Search

In July 2005, Argentina became the first country after the United States to introduce the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) for organ allocation. In this study, we investigated waiting-list (WL) outcomes (n = 3272) and post-liver transplantation (LT) survival in 2 consecutive periods of 5 years before and after the implementation of a MELD-based allocation policy. Data were obtained from the database of the national institute for organ allocation in Argentina. After the adoption of the MELD system, there were significant reductions in WL mortality [28.5% versus 21.9%, P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37-1.81] and total dropout rates (38.6% versus 29.1%, P < 0.001, HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.16-1.48) despite significantly less LT accessibility (57.4% versus 50.7%, P < 0.001, HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.39-1.68). The annual number of deaths per 1000 patient-years at risk decreased from 273 in 2005 to 173 in 2010, and the number of LT procedures per 1000 patient-years at risk decreased from 564 to 422. MELD and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium scores were excellent predictors of 3-month WL mortality with c statistics of 0.828 and 0.857, respectively (P < 0.001). No difference was observed in 1-year posttransplant survival between the 2 periods (81.1% versus 81.3%). Although patients with a MELD score > 30 had lower posttransplant survival, the global accuracy of the score for predicting outcomes was poor, as indicated by a c statistic of only 0.523. Patients with granted MELD exceptions (158 for hepatocellular carcinoma and 52 for other reasons) had significantly higher access to LT (80.4%) in comparison with nonexception patients with equivalent listing priority (MELD score = 18-25; 54.6%, P < 0.001, HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.40-0.61). In conclusion, the adoption of the MELD model in Argentina has resulted in improved liver organ allocation without compromising posttransplant survival., (© 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Objectives: In patients diagnosed with incidental gallbladder cancer (GC), the benefit and optimal extent of further surgery remain unclear. The aims of this study were to analyse outcomes in patients who underwent liver resection following a diagnosis of incidental GC and to determine factors associated with longterm survival., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with incidental GC between June 1999 and June 2010 was performed. Data covering demographics, clinical and surgical characteristics and local pathological stage were analysed., Results: A total of 24 patients were identified. All patients underwent a resection of segments IVb and V and lymphadenectomy. Histological examination revealed residual disease in 10 patients, all of whom presented with recurrent disease at 3-12 months. Overall 5-year survival was 53%. Increasing T-stage (P < 0.001), tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P= 0.003), and the presence of residual tumour in the resected liver (P < 0.001) were all associated with worse survival., Conclusions: Aggressive re-resection of incidental GC offers the only chance for cure, but its efficacy depends on the extent of disease found at the time of repeat surgery. The presence of residual disease correlated strongly with T-stage and was the most relevant prognostic factor for survival in patients treated with curative resection., (© 2012 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.)