Direct oxidation of C–H bonds has the potential to emerge as a powerful approach for introducing oxygen and nitrogen functionality in the synthesis of complex molecules.[1] Functional-group manipulations (FGMs) that are required for carrying oxygenated functionalities throughout a synthetic route may be avoided by installing them directly into the hydrocarbon framework.[2] For a hydrocarbon oxidation strategy to reach its full potential, C–H-oxidation reactions with high levels of chemo-, regio- and stereoselectivity must be identified and developed. We recently described a DMSO-promoted, Pd(OAc)2-catalyzed allylic oxidation reaction that furnishes E allylic acetates from α-olefins with high regio- and stereoselectivity, and with outstanding tolerance of functional groups.[3] Herein, we describe advances in this methodology for the oxidation of C–H bonds which enabled the development of a new hydrocarbon oxidation strategy for the rapid assembly of polyol frameworks. This strategy has been validated in an enantioselective, de novo synthesis of differentially protected L-galactose from a commercial, achiral starting material in which all new oxygen functionality has been installed through oxidation reactions of C–H and C=C bonds. A short hydrocarbon oxidation strategy for the synthesis of chiral polyols is presented in Scheme 1. Key to the efficiency of this strategy is the rapid access to chiral (E)-2-butene-1,4-diols such as 2, which may be directly elaborated to polyol structures through asymmetric dihydroxylation (AD). Compounds like 2 are particularly attractive building blocks because of their dense functionalization, dissonant relationship between the oxygen atoms,[4] and the ease with which they can be further elaborated through the established oxidation chemistry of olefins. Compounds similar to 2 have been routinely employed as intermediates to install a diverse range of structures in the synthesis of natural products; for example, five- and six-membered mono- and polycyclic ethers,[5] epoxy alcohols,[6] and, most extensively, contiguous polyol structures.[7] Notably, compounds analogous to 2 have been used as intermediates in several stereodivergent syntheses of the hexoses, an important class of polyols (Scheme 2).[8a,9] State-of-the-art syntheses of 2 based on Wittig-type olefinations[10] or cross-metathesis reactions[11] suffer from lengthy sequences, in part because of the difficulty in accessing enantioenriched α-hydroxyaldehyde and α-hydroxy olefin starting materials. Alternatively, 2 may be synthesized directly from protected chiral homoallylic alcohols such as 3 through the DMSO/PdII-promoted allylic oxidation by using the strategy presented in Scheme 1. [2,3a] Homoallylic alcohols 3 are readily accessible from the asymmetric allylation of aldehydes[12,13] or the regioselective vinylation of chiral epoxides (Scheme 1).[14] Scheme 1 A hydrocarbon oxidation strategy for the streamlined construction of polyols. Scheme 2 Chiral (E)-2-butene-1,4-diols as key intermediates in stereodivergent hexose syntheses. 4-Methoxybenzoate derivatives of chiral (E)-2-butene-1,4-diols 2 are unique among allylic alcohol derivatives in their ability to undergo AD with excellent reagent-controlled diastereoselectivity and minimal acyl transfer.[8] We recently demonstrated that the DMSO/PdII-promoted linear allylic oxidation of protected chiral homoallylic alcohols with acetic acid furnishes the acetate derivatives of 2 with excellent regio-and stereoselectivities and with no erosion of optical purity.[2] To avoid FGMs, we set out to identify conditions for allylic oxidation of α-olefins using p-anisic acid (5) to directly generate 4-methoxybenzoate derivatives of 2 from α-olefins (Scheme 1). As shown in Table 1, preliminary studies with α-olefin 4 suggested that acid 5 may be a competent nucleophile in the DMSO/PdII-promoted linear allylic oxidation reaction to form the hexose precursor 6, if the challenges associated with high acid loadings and low yields were resolved (15 equiv of 5, 23% yield, Table 1, entry 1). We were encouraged by the observation that significant amounts of the α-olefin starting material remained at the end of the reaction, thus suggesting that the acid-labile acetonide functionality was tolerant of these conditions. The addition of DIPEA, a noncoordinating base additive, effected a significant increase in yield (45%, Table 1, entry 2). Although the exact role of the base is currently unclear, we hypothesize that it increases concentrations of the benzoate anion. The yield was also increased on switching oxidants from benzoquinone (BQ) to phenyl-benzoquinone (PhBQ, 55%, Table 1, entry 3). Finally, on increasing the reaction concentration to 2.0M, we achieved further increases in yields, and were able to use fewer equivalents of carboxylic acid (2.0M, 3 equiv 5, 75% yield, Table 1, entry 6). Table 1 Investigation into the linear allylic oxidation reaction to form the hexose precursor 6. The linear allylic oxidation reaction is exceptionally stereo- and regioselective, with the major product formed being the linear E isomer (linear/branched >300:1, E/Z = 30→36:1, entries 6 and 7, Table 1). The reaction is also preparatively convenient, with all reactions carried out in an air atmosphere with no precautions taken to exclude moisture or O2. Significantly, with these newly developed conditions, the catalyst loading may be decreased to 5 mol% with only a minor decrease in yield (63%, Table 1, entry 8). Moreover, useful yields are obtained from fragment couplings with 1.5 equivalents of carboxylic acid at 3.0M concentrations of α-olefin (50%, Table 1, entry 9). The only by-product we observed in the reaction using Pd(OAc)2 as the PdII source was allylic acetate, which can be eliminated by using [Pd(CH3CN)4](BF4)2 (Table 1, entry 7). We set out to test the efficiency of this overall strategy for polyol construction in the context of a short, de novo synthesis of the differentially protected L-galactose (−)-11 (Scheme 3). Bulk chemical (Z)-2-butene-1,4-diol (7) was epoxidized with m-chloroperbenzoic acid (mCPBA) to give the meso-epoxide 8 in 74% yield. The meso-epoxide 8 was then desymmetrized by using the enantioselective Payne rearrangement with oligomeric (R,R)-[(salen)CoIII]OTf catalyst (salen =N,N′-bis(salicylidene)ethylenediamine, Tf =trifluoromethanesulfonyl) and subsequently ketalized in situ to give the chiral epoxyketal (S,S)-9.[15,16] Regioselective opening at the terminal position of the epoxyketal with vinylcuprate and subsequent protection of the intermediate alcohol gave the benzyl ether protected homoallylic alcohol (−)-4 in 54% overall yield (3 steps, 99% ee).[14,15b] Linear allylic C–H oxidation of (−)-4 using 10 mol% [Pd(CH3CN)4](BF4)2 in DMSO under the optimized conditions (2M, PhBQ, 50 mol% DIPEA) with 3 equivalents of p-anisic acid 5 furnished the 4-methoxybenzoate-derived (E)-2-butene-1,4-diol (+)-6 in 71% yield (along with 13% recovered (−)-4) as essentially one isomer (linear/branched =>300:1; E/Z =36:1) and with no erosion of enantiopurity.[17] Alternatively, on using 10 mol% Pd(OAc)2 in DMSO under the same conditions, (+)-6 was obtained in 75% yield with around 10% of the allylic acetate product that was arduous to separate by silica gel chromatography. Asymmetric dihydroxylation of (+)-6 proceeded smoothly to give the polyoxygenated (−)-10 in 96% yield and greater than 20:1 d.r. (1H NMR).[18] Protection of the diol (−)-10 as the silyl ether, followed by removal of the p-methoxybenzoate ester with DIBAL, Swern oxidation of the resulting primary alcohol, and removal of the isopropyl-idene ketal group with Zn(NO3)·6H2O[19] gave the differentially protected L-galactose (−)-11 in 74% yield (over 4 steps).[20] The enantioselective, de novo synthesis of (−)-11 thus proceeded in a total of 10 linear steps with 20% overall yield from the commercially available 7. Scheme 3 Total synthesis of differentially protected L-galactose (−)-11 (see the Supporting Information for full experimental details). a) mCPBA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C→RT (74%); b) oligomeric (R,R)-[(salen)CoIII]-OTf (0.05 mol%), CH3CN; then 2-methoxypropene, ... Several stereodivergent, de novo syntheses of the hexoses from 7 have employed chiral (E)-2-butene-1,4-diols analogous to 6 as intermediates. The C–H-oxidation route to 6 (5 steps, 28% overall yield) compares favorably, in number of steps and overall yield, with the Wittig olefination routes previously reported (for example: 11 steps, 18% overall yield,[9] and 9 steps, 16% overall yield[8a]). The strategy developed herein, along with these previous syntheses, provides access to hexose stereoisomers that are complementary to those obtained through aldol-based approaches.[21] In summary, we have reported a mild and efficient hydrocarbon oxidation strategy for the preparation of chiral polyols, a process validated by an efficient, enantioselective synthesis of the differentially protected L-galactose (−)-11. The synthesis used a highly regio- and stereoselective linear allylic C–H-oxidation reaction that generated 4-methoxybenzoate derivatives of chiral (E)-2-butene-1,4-diols directly from readily available chiral homoallylic alcohols and carboxylic acids. We anticipate that the simple and mild nature of this transformation (that is 2→3, Scheme 1) will render it useful for the synthesis of polyoxygenated motifs in complex molecules.