Search

In August 2014,1 arrived in Ferguson, Missouri, to cover the fatal shooting of Michael Brown by police officer Darren Wilson. As a young photojournalist, I found myself at the epicenter [...]

This article examines the significance of the so-called “lootings” (rabovačky) in Upper Hungary in the autumn of 1918, when receding soldiers and broad sections of the population attacked the representatives of state power and Jewish innkeepers stereotyped as “usurers.” In addition to their anti-Jewish character, their symbolic content, in which revolt against the old order was accompanied by carnivalesque violent mockery of it, is elaborated upon. The greatest attention, however, is paid to the political instrumentalization of the “lootings” on the part of the representatives of the new Czechoslovak state. This instrumentalization ranged from appropriation (albeit hesitant, given their violent nature) to condemnation: the former for the “Czechoslovak revolution” in the post-war years, the latter as a prelude to Bolshevization at the height of the economic crisis in the early 1930s.

Maladaptive behaviors during a disaster refer to actions that do not benefit the individual or society. Quarantelli highlights several maladaptive behaviors myths associated with disasters: widespread antisocial behavior, passivity, role conflict or abandonment, and sudden widespread mental health breakdowns (1). Despite early work reporting these myths, the common perception is that maladaptive behaviors such as rioting, looting, panic, and criminal conduct are prevalent in the wake of disasters. This is despite research by de Ville de Goyet and Arnold which has called on public officials and the media to stop propagating false disaster myths (2, 3). The classic academic response has been that this is a misconception and that, in fact, such behaviors are a very small part of the overall disaster and are mostly non-existent. Misconceptions about the prevalence of maladaptive behaviors can lead to inappropriate resource allocation, such as allocating extra police officers to prevent looting when the overall crime rate for the most part, decreases during disasters (4). Furthermore, while there are several persistent maladaptive behaviors myths, this is confounded by the presence of actual negative behaviors post disaster: false damage claims, insurance fraud, illegally obtaining relief supplies, failure to provide contracted repair services, hoarding of essential items, psychological trauma (which can lead to intergenerational transmission of the disaster memory) and medications and price gouging (5).When reading lay-press articles about recent disasters, it appears that these behaviors are on the rise. This raises the question: Has there been a change in the basic human reaction to disasters and are maladaptive behaviors on the rise? This review article focuses on case studies from three natural disasters: Hurricanes Hugo and Katrina, and the Haiti Earthquake. The goal of this review article is to evaluate these three natural disasters for evidence of maladaptive behaviors.

The longstanding illicit trafficking of archaeological artefacts has persistently presented a global issue, posing a substantial threat to cultural heritage. This paper introduces an innovative automated system that utilises Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML), and Social Network Analysis (SNA) to construct a Knowledge Graph for antiquities. The objective is to offer insights into the provenance of artefacts and identify potential instances of illicit trafficking. The paper delineates a comprehensive methodology, from the ontology to the Knowledge Graph. The methodology comprises four distinct phases: the initial phase involves tailoring existing ontologies to match project-specific needs; the second phase centres on selecting appropriate technologies, and scraping and text-mining tools are designed to extract pertinent data from textual sources; the third phase centres in the creation of a robust and accurate Knowledge Graph that captures artefact provenance. The paper suggests employing NLP models, specifically utilising Named Entity Recognition (NER) techniques. These models automatically extract relevant information from the unstructured provenance texts, organising them as events to which both objects and actors participated with their locations and dates. The final phase is concerned with defining and building the Knowledge Graph. The authors explore a property graph model that distinctively represents nodes and relationships, each augmented by associated properties. Employing an SNA approach, the model is projected in multiple network levels of ownership histories (actor-object network) or actor relationships (actor-actor network). This approach reveals patterns within the antiquities market. When integrated with the authors’ recommended strategies such as crowdsourced ontology definition, collaboration with reputable organisations for quality sources, and the application of transfer learning techniques, the suggested approach holds promising implications for the protection of cultural heritage.

This article examines the significance of the so-called "lootings" (rabovačky) in Upper Hungary in the autumn of 1918, when receding soldiers and broad sections of the population attacked the representatives of state power and Jewish innkeepers stereotyped as "usurers." In addition to their anti-Jewish character, their symbolic content, in which revolt against the old order was accompanied by carnivalesque violent mockery of it, is elaborated upon. The greatest attention, however, is paid to the political instrumentalization of the "lootings" on the part of the representatives of the new Czechoslovak state. This instrumentalization ranged from appropriation (albeit hesitant, given their violent nature) to condemnation: the former for the "Czechoslovak revolution" in the post-war years, the latter as a prelude to Bolshevization at the height of the economic crisis in the early 1930s. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the formation of the international law principle of the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions in the context of an international armed conflict, given the relevance of the issue of damage and destruction of property as part of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. The author examines the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions through the prism of international human rights law - as such, where the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions (property rights) has been enshrined in the international law system, and also through the prism of international humanitarian law and international criminal law - as such, which are special in relation to the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions in the context of international armed conflict. The article examines the principle of inviolability of property rights at the national level, in particular, in legislative and judicial sources, and its impact on the formation of the relevant international law principle. In particular, the author analyses the philosophical development of the concepts of "sacredness" of property rights and inviolability of property rights, as well as the natural essence of this right for a person. The author examines in detail the rules of conventional and customary international humanitarian law on the right to peaceful enjoyment of property/property rights depending on the type of acts that may be committed against property and the type of property against which certain acts are directed in the context of an international armed conflict or legal regime of occupation. The provisions on the protection of civilian objects, as well as the non-absolute nature of the protection of property rights in international armed conflict in cases of urgent military necessity, are carefully considered. Based on this analysis, the author identifies the key fundamental provisions on the basis of which the international legal principle of the right to peaceful enjoyment of property in the context o f international armed conflict is formed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The loss of archaeological heritage continues today, because of both natural disasters and human-made actions. Alarmingly, a significant amount of the destruction is perpetrated by looters and illegal excavations. This problem is not a new one. However, it has increased exponentially in recent years, especially in countries which witnessed internal turmoil (i.e., the Arab Spring) but also throughout Europe. Local authorities struggle to provide adequate controls because of a lack of human resources, budget constraints or technological know-how. This paper describes a multimodal documentation and monitoring workflow applied to an archaeological site for which, due to the sensitivity of the topic, no specific details can be publicly disclosed. The techniques used include UAV aerial surveys, image-based modelling, change detection, relief visualization and GIS mapping. Thanks to the analysis of the multitemporal datasets, it was possible to assess the extension and spatial progression of illegal excavation over a two-year period.

The article is devoted to the problem of incorrect understanding of such a relevant today phenomenon as looting, responsibility for which is provided for in Art. 432 of the current Criminal Code of Ukraine. An attempt has been made to show in detail the true content of the objective and subjective features of the legal composition of the considered socially dangerous phenomenon with a simultaneous comparative analysis of it with some criminal offenses against property, which, like looting, involve the taking of property, in particular in the form of theft. The relevance of the research is noted, due to the lack of adequate coverage of the content of looting. Certain opinions of other researchers regarding some signs of such a criminal act are highlighted, and arguments of both a supporting and refuting nature are given. Attention is drawn to the fact that looting, although it is a robbery in its content, is only a special manifestation of it, connected with a number of signs, only in the presence of which it will take on the appearance that will characterize it in essence. At the same time, the impossibility of a free, not related to the textually expressed form of looting in the norm of its criminal legal interpretation is indicated. At the same time certain comments of extended content are quite admissible, where it does not contradict the characteristics of the action under consideration (characteristics defined in Article 432 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). It has been noted that the question of the qualification of looting is a question of the need to determine the conformity of the signs of an act actually committed, potentially considered as looting, with the signs that characterize such an act normatively, taking into account the rules and approaches to understanding such a phenomenon as a war crime laid down in legislation. Moreover, cases of actions that resemble looting in appearance, but committed by civilians, as well as representatives of Russian units and persons supported by them from illegal armed formations fighting on the other side, have been differentiated.

The loss of archaeological heritage continues today, because of both natural disasters and human-made actions. Alarmingly, a significant amount of the destruction is perpetrated by looters and illegal excavations. This problem is not a new one. However, it has increased exponentially in recent years, especially in countries which witnessed internal turmoil (i.e., the Arab Spring) but also throughout Europe. Local authorities struggle to provide adequate controls because of a lack of human resources, budget constraints or technological know-how. This paper describes a multimodal documentation and monitoring workflow applied to an archaeological site for which, due to the sensitivity of the topic, no specific details can be publicly disclosed. The techniques used include UAV aerial surveys, image-based modelling, change detection, relief visualization and GIS mapping. Thanks to the analysis of the multitemporal datasets, it was possible to assess the extension and spatial progression of illegal excavation over a two-year period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reviewing the literature in the humanities and social sciences which analyse riots, this article proposes a new theoretical avenue for understanding this particular form of insurrection: a processual approach. Grounded in organizational studies research which mobilizes this approach, the article analyzes the riot that led to the fire of the 3rd District Police Station in Minneapolis in May 2020. The processual approach allows us to unfold the riot and explore how it is embodied not by criminals and madmen, but by strategists who communicate intensely while distributing tasks over a particular territory. Ultimately, the article invites us to take a different look at riots in order to consider them as a moving organization, made up of co-affected bodies and producer of new forms of social life.

Copyright of Hispania Sacra is the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The purpose of the study is to analyze the origins, causes and consequences of mass looting among servicemen of the Russian army and other power structures of the Russian Federation that invaded the territory of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. To investigate and determine the main features of looting, which are characteristic of servicemen of the armed forces and other power structures of the Russian Federation. The research methodology is determined by the general procedures of scientific knowledge, the theoretical work of military historians, psychologists, and legal experts in the field of studying the deviant behavior of combatants. The investigation was carried out using multidisciplinary approaches using the methods of oral history, military anthropology and social psychology. The authors use the terminological apparatus established in the modern scientific and information space. The scientific novelty consists in an attempt to analyze the causes of the emergence of such a type of crimes as looting, committed in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine by servicemen of the armed forces and other power structures of the Russian Federation. Conclusions. Russia’s war against Ukraine 2014–2022 revealed chronic problems of moral order in Russian society and the Armed Forces. Thanks to propaganda operations, the mass consciousness of the citizens of this country has led to a dangerous slide towards legal nihilism, immorality, devaluation of human life and democratic values. These tendencies are fully inherent in the Russian army. In the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war, looting is an additional motivator for Russian servicemen to participate in hostilities and a way of material enrichment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]