To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.01.014 Byline: Monique A.M. Berger (a), Arno J. Krul (b), Hein A.M. Daanen (b)(c) Keywords: Dexterity tests; Gloves Abstract: Finger dexterity tests are generally used to assess performance decrease due to gloves, cold and pathology. It is generally assumed that the O'Connor and Purdue Pegboard test yield similar results. In this experiment we compared these two tests for dry conditions without gloves, and for dry and wet conditions with two types of Nytril gloves. In line with previous observations, wearing gloves caused a decrease in performance of about 12% for the O'Connor test and 9% for the Purdue test. Wetting the gloves prior to the test had no effect on the Purdue score. However, wetting the gloves increased the O'Connor performance significantly by 11%. The results show that the O'Connor and Purdue tests do not yield similar results and should be used selectively for specific tasks. Author Affiliation: (a) Human Kinetic Technology, The Hague University, P.O. Box 13336, 2501 EH The Hague, The Netherlands (b) TNO Defence, Safety and Security, Business Unit Human Factors, Soesterberg, The Netherlands (c) Faculty of Human Movement Science, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Article History: Received 10 September 2007; Accepted 30 January 2008