-dependent pathway. These results also established that soluble factors produced by prostate cancer cells can induce expression of osteoblast-specific genes. This in vitro model provides a valuable system to isolate molecules secreted by prostate cancer cells that favor osteoblast differentiation. Moreover, it allows to screen for therapeutic agents blocking the osteoblast response to prostate cancer.