Search

Knowledge regarding digital practices in the field of systemic therapy is poor. A few surveys have been conducted in non-European countries investigating the provision of digitally based therapy, counselling, training, and supervision by systemic family and couple therapists (SCFTs). Thus, a survey aiming to investigate the use of information and communication technology (ICT) among European SCFTs was launched in 2017. A sample of 220 SCFTs was included in the survey. The majority were residents in Greece, France and Italy. Descriptive analysis compared SCFTs’ digital practices and concerns from the above three countries with those from the rest of Europe. Results showed that 81.4 per cent of European SCFTs used ICT for clinical purposes and 47.7 per cent in training and supervision. Main concerns among European SCFTs related to the quality of therapeutic relationship, ethical and legal issues, and a lack of national and transnational regulation. Practitioner points: ICT use and e-therapy increase access to mental health services and maintain therapeutic contact Systemic individual therapy, supervision and training are workable online settings Legislation regulating ICT use in therapy, supervision and training (e.g. General Data Protection Regulation) has to be respected Training and continuous education in online practices enhance therapists’ and clients’ options, and ensure digital safeness and effective treatment.

In this chapter, we discuss the Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR) or Stimulated Recall Interview (SRI) as a method and show its usage in investigating systemic couple therapy processes in two international research projects. IPR/SRI has been designed as a process-focused interview method for training and supervision, expanded into clinical, especially psychotherapy process research: patients and/or therapists watch video (segments) of the therapeutic situation and comment on their experiences during the session. The aim of the presented analysis is to study the mutual dynamic between the couple therapists’ references to their professional practices and to their personal experiences during the interview. To achieve this aim, we employed two methodological approaches: dialogical analysis to investigate the distinction between the therapist’s professional and personal selves, and the narrative storytelling approach in order to describe the therapist’s positioning in terms of his or her discursive identities being displayed in the IPR/SR interview. We discuss the results in three aspects, describing (1) the therapists’ discursive practices of presenting their professional and personal identities; (2) the shifting of their attention between the video episode from the session and displaying their mental state in relation to it; and (3) the thinking aloud phenomena as enhancing the insight into psychotherapeutic processes. We conclude with methodological reflections.

Das Themenheft zeigt, wie vielfaltig das Thema Supervision zu betrachten ist: Jenseits einer historischen Sichtweise finden sich diverse theoretische und methodische Perspektiven, zahlreiche Zugangsweisen mit z. T. ahnlichen, aber auch differenten Auffassungen.