Search

Background Pulse glucocorticoid therapy is used in COVID-19 infection. We evaluated the effectiveness of methylprednisolone 250 mg/d for 3 days vs. dexamethasone 6 mg/d for 10 days in patients with severe but not critical COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods A multicentre, randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted between February 2021 and August 2021 at 4 hospitals in Spain and included 128 hospitalized adults with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia needing oxygen therapy but not critically ill. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive dexamethasone 6 once daily for 10 days or methylprednisolone 250 mg once daily for 3 days. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Results Of the 128 randomized patients, 125 were analysed (mean age 60 ± 17 years; 82 males [66%]). Mortality at 28 days was 4.8% in the 250 mg methylprednisolone group vs. 4.8 % in the 6 mg dexamethasone group (absolute risk difference, 0.1% [95% CI, -8.8 to 9.1%]; P=0.98). The post-hoc added composite outcome of mortality at 90 days or intubation was 15.9% in the 250 mg methylprednisolone group vs. 15% in the 6 mg dexamethasone group (absolute risk difference, -0.9% [95% CI, -13.8 to 12.3%];P=0.83). Hyperglycaemia was more frequent in the methylprednisolone group, at 27.0 vs. 8.1 % (absolute risk difference, -18.9% [95% CI, -31.8 to - 5.6%]; P=0.007). Conclusion Among severe but not critical patients with COVID-19, 250 mg/d for 3 days of methylprednisolone compared with 6 mg/d for 10 days of dexamethasone did not result in a decrease in mortality or intubation. Disclosures Carlos Dueñas Gutierrez, MD, ViIV, GILEAD, Jannsen, MSD: Lecture fees.

BackgroundOne of the most severe complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is intraoperative bile duct injury (BDI). Despite its low incidence, the medical implications for the patient can be serious. Besides, BDI can also generate significant legal issues in healthcare. Different techniques have been described to reduce the incidence of this complication, and near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography with indocyanine green (NIRFC-ICG) is one of the latest additions. In spite of the great interest aroused by this procedure, there are currently great disparities in the usage or administration protocols of ICG.Methods and analysisThis is a randomised, multicentre, per-protocol analysis, open clinical trial with four arms. The estimated duration of the trial is 12 months. The aim of the study is to analyse whether there are differences between the dose and administration ICG intervals to obtain good-quality NIRFC during LC. The primary outcome is the degree of identification of critical biliary structures during LC. In addition, different factors will be analysed that may have an influence on the results of this technique.Ethics and disseminationThe trial will be conducted according to the recommendations for Clinical Trials in the Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and the recommendations of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPs) for clinical trials. This trial was approved by the local institutional Ethics Committee and the AEMPs. The results of the study will be presented to the scientific community through publications, conferences or other means.EudraCT number2022-000904-36.Protocol versionV.1.4, 2 June 2022Trial registration numberNCT05419947.

ObjectivesThe usefulness of telemedicine (TM) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been discussed in recent years. The aim of this study is to describe patients’ perceptions about TM and to identify preferences on TM resources, in Spain.DesignAn observational, cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire.Participants1036 patients with T2DM accepted to participate in the study (response rate: 68%).ResultsBlood glucose values were recorded by 85.9% of the patients while data such as lifestyle habits were only recorded by 14.4% of the patients. Previous experience in TM was reported by 9.8% of the patients, out of which 70.5% were satisfied with its service and 73.5% considered that the use of TM had optimised their T2DM management. However, most of these patients noted aspects to be improved such as user-friendliness (81.4%), interaction with the medical team (78.4%) and time required for recording/transferring data (78.4%). Experienced patients had better perception about TM usefulness than naïve patients for all listed aspects (pConclusionsIn Spain, nearly 10% of patients with T2DM have experience with TM and it is well accepted, especially one based on glucometers. Nevertheless, in order to promote TM use, easier and time-saving programmes for patient-physician interaction should be optimised.

Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution in populations at risk for anal cancer is needed. Here, we describe the anal HPV genotype distribution in a large Spanish cohort (Cohort of the Spanish HIV Research Network HPV [CoRIS-HPV]) of HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) according to geographical origin, age, and cytological status. A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from 1,439 HIV-infected MSM (2007 to 2012) was performed. Anal HPV genotyping was performed using the Linear Array HPV genotyping test. Descriptive analyses of subject characteristics, prevalences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed. The global prevalences of HPV, high-risk HPV (HR-HPV), and low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) types were 95.8%, 83.0%, and 72.7%, respectively. Among the HR-HPV types, HPV16 was the most common, followed by HPV59, -39, -51, -18, and -52. The prevalence of multiple HR-HPV infections was 58.5%. There were no differences in the crude analyses between Spanish and Latin-American MSM for most HPV types, and a peak in prevalence for most HPV types was seen in patients in their late thirties. Globally and by specific HPV groups, men with abnormal anal cytologies had a higher prevalence of infection than those with normal cytologies. This study has the largest number of HIV-positive MSM with HPV genotype data analyzed according to cytological status as far as we know. The information gained from this study can help with the design of anal cancer prevention strategies in HIV-positive patients.