Search

BackgroundThere are no approved pharmacotherapies for methamphetamine use disorder. Two preliminary phase 2 randomised controlled trials have found mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant, to be effective in reducing methamphetamine use. The proposed Tina Trial is the first phase 3 placebo-controlled randomised trial to examine the effectiveness and safety of mirtazapine as an outpatient pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder.MethodsThis is a multi-site phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial. Participants are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either mirtazapine (30 mg/day for 12 weeks) or matched placebo, delivered as a take-home medication. The target population is 340 people aged 18-65 years who have moderate to severe methamphetamine use disorder. The trial is being conducted through outpatient alcohol and other drug treatment clinics in Australia. The primary outcome is measured as self-reported days of methamphetamine use in the past 4 weeks at week 12. Secondary outcomes are methamphetamine-negative oral fluid samples, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, HIV risk behaviour and quality of life. Other outcomes include safety (adverse events), tolerability, and health service use. Medication adherence is being monitored using MEMS® Smart Caps fitted to medication bottles.DiscussionThis trial will provide information on the safety and effectiveness of mirtazapine as a pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder when delivered as an outpatient medication in routine clinical practice. If found to be safe and effective, this trial will support an application for methamphetamine use disorder to be included as a therapeutic indication for the prescription of mirtazapine.Trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622000235707. Registered on February 9, 2022.

Managing chronic, refractory nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients is challenging, especially when unrelated to cancer treatment. Mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant, effectively alleviates these symptoms, improving quality of life. It offers a promising palliative care alternative, addressing multiple symptoms and reducing polypharmacy, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common and potentially modifiable contributor to excess disability, morbidity, and poor quality of life. Clinical trials of medications for IBS have largely been in younger adults. Yet, a growing number of adults aged 65 and older are living with IBS. No data exist to guide clinicians in the safe and effective use of medications (e.g., anticholinergics, anti-spasmodics, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCA)) for IBS in the geriatric population. These medications—especially anticholinergics and TCAs—carry a high risk of adverse effects (ADE) in older adults because of age-associated decline in drug metabolism and the high prevalence of multiple chronic conditions. Five or more medications (polypharmacy) are frequently used to treat common psychiatric and medical comorbidities of IBS: anxiety, depression, insomnia, migraine headache, diarrhea, nausea, poor appetite, pruritus/skin atopy, and fibromyalgia. These neurological and psychiatric comorbidities reflect shared pathogenic mechanisms and bidirectional crosstalk of high inflammation, alteration of gut microbiota, and dysregulation of multiple gastrointestinal and central nervous system-active neurotransmitters (e.g., serotonin, neuropeptides). Currently, these IBS-associated conditions are treated with multiple medications—which increase the risk of adverse drug–drug interactions. One way to reduce the number of medications used for IBS-associated conditions is the use of one medication that treats many or all of these conditions—Mirtazapine. In this perspective article, we present evidence from basic science, case series, observational and epidemiological studies, clinical studies, and clinical trials supporting mirtazapine, a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic receptor antagonist—with 5-hydroxytryptamine-2 and 3 antagonism, as a potential pharmacotherapeutic intervention for the myriad symptoms and conditions associated with IBS. Specifically, we found evidence of mirtazapine’s role in treating diarrhea, insomnia, migraine headache, nausea, and poor appetite. We propose a large randomized controlled trial to study mirtazapine as a potential one-stop treatment for multiple IBS symptoms, with the potential to reduce polypharmacy and ADEs, especially in the geriatric population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Depression is the most common mental illness in the world, found in nearly three in ten adolescents globally. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of antidepressant prescriptions and the types of antidepressant therapy administered among adolescents diagnosed with depression in Germany. Methods: This retrospective cohort study, based on data provided by 30 child and adolescent psychiatrists, included adolescents aged 13–17 years with an initial diagnosis of depression between 2010 and 2022 (index date) documented in the IQVIATM Disease Analyzer database. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to investigate the one-year cumulative incidence of antidepressant prescriptions stratified by age, sex, and depression severity. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess the association between age, sex, depression severity, co-diagnoses, and antidepressant drug prescription. Results: A total of 6338 adolescents (mean age: 16 years, 67% female, 59% with moderate depression) were available. The cumulative incidence of antidepressant prescriptions was 61% and increased with age from 13 years old to 17 years old. Fluoxetine was the most prescribed drug, followed by Sertraline, Escitalopram, Serotonin and Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, herbal medications, and Mirtazapine. Obsessive–compulsive disorder and eating disorders were found to be significantly associated with antidepressant prescriptions within the spectrum of co-diagnosed conditions. Conclusions: Higher age, depression severity, and a co-diagnosis of an obsessive–compulsive disorder or eating disorder were significantly positively associated with antidepressant prescriptions in adolescents. Fluoxetine was the most frequently prescribed drug for depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decreased appetite is a common clinical problem in captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant originally developed for humans, has shown promise as a safe and effective promoter of weight gain and appetite in several veterinary species including rhesus and cynomolgus macaques. Although mirtazapine is available as oral formulations, transdermal delivery in macaques with reduced appetite would allow quick, painless, topical application. Here we describe the pharmacokinetics of a single application of a widely available veterinary transdermal mirtazapine formulation in 6 rhesus macaques. A dose of 0.5 mg/kg of transdermal mirtazapine ointment that has proven to be effective in rhesus was applied to the caudal pinnae of 3 female and 3 male young adult macaques. Serum was collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after administration. Our data indicate transdermal mirtazapine is absorbed at a lower level in rhesus as compared with published values in domestic cats (rhesus peak serum concentration: 1.2 ± 0.3 ng/mL), while drug half-life is longer than that reported in cats (rhesus: 33 ± 7 h). Mirtazapine reaches peak plasma concentrations in rhesus at 16 ± 10 h after administration; our model indicates that up to 5 d of serial dosing may be necessary to reach steady state. Our preliminary data also suggest that sex differences may contribute to efficacy and/or indicate sex-based differences, as male macaques reached Tmax more quickly than females (19 ± 2 h in females and 8 ± 3 h in males) and showed higher variation in half-life (33 ± 4 h in females and 34 ± 11 h in males). While previous work indicates clinical efficacy of the 0.5-mg/kg dosage in macaques, further investigation is warranted to determine if rhesus may benefit from higher recommended doses than companion animal species.

Background: Treatment with mirtazapine is reported to cause weight gain and adverse metabolic profile in several populations. Limited information is available regarding the metabolic adverse effects of mirtazapine in the Indian population. This study aims to compare the weight and metabolic profile of patients on mirtazapine at baseline and after six months of treatment in a tertiary care Indian setting. Methodology: This hospital-based, observational study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching institute in South India. Forty patients prescribed mirtazapine for various psychiatric disorders were included. Weight, body mass index, lipid profile, blood sugar, and HbA1c values were compared at baseline and after six months of treatment. Descriptive statistics used included mean and standard deviation (SD). Results: Statistically significant increase in mean weight (0.97 kg, SD - 2.2; p = 0.008), mean BMI, mean HbA1C (0.1, SD - 0.21; p = 0.007), and mean total cholesterol (6.6 mg/dl, SD - 13.5; p = 0.005) was observed after six months of treatment with mirtazapine. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the importance of close monitoring of patients who are started on mirtazapine to identify and treat metabolic deregulation promptly. Long-term, controlled studies in larger samples are needed to arrive at meaningful conclusions.

Mirtazapine is an antidepressant medication used to treat the major depressive disorder in adults. In this study, two different chromatographic methods were developed for the determination of mirtazapine in pharmaceutical products. In the first method, An Extend C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used and the temperature was kept constant at 25 °C. The mobile phase was determined as 0.1% formic acid solution and acetonitrile (80/20, v/v), and isocratic elution was applied. The flow rate of the mobile phase was determined as 1.0 mL min−1 and the injection volume was 20 µL. Detection was performed at 291 nm. using a UV detector. In the second method, ethanol was used as the organic modifier. The only difference between these methods was the organic modifier. All other conditions of the methods were the same. Both chromatographic methods were validated by ICH guidelines for various parameters such as selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, detection and quantification limit, and robustness. The determination coefficients of chromatographic methods were greater than 0.999 in the concentration range of 5–30 µg mL−1. of mirtazapine. Later, these chromatographic methods were applied to pharmaceutical formulations. Comparison of the obtained results in terms of means was made using Student's (t) test, and comparisons in terms of standard deviations were made using the Fischer (F) test. It was observed that there was no significant difference between these methods. These two methods were then evaluated using the AGREE-Analytical GREEnness metric software. The chromatographic method using ethanol as an organic modifier has been proposed as an excellent eco-friendly and analyst-friendly alternative for the determination of mirtazapine in pharmaceutical formulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Chronic cocaine exposure induces an increase in dopamine release and an increase in the expression of the Fos protein in the rat striatum. It has been suggested that both are necessary for the expression of cocaine-induced alterations in behavior and neural circuitry. Mirtazapine dosing attenuated the cocaine-induced psychomotor and reinforcer effects. Methods: The study evaluates the effect of chronic dosing of mirtazapine on cocaine-induced extracellular dopamine levels and Fos protein expression in rats. Male Wistar rats received cocaine (10 mg/Kg; i.p.) during the induction and expression of locomotor sensitization. The mirtazapine (30 mg/Kg; MIR), was administered 30 minutes before cocaine during the cocaine withdrawal. After each treatment, the locomotor activity was recorded for 30 minutes. Animals were sacrificed after treatment administration. Dopamine levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) in the ventral striatum, the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in animals treated with mirtazapine and cocaine. The quantification of c-fos immunoreactive cells was carried out by stereology analysis. Results: Mirtazapine generated a decrease in cocaine-induced locomotor activity. In addition, mirtazapine decreased the amount of cocaine-induced dopamine and the number of cells immunoreactive to the Fos protein in the striatum, PFC, and VTA. Discussion: These data suggest that mirtazapine could prevent the consolidation of changes in behavior and the cocaine-induced reorganization of neuronal circuits. It would explain the mirtazapine-induced effects on cocaine behavioral sensitization. Thus, these data together could support its possible use for the treatment of patients with cocaine use disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present research emphasizes fabrication alongside the assessment of an innovative nano-vesicular membranous system known as invasomes (NVMs) laden with Mirtazapine for rectal administration. This system could circumvent the confines of orally administered counterparts regarding dose schedules and bioavailability. Mirtazapine invasomes were tailored by amalgamating phospholipid, cineole, and ethanol through a thin-film hydration approach rooted in the Box–Behnken layout. Optimization of composition parameters used to fabricate desired NVMs' physicochemical attributes was undertaken using the Design-Expert® program. The optimal MRZ-NVMs were subsequently transformed to a pH-triggered in situ rectal gel followed by animal pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic investigations relative to rectal plain gel and oral suspension. The optimized NVMs revealed a diameter size of 201.3 nm, a z potential of −28.8 mV, an entrapment efficiency of 81.45%, a cumulative release within 12 h of 67.29%, and a cumulative daily permeated quantity of 468.68 µg/cm2. Compared to the oral suspension, pharmacokinetic studies revealed a 2.85- and 4.45-fold increase in calculated rectal bioavailability in circulation and brain, respectively. Pharmacodynamic and immunohistopathology evaluations exposed superior MRZ-NVMs attributed to the orally administered drug. Consequently, rectal MRZ-NVMs can potentially be regarded as a prospective nanoplatform with valuable pharmacokinetics and tolerability assets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Managing chronic, refractory nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients is challenging, especially when unrelated to cancer treatment. Mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant, effectively alleviates these symptoms, improving quality of life. It offers a promising palliative care alternative, addressing multiple symptoms and reducing polypharmacy, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction.

An elderly man was hospitalized after a fall following an episode of dizziness. During the initial examination, he was found to have a distended bladder, caused by urinary retention. Moreover, he was diagnosed with severe hypoosmotic hyponatremia. After the urinary retention was resolved, the patient developed severe diuresis, and the hyponatremia corrected rapidly and spontaneously.

Background Chronic pain is common and costly. Antidepressants are prescribed to reduce pain. However, there has not been a network meta-analysis examining all antidepressants across all chronic pain conditions, so effectiveness and safety for most antidepressants for pain conditions remain unknown. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for chronic pain (except headache) in adults. Our primary outcomes were as follows: substantial pain relief (50%), pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were as follows: moderate pain relief (30%), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Patient Global Impression of Change, serious adverse events and withdrawal. Design This was a systematic review with a network meta-analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, AMED and PsycINFO databases for randomised controlled trials of antidepressants for chronic pain conditions up until 4 January 2022. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020171855), and the protocol was published in the Cochrane Library (https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014682). Setting We analysed trials from all settings. Participants We included trials in which participants had chronic pain, defined as longer than 3 months, from any condition excluding headache. Interventions We included all antidepressants. Main outcome measures Our primary outcome was substantial pain relief, defined as a reduction ˃ 50%. We also measured pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Secondary measures included moderate pain relief (above 30% reduction), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Global Impression of Change, serious adverse events, and withdrawal from trial. Results We identified 176 studies with a total of 28,664 participants. Most studies were placebo-controlled (n = 83) and parallel armed (n = 141). The most common pain conditions examined were fibromyalgia (59 studies), neuropathic pain (49 studies) and musculoskeletal pain (40 studies). The average length of randomised controlled trials was 10 weeks. Most studies measured short-term outcomes only and excluded people with low mood and other mental health conditions. Across efficacy outcomes, duloxetine was consistently the highest-ranked antidepressant with moderate- to high-certainty evidence. Standard dose was equally efficacious as high dose for the majority of outcomes. Milnacipran was often ranked as the next most efficacious antidepressant, although the certainty of evidence was lower than that for duloxetine. There was insufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions for the efficacy and safety of any other antidepressant for chronic pain. Limitations The evidence for antidepressants other than duloxetine is poor. For duloxetine, it is not clear whether the effect applies to groups with both pain and low mood, since these groups were excluded from trials. There is also insufficient evidence on long-term outcomes and on adverse effects. Conclusions There is only reliable evidence for duloxetine in the treatment of chronic pain. Duloxetine was moderately efficacious across all outcomes at standard dose. There is also promising evidence for milnacipran, although further high-quality research is needed to be confident in these conclusions. Data for all other antidepressants were of low certainty. However, the findings should not be read as an encouragement to prescribe antidepressants where other non-pharmacological intervention could be equally effective, especially in the absence of good evidence on side effects and safety. Future work There is a need for large, methodologically sound trials testing the effectiveness of antidepressants for chronic pain. These trials should examine long-term outcomes (> 6 months) and include people with low mood. There should also be better reporting of adverse events, tolerance of drugs, and long-term compliance. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171855. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128782) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 62. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Plain language summary What was the question? Chronic pain is pain that lasts for more than 3 months. Over one-third of people across the world experience chronic pain. This often has a detrimental impact on people’s mood, disability and well-being. Antidepressants are often prescribed to reduce pain, but we are not sure which antidepressants work best for different types of pain, or whether they are safe. We wanted to find out whether antidepressants were effective and safe for management of chronic pain. What did we do? We searched for studies that had compared any antidepressant with any other treatment for any type of chronic pain (except headache). We compared all the treatments against each other using a statistical method called network meta-analysis. This method allows us to rank the treatments in order of best to worst for each outcome. What did we find? We found 176 studies that included a total of 28,664 people with chronic pain. Most of the studies (83/176) compared an antidepressant with a placebo (which looks like the real medicine but does not have any medicine in it). The evidence from our analysis suggests that: Duloxetine is the antidepressant that we have the most confidence in. It was the best antidepressant for reducing pain and improving physical function. A standard dose of duloxetine was equally as effective for reducing pain as a high dose of duloxetine. Milnacipran was also effective at reducing pain, but we are not as confident in this result as in the one for duloxetine because there were fewer studies with fewer people involved. Aside from duloxetine and milnacipran, we do not have confidence in the results from any other antidepressant included in this review, and even for duloxetine and milnacipran, we do not know the long-term effects. It is important to recognise that the lack of evidence for the majority of antidepressants in this review does not necessarily equal a lack of benefit. Rather, this means that the large, high-quality trials required for us to be certain of an antidepressant’s effectiveness have not been undertaken. Altogether, although duloxetine and milnacipran are effective, the results of this review should not be read as an encouragement to prescribe antidepressants where other non-pharmacological intervention could be equally effective, especially in the absence of good evidence on side effects and safety. These conclusions were informed by our patient and public involvement group. Scientific summary Background Chronic pain is common in adults, and often has a detrimental impact upon physical ability, well-being, and quality of life. Previous reviews have shown that certain antidepressants may be effective in reducing pain with some benefit in improving patients’ global impression of change for certain chronic pain conditions. However, there has not been a network meta-analysis examining all antidepressants across all chronic pain conditions. Objectives Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for chronic pain (except headache) in adults. Our primary outcomes were as follows: substantial pain relief (50%), pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were as follows: moderate pain relief (30%), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), serious adverse events and withdrawal. Search methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, AMED and PsycINFO databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressants for chronic pain conditions up until 4 January 2022. Selection criteria We included RCTs that examined antidepressants for chronic pain against any comparator. If the comparator was placebo, another medication, another antidepressant or the same antidepressant at different doses, then the study was required to be double-blind. RCTs with active comparators that were unable to be double-blinded (e.g. psychotherapy) were included but rated as at high risk of bias. We excluded RCTs where the follow-up was < 2 weeks and those with < 10 participants in each trial arm. We included any antidepressant at any dose, for any indication but used primarily for treatment of people with chronic pain and compared to placebo or active intervention. Participants We included adults (aged 18 years or older) reporting primary or secondary pain in any part of their body (except headache) as their primary complaint, that matched the International Association for the Study of Pain definition of chronic pain (i.e. at least 3 months’ duration). We included all trials regardless of the severity of participants’ chronic pain, although we extracted whether severity was part of the inclusion criteria of the individual studies. We excluded studies where the participants’ primary pain condition was headache or migraine. Data collection and analysis Two authors separately screened, extracted data and judged risk of bias. We synthesised the data using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta-analyses for each outcome and ranked the antidepressants in terms of their effectiveness using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. We primarily used the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework and ‘Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence in Network meta-analysis’ (ROB-MEN) tool to assess the certainty of the evidence. Where it was not possible to use CINeMA and ROB-MEN due to the complexity of the networks, we used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of the evidence. Main results This review and NMA included 176 studies with a total of 28,664 participants. The majority of studies were placebo-controlled (n = 83) and parallel-armed (n = 141). The most common pain conditions examined were fibromyalgia (59 studies), neuropathic pain (49 studies) and musculoskeletal pain (40 studies). The average length of RCTs was 10 weeks; seven studies provided no useable data and were omitted from the NMAs. The majority of studies measured short-term outcomes only and excluded people with low mood and other mental health conditions. Across efficacy outcomes, duloxetine was consistently the highest-ranked antidepressant with moderate- to high-certainty evidence. In duloxetine trials, standard dose was equally efficacious as high dose for the majority of outcomes. Milnacipran was often ranked as the next most efficacious antidepressant, although the certainty of evidence was lower than that of duloxetine. There was insufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions for the efficacy and safety of any other antidepressant for chronic pain. Primary efficacy outcomes For pain relief, duloxetine standard dose showed a small to moderate effect for substantial pain relief [odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.84] and continuous pain intensity [standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.31, 95% CI −0.39 to −0.24]. For pain intensity, milnacipran standard dose also showed a small effect (SMD −0.22, 95% CI −0.39 to 0.06) with moderate-certainty evidence. For mood, mirtazapine had a moderate effect (SMD −0.5, 95% CI −0.78 to −0.22), while duloxetine showed a small effect (−0.16, 95% CI −0.22 to −0.1); however, it is important to note that most trials excluded participants with mental health conditions, and so average anxiety and depression scores tended to be in the ‘normal’ or ‘subclinical’ ranges at baseline already. Secondary efficacy outcomes Across all secondary efficacy outcomes (moderate pain relief, physical function, sleep, quality of life and PGIC), duloxetine and milnacipran were the highest-ranked antidepressants with moderate-certainty evidence, although effects were small. For both duloxetine and milnacipran, standard doses were equally as efficacious as high doses. Safety There was very low-certainty evidence for all safety outcomes (adverse events, serious adverse events and withdrawal) across all antidepressants. We cannot draw any reliable conclusions from the NMAs for these outcomes. Authors’ conclusions Our review and NMAs show that despite studies investigating 25 different antidepressants, there is reliable evidence for only duloxetine in the treatment of chronic pain. Duloxetine was moderately efficacious across all outcomes at standard dose. There is also promising evidence for milnacipran, although further high-quality research is needed to be confident in these conclusions. Data for all other antidepressants were of low certainty. As RCTs excluded people with low mood, we were unable to establish the effects of antidepressants for people with chronic pain and depression. There is currently no reliable evidence for the long-term efficacy and safety of any antidepressant. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171855. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128782) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 62. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and Restless legs syndrome (RLS) present complex clinical challenges, often coexisting and complicating treatment strategies. While the relationship between MDD and RLS remains somewhat elusive, emerging evidence suggests a potential interplay between antidepressant medications and the worsening of RLS symptoms. This case report illuminates an instance where mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant commonly used in MDD, precipitated a resurgence of RLS symptoms in a patient with a previously controlled presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on a case of a 40-year-old woman who developed melasma as a rare side effect of mirtazapine, an antidepressant prescribed for her severe depressive episode. Topics include the patient's psychiatric history and treatment, the timeline of the appearance and resolution of facial pigmentation, and the diagnosis and management of her melasma by dermatologists.

Abstract Background There are no approved pharmacotherapies for methamphetamine use disorder. Two preliminary phase 2 randomised controlled trials have found mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant, to be effective in reducing methamphetamine use. The proposed Tina Trial is the first phase 3 placebo-controlled randomised trial to examine the effectiveness and safety of mirtazapine as an outpatient pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder. Methods This is a multi-site phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial. Participants are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either mirtazapine (30 mg/day for 12 weeks) or matched placebo, delivered as a take-home medication. The target population is 340 people aged 18–65 years who have moderate to severe methamphetamine use disorder. The trial is being conducted through outpatient alcohol and other drug treatment clinics in Australia. The primary outcome is measured as self-reported days of methamphetamine use in the past 4 weeks at week 12. Secondary outcomes are methamphetamine-negative oral fluid samples, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, HIV risk behaviour and quality of life. Other outcomes include safety (adverse events), tolerability, and health service use. Medication adherence is being monitored using MEMS® Smart Caps fitted to medication bottles. Discussion This trial will provide information on the safety and effectiveness of mirtazapine as a pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder when delivered as an outpatient medication in routine clinical practice. If found to be safe and effective, this trial will support an application for methamphetamine use disorder to be included as a therapeutic indication for the prescription of mirtazapine. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622000235707. Registered on February 9, 2022.

Nausea and vomiting are common experiences and are often dreaded more than pain. This review discusses blonanserin, mirtazapine, and isopropyl alcohol as antiemetics. Blonanserin, an atypical antipsychotic with a high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors and serotonin receptor 5-HT2A, has less of a risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Transdermal blonanserin, available in Korea, Japan, and China in a small number of trials, has improved nausea in patients not responding to standard antiemetics. Mirtazapine is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant that has been used for multiple symptoms besides depression. There is little evidence that mirtazapine improves anorexia or nausea in advanced cancer but is as effective as olanzapine in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Isopropyl alcohol aromatherapy has been successfully used in the emergency department for nausea and vomiting with an onset to benefit more rapidly than standard antiemetics. Isopropyl alcohol prep pads can be used for home-going antiemetic therapy and as a bridge to treating acute nausea until standard antiemetics take effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is characterized by burning sensations in the oral region without corresponding abnormalities and is often accompanied by uncomfortable sensations. Herein, we present cases of BMS in which the remaining uncomfortable sensations improved with perospirone augmentation with clonazepam. Case 1: A 61‐year‐old man complained of a burning pain in his tongue, a sensation of dryness and discomfort as if his tongue was sticking to a palatal plate. With the diagnosis of BMS, psychopharmacotherapy was initiated with amitriptyline. At the dose of amitriptyline 50 mg, the pain lessened but uncomfortable sensations persisted. Further attempts to alleviate symptoms by combining aripiprazole with amitriptyline, aripiprazole with mirtazapine, or aripiprazole with clonazepam were limited; however, nearly all symptoms were relieved by a combination of perospirone 8.0 mg with clonazepam 1.5 mg. Case 2: A 51‐year‐old woman complained of a burning sensation along with oral dryness and crumb‐like feeling on her tongue. She was diagnosed with BMS and began treatment with amitriptyline. Her burning sensation improved at the dose of 25 mg, but uncomfortable sensations persisted. Augmentation of amitriptyline with aripiprazole, aripiprazole either with valproate, mirtazapine, or clonazepam failed to produce a significant improvement. However, a regimen of perospirone 6.0 mg and clonazepam 1.5 mg relieved the crumb‐like sensation and pain and culminated in a stabilized condition. The reported cases suggested that multiple approaches targeting the dopaminergic circuit in basal ganglia involving the serotoninergic and GABA systems, through the administration of perospirone with clonazepam is an effective adjunctive treatment for the remaining uncomfortable sensations in patients with BMS. This is the first report introduced cases of BMS where patients' remained discomfort was ameliorated by perospirone augmentation with clonazepam, which approaches multiply to dopaminergic circuit in basal ganglia involving serotoninergic and GABA system. It may be as effective adjunctive treatment for the remaining uncomfortable sensations in the patients with BMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] acts via 13 different receptors in humans. Of these receptor subtypes, all but 5-HT1eR have confirmed roles in native tissue and are validated drug targets. Despite 5-HT1eR's therapeutic potential and plausible druggability, the mechanisms of its activation remain elusive. To illuminate 5-HT1eR's pharmacology in relation to the highly homologous 5-HT1FR, we screened a library of aminergic receptor ligands at both receptors and observe 5-HT1eR/5-HT1FR agonism by multicyclic drugs described as pan-antagonists at 5-HT receptors. Potent agonism by tetracyclic antidepressants mianserin, setiptiline, and mirtazapine suggests a mechanism for their clinically observed antimigraine properties. Using cryo-EM and mutagenesis studies, we uncover and characterize unique agonist-like binding poses of mianserin and setiptiline at 5-HT1eR distinct from similar drug scaffolds in inactive-state 5-HTR structures. Together with computational studies, our data suggest that these binding poses alongside receptor-specific allosteric coupling in 5-HT1eR and 5-HT1FR contribute to the agonist activity of these antidepressants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionChronic cocaine exposure induces an increase in dopamine release and an increase in the expression of the Fos protein in the rat striatum. It has been suggested that both are necessary for the expression of cocaine-induced alterations in behavior and neural circuitry. Mirtazapine dosing attenuated the cocaine-induced psychomotor and reinforcer effects.MethodsThe study evaluates the effect of chronic dosing of mirtazapine on cocaine-induced extracellular dopamine levels and Fos protein expression in rats. Male Wistar rats received cocaine (10 mg/Kg; i.p.) during the induction and expression of locomotor sensitization. The mirtazapine (30 mg/Kg; MIR), was administered 30 minutes before cocaine during the cocaine withdrawal. After each treatment, the locomotor activity was recorded for 30 minutes. Animals were sacrificed after treatment administration. Dopamine levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) in the ventral striatum, the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in animals treated with mirtazapine and cocaine. The quantification of c-fos immunoreactive cells was carried out by stereology analysis. ResultsMirtazapine generated a decrease in cocaine-induced locomotor activity. In addition, mirtazapine decreased the amount of cocaine-induced dopamine and the number of cells immunoreactive to the Fos protein in the striatum, PFC, and VTA.DiscussionThese data suggest that mirtazapine could prevent the consolidation of changes in behavior and the cocaine-induced reorganization of neuronal circuits. It would explain the mirtazapine-induced effects on cocaine behavioral sensitization. Thus, these data together could support its possible use for the treatment of patients with cocaine use disorder.

Introduction: Current evidence reveals concerning rates of non-adherence to antidepressant treatment, possibly influenced by various relevant determinants such as sociodemographic factors or those related to the health system and their professionals. The aim of this paper is to review the scientific evidence on sociodemographic and clinical predictors of adherence to pharmacological treatment in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. Methods: a systematic review (SR) was conducted. The search for a previous SR was updated and de novo searches were performed in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science (WoS) and PsycInfo (last 10 years). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for non-randomized studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E). Meta-analyses were conducted. Results: Thirty-nine studies (n = 2,778,313) were included, 24 of them in the meta-analyses. In the initiation phase, no association of adherence was found with any of the predictors studied. In the implementation and discontinuation phases, middle-aged and older patients had better adherence rates and lower discontinuation rates than younger ones. White patients adhered to treatment better than African-American patients. Discussion: Age and ethnicity are presented as the predictive factors of pharmacological adherence. However, more research is needed in this field to obtain more conclusive results on other possible factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]