Search

BACKGROUND: Glomerulations are not specific for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Controversy exists about whether cystoscopic findings differ between patients with and without lower urinary tract symptoms. We sought to compare the prevalence of cystoscopic findings in women with “no or minimal” urinary symptoms to those with a “high” symptom burden. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study performed at a University Educational Facility. Participants in this study were part of a larger prospective study, in which female patients scheduled to undergo routine gynecologic procedures were all consented for cystoscopy with hydrodistension (CWHD). We defined the “minimally symptomatic group” as those with ≤1 on each of the O’Leary/Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) subscores and without history of IC/BPS. The “highly symptomatic” cohort of women had composite ICSI score ≥12 and a Burning/Pain subscore of 4 or 5. All were non-smokers. RESULTS: A total of 84 women underwent CWHD, with 33 having minimal symptoms and 51 being highly symptomatic. The two groups were not statistically different when assessing for ‘any glomerulations’ compared to ‘no glomerulations.’ However, minimally symptomatic women had an eight-fold lower prevalence of significant glomerulations than highly symptomatic women (3.0% minimally symptomatic vs. 23.5% highly symptomatic, P

Objectives: This review sought to evaluate the evidence for embryo formation during intrauterine device (IUD) use, to articulate how often embryo loss occurs in well-designed studies, and to comment on other bodies of literature suggestive of postfertilization mechanisms of action of IUDs. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid databases were searched for English-language studies of markers of pregnancy in IUD users in May 2018. Studies of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) were subjected to quality assessment based on the US Preventive Services Task Force quality tool. Bias of studies assessing pregnancy in other ways was assessed on a study-to-study basis. Results: In all, 1,073 studies were identified and 138 were read in detail. Twenty-three studies of β-hCG, 4 studies of direct observation of embryos in fallopian tubes, 2 studies of pregnancy-specific binding globulin (PSBG), and 1 study of heat-shock protein 10 (Hsp10) or chaperonin 10 were included. In all studies considered together, 7.3 percent of IUD users had evidence of fertilization and pregnancy failure. In good-quality studies, 4.5 percent had evidence of fertilization and pregnancy failure. Discussion: There are no randomized trials of embryo formation and loss in IUD users compared with noncontracepting controls. Studies of β-hCG span a large spectrum of quality, but several good-quality studies exist, which support embryo formation and loss in IUD users. Evidence of embryos found in tubes is moderate and evidence of PSBG and Hsp10 elaboration was limited, but these are also concerning for embryo formation and loss. Conclusion: There is good-quality evidence of embryo formation and loss in IUD users. Studies are inconsistent, and the stated conclusions of several papers inaccurately diminish postfertilization evidence of embryo formation. To better assess the rate of embryo loss in IUD users compared with non-users, future research should include well-designed prospective trials and less subjective assessments of embryos in fallopian tubes. Summary: A systematic review was carried out examining the English-language literature in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid databases for evidence of embryo formation and loss during IUD use. In all, 1,073 studies were identified and 138 were read. There are no randomized trials and evidence ranges in quality, but evidence for the embryo formation and loss in 4.5 percent of IUD users exists in good-quality research. Further research is needed to compare embryo loss in IUD users to loss in controls.

The purpose of this review was to determine whether there is evidence that ovulation can occur in women using hormonal contraceptives and whether these drugs might inhibit implantation. We performed a systematic review of the published English-language literature from 1990 to the present which included studies on the hormonal milieu following egg release in women using any hormonal contraceptive method. High circulating estrogens and progestins in the follicular phase appear to induce dysfunctional ovulation, where follicular rupture occurs but is followed by low or absent corpus luteum production of progesterone. Hoogland scoring of ovulatory activity may inadvertently obscure the reality of ovum release by limiting the term “ovulation” to those instances where follicular rupture is followed by production of a threshold level of luteal progesterone, sufficient to sustain fertilization, implantation, and the end point of a positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin. However, follicular ruptures and egg release with subsequent low progesterone output have been documented in women using hormonal contraception. In the absence of specific ovulation and fertilization markers, follicular rupture should be considered the best marker for egg release and potential fertilization. Women using hormonal contraceptives may produce more eggs than previously described by established criteria; moreover, suboptimal luteal progesterone production may be more likely than previously acknowledged, which may contribute to embryo loss. This information should be included in informed consent for women who are considering the use of hormonal contraception. Summary: For this study, the authors looked at English-language research articles that focused on how hormonal birth control, such as the birth control pill, may affect very early human embryos. The authors found that abnormal ovulation, or release of an egg followed by abnormal hormone levels, may often occur in women using hormonal birth control. This may increase the number of very early human embryos who are lost before a pregnancy test becomes positive. For women who are thinking about using hormonal birth control, this is important information to consider.

A multicenter prospective study evaluating the management of endometriosis comparing excision versus ablation is needed using primary outcomes other than chronic pelvic pain., Objective: To serve as a pilot feasibility study for a randomized study of excision versus ablation in the treatment of endometriosis by (1) estimating the magnitude of change in symptoms after excision only at multiple referral centers and (2) determining the proportion of women willing to participate in a randomized trial. Methods: We performed a multicenter prospective study of women undergoing excision for endometriosis (Canadian Task Force class II-3) at Duke University Center for Endometriosis Research & Treatment (currently the Saint Louis University Center for Endometriosis), Center for Endometriosis Care, Northshore University Health System, Memorial University (Canada), and Florida Hospital. The study comprised 100 female patients, aged 18 to 55 years, with endometriosis-suspected pelvic pain. The intervention was laparoscopic excision only of the abnormal peritoneum suspicious for endometriosis. The main outcome measures were quality of life, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and bowel and bladder symptoms. Results: The mean follow-up period was 8.5 months. Excision of endometriosis showed a significant reduction in all pain scores except bowel symptoms, as well as significant improvement in quality of life. Of the patients, 84% were willing to participate in a randomized study. Conclusions: Quality of life is a needed primary outcome for any randomized study comparing excision versus ablation. A multicenter comparative trial is feasible, although quality assurance would have to be addressed. Patients were willing to be randomized even at surgical referral centers.

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine if deep retraction pockets (DRPs) in the posterior cul-de-sac and uterosacral ligaments could be a manifestation of endometriosis and if excision of these pockets improves pain symptoms and quality of life. Study design Prospective cohort study Canadian Task Force Classification, II-3. Materials and methods Preoperative data, operative data, and follow-up data were collected prospectively at the Center for Endometriosis at Saint Louis University, a referral center for the surgical management of endometriosis. Results The 107 consecutive patients who presented with preoperative deep dyspareunia were included in the study, and the median postoperative follow-up was 13 months. Endometriosis was confirmed histologically in any location excised in 88/107 (82.2%) of the women, and 31 DRPs were excised from 25 women with DRPs in the posterior cul-de-sac or uterosacral ligaments, of which 15/31 (48.4%) had endometriosis. Of the 10 DRPs without visible surface lesions, 3 (30.0%) had endometriosis on histology. Pain symptoms and quality of life significantly improved after excision surgery, whether or not DRPs were present. Women who had endometriosis in their DRP also had significant improvement in deep dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain and quality of life. Results did not differ when patients who took postoperative hormonal suppression were removed from the analyses. Conclusion Patients had significantly improved pain symptoms and quality of life after excision surgery, whether or not DRPs were present. This study demonstrated that a DRP may be a manifestation of endometriosis (even with a clear surface of the pocket), so that DRPs should be excised to achieve optimal excision of endometriosis.

Dear Editor, I read with interest the recent issue of the Linacre dedicated to geriatrics and end-of-life care. This is such a timely topic! With the implementation of Obamacare – which is government-run health care funded at the rate of economic inflation, not the more rapidly increasing healthcare inflation – there will be ever-increasing healthcare rationing. This will lead to escalating pressure to withhold life-preserving treatment (including food and water) especially to vulnerable populations including the elderly, the disabled, and the poor. As a result, end-of-life documents are already incredibly important and will become ever moreso. The article by Dr. Morrow articulates several key principles that should be present in an end-of-life document that adheres to Catholic principles – one that recognizes and respects the inherent dignity for human life for its own sake, one that ensure ordinary care and comfort care, and one that is “personalized” by appointing a healthcare proxy who understands and can implement your wishes according to the situation at hand. While there are several end-of-life document templates available, most do not adhere to the principles outlined in Dr. Morrow's article. A practical, easy-to-use resource for developing an end-of-life document that adheres firmly to the principles outlined in Dr. Morrow's article is the Will To Life Project developed by the National Right To Life Committee. From this website, one can download a legally valid document for any of the fifty states. While creating a Catholic end-of-life document can be daunting, this resource provides a practical starting point and a template anyone can complete. For more information, check out: http://www.nrlc.org/medethics/willtolive/.

The current approach to infertility of assisted reproductive technology (ART) completely misses and then bypasses the evaluation and treatment of cervical factor infertility. In contrast, the Creighton Model Fertility Care System (CrMS), a method of fertility awareness that has the unique ability to quantify cervical mucus observations, and natural procreative technology (NaProTECHNOLOGY or NPT) directly evaluate and treat cervical factor infertility. The ART treatment of choice for cervical factor infertility–-intrauterine insemination (IUI)–-is also morally disparate from the NPT treatment protocol: while the latter genuinely assists the infertile couple's act of sexual union to achieve its natural end of pregnancy, IUI replaces the natural act, depriving human conception of the one context worthy of the dignity of human life and procreation, a reciprocal self-gifting act of love between husband and wife. A renewed interest and focus on the direct evaluation and treatment of cervical factor infertility is needed.

Objective To report the novel technique of periumbilical ultrasound-guided saline infusion (PUGSI). Design Prospective study of two noninvasive diagnostic tests to detect obliterating subumbilical adhesions. Setting Tertiary care center. Patient(s) One hundred fifty patients were included in the study. Patients without risk factors for adhesions were used as a control group (n = 38), whereas the study group had risk factors for intra-abdominal adhesions (n = 112). Intervention(s) Preoperative examination with the visceral slide and the PUGSI. Main Outcome Measure(s) The presence of obliterating subumbilical adhesions in the high-risk patient and the ability of the PUGSI to detect them preoperatively. Result(s) There were no obliterating umbilical adhesions in the control group. The prevalence of obliterating umbilical adhesions in the risk group was 3.6%. The visceral slide test had an accuracy of 96.4%, a sensitivity of 50%, and a specificity of 98.1%, with a negative predictive value of 98.1% and a positive predictive value of 50%. The PUGSI test was able to detect all cases of obliterating subumbilical adhesions, demonstrating sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Conclusion(s) The PUGSI test has excellent negative and positive predictive values and is useful in determining patients who have obliterating subumbilical adhesions. Use of both tests preoperatively appears to be helpful in identifying patients at risk for visceral injury during laparoscopic surgery.

Objective: To assess the intratubal pressure (ITP) and patency status of the fallopian tubes before and after transcervical catheterization of the fallopian tubes (TCFT). Design: Prospective procedural assessment. Setting: Pope Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction. Patient(s): Two hundred thirty-four women with either primary or secondary infertility. Intervention(s): Patients underwent selective hysterosalpingography and, in some cases, TCFT with measurement of the ITP before and after the procedure. Main Outcome Measure(s): The ITP before and after TCFT. Result(s): The mean (±SD) ITP in freely patent tubes was 0.53 ± 0.06 atm, that in partially obstructed tubes was 1.23 ± 0.52 atm, and that in completely obstructed tubes was 2.79 ± 1.40 atm. After TCFT, the mean (±SD) ITP in partially obstructed tubes decreased to 0.64 ± 0.31 atm and that in completely obstructed tubes decreased to 1.86 ± 1.35 atm. The ITP was normalized in 76% of partially obstructed tubes and in 29.5% of completely obstructed tubes. In all cases of complete obstruction in which surgical correction was attempted, organic pathology was identified. Conclusion(s): The procedure described is a safe and easy means of obtaining reliable and significant information on the status of the proximal fallopian tube.

I. The model, 512. —II. Profit maximization (PM), 513. —III. Sales revenue maximization (SRM), 515. — IV. Conclusion, 517.