Search

Aims Finerenone reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We investigated the causes of mortality in the FIDELITY population. Methods and results The FIDELITY prespecified pooled data analysis from FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD excluded patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Outcomes included intention-to-treat and prespecified on-treatment analyses of the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Of 13 026 patients [mean age, 64.8 years; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 57.6 mL/min/1.73 m2], 99.8% were on renin–angiotensin system inhibitors. Finerenone reduced the incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality vs. placebo (8.5% vs. 9.4% and 4.9% vs. 5.6%, respectively) and demonstrated significant on-treatment reductions [hazard ratio (HR), 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–0.96; P = 0.014 and HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67–0.99; P = 0.040, respectively]. Cardiovascular-related mortality was most common, and finerenone lowered the incidence of sudden cardiac death vs. placebo [1.3% (incidence rate 0.44/100 patient-years) vs. 1.8% (0.58/100 patient-years), respectively; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57–0.996; P = 0.046]. The effects of finerenone on mortality were similar across all Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes risk groups. Event probability with finerenone at 4 years was consistent irrespective of baseline urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, but seemingly more pronounced in patients with higher baseline eGFR. Conclusion In FIDELITY, finerenone significantly reduced the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality vs. placebo in patients with T2D across a broad spectrum of CKD stages while on treatment, as well as sudden cardiac death in the intention-to-treat population. Clinical trials registration FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02540993 and NCT02545049, respectively (funded by Bayer AG).

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is projected to become a leading global cause of death by 2040, and its early detection is critical for effective and timely management. The current definition of CKD identifies only advanced stages, when kidney injury has already destroyed >50% of functioning kidney mass as reflected by an estimated glomerular filtration rate six-fold higher than physiological levels (i.e. > 30 mg/g). An elevated urinary albumin-excretion rate is a known early predictor of future cardiovascular events. There is thus a ‘blind spot’ in the detection of CKD, when kidney injury is present but is undetectable by current diagnostic criteria, and no intervention is made before renal and cardiovascular damage occurs. The present review discusses the CKD ‘blind spot’ concept and how it may facilitate a holistic approach to CKD and cardiovascular disease prevention and implement the call for albuminuria screening implicit in current guidelines. Cardiorenal risk associated with albuminuria in the high-normal range, novel genetic and biochemical markers of elevated cardiorenal risk, and the role of heart and kidney protective drugs evaluated in recent clinical trials are also discussed. As albuminuria is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease, starting from levels not yet considered in the definition of CKD, the implementation of opportunistic or systematic albuminuria screening and therapy, possibly complemented with novel early biomarkers, has the potential to improve cardiorenal outcomes and mitigate the dismal 2040 projections for CKD and related cardiovascular burden.

Background Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP) and increase serum potassium concentration ([K+]). This indirect comparison investigated any differences in SBP-lowering and hyperkalemia risk between finerenone, a nonsteroidal MRA, and the steroidal MRA spironolactone ± a potassium binder. Methods In FIDELITY (a pooled analysis of FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD), a subgroup of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) and chronic kidney disease meeting eligibility criteria of the AMBER trial were identified (FIDELITY-TRH). The main outcomes were mean change in SBP, incidence of serum [K+] ≥5.5 mmol/L and hyperkalemia-associated treatment discontinuation. Results at ∼17 weeks were compared with 12 weeks from AMBER. Results In 624 FIDELITY-TRH patients and 295 AMBER patients, the least squares mean change in SBP (mmHg) from baseline was −7.1 for finerenone and −1.3 for placebo {between-group difference −5.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) −7.99 to −3.49], P Conclusions In patients with TRH and chronic kidney disease compared with spironolactone with or without patiromer, finerenone was associated with a lower SBP reduction and lower risk of hyperkalemia and treatment discontinuation. Trial Registration: AMBER (NCT03071263), FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993), FIGARO-DKD (NCT02545049)

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered. ispartof: JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION vol:40 issue:10 pages:1859-1875 ispartof: location:Netherlands status: published

Background: Finerenone reduced risk of cardiorenal outcomes in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes in the FIDELIO-DKD trial. We report incidences and risk factors for hyperkalemia with finerenone and placebo in FIDELIO-DKD. Methods: This post hoc safety analysis defined hyperkalemia as ≥mild or ≥moderate based on serum potassium concentrations of >5.5 or >6.0 mmol/L, respectively, assessed at all regular visits. Cumulative incidences of hyperkalemia were based on the Aalen-Johansen estimator using death as competing risk. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model identified significant independent predictors of hyperkalemia. Restricted cubic splines assessed relationships between short-term post-baseline changes in serum potassium or eGFR and subsequent hyperkalemia risk. During the study, serum potassium levels guided drug dosing. Patients in either group who experienced ≥mild hyperkalemia had the study drug withheld until serum potassium was ≤5.0 mmol/L; then the drug was restarted at the 10 mg daily dose. Placebo-treated patients underwent sham treatment interruption and downtitration. Results: Over 2.6 years' median follow-up, 597 of 2785 (21.4%) and 256 of 2775 (9.2%) patients treated with finerenone and placebo, respectively, experienced treatment-emergent ≥mild hyperkalemia; 126 of 2802 (4.5%) and 38 of 2796 (1.4%) patients, respectively, experienced moderate hyperkalemia. Independent risk factors for ≥mild hyperkalemia were higher serum potassium, lower eGFR, increased urine albumin-creatinine ratio, younger age, female sex, β-blocker use, and finerenone assignment. Diuretic or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use reduced risk. In both groups, short-term increases in serum potassium and decreases in eGFR were associated with subsequent hyperkalemia. At month 4, the magnitude of increased hyperkalemia risk for any change from baseline was smaller with finerenone than with placebo. Conclusions: Finerenone was independently associated with hyperkalemia. However, routine potassium monitoring and hyperkalemia management strategies employed in FIDELIO-DKD minimized the impact of hyperkalemia, providing a basis for clinical use of finerenone. Bayer AG 10.121 JCR (2020) Q1, 6/89 Urology & Nephrology 4.451 SJR (2020) Q1, 39/2446 Medicine (miscellaneous) No data IDR 2020 UEM

In FIDELITY, a prespecified pooled analysis of the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD studies, finerenone was found to improve cardiorenal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 30–5000 mg/g, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25 ml/min per 1.73 m2 or more and also receiving optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade treatment. This present analysis focused on the efficacy and safety of finerenone on kidney outcomes. Among 13,026 patients with a median follow-up of three years, finerenone significantly reduced the hazard of a kidney composite outcome (time to kidney failure, sustained 57% or more decrease in eGFR from baseline, or kidney death) by 23% versus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.88), with a three-year absolute between-group difference of 1.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.7–2.6). Hazard ratios were directionally consistent for a prespecified baseline eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio categories (Pinteraction = 0.62 and Pinteraction = 0.67, respectively), although there was a high degree of uncertainty in the 30–300 mg/g subgroup. Finerenone significantly reduced the hazard of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by 20% versus placebo (0.80; 0.64–0.99). Adverse events were similar between treatment arms, although hyperkalemia leading to treatment discontinuation occurred significantly more frequently with finerenone versus placebo (2.4% vs 0.8% and 0.6% vs 0.3% in patients with eGFR less than 60 vs. greater than or equal to 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively). Thus, finerenone improved kidney outcomes, reduced the hazard of ESKD, and is well tolerated in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.

Aims Finerenone, a selective, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improves cardiovascular (CV) and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This subgroup analysis of FIDELITY, a pre-specified, pooled, individual patient-data analysis of FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993) and FIGARO-DKD (NCT02545049), compared finerenone vs. placebo in patients with and without baseline history of atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). Methods and results Outcomes included a composite CV outcome [CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF)]; CV death or HHF; a composite kidney outcome (kidney failure, sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease ≥57%, or kidney-related death); all-cause mortality; and safety by baseline history of ASCVD. Of 13 026 patients, 5935 (45.6%) had a history of ASCVD. The incidence of the composite CV outcome, CV death or HHF, and all-cause mortality was higher in patients with ASCVD vs. those without, with no difference between groups in the composite kidney outcome. Finerenone consistently reduced outcomes vs. placebo in patients with and without ASCVD (P-interaction for the composite CV outcome, CV death or HHF, the composite kidney outcome, and all-cause mortality 0.38, 0.68, 0.33, and 0.38, respectively). Investigator-reported treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent between treatment arms across ASCVD subgroups. Conclusion Finerenone reduced the risk of CV and kidney outcomes consistently across the spectrum of CKD in patients with T2D, irrespective of prevalent ASCVD.

AimsTo explore the modifying effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use on outcomes with finerenone across a wide spectrum of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the pooled analysis of FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD.Materials and methodsPatients with T2D and CKD treated with optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade were randomized to finerenone or placebo. Effects of finerenone on a cardiovascular composite outcome (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and a kidney composite outcome (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] decline, or renal death), change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and safety were analysed by GLP-1RA use.ResultsOf 13 026 patients, 944 (7.2%) used GLP-1RAs at baseline. Finerenone reduced the risk of the cardiovascular composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–1.11 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79–0.96 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction = 0.63) and the kidney composite outcome (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45–1.48 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67–0.89 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction = 0.79) irrespective of baseline GLP-1RA use. Reduction in UACR with finerenone at Month 4 was –38% in patients with baseline GLP-1RA use compared with –31% in those without GLP-1RA use (P-interaction = 0.03). Overall safety and incidence of hyperkalaemia were similar, irrespective of GLP-1RA use.ConclusionsThe cardiorenal benefits of finerenone on composite cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and UACR reduction in patients with CKD and T2D appear to be maintained, regardless of GLP-1RA use. Subsequent studies are needed to investigate any potential benefit of this combination. Aims: To explore the modifying effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use on outcomes with finerenone across a wide spectrum of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the pooled analysis of FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD. Materials and methods: Patients with T2D and CKD treated with optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade were randomized to finerenone or placebo. Effects of finerenone on a cardiovascular composite outcome (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and a kidney composite outcome (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] decline, or renal death), change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and safety were analysed by GLP-1RA use. Results: Of 13 026 patients, 944 (7.2%) used GLP-1RAs at baseline. Finerenone reduced the risk of the cardiovascular composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–1.11 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79–0.96 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction = 0.63) and the kidney composite outcome (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45–1.48 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67–0.89 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction = 0.79) irrespective of baseline GLP-1RA use. Reduction in UACR with finerenone at Month 4 was –38% in patients with baseline GLP-1RA use compared with –31% in those without GLP-1RA use (P-interaction = 0.03). Overall safety and incidence of hyperkalaemia were similar, irrespective of GLP-1RA use. Conclusions: The cardiorenal benefits of finerenone on composite cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and UACR reduction in patients with CKD and T2D appear to be maintained, regardless of GLP-1RA use. Subsequent studies are needed to investigate any potential benefit of this combination.

La pandemia producida por el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) ha obligado, en muchos casos a sustituir la consulta presencial por la consulta telemática para reducir el riesgo de contagio asociado a la presencia de pacientes en los centros sanitarios. Este cambio puede representar una oportunidad para una comunicación diferente y más eficiente entre profesionales y pacientes, permitiendo mejorar la accesibilidad a la atención médica y un abordaje más sistemático e integral a los pacientes con hipertensión y riesgo cardiovascular. No obstante, se necesitan herramientas organizativas que faciliten la comunicación entre pacientes y profesionales, específicamente con intercambio de datos clínicos que favorezcan la monitorización remota de las variables asociadas a la hipertensión y riesgo cardiovascular (presión arterial, peso, talla, variables analíticas…) y permitan realizar un seguimiento adecuado en aspectos como la adherencia a los tratamientos, estilos de vida y factores de riesgo. Todo ello sería deseable que fuera realizado por equipos multidisciplinares, tanto de atención primaria como hospitalaria y farmacia comunitaria, con una coordinación adecuada del cuidado en este tipo de pacientes. Este documento de la Sociedad Española de Hipertensión-Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA) trata de dar las claves para mejorar la calidad asistencial de las consultas telemáticas de los pacientes con hipertensión y riesgo cardiovascular, proporcionar criterios básicos de atención telemática o presencial y sistematizar el contenido de estas. Así mismo se plantean los criterios de seguimiento por los diferentes profesionales.

Background: Chronic kidney disease is frequently associated with hypertension and poorly controlled blood pressure can lead to chronic kidney disease progression. Finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, significantly improves cardiorenal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. This analysis explored the relationship between office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cardiorenal outcomes with finerenone in FIDELIO-DKD trial (Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease). Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30 to 5000 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 25 to 2 receiving optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade, were randomized to finerenone or placebo. For this analysis, patients (N=5669) were grouped by baseline office SBP quartiles. Results: Finerenone reduced office SBP across the baseline office SBP quartiles, including patients with baseline office SBP of >148 mm Hg. Overall, patients with lower baseline office SBP quartile and greater declines from baseline in SBP were associated with better cardiorenal outcomes. The risk of primary kidney and key secondary cardiovascular composite outcomes was consistently reduced with finerenone versus placebo irrespective of baseline office SBP quartiles ( P for interaction 0.87 and 0.78, respectively). A time-varying analysis revealed that 13.8% and 12.6% of the treatment effect with finerenone was attributed to the change in office SBP for the primary kidney composite outcome and the key secondary cardiovascular outcome, respectively. Conclusions: In FIDELIO-DKD, cardiorenal outcomes improved with finerenone irrespective of baseline office SBP. Reductions in office SBP accounted for a small proportion of the treatment effect on cardiorenal outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02540993.

Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS/Fondos FEDER (PI17/01093, PI17/01193, CP15/00129, CPII20/00022, PI18/01366, PI19/00588, PI19/00815, PI20/00763, DTS18/00032) ERA-PerMedJTC2018 (KIDNEY ATTACK AC18/00064 and PERSTIGAN AC18/00071, ISCIII-RETIC REDinREN RD016/0009) Sociedad Española de Nefrología, FRIAT, Comunidad de Madrid en Biomedicina (B2017/BMD-3686 CIFRA2- CM) 35.855 JCR (2021) Q1, 3/143 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems 4.118 SJR (2021) Q1, 9/356 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine No data IDR 2021 UEM

Resistant hypertension (RH) is related to increased risk for cardiovascular events. We aimed to evaluate the risk of total and cardiovascular mortality associated with RH in comparison to controlled hypertension, as well as in true versus “white-coat” RH. From the mortality data of the Spanish ABPM Registry, including 35119 treated patients, we identified 9408 RH, defined as office BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg while treated with ≥ 3 drugs (8577 patients), or treated and controlled (office BP < 140/90 mmHg) with ≥ 4 drugs (831 patients). They were compared against 8144 patients treated with ≤ 3 drugs and having normal office BP. In addition, among 8577 patients with uncontrolled RH, 5288 (61.7%) had true RH (24-h BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg) and 3289 (38.3%) had “white coat” RH (24-h BP < 130/80 mmHg). Median follow-up was 5 years. Total and cardiovascular mortality were assessed through death certificates. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated through Cox-proportional models, adjusted for age and sex. Table shows the number of patients in each group, number of total and cardiovascular deaths and HR of the 2 comparisons performed. Compared to treated and controlled patients, those with RH had and increased risk of total (19%) and cardiovascular (32%) mortality. Likewise, true RH had an increased risk of total (42%) and cardiovascular (81%) mortality, in comparison with “white-coat” RH. We conclude that RH is associated with and increased total and cardiovascular mortality. In RH patients with elevated office BP, the concomitant elevation of 24-hBP (true RH) is also associated with an increased risk of mortality when compared with those with normal 24-h BP (“white-coat” RH).

OBJECTIVE Finerenone reduced the risk of kidney and cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes in the FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993) and FIGARO-DKD (NCT02545049) phase 3 studies. Effects of finerenone on outcomes in patients taking sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) were evaluated in a prespecified pooled analysis of these studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥30–≤5,000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2 were randomized to finerenone or placebo; SGLT2is were permitted at any time. Outcomes included cardiovascular composite (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and kidney composite end points (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% eGFR decline, or renal death), changes in UACR and eGFR, and safety outcomes. RESULTS Among 13,026 patients, 877 (6.7%) received an SGLT2i at baseline and 1,113 (8.5%) initiated one during the trial. For the cardiovascular composite, the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.96) without SGLT2i and 0.67 (95% CI 0.42–1.07) with SGLT2i. For the kidney composite, the HRs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.92) without SGLT2i and 0.42 (95% CI 0.16–1.08) with SGLT2i. Baseline SGLT2i use did not affect risk reduction for the cardiovascular or kidney composites with finerenone (Pinteraction = 0.46 and 0.29, respectively); neither did SGLT2i use concomitant with study treatment. CONCLUSIONS Benefits of finerenone compared with placebo on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes were observed irrespective of SGLT2i use.

Finerenone is a potent and selective mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist that slowed progression of CKD and reduced risk of CV outcomes vs. placebo in patients with CKD and T2D in the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD phase 3 trials. MR overactivation is involved in DR pathogenesis. To evaluate potential benefits of oral finerenone on progression of DR, two studies of identical observational design (ReFineDR and DeFineDR) retrospectively collected data from patients with DR in FIDELIO-DKD/FIGARO-DKD at selected centers. Eligible patients had a routine ophthalmological examination showing NPDR in ≥1 eye performed 6 months prior to 1 month post-randomization in FIDELIO-DKD/FIGARO-DKD, and ≥1 subsequent ophthalmological assessment. Patients with advanced DR were excluded; inclusion was blinded to FIDELIO-DKD/FIGARO-DKD treatment assignment. Primary endpoint was occurrence of vision-threatening events (ASN, DME or PDR) at 2 years. Overall, 134 patients received finerenone and 1received placebo, of whom 68.7% and 71.8% had mild/moderate NPDR, 3.0% and 10.0% had severe NPDR, 27.6% and 15.5% had NPDR of unknown severity and 70.1% and 64.5% had HbA1c >7.5%, at baseline (mean HbA1c 8.25 [SD 1.41] and 8.18 [SD 1.34]) . At 2 years, 5 (3.7%) and 7 (6.4%) patients in the finerenone and placebo groups had a vision-threatening event in ≥1 eye (difference -0.026, 95% CI -0.082 to 0.029, p=0.3550) . The number of events increased after 2 years, with trends in Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence probabilities in favor of finerenone at 30 and 36 months (post hoc) . Results were generally consistent across components of the primary endpoint and subgroups with baseline HbA1c ≤ and >7.5%, UACR 30- Disclosure P.Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. D.Finis: Employee; Bayer AG. S.Leal: Employee; Bayer Consumer Care AG. T.Schmelter: Employee; Bayer AG, Stock/Shareholder; Bayer AG. G.Bakris: Consultant; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, DiaMedica Therapeutics, Inc., Horizon Therapeutics plc, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. S.Anker: Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Research Support; Abbott. J.G.Garweg: Advisory Panel; AbbVie Inc., Research Support; Roche Pharmaceuticals, Speaker's Bureau; Bayer AG, Novartis AG. T.Osonoi: Research Support; Bayer AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Kowa Company, Ltd., Novo Nordisk, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk. B.Pitt: Advisory Panel; Merck & Co., Inc., Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. S.Rosas: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Teladoc Health, Other Relationship; Bayer AG, Research Support; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG. L.M.Ruilope: Consultant; Bayer AG. D.Zhu: n/a. M.Brinker: Employee; Bayer AG.

Introduction: Finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular (CV) and kidney outcomes, without affecting HbA1c, in CKD and T2D patients in the FIDELITY prespecified pooled analysis of the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD studies. Here, we evaluate the effect of finerenone by baseline HbA1c, HbA1c variability, and diabetes duration. Methods: Patients with T2D and CKD (UACR ≥30-≤5000 mg/g and eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2) were randomized to finerenone or placebo. Effects of finerenone vs. placebo on CV (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and kidney (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% eGFR decline from baseline, or renal death) composite outcomes were analyzed by baseline HbA1c quartiles, HbA1c variability (first year of treatment) , and diabetes duration quartiles. Results: In 13,026 patients included in the analysis, mean baseline HbA1c was 7.7% and diabetes duration was 15.4 years. Higher baseline HbA1c quartiles had longer diabetes duration and more diabetes-related complications. Risk reductions in the CV and kidney composite outcomes with finerenone vs. placebo were consistent across HbA1c (p-interaction 0.52 and 0.09, respectively) and diabetes duration (p-interaction 0.12 and 0.75) quartiles. HbA1c variability in the first year of treatment was associated with higher cardiorenal risks; each 1 unit increase in mean absolute residual of HbA1c was associated with a 20% increased risk of a CV event (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07-1.35; p=0.0016) and a 36% increased risk of a kidney event (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.21-1.52; p Conclusion: Greater variability in HbA1c was associated with increased risks of cardiorenal outcomes. Risk reductions in the CV and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with CKD and T2D were not modified by baseline HbA1c, HbA1c variability, or duration of diabetes. Disclosure J. B. Mcgill: Advisory Panel; Gilead Sciences, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, MannKind Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S, Provention Bio, Inc., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk. M. Brinker: Employee; Bayer AG. A. Joseph: Employee; Bayer AG. A. Z. Lage: None. R. Lawatscheck: None. C. Scott: Employee; Bayer AG. P. Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker’s Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. R. Agarwal: Advisory Panel; Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., Bayer AG, Board Member; Chinook Therapeutics Inc., DiaMedica Therapeutics, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. S. Anker: Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Research Support; Abbott. G. Bakris: Consultant; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, DiaMedica Therapeutics, Inc., Horizon Therapeutics plc, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. G. Filippatos: Other Relationship; Amgen Inc., Amgen Inc., Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Medtronic, Novartis AG, Servier Laboratories, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. B. Pitt: Advisory Panel; Merck & Co., Inc., Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. L. M. Ruilope: Consultant; Bayer AG. A. L. Birkenfeld: None. L. Caramori: Advisory Panel; Bayer AG, Consultant; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Bayer AG, Novartis AG.

Introduction: Finerenone reduced risk of cardiorenal outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D in the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD studies. In FIDELIO-DKD the effects of finerenone on kidney and CV outcomes were consistent irrespective of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use, but analyses were better powered to evaluate change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) . Here, we extend these analyses to patients in both studies (FIDELITY analysis) , thus encompassing a larger population with broader inclusion criteria. Methods: Patients with T2D and CKD (UACR ≥30- Results: Of 13026 patients, 944 (7.2%) received GLP-1RAs at baseline. Results were consistent irrespective of GLP-1RA use at baseline for the CV composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.52-1.with GLP-1RA; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96 without GLP-1RA; p-interaction 0.63) , and the kidney composite outcome (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.45-1.48 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.89 without GLP-1RA; p-interaction 0.79) . A greater reduction in UACR was observed with finerenone in patients taking GLP-1RA at baseline (placebo-corrected change -38% with GLP-1RA and -31% without GLP-1RA use; p-interaction 0.03) . Incidence of hyperkalemia was similarly increased with finerenone irrespective of GLP-1RA use at baseline. Conclusion: The benefits of finerenone on composite CV and kidney outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D are not modified by GLP-1RA use at baseline, with an increased effect observed for UACR reduction, suggesting a different mechanism of reduction in albuminuria. Disclosure P.Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. P.Viswanathan: Employee; Bayer AG. R.Lawatscheck: None. A.Joseph: Employee; Bayer AG. G.Bakris: Consultant; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, DiaMedica Therapeutics, Inc., Horizon Therapeutics plc, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. S.Anker: Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Research Support; Abbott. G.Filippatos: Other Relationship; Amgen Inc., Amgen Inc., Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Medtronic, Novartis AG, Servier Laboratories, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. B.Pitt: Advisory Panel; Merck & Co., Inc., Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. L.M.Ruilope: Consultant; Bayer AG. V.Fonseca: Consultant; Abbott, Asahi Kasei Corporation, Bayer AG, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Fractyl Health, Inc., Jaguar Gene Therapy, Stock/Shareholder; Abbott, Amgen Inc., BRAVO4Health, Mellitus Health. G.E.Umpierrez: Research Support; AstraZeneca, Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk. L.Caramori: Advisory Panel; Bayer AG, Consultant; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Bayer AG, Novartis AG. M.Lambelet: Other Relationship; Bayer AG.

In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), risks of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) increase with decreasing kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) and increasing albuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR]). Finerenone, a selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improved cardiorenal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and T2D in FIDELITY (Finerenone in Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: Combined FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD Trial Programme Analysis).This study sought to evaluate the effects of finerenone on HF outcomes by eGFR and/or UACR categories.FIDELITY included 13,026 patients with T2D and CKD (UACR 30-5,000 mg/g and eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73 mCompared with placebo, finerenone significantly reduced risk of first HHF (HR: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.66-0.92]; P = 0.003), cardiovascular death or first HHF (HR: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.74-0.93]; P = 0.002), recurrent HHF (HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.64-0.96]; P = 0.021), and cardiovascular death or recurrent HHF (HR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.72-0.95]; P = 0.006). The risk of outcomes increased across baseline eGFR and UACR categories; lowest incidences were seen in patients with an eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 mCompared with placebo, finerenone improved HF-related outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D, with consistent benefits across eGFR and/or UACR categories. (Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Kidney Disease [FIDELIO-DKD], NCT02540993; Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Clinical Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease [FIGARO-DKD], NCT02545049).

Hypertension affects approximately one third of the world's adult population and is a major cause of premature death despite considerable advances in pharmacological treatments. Growing evidence supports the use of lifestyle interventions for the prevention and adjuvant treatment of hypertension. In this Review, we provide a summary of the epidemiological research supporting the preventive and antihypertensive effects of major lifestyle interventions (regular physical exercise, body weight management and healthy dietary patterns), as well as other less traditional recommendations such as stress management and the promotion of adequate sleep patterns coupled with circadian entrainment. We also discuss the physiological mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of these lifestyle interventions on hypertension, which include not only the prevention of traditional risk factors (such as obesity and insulin resistance) and improvements in vascular health through an improved redox and inflammatory status, but also reduced sympathetic overactivation and non-traditional mechanisms such as increased secretion of myokines. Sin financiación 32.419 JCR (2020) Q1, 1/142 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems 5.495 SJR (2020) Q2, 6/349 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine No data IDR 2019 UEM

Background and Purpose Klotho is a membrane‐bound or soluble protein, originally identified as an age‐suppressing factor and regulator of mineral metabolism. Klotho deficiency is associated with the development of renal disease, but its role in cardiac function in the context of uraemic cardiomyopathy is unknown. Experimental Approach We explored the effects of Klotho on cardiac Ca2+ cycling. We analysed Ca2+ handling in adult cardiomyocytes from Klotho‐deficient (kl/kl) mice and from a murine model of 5/6 nephrectomy (Nfx). We also studied the effect of exogenous Klotho supplementation, by chronic recombinant Klotho treatment, or endogenous Klotho overexpression, using transgenic mice overexpressing Klotho (Tg‐Kl), on uraemic cardiomyopathy. Hearts from Nfx mice were used to study Ca2+ sensitivity of ryanodine receptors and their phosphorylation state. Key Results Cardiomyocytes from kl/kl mice showed decreased amplitude of intracellular Ca2+ transients and cellular shortening together with an increase in pro‐arrhythmic Ca2+ events compared with cells from wild‐type mice. Cardiomyocytes from Nfx mice exhibited the same impairment in Ca2+ cycling as kl/kl mice. Changes in Nfx cardiomyocytes were explained by higher sensitivity of ryanodine receptors to Ca2+ and their increased phosphorylation at the calmodulin kinase type II and protein kinase A sites. Ca2+ mishandling in Nfx‐treated mice was fully prevented by chronic recombinant Klotho administration or transgenic Klotho overexpression. Conclusions and Implications Klotho emerges as an attractive therapeutic tool to improve cardiac Ca2+ mishandling observed in uraemic cardiomyopathy. Strategies that improve Klotho availability are good candidates to protect the heart from functional cardiac alterations in renal disease. Sin financiación 8.740 JCR (2020) Q1, 12/276 Pharmacology & Pharmacy 2.432 SJR (2020) Q1, 16/314 Pharmacology No data IDR 2020 UEM

AimsThe aim of this study was to determine whether arterial stiffness assessed with the biochemical parameter active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and the clinical parameters pulse pressure (PP) and pulse wave velocity predicts the response to spironolactone in resistant hypertension (RH).Methods and resultsAmbulatory blood pressure (BP) and active MMP-9 (measured by zymography and ELISA) were measured at baseline, and patients were classified as having pseudo-RH or RH. Patients with RH received spironolactone and the response was determined after 8 weeks by ambulatory BP monitoring: those who achieved BP goals were considered controlled (CRH) and those who did not were considered uncontrolled (UCRH). Plasma active MMP-9 was significantly higher in patients with RH than with pseudo-RH, and correlated with 24 h systolic BP and PP. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that active MMP-9 could predict the response to spironolactone, and its combination with 24 h PP and pulse wave velocity significantly improved this prediction. Moreover, plasma of patients with UCRH induced the MMP-9 expression pathway.ConclusionWe propose active MMP-9 as a useful biomarker to identify patients with RH who will not respond to spironolactone. Combining MMP-9 activity with classical arterial stiffness parameters improves the prediction of the clinical response to spironolactone and might contribute to guide the most appropriate therapeutic decisions for patients with RH.

Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) can be particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of excessive blood pressure (BP) lowering by antihypertensive treatment. The identification of hypotension is thus especially important. This study estimated the prevalence of hypotension among CHD-treated hypertensive patients undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in routine clinical practice. We performed a cross-sectional study with 2892 CHD-treated hypertensive patients from the Spanish ABPM Registry. Based on previous studies, hypotension was defined as systolic/diastolic BP

OBJECTIVE Finerenone reduced the risk of kidney and cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes in the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD phase 3 studies. Effects of finerenone on outcomes in patients taking sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) were evaluated in a prespecified pooled analysis of these studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥30 to ≤5,000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2 were randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo; SGLT2is were permitted at any time. Outcomes included cardiovascular composite (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and kidney composite (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% eGFR decline, or renal death) end points, changes in UACR and eGFR, and safety outcomes. RESULTS Among 13,026 patients, 877 (6.7%) received an SGLT2i at baseline and 1,113 (8.5%) initiated one during the trial. For the cardiovascular composite, the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.96) without SGLT2i and 0.67 (95% CI 0.42–1.07) with SGLT2i. For the kidney composite, the HRs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.92) without SGLT2i and 0.42 (95% CI 0.16–1.08) with SGLT2i. Baseline SGLT2i use did not affect risk reduction for the cardiovascular or kidney composites with finerenone (Pinteraction = 0.46 and 0.29, respectively); neither did SGLT2i use concomitant with study treatment. CONCLUSIONS Benefits of finerenone compared with placebo on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes were observed irrespective of SGLT2i use.

Aims: This prespecified analysis of the FIDELIO-DKD trial compared the effects of finerenone, a selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) by history of heart failure (HF). Methods and results: Patients with T2D and CKD (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30–5000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥25–2), without symptomatic HF with reduced ejection fraction (New York Heart Association II–IV) and treated with optimized renin–angiotensin system blockade were randomized to finerenone or placebo. The composite cardiovascular (CV) outcome (CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for HF) and composite kidney outcome (kidney failure, sustained ≥40% decrease in eGFR from baseline, or renal death) were analysed by investigator-reported medical history of HF. Of 5674 patients, 436 (7.7%) had a history of HF. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, the effect of finerenone compared with placebo on the composite CV outcome was consistent in patients with and without a history of HF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–1.06 and HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77–1.04, respectively; interaction p = 0.33). The effect of finerenone on the composite kidney outcome did not differ by history of HF (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.52–1.20 and HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.94, respectively; interaction p = 0.83). Conclusion: In FIDELIO-DKD, finerenone improved cardiorenal outcome in patients with CKD and T2D irrespective of baseline HF history.