Search

Aims: There is a paucity of data on the performance of angiography-derived vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) in coronary artery lesions of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows for visualization of lumen dimensions and plaque integrity with high resolution. The aim of this study was to define the association between vFFR and OCT findings in intermediate coronary artery lesions in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS., Methods and Results: The FAST OCT study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. Patients presenting with NSTE-ACS with intermediate to severe coronary artery stenosis in one or multiple vessels with TIMI 3 flow suitable for OCT imaging were eligible. Complete pre-procedural vFFR and OCT data were available in 226 vessels (in 188 patients). A significant association between vFFR and minimal lumen area (MLA) was observed, showing an average decrease of 20.4% (95% CI -23.9% to -16.7%) in MLA per 0.10 decrease in vFFR (adjusted P < 0.001). vFFR ≤ 0.80 showed a sensitivity of 56.7% and specificity of 92.5% to detect MLA ≤ 2.5 mm2. Conversely, vFFR had a poor to moderate discriminative ability to detect plaque instability (sensitivity, 46.9%; specificity, 71.6%)., Conclusion: In patients with NSTE-ACS, vFFR is significantly associated with OCT-detected MLA, and vFFR ≤ 0.80 is highly predictive of the presence of significant disease based on OCT. Conversely, the sensitivity of vFFR ≤ 0.80 to detect OCT-assessed significant disease was low, indicating that the presence of significant OCT findings cannot be ruled out based on a negative vFFR., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Joost Daemen received institutional grant/research support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, ACIST Medical, Medtronic, Microport, Pie Medical, and ReCor medical and consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, ACIST medical, Boston Scientific, Cardialysis BV, CardiacBooster, Kaminari Medical, ReCor Medical, PulseCath, Pie Medical, Sanofi, Siemens Health Care, and Medtronic. Nicolas van Mieghem received institutional research grant support from Abbott Vascular, Astra Zeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Teleflex, PulseCath and Daiichi Sankyo and consultancy fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abiomed, PulseCath BV, Daiichi Sankyo, Teleflex, Anteris, JenaValve, Amgen, Siemens, and Pie Medical. Rutger-Jan Nuis received research grant support from Vifor Pharma and Meril and consultancy fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. Ernest Spitzer declares institutional contracts/grants for which he receives no direct compensation from Abbott, Biosensors Europe SA, Boston Scientific, Cardiawave, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Mixin Medtech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Shanghai Microport Medical Co., Ltd., NVT GmBH, Philips Healthcare, Pie Medical Imaging, Shanghai Shenqi Medical Technologies Co., Ltd., and Siemens Healthcare GmBH and declares being a board member of Cardialysis, European Cardiovascular Research Institute, EU-MDR Cardiovascular Collaboratory, and Academic Research Consortium. Wojciech Wojakowski received lecture fees from Abbott Vascular. Tom Adriaenssens reports speaker and consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular. Wojciech Wojakowski reports speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. The remaining authors report to have no disclosures., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: To study if any qualitative or quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) variables in combination with thin cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) patients could improve the identification of lesions at risk for future major adverse cardiac events (MACEs)., Methods and Results: From the combined optical coherence tomography morphologic and fractional flow reserve hemodynamic assessment of non- culprit lesions to better predict adverse event outcomes in diabetes mellitus patients: COMBINE (OCT-FFR) trial database (NCT02989740), we performed a detailed assessment OCT qualitative and quantitative variables in TCFA carrying diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with vs. without MACE during follow-up. MACEs were defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina. From the 390 fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative DM patients, 98 (25.2%) had ≥1 OCT-detected TCFA, of which 13 (13.3%) had MACE and 85 (86.7%) were event-free (non-MACE). The baseline characteristics were similar between both groups; however, a smaller minimal lumen area (MLA) and lower mean FFR value were observed in MACE group (1.80 vs. 2.50 mm2, P = 0.01, and 0.85 vs. 0.89, P = 0.02, respectively). Prevalence of healed plaque (HP) was higher in the MACE group (53.85 vs. 21.18%, P = 0.01). TCFA were predominantly located proximal to the MLA. TCFA area was smaller in the MACE group, while no difference was observed regarding the lesion area., Conclusion: Within TCFA carrying patients, a smaller MLA, lower FFR values, and TCFA location adjacent to a HP were associated with future MACE. Carpet-like measured lesion area surface was similar, while the TCFA area was smaller in the MACE arm, and predominantly located proximal to the MLA., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Nothing to Disclose., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The long-term prognostic implications of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative lesions hosting vulnerable plaques remain unsettled., Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of non-ischaemic lesions hosting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-detected thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFA) with first and recurrent cardiovascular events during follow-up up to 5 years in a diabetes mellitus (DM) patient population., Methods: COMBINE OCT-FFR is a prospective, international, double-blind, natural history study. Patients with DM and with ≥1 FFR-negative lesion were classified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of ≥1 TCFA lesion. The primary endpoint (PE) is a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR), or unstable angina (UA) requiring hospitalisation during follow-up up to 5 years., Results: Among 390 DM patients (age 67.5±9 years; 37% female) with ≥1 FFR-negative lesion, 292 (74.9%) were TCFA-negative while 98 (25.1%) were TCFA-positive. The PE occurred more frequently in TCFA-positive than in TCFA-negative patients (21.4% vs 8.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-5.20; p<0.001; 6.42 vs 2.46 events per 100 patient-years, rate ratio [RR] 2.61, 95% CI: 1.38-4.90; p=0.002). Furthermore, when TV-MI, TLR, and UA were treated as recurrent components of the PE, TCFA-positive patients experienced a higher risk of recurrent events (HR 2.89, 95% CI; 1.74-4.80; p<0.001; 13.45 vs 2.87 events per 100 patient-years, RR 4.69, 95% CI: 2.86-7.83; p<0.001). A multivariable analysis identified the presence of TCFA as an independent predictor of the PE (HR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.53-4.97; p<0.001)., Conclusions: OCT-detected TCFA-positive lesions, although not ischaemia-generating, are associated with an increased risk of adverse events during long-term follow-up., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT02989740.

Background: Scientific statements recommend multimodality imaging in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) to define the underlying cause., Aim: We evaluated the diagnostic yield of intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the MINOCA setting., Methods: In this prospective, single center, observational pilot study, we enrolled patients with MINOCA without previous coronary interventions. All patients underwent three vessel OCT, followed by CMR. Imaging results were combined to determine the mechanism of MINOCA, when possible., Results: We enrolled 10 patients in this pilot study. Women constituted 50% of the analyzed population. The mean age of patients was 52 years. ST-segment elevation was found in 30% of patients. A possible culprit lesion was identified by OCT in 70% of participants, most commonly plaque rupture or erosion. An ischemic pattern of CMR abnormalities was identified in 70% of participants. Myocarditis and Tako-Tsubo were identified in 30%. A cause of MINOCA was identified in all patients using multimodality imaging, while using OCT alone identification occurred in only 70% of patients., Conclusion: In this pilot study, multimodality imaging with OCT and CMR identified potential mechanisms in all patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA, and it has the potential to guide medical therapy for secondary prevention.

Background: Autopsy studies have established that thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFAs) are the most frequent cause of fatal coronary events. In living patients, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has sufficient resolution to accurately differentiate TCFA from thick-cap fibroatheroma (ThCFA) and not lipid rich plaque (non-LRP). However, the impact of OCT-detected plaque phenotype of nonischemic lesions on future adverse events remains unknown. Therefore, we studied the natural history of OCT-detected TCFA, ThCFA, and non-LRP in patients enrolled in the prospective multicenter COMBINE FFR-OCT trial (Combined Optical Coherence Tomography Morphologic and Fractional Flow Reserve Hemodynamic Assessment of Non-Culprit Lesions to Better Predict Adverse Event Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients)., Methods: In the COMBINE FFR-OCT trial, patients with diabetes and ≥1 lesion with a fractional flow reserve >0.80 underwent OCT evaluation and were clinically followed for 18 months. A composite primary end point of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina was evaluated in relation to OCT-based plaque morphology., Results: A total of 390 patients (age 67.5±9 years; 63% male) with ≥1 nonischemic lesions underwent OCT evaluation: 284 (73%) had ≥1 LRP and 106 (27%) non-LRP lesions. Among LRP patients, 98 (34.5%) had ≥1 TCFA. The primary end point occurred in 7% of LRP patients compared with 1.9% of non-LRP patients (7.0% versus 1.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 3.9 [95% CI, 0.9-16.5]; P =0.068; log rank- P =0.049). However, within LRP patients, TCFA patients had a much higher risk for primary end point compared with ThCFA (13.3% versus 3.8%; HR, 3.8 [95% CI, 1.5-9.5]; P <0.01), and to non-LRP patients (13.3% versus 1.9%; HR, 7.7 [95% CI, 1.7-33.9]; P <0.01), whereas ThCFA patients had risk similar to non-LRP patients (3.8% versus 1.9%; HR, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.42-9.7]; P =0.38). Multivariable analyses identified TCFA as the strongest independent predictor of primary end point (HR, 6.79 [95% CI, 1.50-30.72]; P =0.013)., Conclusions: Among diabetes patients with fractional flow reserve-negative lesions, patients carrying TCFA lesions represent only one-third of LRP patients and are associated with a high risk of future events while patients carrying LRP-ThCFA and non-LRP lesions portend benign outcomes., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02989740.

Background: Whereas the efficacy and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) have been confirmed in de novo calcified coronary lesions, little is known about its utility in treating stent underexpansion. This study aimed to investigate the impact of IVL in treating stent underexpansion. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with stent underexpansion treated with IVL entered the multicenter IVL-Dragon Registry. The procedural success (primary efficacy endpoint) was defined as a relative stent expansion >80%. Thirty days device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) (defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel myocardial infarction) was the secondary endpoint. A total of 62 patients were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 72.6% of patients. Both stent underexpansion 58.5% (47.5−69.7) vs. 11.4% (5.8−20.7), p < 0.001, and the stenotic area 82.6% (72.4−90.8) vs. 21.5% (11.1−37.2), p < 0.001, measured by quantitative coronary angiography improved significantly after IVL. Intravascular imaging confirmed increased stent expansion following IVL from 37.5% (16.0−66.0) to 86.0% (69.2−90.7), p < 0.001, by optical coherence tomography and from 57.0% (31.5−77.2) to 89.0% (85.0−92.0), p = 0.002, by intravascular ultrasound. Secondary endpoint occurred in one (1.6%) patient caused by cardiac death. There was no target lesion revascularization or target vessel myocardial infarction during the 30-day follow-up. Conclusions: In this real-life, largest-to-date analysis of IVL use to manage underexpanded stent, IVL proved to be an effective and safe method for facilitating stent expansion and increasing luminal gain.

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.