Search

Introduction: Solanezumab treatment was previously shown to significantly increase total (bound + unbound) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of amyloid β (Aβ) 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia yet did not produce meaningful cognitive effects. This analysis assessed solanezumab's central nervous system target engagement by evaluating changes in CSF total and free Aβ isoforms and their relationship with solanezumab exposure., Methods: CSF Aβ isoform concentrations were measured in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease dementia from a pooled EXPEDITION + EXPEDITION2 population and from EXPEDITION3. CSF solanezumab concentrations were determined from EXPEDITION3., Results: Solanezumab produced statistically significant increases in CSF total Aβ isoforms versus placebo, which correlated with CSF solanezumab concentration. Inconsistent effects on free Aβ isoforms were observed. Solanezumab penetration into the central nervous system was low., Discussion: Solanezumab administration engaged the central molecular target, and molar ratio analyses demonstrated that higher exposures may further increase CSF total Aβ concentrations.

Introduction: An Elecsys® Amyloid β (Aβ [1-42]) immunoassay cutoff for classification of patients with Alzheimer's disease was investigated., Methods: Cerebrospinal fluid samples collected from patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease were analyzed by Elecsys® immunoassays: (1) Aβ (1-42), (2) total tau, and (3) phosphorylated tau. Cutoffs (Aβ [1-42] and ratios with tau) were estimated by method comparison between AlzBio3 ( n  = 206), mixture modeling ( n  = 216), and concordance with florbetapir F 18 imaging-based classification ( n  = 75)., Results: A 1065-pg/mL (95% confidence interval: 985-1153) Elecsys® Aβ (1-42) cutoff provided 94% overall percentage agreement with AlzBio3. Comparable cutoff estimates (95% confidence interval) were derived from mixture modeling (equally weighted: 1017 [949-1205] pg/mL; prevalence weighted: 1172 [1081-1344] pg/mL) and concordance with florbetapir F 18 imaging (visual read: 1198 [998-1591] pg/mL; automated: 1198 [1051-1638] pg/mL)., Discussion: Based on three approaches, a 1100-pg/mL Elecsys® Aβ (1-42) cutoff is suitable for clinical trials with similar populations and preanalytical handling.

Background: Amyloid-β 1-42 peptide (Aβ 1-42 ) is associated with plaque formation in the brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Pharmacodynamic studies of AD therapeutics that lower the concentrations of Aβ 1-42 in peripheral blood require highly sensitive assays for its measurement. A digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using single molecule array (Simoa) technology has been developed that provides improved sensitivity compared with conventional ELISA methods using the same antibody reagents., Methods: A sensitive digital ELISA for measurement of Aβ 1-42 using antibodies 3D6 and 21F12 was developed. Assay performance was evaluated by repeated testing of pooled human plasma and buffer diluent quality control samples to determine relative accuracy, intra- and inter-assay precision, limit of detection (LOD), lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), dilutional linearity, and spike recovery. The optimized assay was used to quantify Aβ 1-42 in clinical samples from patients treated with the β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 inhibitor LY2886721., Results: The prototype assay measured Aβ 1-42 with an LOD of 0.3 pg/ml and an LLOQ of 2.8 pg/ml in plasma, calibrated using an Aβ 1-42 peptide standard from Fujirebio. Assay precision was acceptable with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation both being ≤10%. Dilutional linearity was demonstrated in sample diluent and immunodepleted human plasma. Analyte spike recovery ranged from 51% to 93% with a mean of 80%. This assay was able to quantify Aβ 1-42 in all of the 84 clinical samples tested. A rapid reduction in levels of Aβ 1-42 was detected within 1 h after drug treatment, and a dose-dependent decrease of Aβ 1-42 levels was also observed over the time course of sample collection., Conclusions: This digital ELISA has potential utility in clinical applications for quantification of Aβ 1-42 in plasma where high sensitivity and precision are required.

Increasingly, commercial immunoassay kits are used to support drug discovery and development. Longitudinally consistent kit performance is crucial, but the degree to which kits and reagents are characterized by manufacturers is not standardized, nor are the approaches by users to adapt them and evaluate their performance through validation prior to use. These factors can negatively impact data quality. This paper offers a systematic approach to assessment, method adaptation and validation of commercial immunoassay kits for quantification of biomarkers in drug development, expanding upon previous publications and guidance. These recommendations aim to standardize and harmonize user practices, contributing to reliable biomarker data from commercial immunoassays, thus, enabling properly informed decisions during drug development.

Aims: Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist that inhibits ADP-mediated platelet activation and aggregation. Accordingly, it may be useful in reducing platelet-related ischaemia in sickle cell disease (SCD). Exposure to prasugrel's active metabolite (Pras-AM) and its antiplatelet activity in SCD have not been investigated., Methods: Thirteen adult patients with SCD and an equal number of matched healthy control subjects were studied before and after 12 days of 5.0 or 7.5 mg day(-1) prasugrel treatment. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), impedance aggregometry (MEA), VerifyNow® P2Y12, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation and Plateletworks. Exposure to Pras-AM was also assessed., Results: At baseline, patients with SCD showed increased platelet reactivity vs. healthy control subjects with VerifyNow (408 vs. 323 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), respectively, P = 0.003) and MEA (106 vs. 77 area under the aggregation curve (AU.min), P = 0.002); lower platelet reactivity index with VASP flow cytometry (59 vs. 79% platelet reactivity index (PRI), P = 0.018); and no significant differences with LTA, VASP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or Plateletworks. Relative to baseline, prasugrel significantly reduced platelet reactivity by all assays in both populations (all P < 0.05). Prasugrel was well tolerated, with no bleeding-related events in patients with SCD. The mean concentration-time profiles of Pras-AM were comparable between healthy subjects and patients with SCD following a single 10 mg prasugrel dose and following the 12th dose of 7.5 or 5 mg prasugrel., Conclusions: Results demonstrate that in response to prasugrel, patients with SCD and healthy subjects have similar degrees of platelet inhibition and exposure to Pras-AM, and provide a basis for further study of prasugrel in patients with SCD., (© 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Thienopyridines are metabolized to active metabolites that irreversibly inhibit the platelet P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate receptor. The pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel is more variable than the response to prasugrel, but the reasons for variation in response to clopidogrel are not well characterized., Objective: To determine the relationship between genetic variation in cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic response to prasugrel and clopidogrel., Methods: Genotyping was performed for CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 on samples from healthy subjects participating in studies evaluating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to prasugrel (60 mg, n = 71) or clopidogrel (300 mg, n = 74)., Results: In subjects receiving clopidogrel, the presence of the CYP2C19*2 loss of function variant was significantly associated with lower exposure to clopidogrel active metabolite, as measured by the area under the concentration curve (AUC(0-24); P = 0.004) and maximal plasma concentration (C(max); P = 0.020), lower inhibition of platelet aggregation at 4 h (P = 0.003) and poor-responder status (P = 0.030). Similarly, CYP2C9 loss of function variants were significantly associated with lower AUC(0-24) (P = 0.043), lower C(max) (P = 0.006), lower IPA (P = 0.046) and poor-responder status (P = 0.024). For prasugrel, there was no relationship observed between CYP2C19 or CYP2C9 loss of function genotypes and exposure to the active metabolite of prasugrel or pharmacodynamic response., Conclusions: The common loss of function polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 are associated with decreased exposure to the active metabolite of clopidogrel but not prasugrel. Decreased exposure to its active metabolite is associated with a diminished pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel.

The aims of this open-label, randomized, dose-escalation pharmacodynamic study of prasugrel, an orally active antiplatelet agent, were to assess its interaction with aspirin (ASA, 325 mg) in healthy subjects after a loading dose (LD) and subsequent 5 days of once-daily maintenance doses (MD) of prasugrel or the active comparator, clopidogrel. We measured platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen, and TRAP and compared effects on maximal and residual platelet aggregation responses. On a background of ASA, subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 prasugrel treatment groups (LD/MD in mg: 20/5, 30/7.5, 40/10, or 60/15; n = 8/group) or to clopidogrel 300 mg LD/75 mg MD (n = 11). Prasugrel dose-dependently inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation and exhibited higher levels of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel or ASA alone. Prasugrel plus ASA resulted in additive inhibition of collagen- and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation. Although inhibition of residual aggregation was greater than inhibition of maximal aggregation, values were highly correlated. The safety and tolerability of prasugrel plus ASA were also monitored. Within the limitations of the study, prasugrel was found to be well tolerated when dosed as LD followed by MD in the presence of ASA and provided greater platelet inhibition than ASA alone.

Background: Addition of adenosine to cardioplegic fluid has been shown to improve myocardial tolerance to ischemia. This study was designed to investigate further this phenomenon to evaluate the dose-response and the temperature dependence of the effect of addition of adenosine to St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution., Methods: The isolated working rat heart model was used in this study. After the assessment of control function, hearts (6 in each group) were subjected to infusions of cardioplegic solution containing 0.0 (control), 0.1, 5.0, 10.0 or 20.0 mmol/L adenosine followed by 3 hours of ischemic arrest at temperatures of 20 degrees C, 10 degrees C, or 4 degrees C with multidose (3 minutes every 30 minutes) cardioplegic infusion., Results: After ischemic arrest at 20 degrees C, the recovery of cardiac output (expressed as percent of preischemic baseline) was 35.4 +/- 5.11 (control) 45.0 +/- 5.51 (0.1 mmol/L), 53.1 +/- 2.9 (5.0 mmol/L), 61.8 +/- 3.7 (10.0 mmol/L), and 57.6 +/- 2.3 (20.0 mmol/L). Hearts receiving 5.0 to 20.0 mmol/L adenosine had significantly greater recovery of cardiac output than control hearts. In its optimal concentration (10 mmol/L), adenosine improved the efficacy of the cardioplegic solution by almost 75%. Myocardial adenosine triphosphate content (expressed in mumol/g protein) was 4.7 +/- 0.5 (control), 4.9 +/- 1.4 (0.1 mmol/L), 8.1 +/- 0.7 (5 mmol/L), 12.5 +/- 2.0 (10 mmol/L), and 11.2 +/- 2.8 (20 mmol/L), at the end of ischemia and 13.9 +/- 0.2 (control), 13.1 +/- 1.7 (0.1 mmol/L), 18.0 +/- 2.0 (5 mmol/L), 18.6 +/- 1.2 (10 mmol/L), and 20.7 +/- 2.1 (20 mmol/L) at the end of reperfusion. Thus, the adenosine triphosphate content was higher (p < 0.05) in hearts receiving 5.0 to 20.0 mmol/L adenosine than in controls both at the end of ischemia and after reperfusion. Myocardial adenosine monophosphate level at the end of ischemia was inversely related to adenosine triphosphate level. Functional assessment of the effect of 10 mmol/L adenosine at 10 degrees C and 4 degrees C during arrest indicated attenuation of beneficial effects: adenosine improved function only by 17% at 10 degrees C, whereas at 4 degrees C the protective effect was not observed., Conclusions: These observations suggest that adenosine has the potential to enhance the efficacy of clinical cardioplegic arrest but the degree of improvement is lower at decreased temperature during ischemia. A principal mechanism of action of this modification of cardioplegic fluid appears to be through the inhibition of high-energy phosphate utilization immediately before or during ischemia.

Background: The role of cardiac extrinsic innervation in the regulation of sodium balance and blood pressure is controversial., Methods and Results: We performed a double-blind study of endocrine and blood pressure responses to 5 days of low- (LS, 10 mmol/d) and 5 days of high- (350 mmol/d) sodium intake in 12 cardiac transplant recipients, 12 matched healthy subjects, and 12 matched subjects with untreated essential hypertension. In transplant recipients on low sodium, supine blood pressure was 137/94 +/- 8/4 (mean +/- SEM) mm Hg and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) was 59.3 +/- 6.3 pg/mL; on high sodium, blood pressure was 148/97 +/- 5/3 mmHg (P < .05 for systolic pressure versus LS), and ANP was 94.3 +/- 10.6 pg/mL (P < .01 versus LS), respectively. Plasma ANP for those on each diet was significantly higher in the cardiac transplant recipients than in healthy or hypertensive controls; relative changes in plasma ANP in changing from low- to high-sodium diet were similar in each group. Urinary sodium excretion by the fifth day of each diet was similar in each group. Suppression of plasma renin activity and aldosterone by high-sodium diet was blunted in cardiac transplant recipients compared with healthy subjects (respectively, plasma renin activity: 1.41 +/- 0.30 versus 0.68 +/- 0.21 ng.mL-1 x h-1, P < .05; aldosterone: 391 +/- 35 versus 166 +/- 21 pmol/L, P < .05)., Conclusions: These results suggest that extensive denervation of the heart does not result in major abnormalities in regulation of large changes in sodium intake and that intact cardiac innervation is not required for plasma ANP responses to altered sodium intake. Blood pressure after cardiac transplantation is sensitive to reduced sodium intake.

The components of the University of Wisconsin solution have the potential to enhance and extend heart preservation. We have evaluated University of Wisconsin solution by comparing it with St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution in the isolated pig heart subjected to 8 hours of ischemia at 4 degrees C (n = 6 in each). The hearts were perfused ex vivo with enriched autologous blood for the control and the postpreservation assessments. Morphologic, metabolic, and functional evaluations were performed. Left and right ventricular function as assessed by the slope values of systolic and diastolic pressure-volume relationships of isovolumically contracting isolated heart was better preserved by University of Wisconsin solution (percent reduction: left ventricular systolic, 52.4% +/- 5.5% versus 17.7% +/- 6.7% [p less than 0.001]; right ventricular systolic, 125.6% +/- 46.4% versus 65.5% +/- 31.4% [p less than 0.05]; right ventricular diastolic, 112.3% +/- 48.7% versus 40.2% +/- 31.3% [p less than 0.02] after St. Thomas' Hospital and University of Wisconsin preservation, respectively). Postischemic recovery of left ventricular rate of rise of pressure and myocardial oxygen consumption were significantly improved after University of Wisconsin preservation (percent reduction, rate of rise of pressure: St. Thomas' Hospital 39.3% +/- 8.1%; University of Wisconsin 18.1% +/- 4.6%; percent reduction, myocardial oxygen consumption St. Thomas' Hospital 55.1% +/- 6.9%, University of Wisconsin 24.8% +/- 6.7%; p less than 0.001). Microvascular functional integrity as assessed by coronary vascular resistance was well maintained throughout the postischemic period and was similar to the preischemic control value in the University of Wisconsin group. By contrast, a significant increase was found at the beginning of postpreservation reperfusion, with a progressive rise thereafter in the St. Thomas' Hospital group (p less than 0.001). Preservation of myocardial adenosine triphosphate was improved and energy charge was unchanged after 8 hours of ischemia and reperfusion in the University of Wisconsin-preserved hearts compared with the St. Thomas' Hospital-preserved hearts (p less than 0.01). Electron microscopic examination revealed substantially better preservation of the contractile apparatus after preservation with University of Wisconsin solution. Myocytes from hearts receiving University of Wisconsin solution, unlike those given St. Thomas' Hospital solution, showed relaxed myofibrils with prominent I-bands. We conclude that University of Wisconsin solution has the potential to improve the preservation of the heart and possibly prolong the ischemic period in clinical cardiac transplantation.

The University of Wisconsin solution differs from other types of solutions used for organ preservation because it contains high-energy phosphate precursors (adenosine and phosphate), impermeants (lactobionate and raffinose), an oncotic agent (pentafraction), and antioxidants (allopurinol and glutathione). These components have the potential to enhance the preservation of ATP, reduce intracellular and extracellular edema, and attenuate free-radical-mediated injury. The University of Wisconsin solution has been demonstrated to enhance and extend the preservation of the liver, pancreas, and kidney, but its potential role in the heart remains unproven. We have evaluated the University of Wisconsin solution (Du Pont) by comparing it with the St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solutions No. 1 and No. 2 (Plegisol), which are used in Europe and the United States for routine cardiac surgery and transplantation. For each solution, 10 isolated working rat hearts were arrested by 10 ml of the solution (at 4 degrees C) and then maintained immersed in the same solution for 4 hours at 4 degrees C. Mean recovery of functional indexes (expressed as a percentage of their preischemic control values) after use of the University of Wisconsin solution were as follows: peak aortic pressure, 90.6 +/- 1.0; dP/dt, 71.5 +/- 5.5; aortic flow, 81.6 +/- 4.7; coronary flow, 87.5 +/- 3.5; and cardiac output, 82.6 +/- 3.5. In contrast, the mean recoveries after St. Thomas' Hospital solution No. 1 were as follows: peak aortic pressure, 82.8 +/- 1.3; dP/dt, 49.7 +/- 3.0; aortic flow, 58.4 +/- 5.3; coronary flow, 79.6 +/- 5.9; and cardiac output, 63.0 +/- 4.9. In contrast still, mean recoveries after St. Thomas' Hospital solution No. 2 were as follows: peak aortic pressure, 83.1 +/- 1.2; dP/dt, 40.7 +/- 6.1; aortic flow, 37.0 +/- 5.1; coronary flow, 65.8 +/- 3.6; and cardiac output, 43.1 +/- 5.6. The recovery of all indexes were significantly superior (p less than 0.005) after preservation with University of Wisconsin solution compared with either of the St. Thomas' Hospital solutions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)