Search

Background: Artificial intelligence, particularly chatbot systems, is becoming an instrumental tool in health care, aiding clinical decision-making and patient engagement., Objective: This study aims to analyze the performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 in addressing complex clinical and ethical dilemmas, and to illustrate their potential role in health care decision-making while comparing seniors' and residents' ratings, and specific question types., Methods: A total of 4 specialized physicians formulated 176 real-world clinical questions. A total of 8 senior physicians and residents assessed responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a 1-5 scale across 5 categories: accuracy, relevance, clarity, utility, and comprehensiveness. Evaluations were conducted within internal medicine, emergency medicine, and ethics. Comparisons were made globally, between seniors and residents, and across classifications., Results: Both GPT models received high mean scores (4.4, SD 0.8 for GPT-4 and 4.1, SD 1.0 for GPT-3.5). GPT-4 outperformed GPT-3.5 across all rating dimensions, with seniors consistently rating responses higher than residents for both models. Specifically, seniors rated GPT-4 as more beneficial and complete (mean 4.6 vs 4.0 and 4.6 vs 4.1, respectively; P<.001), and GPT-3.5 similarly (mean 4.1 vs 3.7 and 3.9 vs 3.5, respectively; P<.001). Ethical queries received the highest ratings for both models, with mean scores reflecting consistency across accuracy and completeness criteria. Distinctions among question types were significant, particularly for the GPT-4 mean scores in completeness across emergency, internal, and ethical questions (4.2, SD 1.0; 4.3, SD 0.8; and 4.5, SD 0.7, respectively; P<.001), and for GPT-3.5's accuracy, beneficial, and completeness dimensions., Conclusions: ChatGPT's potential to assist physicians with medical issues is promising, with prospects to enhance diagnostics, treatments, and ethics. While integration into clinical workflows may be valuable, it must complement, not replace, human expertise. Continued research is essential to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical environments., (©Adi Lahat, Kassem Sharif, Narmin Zoabi, Yonatan Shneor Patt, Yousra Sharif, Lior Fisher, Uria Shani, Mohamad Arow, Roni Levin, Eyal Klang. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 27.06.2024.)

Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic conditions with overlapping pathogenic mechanisms. The genetic predisposition and inflammatory pathways common to both diseases suggest a syndemic relationship. While some evidence points to a connection between the two conditions, other reports do not support this link., Objectives: To investigate the association between AS and the subsequent incidence of IBD. To identify potential risk factors and effect modifiers that contribute to this relationship., Methods: Utilizing the Chronic Disease Registry of Clalit Health Services, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of individuals diagnosed with AS between January 2002 and December 2018. We compared these patients with age- and sex-matched controls, excluding those with a prior diagnosis of IBD. Statistical analyses included chi-square and t-tests for demographic comparisons, and Cox proportional hazards models for evaluating the risk of IBD development, with adjustments for various co-morbidities and demographic factors., Results: The study included 5825 AS patients and 28,356 controls. AS patients demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of IBD with hazard ratios of 6.09 for Crohn's disease and 2.31 for ulcerative colitis, after multivariate adjustment. The overall incidence of IBD in the AS cohort was significantly higher compared to controls., Conclusions: AS patients exhibit a markedly increased risk of developing IBD. These findings advocate for heightened clinical vigilance for IBD symptoms in AS patients and suggest the need for a multidisciplinary approach to patient care. Further research into the shared pathogenic pathways is needed to develop personalized treatment strategies and improve patient management.

Lessons Learned: There continues to be a lack of systemic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); sorafenib and, very recently, regorafenib are the only approved options. There exists a potential to combine sorafenib with chemotherapeutic agents shown to be active in HCC, such as capecitabine, safely.Good tumor response was observed, with objective improvement in a few patients seldom seen by single agent sorafenib; however, because of the limited number of patients, meaningful conclusions on survival cannot be drawn., Background: Sorafenib is the currently approved first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Capecitabine has antitumor activity in hepatobiliary cancers. The combination of the two, if tolerated, could possibly improve antitumor response, and survival., Methods: Patients with advanced HCC ineligible for locoregional therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2, Child-Pugh class A or B-7 cirrhosis, hemoglobin ≥8.5 g/dL, platelets ≥50,000/μL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,500 cells/μL, and serum creatinine of ≤2.0 mg/dL were recruited. All subjects received a combination of sorafenib and capecitabine, on a 14-day 7-days on 7-days off schedule. The primary end point was safety and secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease control rate., Results: A total of 15 out of 47 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 64 years (56-79) and 77% were male. With a median follow-up of 12 months, median OS was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5-23.4). Disease control rate was 77% (complete response 8%, partial response 8%, and stable disease 61%). Common adverse events were as follows: (a) thrombocytopenia (64%); (b) anemia (14%); (c) hypophosphatemia (21%); (d) hypomagnesemia (14%); (e) hyperbilirubinemia (21%); (f) increased aspartate transaminase (AST) (14%); (g) hand-foot syndrome (21%); and (h) deep vein thrombosis (21%)., Conclusion: At tolerable doses, the combination of sorafenib and capecitabine seems an active and safe palliative treatment for HCC in class A and B-7 patients with cirrhosis. The small sample size does not allow comparison with single-agent sorafenib., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article., (©AlphaMedPress; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.)

The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a chemotherapy combination of cisplatin, IFN alpha-2b, doxorubicin, Adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (PIAF) as treatment for radiologically measurable cancer of the biliary tree. Forty-one patients (19 gallbladder carcinoma and 22 cholangiocarcinoma) with unresectable, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma were registered. Starting chemotherapy doses were as follows: cisplatin, 80 mg/m(2) i.v. over 2 h; doxorubicin, 40 mg/m(2) i.v. over 2 h; and 5-fluorouracil, 500 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion daily for 3 days. IFN alpha-2b (5 x 10(6) units/m(2)) was administered s.c. before the cisplatin and daily thereafter for a total of four doses. The overall response rate was 21.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 10-37]. For cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma patients, the response rates were 9.5% (95% CI, 1-32%) and 35.3% (95% CI, 14-62%), respectively. Overall median survival time was 14 months (95% CI, 9.5-18.5), 18.1 months (95% CI, 12.1-24.1) for the cholangiocarcinoma patients, and 11.5 months (95% CI, 5.9-17.1) for the gallbladder carcinoma patients. This difference was not statistically significant. The most common grade III and IV toxicities were neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (20%), nausea and vomiting (34%), and fatigue (20%). In conclusion, the PIAF combination seemed more active against gallbladder carcinoma than against cholangiocarcinoma but was associated with significant toxicity. Therefore, this regimen cannot be recommended for cholangiocarcinoma, but it may have a role in the treatment of gallbladder carcinoma, particularly among patients who were refractory to higher priority investigational agents.

The purpose of this Phase II study was to determine the response rate, the toxicity, and the effect on survival of the combination of cisplatin, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and alpha-IFN (PIAF) in advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Fifty patients with either unresectable or metastatic disease were treated with PIAF: cisplatin (20 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-4), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 i.v., day 1), 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-4), and alpha-IFN (5 MU/m2 s.c., days 1-4). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks to a maximum of six cycles. All patients were evaluable for response, toxicity, and survival. As assessed by conventional imaging criteria, there were no complete responses, but 13 patients (26%) had a partial response. Among the 36 patients who had an initially high alpha-fetoprotein level (>500 ng/ml), 15 (42%) had a >50% fall after therapy. Nine patients underwent surgical resection after achieving partial response and, in 4 of these patients, histological examination of the resected specimens revealed no viable tumor cells. All these nine patients are alive, and eight patients remain in complete remission at between 7.6 and 25.8 months at the time of analysis. The overall median survival was 8.9 months. Toxicity was mainly myelosuppression and mucositis. There were two treatment-related deaths due to neutropenic sepsis. PIAF is active in hepatocellular carcinoma despite considerable hematological toxicity. Complete pathological remission is possible with this systemic combination. Apparently, persistent radiological lesions may still represent complete pathological resolution of active disease.

Although the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poorly understood, hepatitis B virus and dietary aflatoxin exposures are established etiological factors for this disease. We conducted a pilot study of 28 patients with HCC and 110 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and ethnicity to determine whether constitutional genetic instability, based on the quantification of mutagen-induced chromatid breaks in cultured lymphocytes, modifies an individual's risk of HCC development. The mean numbers of bleomycin-induced breaks per cell for cases and controls were 0.92 and 0.55, respectively (P < 0.0001). For benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE) sensitivity, the values were 0.90 for cases and 0.46 for controls (P < 0.0001). Nearly 68% of the cases but only 27% of the controls exhibited bleomycin sensitivity (i.e., had > or = 0.68 breaks per cell). Eighty % of the case group but only 22% of the control group exhibited BPDE sensitivity (i.e., had > or = 0.58 breaks per cell). On multivariate analyses, both bleomycin sensitivity and BPDE sensitivity were associated with significantly elevated risks for HCC, with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 5.63 (2.30, 13.81) and 14.13 (3.52, 56.68), respectively. For individuals who were sensitive to both assays, the risk was 35.88. A synergistic interaction between the bleomycin sensitivity and BPDE sensitivity in HCC risk was suggested. These preliminary findings suggest that differences in host factors related to the predisposition to chromosome breakage, the capacity for DNA repair, or both may be involved in HCC development by influencing the predisposition of hepatitis B virus integration into human DNA or that the carcinogens induced DNA damage susceptibility. A larger study is needed to confirm these intriguing results.

Objective: The objective was to determine the role of arcitumomab (CEA-Scan; Immunomedics, Morris Plains, NJ), an anticarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) Fab' labeled with technetium-99m, in the presurgical evaluation of patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal carcinoma., Summary Background Data: Surgical resection is the only method known to cure recurrent or metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The location and extent of disease must be determined before surgery. The role of antibody imaging, a new cancer detection modality, in preoperative evaluation for resection of locally recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer has not been established, either alone or in combination with standard diagnostic modalities., Methods: In a blinded analysis of 209 patients with known or suspected colorectal cancer, the accuracy of arcitumomab, alone and combined with computed tomography (CT), was compared to that of CT for predicting abdominopelvic tumor resectability by correlating the results with surgical and histopathologic findings., Results: Arcitumomab alone or combined with CT was found to be significantly more accurate for predicting surgical outcome than CT alone. When the results of CT and arcitumomab were concordant for abdominopelvic resectability, nonresectability, or absence of disease, the prediction was accurate in 67%, 100%, and 64%, respectively. Thus, the concordance for nonresectability (100% correct) may obviate the need for other diagnostic modalities or exploratory surgery. When the two tests were discordant, arcitumomab was correct substantially more often than CT. Because the liver is the most common site of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer, a subset of patients with hepatic disease was also analyzed; findings were similar to the overall resectability results. The product's safety profile was excellent: the incidence of induction of an immune response against arcitumomab was <1% and that of potentially adverse events was 1.2%., Conclusions: The accuracy of arcitumomab for assessing resectability status is greater than that of CT, both in all patients undergoing evaluation for curative abdominopelvic resection of colorectal cancer and in the subset of patients with suspected or proven liver metastases. The additional use of arcitumomab with CT potentially doubles the number of patients who could be saved the cost, morbidity, and mortality of unnecessary abdominopelvic surgery and increases those who are potentially resectable for cure by 40%.

Eighteen colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases receiving hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapeutic agents (mitomycin-C + 5-FUDR) were randomized to receive misoprostol (a prostaglandin E1 analogue) or placebo as a mode of cytoprotection against inadvertent gastroduodenal mucosal injury. Four of 10 patients on misoprostol and 3 of 8 patients on placebo developed gastroduodenal mucosal injury (p greater than 0.1), which was confirmed by endoscopy. Significant tumor responses to chemotherapy were equally distributed between the two groups. Although our sample size was small and type II error (false-negative trial) cannot be excluded, these data strongly suggest that prophylaxis with misoprostol does not prevent the acute gastroduodenal mucosal injury associated with hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapeutic agents.

Suppressor cell activity which was radiosensitive in most subjects and thymic hormone sensitive in some was identified in patients with cancer, and compared to simultaneously studied normal controls. Suppressor cell activity was measured in cocultures of normal lymphocytes with patient lymphocytes added in microwells using the blastogenic response to phytohemagglutinin and concanavalin A as the measure of activity. Thirty-five patients (lung cancer, 21; leukemia in remission, seven; and various solid tumors, seven) and an equal number of controls were studied. Suppressor cell activity was identified in 71% of the patients. In approximately 75% of these, the suppressor cell activity was radiosensitive (4000 to 6000 rads). For the phytohemagglutinin response, suppressor cell activity was thymic hormone sensitive in approximately 40% (Thymosin Fraction 5 or thymic humoral factor), and for the concanavalin A response, it was thymic hormone sensitive in about 25% of the cases. There was a significant correlation between the presence of immunodeficiency (defined as a phytohemagglutinin response < 35,000 or a concanavalin A response < 12,000 cpm) and the presence of the suppressor cell activity. The suppressor cell activity was heterogenous relative to its radiosensitivity and thymic hormone sensitivity. Suppressor cell activity was observed in all the patient categories. These results indicate that certain available therapeutic manipulations may have significant effects on suppressor cell activity and should be an important subject for further investigation.

Recombinant human gamma-interferon and recombinant human tumor necrosis factor are two representatives of a new class of antineoplastic agents. In vitro studies have suggested synergistic cytotoxic activities when the agents are combined. We report a phase I study of these two agents when administered daily for 5 consecutive days every 2 weeks in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers. Toxicity resulting from these agents was significant with hyperbilirubinemia representing the dose-limiting toxicity. Significant, although transient, myelosuppression was also observed. The maximal tolerated doses were 150 micrograms/m2/day for 5 days for each agent. Suggestive antineoplastic activity in biliary and pancreatic cancer was observed. Phase II trials of this combination are currently in progress.