Search

Your search keyword '"Magboo VP"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Magboo VP" Search Limiters Full Text
6 results on '"Magboo VP"'

1. Nuclear cardiology practice and associated radiation doses in Europe: results of the IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Study (INCAPS) for the 27 European countries

Author

Lindner, O., Pascual, Tn, Mercuri, M, Acampa, W, Burchert, W, Flotats, A, Kaufmann, Pa, Kitsiou, A, Knuuti, J, Underwood, Sr, Vitola, Jv, Mahmarian JJ, Karthikeyan, G, Better, N, Rehani, Mm, Kashyap, R, Dondi, M, Paez, D, Einstein, Aj, INCAPS Investigators Group: Pascual TN, Bouyoucef, Se, Lele, V, Magboo, Vp, Mut, F, Mahmarian, Jj, Meeks, Jb, Alexánderson, E, Allam, A, Al-Mallah, Mh, Bom, H, Jerome, S, Luxenburg, O, Mahmarian, J, Shaw, Lj, Vitola, J, Amouri, W, Essabbah, H, Gassama, Ss, Makhdomi, Kb, El Mustapha GI, El Ouchdi, N, Qaïs, N, Soni, N, Vangu, W, Abazid, Rm, Adams, B, Agarwal, V, Alfeeli, Ma, Alnafisi, N, Bernabe, L, Bural, Gg, Chaiwatanarat, T, Chandraguptha, Jm, Cheon, Gj, Cho, I, Dogan, As, Eftekhari, M, Frenkel, A, Garty, I, George, S, Geramifar, P, Golan, H, Habib, S, Hussain, R, Im, H, Jeon, Hj, Kalawat, T, Kang, Wj, Keng, F, Klaipetch, A, Kumar, Pg, Lee, J, Lee, Ww, Lim, I, Macaisa, Cm, Malhotra, G, Mittal, Br, Mohammad, Mh, Mohan, P, Mulyanto, Id, Nariman, D, Nayak, Un, Niaz, K, Nikolov, G, Obaldo, Jm, Ozturk, E, Park, Jm, Park, S, Patel, Cd, Phuong, Hk, Quinon, Ap, Rajini, Tr, Saengsuda, Y, Santiago, J, Sayman, Hb, Shinto, As, Sivasubramaniyan, V, Son, Mh, Sudhakar, P, Syed, Gm, Tamaki, N, Thamnirat, K, Thientunyakit, T, Thongmak, S, Velasco, Dn, Verma, A, Vutrapongwatana, U, Wang, Y, Won, Ks, Yao, Z, Yingsa-nga, T, Yudistiro, R, Yue, Kt, Zafrir, N, Adrian, Sc, Agostini, D, Aguadé, S, Armitage, G, Backlund, M, Backman, M, Baker, M, Balducci, Mt, Bavelaar, C, Berovic, M, Bertagna, F, Beuchel, R, Biggi, A, Bisi, G, Bonini, R, Bradley, A, Brudin, L, Bruno, I, Busnardo, E, Casoni, R, Choudhri, A, Cittanti, C, Clauss, R, Costa, Dc, Costa, M, Dixon, K, Dziuk, M, Egelic, N, Eriksson, I, Fagioli, G, de Faria DB, Florimonte, L, Francini, A, French, M, Gallagher, E, Garai, I, Geatti, O, Genovesi, D, Gianolli, L, Gimelli, A, del Giudice, E, Halliwell, S, Hansson, Mj, Harrison, C, Homans, F, Horton, F, Jędrzejuk, D, Jogi, J, Johansen, A, Johansson, H, Kalnina, M, Kaminek, M, Kiss, A, Kobylecka, M, Kostkiewicz, M, Kropp, J, Kullenberg, R, Lahoutte, T, Lang, O, Larsson, Yh, Lázár, M, Leccisotti, L, Leners, N, Lindner, O, Lipp, Rw, Maenhout, A, Maffioli, L, Marcassa, C, Martins, B, Marzullo, P, Medolago, G, Mendiguchía, Cg, Mirzaei, S, Mori, M, Nardi, B, Nazarenko, S, Nikoletic, K, Oleksa, R, Parviainen, T, Patrina, J, Peace, R, Pirich, C, Piwowarska-Bilska, H, Popa, S, Prakash, V, Pubul, V, Puklavec, L, Rac, S, Ratniece, M, Rogan, Sa, Romeo, A, Rossi, M, Ruiz, D, Sabharwal, N, Salobir, Bg, Santos, Ai, Saranovic, S, Sarkozi, A, Schneider, Rp, Sciagra, R, Scotti, S, Servini, Z, Setti, Lr, Starck, Så, Vajauskas, D, Veselý, J, Vieni, A, Vignati, A, Vito, Im, Weiss, K, Wild, D, Zdraveska-Kochovska, M, Agüro, Rn, Alvarado, N, Barral, Cm, Beretta, M, Berrocal, I, Batista Cuellar JF, Cabral Chang TM, Cabrera Rodríguez LO, Canessa, J, Castro Mora, G, Claudia, Ac, Clavelo, Gf, Cruz Júnior AF, Faccio, Ff, Fernández, Km, Gomez Garibo JR, Gonzalez, U, E P, González, Guzzo, Ma, Jofre, J, Kapitán, M, Kempfer, G, Lopez, Jl, V T, Massardo, Medeiros Colaco, I, Mesquita, Ct, Montecinos, M, Neubauer, S, Pabon, Lm, Puente, A, Rochela Vazquez LM, Serna Macias JA, Silva Pino AG, Tártari Huber FZ, Tovar, Ap, Vargas, L, Wiefels, C, Aljizeeri, A, Alvarez, Rj, Barger, D, Beardwood, W, Behrens, J, Brann, L, Brown, D, Carr, H, Churchwell, K, Comingore, Ga, Corbett, J, Costello, M, Cruz, F, Depinet, T, Dorbala, S, Earles, M, Esteves, Fp, Etherton, E, Fanning RJ Jr, Fornace, J, Franks, L, Gewirtz, H, Gulanchyn, K, Hannah, Cl, Hays, J, Hendrickson, J, Hester, J, Holmes, K, Johnson, A, Jopek, C, Lewin, H, Lyons, J, Manley, C, Meden, J, Moore, S, Moore, Wh, Murthy, V, Nace, R, Neely, D, Nelson, L, Niedermaier, O, Rice, D, Rigs, R, Schiffer, K, Schockling, E, Schultz, T, Schumacker, T, Sheesley, B, Sheikh, A, Siegel, B, Slim, Am, Smith, J, Szulc, M, Tanskersley, N, Tilkemeier, P, Valdez, Gd, Vrooman, R, Wawrowicz, D, Winchester, De, Alcheikh, A, Allen, B, Atkins, E, Bevan, J, Bonomini, C, Christiansen, J, Clack, L, Craig, E, Dixson, H, Duncan, I, Fredericks, S, Gales, S, Hampson, R, Hanley, T, Hartcher, K, Hassall, J, Kelley, B, Kelly, S, Kidd, T, de Kort, T, Larcos, G, Macdonald, W, Mcgrath, C, Murdoch, E, O'Malley, S, O'Rourke, M, Pack, M, Pearce, R, Praehofer, R, Ramsay, S, Scarlett, L, Smidt, K, Souvannavong, F, Taubman, K, Taylor, G, Tse, K, Unger, S, Weale, J., Lindner, Oliver, Pascual, Thomas N. B, Mercuri, Mathew, Acampa, Wanda, Burchert, Wolfgang, Flotats, Albert, Kaufmann, Philipp A, Kitsiou, Anastasia, Knuuti, Juhani, Underwood, S. Richard, Vitola, João V, Mahmarian, John J, Karthikeyan, Ganesan, Better, Nathan, Rehani, Madan M, Kashyap, Ravi, Dondi, Maurizio, Paez, Diana, Einstein, Andrew J., Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC), and Columbia University [New York]

Subjects
INCAPS Investigators Group, [SDV.IB.IMA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Imaging, Computed tomography, Best practice, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 0302 clinical medicine, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Medicine, media_common, medicine.diagnostic_test, Radiation dose, Scientific, General Medicine, 3. Good health, Patient management, Europe, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, SPECT, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Cardiology, Original Article, Radiology, Societies, Scientific, medicine.medical_specialty, Best practices, 0299 Other Physical Sciences, [SDV.IB.MN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Nuclear medicine, Radiation Dosage, NO, 03 medical and health sciences, Internal medicine, media_common.cataloged_instance, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Medical physics, European Union, Quality of care, European union, Cardiac Imaging Technique, business.industry, Nuclear cardiology, PET, Cardiac Imaging Techniques, Nuclear Medicine, Positron-Emission Tomography, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 1103 Clinical Sciences, business, Societies, Medical therapy, [SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology
Abstract

Purpose Nuclear cardiology is widely used to diagnose coronary artery disease and to guide patient management, but data on current practices, radiation dose-related best practices, and radiation doses are scarce. To address these issues, the IAEA conducted a worldwide study of nuclear cardiology practice. We present the European subanalysis. Methods In March 2013, the IAEA invited laboratories across the world to document all SPECT and PET studies performed in one week. The data included age, gender, weight, radiopharmaceuticals, injected activities, camera type, positioning, hardware and software. Radiation effective dose was calculated for each patient. A quality score was defined for each laboratory as the number followed of eight predefined best practices with a bearing on radiation exposure (range of quality score 0 - 8). The participating European countries were assigned to regions (North, East, South, and West). Comparisons were performed between the four European regions and between Europe and the rest-of-the-world (RoW). Results Data on 2,381 European patients undergoing nuclear cardiology procedures in 102 laboratories in 27 countries were collected. A cardiac SPECT study was performed in 97.9 % of the patients, and a PET study in 2.1 %. The average effective dose of SPECT was 8.0 +/- 3.4 mSv (RoW 11.4 +/- 4.3 mSv; P < 0.001) and of PET was 2.6 +/- 1.5 mSv (RoW 3.8 +/- 2.5 mSv; P < 0.001). The mean effective doses of SPECT and PET differed between European regions (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The mean quality score was 6.2 +/- 1.2, which was higher than the RoW score (5.0 +/- 1.1; P < 0.001). Adherence to best practices did not differ significantly among the European regions (range 6 to 6.4; P = 0.73). Of the best practices, stress-only imaging and weight-adjusted dosing were the least commonly used. Conclusion In Europe, the mean effective dose from nuclear cardiology is lower and the average quality score is higher than in the RoW. There is regional variation in effective dose in relation to the best practice quality score. A possible reason for the differences between Europe and the RoW could be the safety culture fostered by actions under the Euratom directives and the implementation of diagnostic reference levels. Stress-only imaging and weight-adjusted activity might be targets for optimization of European nuclear cardiology practice.

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS)

Author

Einstein, Aj, Pascual, Tn, Mercuri, M, Karthikeyan, G, Vitola, Jv, Mahmarian, Jj, Better, N, Bouyoucef, Se, Hee-Seung Bom, H, Lele, V, Magboo, Vp, Alexánderson, E, Allam, Ah, Al-Mallah, Mh, Flotats, A, Jerome, S, Kaufmann, Pa, Luxenburg, O, Shaw, Lj, Underwood, Sr, Rehani, Mm, Kashyap, R, Paez, D, Dondi, M, INCAPS Investigators Group: Einstein AJ, Alexanderson, E, Allam, A, Bom, H, Mahmarian, J, Vitola, J, Amouri, W, Essabbah, H, Gassama, Ss, Makhdomi, Kb, El Mustapha GI, El Ouchdi, N, Qaïs, N, Soni, N, Vangu, W, Abazid, Rm, Adams, B, Agarwal, V, Alfeeli, Ma, Alnafisi, N, Bernabe, L, Bural, Gg, Chaiwatanarat, T, Chandraguptha, Jm, Cheon, Gj, Cho, I, Dogan, As, Eftekhari, M, Frenkel, A, Garty, I, George, S, Geramifar, P, Golan, H, Habib, S, Hussain, R, Im, H, Jeon, Hj, Kalawat, T, Kang, Wj, Keng, F, Klaipetch, A, Kumar, Pg, Lee, J, Lee, Ww, Lim, I, Macaisa, Cm, Malhotra, G, Mittal, Br, Mohammad, Mh, Mohan, P, Mulyanto, Id, Nariman, D, Nayak, Un, Niaz, K, Nikolov, G, Obaldo, Jm, Ozturk, E, Park, Jm, Park, S, Patel, Cd, Phuong, Hk, Quinon, Ap, Rajini, Tr, Saengsuda, Y, Santiago, J, Sayman, Hb, Shinto, As, Sivasubramaniyan, V, Son, Mh, Sudhakar, P, Syed, Gm, Tamaki, N, Thamnirat, K, Thientunyakit, T, Thongmak, S, Velasco, Dn, Verma, A, Vutrapongwatana, U, Wang, Y, Won, Ks, Yao, Z, Yingsa-nga, T, Yudistiro, R, Yue, Kt, Zafrir, N, Adrian, Sc, Agostini, D, Aguadé, S, Armitage, G, Backlund, M, Backman, M, Baker, M, Balducci, Mt, Bavelaar, C, Berovic, M, Bertagna, F, Beuchel, R, Biggi, A, Bisi, G, Bonini, R, Bradley, A, Brudin, L, Bruno, I, Busnardo, E, Casoni, R, Choudhri, A, Cittanti, C, Clauss, R, Costa, Dc, Costa, M, Dixon, K, Dziuk, M, Egelic, N, Eriksson, I, Fagioli, G, de Faria DB, Florimonte, L, Francini, A, French, M, Gallagher, E, Garai, I, Geatti, O, Genovesi, D, Gianolli, L, Gimelli, A, del Giudice, E, Halliwell, S, Hansson, Mj, Harrison, C, Homans, F, Horton, F, Jędrzejuk, D, Jogi, J, Johansen, A, Johansson, H, Kalnina, M, Kaminek, M, Kiss, A, Kobylecka, M, Kostkiewicz, M, Kropp, J, Kullenberg, R, Lahoutte, T, Lang, O, Larsson, Yh, Lázár, M, Leccisotti, L, Leners, N, Lindner, O, Lipp, Rw, Maenhout, A, Maffioli, L, Marcassa, C, Martins, B, Marzullo, P, Medolago, G, Meeks, Jb, Mendiguchía, Cg, Mirzaei, S, Mori, M, Nardi, B, Nazarenko, S, Nikoletic, K, Oleksa, R, Parviainen, T, Patrina, J, Peace, R, Pirich, C, Piwowarska-Bilska, H, Popa, S, Prakash, V, Pubul, V, Puklavec, L, Rac, S, Ratniece, M, Rogan, Sa, Romeo, A, Rossi, M, Ruiz, D, Sabharwal, N, Salobir, Bg, Santos, Ai, Saranovic, S, Sarkozi, A, Schneider, Rp, Sciagra, R, Scotti, S, Servini, Z, Setti, Lr, Starck, Så, Vajauskas, D, Veselý, J, Vieni, A, Vignati, A, Vito, Im, Weiss, K, Wild, D, Zdraveska-Kochovska, M, Agüro, Rn, Alvarado, N, Barral, Cm, Beretta, M, Berrocal, I, Batista Cuellar JF, Cabral Chang TM, Cabrera Rodríguez LO, Canessa, J, Castro Mora, G, Claudia, Ac, Clavelo, Gf, Cruz Júnior AF, Faccio, Ff, Fernández, Km, Gomez Garibo JR, Gonzalez, U, E P, González, Guzzo, Ma, Jofre, J, Kapitán, M, Kempfer, G, Lopez, Jl, V T, Massardo, Medeiros Colaco, I, Mesquita, Ct, Montecinos, M, Neubauer, S, Pabon, Lm, Puente, A, Rochela Vazquez LM, Serna Macias JA, Silva Pino AG, Tártari Huber FZ, Tovar, Ap, Vargas, L, Wiefels, C, Aljizeeri, A, Alvarez, Rj, Barger, D, Beardwood, W, Behrens, J, Brann, L, Brown, D, Carr, H, Churchwell, K, Comingore, Ga, Corbett, J, Costello, M, Cruz, F, Depinet, T, Dorbala, S, Earles, M, Esteves, Fp, Etherton, E, Fanning RJ Jr, Fornace, J, Franks, L, Gewirtz, H, Gulanchyn, K, Hannah, Cl, Hays, J, Hendrickson, J, Hester, J, Holmes, K, Johnson, A, Jopek, C, Lewin, H, Lyons, J, Manley, C, Meden, J, Moore, S, Moore, Wh, Murthy, V, Nace, R, Neely, D, Nelson, L, Niedermaier, O, Rice, D, Rigs, R, Schiffer, K, Schockling, E, Schultz, T, Schumacker, T, Sheesley, B, Sheikh, A, Siegel, B, Slim, Am, Smith, J, Szulc, M, Tanskersley, N, Tilkemeier, P, Valdez, Gd, Vrooman, R, Wawrowicz, D, Winchester, De, Alcheikh, A, Allen, B, Atkins, E, Bevan, J, Bonomini, C, Christiansen, J, Clack, L, Craig, E, Dixson, H, Duncan, I, Fredericks, S, Gales, S, Hampson, R, Hanley, T, Hartcher, K, Hassall, J, Kelley, B, Kelly, S, Kidd, T, de Kort, T, Larcos, G, Macdonald, W, Mcgrath, C, Murdoch, E, O'Malley, S, O'Rourke, M, Pack, M, Pearce, R, Praehofer, R, Ramsay, S, Scarlett, L, Smidt, K, Souvannavong, F, Taubman, K, Taylor, G, Tse, K, Unger, S, and Weale, J.

Subjects
Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Best practices, Cross-sectional study, Cardiology, Global Health, Radiation Dosage, Effective dose (radiation), NO, Myocardial perfusion imaging, Clinical Protocols, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Tomography, Nuclear cardiology, PET, Quality of care, Radiation dose, SPECT, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Guideline Adherence, Middle Aged, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Professional Practice, Quality of Health Care, Radiation Exposure, Regression Analysis, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Radiation exposure, Positron emission tomography, Mauriceau–Smellie–Veit maneuver, Observational study, Emission-Computed, business, Single-Photon
Abstract

Aims To characterize patient radiation doses from nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and the use of radiation-optimizing ‘best practices’ worldwide, and to evaluate the relationship between laboratory use of best practices and patient radiation dose. Methods and results We conducted an observational cross-sectional study of protocols used for all 7911 MPI studies performed in 308 nuclear cardiology laboratories in 65 countries for a single week in March–April 2013. Eight ‘best practices’ relating to radiation exposure were identified a priori by an expert committee, and a radiation-related quality index (QI) devised indicating the number of best practices used by a laboratory. Patient radiation effective dose (ED) ranged between 0.8 and 35.6 mSv (median 10.0 mSv). Average laboratory ED ranged from 2.2 to 24.4 mSv (median 10.4 mSv); only 91 (30%) laboratories achieved the median ED ≤ 9 mSv recommended by guidelines. Laboratory QIs ranged from 2 to 8 (median 5). Both ED and QI differed significantly between laboratories, countries, and world regions. The lowest median ED (8.0 mSv), in Europe, coincided with high best-practice adherence (mean laboratory QI 6.2). The highest doses (median 12.1 mSv) and low QI (4.9) occurred in Latin America. In hierarchical regression modelling, patients undergoing MPI at laboratories following more ‘best practices’ had lower EDs. Conclusion Marked worldwide variation exists in radiation safety practices pertaining to MPI, with targeted EDs currently achieved in a minority of laboratories. The significant relationship between best-practice implementation and lower doses indicates numerous opportunities to reduce radiation exposure from MPI globally.

Published
2015

3. Validation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast Determination of Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Burden in Pediatric Lymphoma.

Author

Etchebehere E, Andrade R, Camacho M, Lima M, Brink A, Cerci J, Nadel H, Bal C, Rangarajan V, Pfluger T, Kagna O, Alonso O, Begum FK, Mir KB, Magboo VP, Menezes LJ, Paez D, and Pascual TN

Subjects
Child, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Retrospective Studies, Tumor Burden, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 metabolism, Lymphoma diagnostic imaging
Abstract

18 F-FDG PET/CT quantification of whole-body tumor burden in lymphoma is not routinely performed because of the lack of fast methods. Although the semiautomatic method is fast, it is not fast enough to quantify tumor burden in daily clinical practice. Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of convolutional neural network (CNN) software in localizing neoplastic lesions in whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT images of pediatric lymphoma patients. Methods: The retrospective image dataset, derived from the data pool of the International Atomic Energy Agency (coordinated research project E12017), included 102 baseline staging 18 F-FDG PET/CT studies of pediatric lymphoma patients (mean age, 11 y). The images were quantified to determine the whole-body tumor burden (whole-body metabolic tumor volume [wbMTV] and whole-body total lesion glycolysis [wbTLG]) using semiautomatic software and CNN-based software. Both were displayed as semiautomatic wbMTV and wbTLG and as CNN wbMTV and wbTLG. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was applied to evaluate concordance between the CNN-based software and the semiautomatic software. Results: Twenty-six patients were excluded from the analysis because the software was unable to perform calculations for them. In the remaining 76 patients, CNN and semiautomatic wbMTV tumor burden metrics correlated strongly (ICC, 0.993; 95% CI, 0.989 - 0.996; P < 0.0001), as did CNN and semiautomatic wbTLG (ICC, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.998-0.999; P < 0.0001). However, the time spent calculating these metrics was significantly (<0.0001) less by CNN (mean, 19 s; range, 11-50 s) than by the semiautomatic method (mean, 21.6 min; range, 3.2-62.1 min), especially in patients with advanced disease. Conclusion: Determining whole-body tumor burden in pediatric lymphoma patients using CNN is fast and feasible in clinical practice., (© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Is True Whole-Body 18 F-FDG PET/CT Required in Pediatric Lymphoma? An IAEA Multicenter Prospective Study.

Author

Cerci JJ, Etchebehere EC, Nadel H, Brink A, Bal CS, Rangarajan V, Pfluger T, Kagna O, Alonso O, Begum FK, Mir KB, Magboo VP, Menezes LJ, Paez D, and Pascual TN

Subjects
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Hodgkin Disease diagnostic imaging, Humans, Infant, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin diagnostic imaging, Male, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Whole Body Imaging methods, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 pharmacology, Lymphoma diagnostic imaging, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Abstract

Guidelines recommend true whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans from vertex to toes in pediatric lymphoma patients, although this suggestion has not been validated in large clinical trials. The objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical impact of lesions outside the "eyes to thighs" regular field of view (R-FOV) in 18 F-FDG PET/CT staging (sPET) and interim (iPET) scans in pediatric lymphoma patients. Methods: True whole-body sPET and iPET scans were prospectively obtained in pediatric lymphoma patients (11 worldwide centers). Expert panel central review of sPET and iPET scans were evaluated for lymphoma lesions outside the R-FOV and clinical relevance of these findings. Results: A total of 610 scans were obtained in 305 patients. The sPET scans did not show lesions outside the R-FOV in 91.8% of the patients, whereas in 8.2% patients the sPET scans demonstrated lesions also outside the R-FOV (soft tissue, bone, bone marrow, and skin); however, the presence of these lesions did not change the clinical stage of any patient and did not affect treatment decision. Among the 305 iPET scans, there were no new positive 18 F-FDG-avid lesions outside the R-FOV, when compared with their paired sPET scans. A single lesion outside the R-FOV on iPET occurred in 1 patient (0.3%), with the primary lesion diagnosed in the femur on sPET that persisted on iPET. Conclusion: The identification of additional lesions outside the R-FOV (eyes to thighs) using 18 F-FDG PET/CT has no impact in the definition of the clinical stage of disease and minimal impact in the treatment definition of patients with pediatric lymphoma. As so, R-FOV for both sPET and iPET scans could be performed., (© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Results of a Prospective Multicenter International Atomic Energy Agency Sentinel Node Trial on the Value of SPECT/CT Over Planar Imaging in Various Malignancies.

Author

Jimenez-Heffernan A, Ellmann A, Sado H, Huić D, Bal C, Parameswaran R, Giammarile F, Pruzzo R, Kostadinova I, Vorster M, Almeida P, Santiago J, Gambhir S, Sergieva S, Calderon A, Young GO, Valdes-Olmos R, Zaknun J, Magboo VP, and Pascual TN

Subjects
Female, Humans, International Agencies, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Middle Aged, Radionuclide Imaging methods, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Lymph Nodes diagnostic imaging, Multimodal Imaging methods, Neoplasms diagnosis, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon methods, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods
Abstract

Unlabelled: We aimed to assess the additional value of SPECT/CT over planar lymphoscintigraphy (PI) in sentinel node (SN) detection in malignancies with different lymphatic drainage such as breast cancer, melanoma, and pelvic tumors., Methods: From 2010 to 2013, 1,508 patients were recruited in a multicenter study: 1,182 breast cancer, 262 melanoma, and 64 pelvic malignancies (prostate, cervix, penis, vulva). PI was followed by SPECT/CT 1-3 h after injection of (99m)Tc-colloid particles. Surgery was performed the same or next day., Results: Significantly more SNs were detected by SPECT/CT for breast cancer (2,165 vs. 1,892), melanoma (602 vs. 532), and pelvic cancer (195 vs. 138), all P < 0.001. The drainage basin mismatch between PI and SPECT/CT was 16.5% for breast cancer, 11.1% for melanoma, and 51.6% for pelvic cancers. Surgical adjustment was 17% for breast cancer, 37% for melanoma, and 65.6% for pelvic cancer., Conclusion: SPECT/CT detected more SNs and changed the drainage territory, leading to surgical adjustments in a considerable number of patients in all malignancies studied but especially in the pelvic cancer group because of this group's deep lymphatic drainage. We recommend SPECT/CT in all breast cancer patients with no SN visualized on PI, all patients with melanoma of the head and neck or trunk, all patients with pelvic malignancies, and those breast cancer and melanoma patients with unexpected drainage on PI., (© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.)

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS).

Author

Einstein AJ, Pascual TN, Mercuri M, Karthikeyan G, Vitola JV, Mahmarian JJ, Better N, Bouyoucef SE, Hee-Seung Bom H, Lele V, Magboo VP, Alexánderson E, Allam AH, Al-Mallah MH, Flotats A, Jerome S, Kaufmann PA, Luxenburg O, Shaw LJ, Underwood SR, Rehani MM, Kashyap R, Paez D, and Dondi M

Subjects
Aged, Cardiology standards, Clinical Protocols standards, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Global Health, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging standards, Positron-Emission Tomography standards, Positron-Emission Tomography statistics & numerical data, Professional Practice standards, Professional Practice statistics & numerical data, Quality of Health Care standards, Quality of Health Care statistics & numerical data, Regression Analysis, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon standards, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon statistics & numerical data, Guideline Adherence standards, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging statistics & numerical data, Practice Guidelines as Topic standards, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Exposure analysis
Abstract

Aims: To characterize patient radiation doses from nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and the use of radiation-optimizing 'best practices' worldwide, and to evaluate the relationship between laboratory use of best practices and patient radiation dose., Methods and Results: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study of protocols used for all 7911 MPI studies performed in 308 nuclear cardiology laboratories in 65 countries for a single week in March-April 2013. Eight 'best practices' relating to radiation exposure were identified a priori by an expert committee, and a radiation-related quality index (QI) devised indicating the number of best practices used by a laboratory. Patient radiation effective dose (ED) ranged between 0.8 and 35.6 mSv (median 10.0 mSv). Average laboratory ED ranged from 2.2 to 24.4 mSv (median 10.4 mSv); only 91 (30%) laboratories achieved the median ED ≤ 9 mSv recommended by guidelines. Laboratory QIs ranged from 2 to 8 (median 5). Both ED and QI differed significantly between laboratories, countries, and world regions. The lowest median ED (8.0 mSv), in Europe, coincided with high best-practice adherence (mean laboratory QI 6.2). The highest doses (median 12.1 mSv) and low QI (4.9) occurred in Latin America. In hierarchical regression modelling, patients undergoing MPI at laboratories following more 'best practices' had lower EDs., Conclusion: Marked worldwide variation exists in radiation safety practices pertaining to MPI, with targeted EDs currently achieved in a minority of laboratories. The significant relationship between best-practice implementation and lower doses indicates numerous opportunities to reduce radiation exposure from MPI globally., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results