1. Health Disparities and Inequities in the Utilization of Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer.
- Author
-
Washington, Cyrus Gavin and Deville, Curtiland
- Abstract
Simple Summary: As technology progresses, the scope and practice of medicine adapts, resulting in treatment applications that improve the precise and potentially current standard of care. The advent and continued use of proton beam therapy for use in patients with prostate cancer is a slowly evolving topic due to the lack of level 1 evidence demonstrating improved efficacy with its use. Despite this, not all patients are provided with equal access to this treatment modality. While there have been several publications utilizing either single-institutional analyses or national medical databases, to date, a comprehensive review summarizing the disparities and inequities in proton beam therapy use in prostate cancer does not exist. Our research sought to elucidate trends in this topic and create a compendium that can be used to inform future study and equitable advances in the field. Our study sought to review and summarize the reported health disparities and inequities in the utilization of proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer. We queried the PubMed search engine through 12/2023 for original publications examining disparate utilization of PBT for prostate cancer. The query terms included the following: prostate cancer AND proton AND (disparities OR IMRT OR race OR insurance OR socioeconomic OR inequities)". Studies were included if they involved United States patients, examined PBT in prostate cancer, and addressed health inequities. From this query, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 13 population-based analyses, 5 single-institutional analyses, 3 cost/modeling investigations, and 1 survey-based study. The analyses revealed that in addition to age-related and insurance-related disparities, race and socioeconomic status played significant roles in the receipt of PBT. The likelihood of receiving PBT was lower for non-White patients in population-based and single-institution analyses. Socioeconomic metrics, such as higher median income and higher education level, portended an increased likelihood of receiving PBT. Conclusively, substantial age-based, racial, socioeconomic/insurance-related, and facility-associated disparities and inequities existed for PBT utilization in prostate cancer. The identification of these disparities provides a framework to better address these as the utility of PBT continues to expand across the US and globally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF