1. [A meta-analysis on the improvement of vocal function in unilateral vocal cord paralysis by reinnervation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve].
- Author
-
Zhou S, Liu L, Yang Y, Mo H, Wei L, Xu D, Yang Y, Luo R, Hu J, and Fang H
- Subjects
- Humans, Treatment Outcome, Voice Quality, Phonation, Vocal Cord Paralysis surgery, Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve surgery
- Abstract
Objective: To conduct a systematic description and meta-analysis of the treatment of unilateral vocal cord paralysis(UVCP) with recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation through literature search, and to analyze the therapeutic effect of recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation on improving vocal function in UVCP. Methods: Electronic databases Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched using relevant keywords and screened in strict accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality evaluations were conducted. Reported treatment outcomes were measured by relevant data extracted from literature, such as auditory perception assessment(GRBAS), voice handicap index(VHI), maximal phonation time(MPT), jitter, shimmer, and noise harmonic ratio(NHR), etc. Meta-analysis was performed by Revman5.3 and heterogeneity was analyzed using fixed effects or random effects models. Results: Eight articles were included in this study, all of which showed that the postoperative maximum phonation time of patients was significantly prolonged compared to preoperative, while the postoperative GRBAS score, Jitter, Shimmer, and NHR decreased compared to preoperative with statistical significance. Conclusion: The innervation of the internal laryngeal muscle was obtained through the reinnervation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, which effectively improved the patient's vocal function and had a good long-term therapeutic effect. Although there was no difference in the efficacy of surgical methods for reconstructing the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the anastomosis between ansa cervicalis nerve and the recurrent laryngeal nerve is more ideal. Further randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up periods and larger samples will increase the credibility of their effectiveness., Competing Interests: The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose., (Copyright© by the Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF