Search

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in African American (AA) patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). BACKGROUND: AA patients are at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes after PCI and may derive greater benefit from the use of potent antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Using the multicenter PROMETHEUS observational registry of ACS patients treated with PCI, we grouped patients by self-reported AA or other races. Clinical outcomes at 90-day and 1-year included non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), major adverse cardiac events (composite of death, MI, stroke, or unplanned revascularization) and major bleeding. RESULTS: The study population included 2,125 (11%) AA and 17,707 (89%) non-AA patients. AA patients were younger, more often female (46% vs. 30%) with a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and prior coronary intervention than non-AA patients. Although AA patients more often presented with troponin (+) ACS, prasugrel use was much less common in AA vs. non-AA (11.9% vs. 21.4%, respectively, P = 0.001). In addition, the use of prasugrel increased with the severity of presentation in non-AA but not in AA patients. Multivariable logistic regression showed AA race was an independent predictor of reduced use of prasugrel (0.42 [0.37-0.49], P

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial data studies suggest superiority of prasugrel over clopidogrel in patients with diabetes. However, the use, safety and efficacy profile of prasugrel in unselected diabetic patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain unclear. METHODS: PROMETHEUS was a prospective multicenter observational study of 19,919 ACS PCI patients enrolled between 2010 and 2013. The primary endpoint was 90-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), comprising all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke or unplanned revascularization. The safety endpoint was bleeding requiring hospitalization. RESULTS: We identified 7580 (38%) subjects with and 12,329 (62%) without diabetes. Diabetic patients were older and had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors. However, they were less likely to receive prasugrel (18.2% vs. 21.7%). Use of prasugrel did not increase with the severity of clinical presentation in diabetics, whereas, among non-diabetics, prescription of prasugrel was higher in NSTEMI and STEMI compared to unstable angina. The 90-day and 1-year adjusted risk of MACE was greater in diabetics (at 1 year: 22.7% vs. 16.5%; HR 1.22 [1.14-1.33], p

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the frequency of use and association between prasugrel and outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice. METHODS: PROMETHEUS was a multicenter observational registry of acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI from 8 centers in the United States that maintained a prospective PCI registry for patient outcomes. The primary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events at 90days, a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization. Major bleeding was defined as any bleeding requiring hospitalization or blood transfusion. Hazard ratios (HRs) were generated using multivariable Cox regression and stratified by the propensity to treat with prasugrel. RESULTS: Of 19,914 patients (mean age 64.4years, 32% female), 4,058 received prasugrel (20%) and 15,856 received clopidogrel (80%). Prasugrel-treated patients were younger with fewer comorbid risk factors compared with their counterparts receiving clopidogrel. At 90days, there was a significant association between prasugrel use and lower major adverse cardiovascular event (5.7% vs 9.6%, HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67, P

Background Few studies have explored percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI), even though PMI is a major cause of mortality in patients undergoing urgent/emergent noncardiac surgery. Objectives This study sought to describe the angiographic characteristics and outcomes in patients presenting to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for myocardial infarction sustained after undergoing noncardiac surgery, with a detailed analysis of those undergoing PCI. Methods We included all patients presenting to the catheterization laboratory at our institution after PMI from 2003 to 2012, who had noncardiac surgery within the previous 7 days. Data from patients who underwent PCI were analyzed using both standard regression and time-to-event survival analysis. Results From 2003 to 2012, 1,093 patients with 3,832 person-years of follow-up underwent diagnostic coronary angiography, of whom 281 (40 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and 241 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI] cases) underwent PCI. Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, we found 30-day mortality was 5.2% and 1-year mortality was 15% in the overall population. In the PCI subpopulation, we estimated 30-day mortality to be 11.3%. The 30-day death rate in the STEMI cohort was 31.2% and 8.5% in the NSTEMI cohort of the PCI subpopulation. Stepwise logistic regression revealed the following factors as strong predictors of 30-day mortality after PCI: bleeding event after PCI (odds ratio [OR]: 4.33; 95% confidence limits (CL): 1.52 to 12.30), peak troponin T level (OR: 1.20; 95% CL: 1.08 to 1.34), and underlying peripheral vascular disease (OR: 4.86; 95% CL: 1.66 to 14.22). Cox proportional hazard analysis of survival data showed that increasing age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03; 95% CL: 1.01 to 1.04), bleeding after PCI (HR: 2.31; 95% CL: 1.61 to 3.32), renal insufficiency (HR: 2.26; 95% CL: 1.51 to 3.39]), and vascular surgery (HR: 1.48; 95% CL: 1.02 to 2.15]) were all significant predictors of long-term mortality after PCI. Conclusions Perioperative MI has a markedly high mortality rate, despite PCI. Bleeding event, peak troponin T level, and peripheral vascular disease predict mortality within 30 days of PCI in this patient population. Similarly, older age, vascular surgery, bleeding event, and renal dysfunction strongly predict long-term mortality after PCI in the setting of PMI.

Background A percutaneous approach with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left main coronary artery (LM) is frequently used in high-risk patients with coexisting aortic stenosis and LM disease. Outcomes of TAVR plus LM PCI have not been previously reported. Objectives The primary objective of the TAVR-LM registry is to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR plus LM PCI. Methods Clinical, echocardiographic, computed tomographic, and angiographic characteristics were retrospectively collected in 204 patients undergoing TAVR plus LM PCI. In total, 128 matched patient pairs were generated by performing 1:1 case-control matching between 167 patients with pre-existing LM stents undergoing TAVR and 1,188 control patients undergoing TAVR without LM revascularization. Results One-year mortality (9.4% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.83) was similar between the TAVR plus LM PCI cohort and matched controls. One-year mortality after TAVR plus LM PCI was not different in patients with unprotected compared with protected LMs (7.8% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.88), those undergoing LM PCI within 3 months compared with those with LM PCI greater than 3 months before TAVR (7.4% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.61), and those with ostial versus nonostial LM stents (10.3% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.20). Unplanned LM PCI performed because of TAVR-related coronary complication, compared with planned LM PCI performed for pre-existing LM disease, resulted in increased 30-day (15.8% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.013) and 1-year (21.1% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.071) mortality. Conclusions Despite the anatomic proximity of the aortic annulus to the LM, TAVR plus LM PCI is safe and technically feasible, with short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes comparable with those in patients undergoing TAVR alone. These results suggest that TAVR plus LM PCI is a reasonable option for patients who are at high risk for surgery.

Objectives This study investigated whether patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) have an increased risk of stroke due to permanent pacemaker (PPM)/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Background Data are lacking on the risk of stroke in patients with PFO and implantable intracardiac devices, either a PPM or an ICD. We investigated whether patients with PFO have increased risk of stroke due to PPM/ICD implantation. Methods Between 2001 and 2008, 2,921 consecutive patients with PFO (67.5 ± 16.4 years of age, 52.2% male) were identified from our echocardiography database. These patients were divided into a device group (patients had PPM/ICD implantation for any reason after receiving a diagnosis of PFO) and a no device group (patients did not have PPM or ICD implantation). Patients who had PFO closure during follow-up were excluded. Both groups were matched for baseline characteristics and medications. The incidence of ischemic stroke was assessed in each group after propensity score matching (case:control ratio of 1:1 yielding 231 pairs). All patients completed at least 4 years of follow-up until May 2012. Results There were 2,690 patients in the n device group (67.3 ± 16.4 years of age, 51.6% male) and 231 patients in the device group (75.4 ± 14.6 years of age, 59.3% male). Six patients (2.6%) in the no device group and 6 (2.6%) in the device group had a stroke during the follow-up period. No difference in the rate of stroke, transient ischemic stroke, or stroke/transient ischemic stroke was observed between the 2 groups. Conclusions The risk of stroke in patients with PFO and an implantable intracardiac device is similar to those without an intracardiac device. In patients with PFO, without a history of stroke, device implantation might not be considered a risk factor for future stroke occurrence.

Objectives Transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TA-TAVR) is a viable treatment option for selected high-risk elderly patients. We analyzed the 30-day mortality and perioperative complications, focusing on the "learning curve" since our first TA procedure in 2007. We also introduce unique cases, demonstrating new possibilities for alternate access sites and concurrent cardiac interventions using the apical approach. Methods From February 2007 to May 2013, 150 patients underwent TA-TAVR (mean age, 81.4 ± 7 years; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, 9.8 ± 3.5). We compared 2 groups (group A, n = 65, procedures from February 2007 to December 2010; group B, n = 85, procedures from January 2011 to May 2013). Results Five deaths (3.3%) occurred within 30 days, with a decrease in 30-day mortality between the 2 groups (group A, n = 4, 6.2%; group B, n = 1, 1.2%) that became significant at 1 year (log-rank, P = .002). Severe bleeding from the apex (group A, 4.6%; group B 4.4%) and deployment of >1 valve (group A, 7.6%; group B, 10.5%) was similar in both groups. Valve embolization was less frequent in group B (group A, 4.6%; group B, 2.4%). Postoperative complications in groups A and B included stroke (3.1% vs 0%), renal failure (9.3% vs 4.7%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (6.1% vs 5.9%). No myocardial infarctions occurred in either group. Two patients received simultaneous aortic and mitral valve implantation; 1 patient undergoing TA-TAVR also underwent distal arch and descending aorta repair; all had favorable outcomes. With a further 25 TA-TAVR since May 2013, the overall mortality is 2.9% (5/175). Conclusions Although working with the fragile apical tissues in high-risk elderly patients remains a challenge, we have demonstrated a reduction in mortality and complications with increasing experience in TA-TAVR. We have successfully demonstrated novel combined procedures and uses for the transapical approach and alternate access sites, which should continue to be explored.

Objectives The goal of this study was to provide a systematic review and analysis of observational studies on percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion for stroke prophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Background A recent randomized controlled trial in patients with NVAF suggested noninferiority of percutaneous LAA occlusion versus medical management for stroke prevention. However, the use of percutaneous devices remains controversial because of limited literature on their efficacy and safety. We performed a systematic analytical review of existing observational studies to assess the rate of neurological events for patients treated with occlusion devices. Methods A comprehensive search of the Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception through August 1, 2013, was conducted using pre-defined criteria. We included studies reporting implantation in at least 10 patients and a follow-up of 6 months or more. Results In 17 eligible studies, a total of 1,052 devices were implanted in 1,107 patients with 1,586.4 person-years (PY) of follow-up. The adjusted incidence rate of stroke was 0.7/100 PY (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3 to 1.1/100 PY), of transient ischemic attacks was 0.5/100 PY (95% CI: 0.1 to 1.8/100 PY), and of combined neurological events (strokes or transient ischemic attacks) was 1.1/100 PY (95% CI: 0.6 to 1.6/100 PY). Access site vascular complications and pericardial effusion were the most commonly observed procedural complications at a rate of 8.6% (95% CI: 6.3% to 11.7%) and 4.3% (95% CI: 3.1% to 5.9%), respectively. Conclusions Our systematic review suggested comparable efficacy of LAA occlusion devices compared with historical controls treated with adjusted-dose warfarin and other anticoagulation strategies for prevention of stroke in patients with NVAF.

Objectives This study sought to compare everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background There is a paucity of data to exclusively evaluate the safety and efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in the setting of AMI. Methods The present study enrolled 3,309 AMI patients treated with ZES (n = 1,608) or EES (n = 1,701) in a large-scale, prospective, multicenter registry—KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry). Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for differences in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, producing a total of 2,646 patients (1,343 receiving ZES, and 1,343 receiving EES). Target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as the composite of cardiac death, recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. Major clinical outcomes at 1 year were compared between the 2 propensity score-matched groups. Results After propensity score matching, baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes of the propensity score-matched patients showed that, despite similar incidences of recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction and in-hospital and 1-year mortality, patients in the EES group had significantly lower rates of TLF (6.5% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.029) and probable or definite stent thrombosis (0.3% vs. 1.6%, p Conclusions In this propensity-matched comparison, EES seems to be superior to ZES in reducing TLF and stent thrombosis in patients with AMI.

High-dose aspirin has been reported to aggravate coronary artery spasm (CAS). However, it is unknown whether low-dose aspirin (LDA; 100mg) has deleterious impact on CAS. We assessed the impact of LDA on CAS induced by intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test. A total of 2789 consecutive patients without significant coronary artery disease who underwent ACh test between November 2004 and March 2010 were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: the aspirin group taking LDA before ACh test (n=221) and the no aspirin group not taking aspirin (n=2568). At baseline, the prevalence of old age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were higher in the aspirin group. During the ACh test, the incidence of significant CAS, ischemic chest pain, as well as severe and multivessel spasm was higher in the aspirin group. The response rate to lower ACh dose was higher in the aspirin group. Multivariate analysis showed that the previous use of LDA was an independent predictor of CAS (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.0–2.3; p=0.031). However, it is likely that the association of LDA and CAS that we have observed is not causal but may be hypothesis generating due to significant baseline differences. Further, male gender, old age, lipid-lowering drugs, baseline spasm, and myocardial bridge were independent predictors of CAS. LDA was more frequently associated with CAS and ischemic symptoms, as well as severe and multivessel spasm, suggesting the patients who have received LDA would require more intensive medical therapies and close follow up.

Break of a stent delivery catheter and subsequent stent loss (SL) has been a rare event in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. We here report a case of successful retrieval of a stent after a break if the delivery catheter and SL from a balloon catheter at a culprit lesion. We finally resolved this situation using a simple balloon technique for both the broken stent catheter inside of the guide catheter and the unexpanded stent in the culprit lesion. Thus balloons are an important weapon in our armamentarium in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for urgent retrieval of a lost stent. Their apt use definitely allowed our patient to avoid undergoing emergency cardiovascular thoracic surgery.

Both hypertension and coronary artery spasm (CAS) are associated with endothelial dysfunction. Thus, a higher incidence of CAS is expected in hypertensive patients. We evaluated the impact of hypertension on CAS with intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test. A total of 986 patients (685 hypertensive patients vs 301 normotensive patients) who underwent coronary angiography with ACh provocation test were enrolled. ACh was injected into the left coronary artery in incremental doses of 20, 50 and 100 microg min(-1). Significant CAS was defined as a transient70% luminal narrowing with concurrent chest pain and/or ST-segment changes. Although the incidences of significant ACh-induced CAS were similar between hypertensive and normotensive patients (35.8 vs 39.2%, P=0.303), multivariate logistic analysis showed that hypertension was negatively associated with ACh-induced CAS (odds ratio: 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.94, P=0.020). The angiographic characteristics of ACh-induced CAS were similar between these two groups. Subgroup analysis regarding the impact of the status of blood pressure control on CAS showed that hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure had a significantly higher incidence of CAS than those with uncontrolled blood pressure (45.2 vs 27.9%, P0.001), and that uncontrolled blood pressure was negatively associated with ACh-induced CAS (odds ratio: 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.40-0.79, P=0.001). In conclusion, despite the expected endothelial dysfunction, hypertension and uncontrolled blood pressure are negatively associated with CAS, suggesting that the mechanisms and risk factors of CAS may be significantly different from those of coronary artery disease.

Background The SAPIEN-XT is a newer generation balloon-expandable valve created of cobalt chromium frame, as opposed to the stainless steel frame used in the older generation SAPIEN valve. We sought to determine if there was difference in acute recoil between the two valves. Methods All patients who underwent transfemoral–transcatheter aortic valve replacement using the SAPIEN-XT valve at the Cleveland Clinic were included. Recoil was measured using biplane cine-angiographic image analysis of valve deployment. Acute recoil was defined as [(valve diameter at maximal balloon inflation) − (valve diameter after deflation)]/valve diameter at maximal balloon inflation (reported as percentage). Patients undergoing SAPIEN valve implantation were used as the comparison group. Results Among the 23 mm valves, the mean (standard deviation—SD) acute recoil was 2.77% (1.14) for the SAPIEN valve as compared to 3.75% (1.52) for the SAPIEN XT valve (P = 0.04). Among the 26 mm valves, the mean (SD) acute recoil was 2.85% (1.4) for the SAPIEN valve as compared to 4.32% (1.63) for the SAPIEN XT valve (P = 0.01). Multivariable linear regression analysis demonstrated significantly greater adjusted recoil in the SAPIEN XT valves as compared to the SAPIEN valves by 1.43% [(95% CI: 0.69–2.17), P

The determinants of clinical decision-making for potent platelet inhibition with prasugrel versus clopidogrel in real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to identify factors

The contemporary incidence, associated factors and implications of stroke after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and novel antiplatelet drugs is unknown. We sought to characterize the incidence, predictors and impact of stroke on subsequent

Results: High hs CRP group had more elderly and smoker, more STEMI and NSTEMI, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Six-month angiographic outcomes were similar between two groups and pts of high hs CRP group showed higher cumulative cardiac death (CD) and total major cardiac adverse event (MACE) up to 2 years compared with control group. High hsCRP was an independent risk factor of CD (Adjusted OR: 11.290, 95% CI:3.847-33.133, p-value=0.001) and total MACE up to 2 years (Adjusted OR: 2.712, 95% CI:1.854-3.967, p-value=0.001) (Table).

To the Editor: We read with interest the work by Chen et al,1 which reported that triple antiplatelet therapy seems to be superior to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Chen et al1 reported the mortality benefits of triple antiplatelet therapy obtained mainly within 30 days after STEMI, reflecting the importance of the addition of cilostazol to aspirin and clopidogrel before stenting. Meanwhile, …

Background: There is limited information regarding the angiographic and clinical outcomes among the different drug-eluting stents (DESs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results: A total 355 consecutive AMI patients who underwent PCI with a sirolimus- (SES, n=116) or paclitaxel- (PES, n=153) or zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES, n=86) were enrolled. The 6-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared among the 3 groups. At 6 months, there was a trend toward a higher incidence of binary restenosis in the PES group (SES: 8.6%, PES: 19.8%, ZES: 8.3%, P=0.052). Percentage of restenosis was higher in the PES group compared with SES, but was similar to ZES (SES: 18.75 ±18.16%, PES: 29.32 ±24.16%, ZES: 23.91 ±17.03%, P=0.006). Late loss was lower in the SES group compared with PES and ZES (SES: 0.44 ±0.52, PES: 0.83 ±0.87, ZES: 0.75 ±0.63, P

Background— Whether triple antiplatelet therapy is superior or similar to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of drug-eluting stents remains unclear. Methods and Results— A total of 4203 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents were analyzed retrospectively in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). They received either dual (aspirin plus clopidogrel; dual group; n=2569) or triple (aspirin plus clopidogrel plus cilostazol; triple group; n=1634) antiplatelet therapy. The triple group received additional cilostazol at least for 1 month. Various major adverse cardiac events at 8 months were compared between these 2 groups. Compared with the dual group, the triple group had a similar incidence of major bleeding events but a significantly lower incidence of in-hospital mortality. Clinical outcomes at 8 months showed that the triple group had significantly lower incidences of cardiac death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.84; P =0.007), total death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.89; P =0.010), and total major adverse cardiac events (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.95; P =0.019) than the dual group. Subgroup analysis showed that older (>65 years old), female, and diabetic patients got more benefits from triple antiplatelet therapy than their counterparts who received dual antiplatelet therapy. Conclusions— Triple antiplatelet therapy seems to be superior to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. These results may provide the rationale for the use of triple antiplatelet therapy in these patients.

Background: Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) can be an important future cardiovascular event. The impact of previous cerebrovascular disease (CVD) on the clinical characteristics and midterm outcomes of patients (pts) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been well described in Asian population. Methods: Data were analyzed from 8151 pts with AMI (either STEMI or NSTEMI) enrolled in Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) from 2005 to 2007. Results: Of 8151 pts, 552 pts (6.8%) had previous CVD. The pts with CVD were older (68.95 ± 10.11 vs 62.83 ± 12.74, P P P P P =0.003) at 8 months. The incidences of recurrent MI and repeat revascularization at 8 months were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Pts with CVD showed more severe and worse clinical characteristics on admission and was associated with lower rates of PCI or thrombolysis. When we consider the poorer midterm clinical outcomes including higher mortality and MACE, in pts with prior CVD, more intensive and aggressive management for this particular subset of pts should be emphasized for better long-term clinical outcomes.

To the Editor: Mitral valve (MV) surgery is recommended in patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) [(1)][1]. The role of MV surgery is unclear in patients with severe MR secondary to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction [(1)][1]. Many patients with severe MR are at high surgical

Background Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have drastically improved the angiographic and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients (pts) with diabetes mellitus. However, little has been known whether the different types of DESs have similar efficacy in Asian diabetic pts. Methods A total of 305 diabetic pts who underwent PCI with Sirolimus (SES group; Cypher, n=102 pts, 247 lesions), Paclitaxel (PES group; Taxus, n=138 pts, 414 lesions) or Zotarolimus (ZES group; Endeavour, n=65 pts, 138 lesions)-eluting stents were enrolled. Angiographic outcomes at 6 months and cumulative clinical outcomes up to 2 years were compared among these 3 groups. Results These 3 groups had similar baseline clinical and procedural characteristics except that SES group had longer stent length and PES group had smaller stent diameter as compared with other groups. Six-month angiographic outcomes showed that SES group had less binary restenosis, lower restenosis percent, and late loss as compared with the other 2 groups. Major clinical outcomes were similar among the 3 groups up to 2 years except a trend towards lower incidence of TVR in SES group as compared with the other 2 groups. ZES group had 1 acute, 1 subacute, and 1 late stent thrombosis (ST), while the other 2 groups didn9t have ST throughout the follow-up period (Table). Conclusions Although SES had favourable angiographic outcomes at 6 months as compared with PES and ZES, these angiographic benefits were not translated into better clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes up to 2 years. Table: Six-month Angiographic and 2-year clinical outcomes Variable, n (%) SES Group (n=102 pts, 247 lesions) PES Group (n=138 pts, 414 lesions) ZES Group (n=65 pts, 138 lesions) p value Stent diameter, mm 2.95±0.36 2.86±0.38 3.03±0.44

Background and Objectives Although the use of heterogeneous overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) is not uncommon in clinical practice, whether the implantation sequences of heterogeneous DES will influence the endothelialization or arterial responses differently remains unclear. Materials and Methods Twenty-one rabbits were randomized to receive overlapping stents in the iliac artery for 3 months {distal sirolimus-eluting stent (SES, Cypher™)+proximal paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES, Taxus™) (C+T, n=7), distal Taxus+proximal Cypher (T+C, n=7) and bare metal stent (BMS)+BMS (B+B, n=7)}. Endothelial function was evaluated by the acetylcholine provocation test during follow-up angiography. Histopathological changes in proximal, overlapped, and distal stented segments were evaluated. Results Although the overall angiographic outcomes were comparable, late loss (mm) in the distal stented segment was higher in the B+B (0.39±0.07) and C+T (0.40±0.20) than that in the T+C (0.06±0.02) group (p

Background: Higher level of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) is known to be associated with long term vascular complications of diabetic patients (pts). However, there have been limited data whether...

Summary Background Whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin is equivalent to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) remains unclear. Methods A total of 2397 NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI with DES received either LMWH [ n = 1178, subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg, b.i.d., initiated after the patient's arrival and continued until 3–5 days after PCI plus reduced dose of UFH (50–70 U/kg) during PCI] or UFH ( n = 1219, 24,000 U/day infusion, initiated after the patient's arrival and continued until at least 48 h after PCI). The bleeding events and clinical outcomes during in-hospital and at 8 months were compared. Results Enoxaparin group had similar incidences of cardiac death, total death, and total major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 8 months compared with UFH group. The incidences of major and minor bleeding events were also similar between the two groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that enoxaparin group had similar incidences of cardiac death [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–2.10, p = 0.620], total death (adjusted OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.66–1.76, p = 0.760), and total MACE (adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.28, p = 0.692) at 8 months as compared with UFH group. Conclusions Enoxaparin with reduced dose of UFH only during PCI as an adjunctive antithrombotic therapy in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI with DES was safe and showed comparable 8-month clinical outcomes as compared with UFH alone.

Randomized data have shown that prasugrel is superior to clopidogrel in reducing ischemic risk including unplanned revascularization, albeit with increased bleeding. Greater stent length is also an independent correlate of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to

There is a paucity of evidence on the impact of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on long-term outcomes in patients with ejection fraction (EF) >40% after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial