Search

Aim: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) during refractory cardiac arrest presents significant medical and psychological challenges for healthcare providers. Beyond managing cardiac arrest and preparing for potential coronary angiography, the ECMO circuit must be assembled and primed under strictly sterile conditions, contributing to additional psychological stress and potential delays in ECMO cannulation. This pragmatic study thought to evaluate whether pre-assembled and pre-primed ECMO circuits (pre-primed group) maintain sterility over a 21-day period, expedite ECMO initiation in ECPR patients and alleviate the psychological burden on the ECPR team, compared to newly assembled and primed ECMO circuits (on-demand group)., Methods: In a prospective manner, ECMO circuits were either pre-assembled and pre-primed under sterile conditions, maintained for 21 days with culture samples taken every seventh day, or newly assembled and primed during the acute emergency situation. The transition from on-demand assembly and priming of ECMO circuits to pre-primed ECMO circuits occurred on January 1st, 2021. The interval between patients' arrival in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and the initiation of ECMO was recorded and retrospectively compared between the two treatment groups. The ECPR team, comprising experienced cardiologists and nurses, was prospectively surveyed using the modified Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-20)., Results: All aseptically pre-assembled and pre-primed ECMO circuits demonstrated sterile cultures for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms as well as fungal agents over the 21-day period: 0/120 positive cultures (0 %, 95 % CI for binomial probability 0-0.03). The time to ECMO initiation was significantly reduced in the pre-primed group compared to the on-demand group: 13 [IQR 9-17] versus 31 [IQR 27-44] minutes, P < 0.001. Responses from ECPR physicians and nurses on the PSQ-20 were similar across all items. With the use of pre-primed ECMO circuits, all ECPR professionals reported a greater sense of settled inner feeling, considerably less psychological tension, fewer worries and insecurities, as well as more effective ICU shifts with improved personal goal achievement. However, treating ECPR patients with pre-primed ECMO circuits did not lead to increased job satisfaction or higher physical energy levels., Conclusion: Aseptically pre-assembled and pre-primed ECMO circuits maintain sterility for multiple weeks, significantly reducing ECMO initiation times and alleviating psychological strain on the ECPR team. Consequently, implementing these circuits in ECPR centers could enhance both patient outcomes and healthcare provider well-being., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Objective: We investigated the benefit of Impella, a modern percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) device, versus former standard intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS)., Methods: This single-centre, retrospective study included patients with AMICS receiving pMCS with either Impella or IABP. Disease severity at baseline was assessed with the IABP-SHOCK II score. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were parameters of shock severity at the early postimplantation phase. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models identified independent predictors of the primary outcome., Results: Of 116 included patients, 62 (53%) received Impella and 54 (47%) IABP. Despite similar baseline mortality risk (IABP-SHOCK II high-risk score of 18 % vs 20 %; p = 0.76), Impella significantly reduced the inotropic score (p < 0.001), lactate levels (p < 0.001) and SAPS II (p = 0.02 ) and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.01). All-cause mortality at 30 days was similar with Impella and IABP (52 % and 67 %, respectively; p = 0.13), but bleeding complications were more frequent in the Impella group (3 vs 4 units of transfused erythrocytes concentrates due to bleeding complications, p = 0.03). Previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.76 to 5.89; p < 0.01) and an estimated intermediate (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.40; p < 0.01) and high (HR 4.32 95% CI 2.03 to 9.24; p = 0.01) IABP-SHOCK II score were independent predictors of all-cause mortality., Conclusions: In patients with AMICS, haemodynamic support with the Impella device had no significant effect on 30-day mortality as compared with IABP. In these patients, large randomised trials are warranted to ascertain the effect of Impella on the outcome., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT: Dr Carsten Skurk has perceived lecturer fees from Abiomed, outside the submitted work. Dr Landmesser reports grants from Edwards Lifesciences, grants and personal fees from Abbott, outside the submitted work. All other authors report no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.