Search

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The evaluation of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) should be aimed to answer the following four questions: (1) does the fracture need surgery in each particular patient? (2) if surgery is recommended, is it better to proceed with internal fixation or shoulder arthroplasty, (3) if internal fixation is recommended, what is the ideal fixation device strategy, and (4) how can outcomes be optimized? This review article tries to answer these questions and provides some clarity regarding what works and what does not in PHFs treated with intramedullary nailing. RECENT FINDINGS: According to published articles on the treatment of PHFs with intramedullary nails, it is difficult to draw conclusions about outcomes and complications due to great variation in age, type of fracture, and nail designs included in the studies. However, the literature seems to support the use of modern nail designs for PHFs, especially in fractures of the surgical neck as well as varus posteromedial and valgus fractures with no tuberosity involvement. SUMMARY: Although the results of IMN in PHF seem to be better in two-part fractures, in more complex fractures, the quality of the reduction achieved seems to influence functional outcomes. Tuberosity malreduction leads to poor clinical outcomes, high rate of complications, and an increased risk of avascular necrosis. Malreduction of the humeral head increases the risk of postoperative loss of reduction, especially for varus posteromedial impacted fractures. A medial nail entry point decreases the risk of postoperative varus malunion, preserves the rotator cuff tendon, and avoids iatrogenic fractures of the GT. To decrease the risk of postoperative stiffness, fracture fixation should be stable enough to allow early mobilization.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The key question to answer during the decision-making process for proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is whether the amount of displacement of a specific fracture pattern will be acceptable taking into account the anticipated demands on the patient. The aim of this review article was to provide some clarity regarding the features that contribute to poor clinical outcomes when PHF are treated non-operatively and to review the reported outcomes of conservative treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Conservative treatment for non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures leads to good outcomes in 80% to 90% of patients. However, with increasing fracture complexity and displacement, functional outcomes tend to diminish. In active patients with significant functional demands, the challenge is to predict which fractures will do poorly when treated non-operatively. SUMMARY: A better understanding of fracture patterns and fragment displacement may improve treatment indications. To avoid complications related to conservative treatment, surgery should be considered (1) in fractures in which the humeral head is severely compromised (due to fracture-dislocation, severe impaction, or a split of the head itself), (2) in non-impacted fractures with gross instability between the humeral shaft and humeral head, and (3) in those cases in which displacement of the tuberosities or the final shape of the proximal humerus after healing will lead to symptomatic malunion.

Screw tip augmentation with bone cement for fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures seems to improve stability and to decrease the rate of complications related to implant failure. However, the optimal augmentation combinations are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the relative stability of two augmentations combinations under axial compression load in a simulated proximal humerus fractures fixed with locking plate.A surgical neck osteotomy was created in five pairs of embalmed humeri with a mean age of 74 years (range 46-93 years), secured with a stainless-steel locking-compression plate. In each pair of humeri, on the right humerus were cemented the screws A and E, and in the contralateral side were cemented screws B and D of the locking plate. The specimens were first tested cyclically in axial compression for 6000 cycles to evaluate interfragmentary motion (dynamic study). At the end of the cycling test, the specimens were loaded in compression force simulating varus bending with increasing load magnitude until failure of the construct (static study).There were no significant differences in interfragmentary motion between the two configurations of cemented screws in the dynamic study (p=0.463). When tested to failure, the configuration of cemented screws in lines B and D demonstrated higher compression load to failure (2218N vs 2105, p= 0.901) and higher stiffness (125 N/mm vs 106 N/mm, p 0.672). However, no statistically significant differences were reported in any of these variables.In simulated proximal humerus fractures, the configuration of the cemented screws does not influence the implant stability when a low-energy cyclical load is applied. Cementing the screws in rows B and D provides similar strength to the previously proposed cemented screws configuration and could avoid complications observed in clinical studies.

Most patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow report a history of heavy lifting with the affected upper extremity . Conservative treatment, including activity modifications, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the occasional intraarticular corticosteroid injection, may provide adequate pain relief in earlier stages . When surgery is required, and despite the presence of cartilage wear, many patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis experience substantial pain improvement with joint preserving procedures . The ulnar nerve needs to be carefully assessed and addressed at the time of surgery . Although open debridement procedures are effective, arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty has emerged as the surgical procedure of choice . Total elbow arthroplasty is very successful in terms of pain relief and function, but it is reserved for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis who are relatively older and have failed joint preserving procedures.

The term "pectoralis minor syndrome" refers to this constellation of symptoms that can occur when the pectoralis minor (Pm) is shortened and contracted. Release of the tendon of the Pm from the coracoid has been reported to provide substantial clinical improvement to patients presenting with pectoralis minor syndrome. The purpose of this study was (1) to describe the technique for endoscopic release of pectoralis minor tendon at the subdeltoid space, (2) to classify the pectoralis minor syndrome according to its severity and (3) and to report the short-term outcomes of this procedure in a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with pectoralis minor syndrome.Endoscopic release of the pectoralis minor tendon was performed in a series of 10 patients presenting with pectoralis minor syndrome. There were six females and four males with a median age at the time of surgery of 42 (range from 20 to 58) years. Four shoulders were categorized as grade I (scapular dyskinesis), and six as grade II (intermittent brachial plexopathy). Shoulders were evaluated for pain, motion, satisfaction, subjective shoulder value (SSV), quick-DASH, ASES score, and complications. The mean follow-up time was 19 (range, 6 to 49) months.Arthroscopic release of the tendon of the Pm led to substantial resolution of pectoralis minor syndrome symptoms in all but one shoulder, which was considered a failure. Preoperatively, the median VAS for pain was 8.5 (range, 7-10) and the mean SSV was 20% (range, 10% - 50%). At most recent follow-up the mean VAS for pain was 1 (range, 0-6) and the mean SSV 80% (range, 50% - 90%). Before surgery, mean ASES and quick-DASH scores were 19.1 (range, 10-41.6) and 83.1 (range, 71 and 95.5) points respectively. At most recent follow-up, mean ASES and quick-DASH scores were 80.1 (range, 40-100) and 19.3 (range, 2.3-68) points respectively. No surgical complications occurred in any of the shoulder included in this study.Endoscopic release of the tendon of the pectoralis minor from the coracoid improves pain, function and patient reported outcomes in the majority of patients presenting with the diagnosis of isolated pectoralis minor syndrome.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) associated with modified L'Episcopo (isolated LD) or L'Episcopo (combined TM and LD) procedures had been confirmed to effectively overcome the expected external rotation deficit in patient with postero-superior massive cuff tear and teres minor deficiency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the radiological bony lesions of the lateral proximal humerus following RSA combined with tendon transfer, and to determine whether these bony lesions affect the clinical outcome.A retrospective review of 24 RSAs (mean age 68.71 years, range 52-83) associated with modified L'Episcopo procedure (9) and L'Episcopo procedure (15) was performed. X-rays were assessed for lateral cortex lesions and were categorized into either intact, irregular or complete lytic appearances. In addition, signs of stem loosening were assessed. Clinical outcome measures included range of motion, SSV, VAS, and Constant-Murley scores.With a mean follow-up of 44.71 months (12-97; SD 27.42), eight (33.3%) patients demonstrated intact lateral cortex, eight (33.3%) irregular and eight (33.3%) lytic lesions. 40% of cemented stems demonstrated a deformed cortex compared to 74% of cementless stems. Radiolucent lines were detected in one cemented stem (p=0.046). GT resorption (p=0.147), condensations lines (p=0.449) and spot weld (p=0.342), appeared exclusively in non-cemented stem. Postoperatively all patients (24) demonstrated significant improvements in all clinical and functional parameters. A comparison between patient with (Group 2, 16 patients) and without bony lesions (Group 1, 8 patients) revealed no significant differences in functional scores and range of motion: Constant (p=0,61), VAS (p=0,61), SSV (p=0,66) and external rotation (p=0,34).At short-term follow-up, RSA combined with L'Episcopo or modified l'Episcopo procedure resulted in high incidence (67%) of lateral proximal humerus lesions. Radiolucent lines were noted in cemented stems whereas, signs of stress shielding and GT resorption appeared in non-cemented stems. Yet, no case of humeral loosening was detected and these lesions did not seem to affect the clinical outcome. The use of cemented straight standard-length humeral stems should be positively considered in RSA associated with LD\TM tendon transfer.IV; retrospective study.

Background Persistent infection rate after 2-stage reimplantation complicating elbow arthroplasty has been reported to be as high as 25%. The purposes of this retrospective study were to determine the infection eradication rates, complications and outcomes in a cohort of patients treated with two-stage reimplantation for deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and to determine possible associated risk factors for treatment failure. Methods Between 2000 and 2017, 52 elbows underwent a two-stage reimplantation for PJI after TEA. There were 22 males and 30 females with a mean age of 61 (range, 25–82) years. The most common bacterium was Staphylococcus epidermidis (28 elbows). Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were calculated at the latest follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 6 years (range, 2–14 years). Results PJI was eradicated in 36 elbows (69%). The remaining 16 elbows were considered treatment failures secondary to recurrent infection. The risk of persistent infection was 3.3 times higher in elbows with retained cement (p 0.04), and 3.5 times higher when the infecting organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis (p 0.06). Conclusion Two-stage reimplantation for PJI after TEA was successful in eradicating deep infection in 69% of cases. The eradication of PJI after TEA still needs to be improved substantially.