Search

Objectives: To compare the perioperative and functional outcomes after open and robotic partial nephrectomy performed with cold ischemia. Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed of consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy with renal hypothermia between January 2011 and September 2016. The study cohort included both open (Open Cold Ischemia, OCI; n=170) and robotic (Robotic Cold Ischemia, RCI; n=31) patients with complex renal masses (R.E.N.A.L. score >7) who did not meet exclusion criteria. A modified intracorporeal technique 1 was utilized for the introduction of ice slush at the time of hilar clamping in the RCI group. Statistical testing was performed to compare key perioperative and functional outcomes after ensuring equilibration of both groups by clinicodemographic criteria. Results: Both groups were statistically equivalent with respect to baseline characteristics. Median GFR preservation postoperatively was 86.7% for the open group and 86.6% in the robotic group (p=0.49). Cold ischemia time (CIT) in the open group was 35 minutes compared to 28 minutes (p = 0.03) in the robotic group. LOS was significantly shorter by 2 days (p < 0.01) in the robotic group. Positive margins was noted to be 17 (10%) in the open group and 2 (6.5%) patients in the robotic group (p=0.48). Conclusions: We demonstrate an effective and simplified method of intracorporeal ice cooling during robotic partial nephrectomy. Our data suggests that results with this approach compare favorably to open cold ischemia technique. Intracorporeal ice cooling can be considered when performing complex partial nephrectomies with ischemia times expected to exceed 25 minutes.

Introduction: The surgical morbidity of ipsilateral synchronous multifocality (ISM) is poorly characterized. We assessed the impact of ISM on complications after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). Patients and Methods: We abstracted data on RPN cases performed between 2006 and 2015 at our institution. Multifocal disease was characterized by >1 renal mass on preoperative imaging or >1 mass excision during RPN. The primary outcome was the rate of overall postoperative complications. The association between multifocality and complications was evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses. Results: Of 1121 cases, 59 (5.3%) had >1 ipsilateral renal mass and 50 (4.5%) required >1 excision. The overall complication rate was 20.3% (230/1121). The radiographic number of ipsilateral renal masses was not significantly associated with complications (20.2% for 1 mass vs. 25.4% for >1 mass, p = 0.338). However, the actual number of ipsilateral mass excisions performed during RPN was significantly assoc...

Objectives To assess differences in complications after robot-assisted (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) among experienced surgeons. Patients and Methods We identified patients in our institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained database who underwent OPN or RAPN for management of unifocal, T1a renal tumours at our institution between January 2011 and August 2015. The primary outcome measure was the rate of 30-day overall postoperative complications. Baseline patient factors, tumour characteristics and peri-operative factors, including approach, were evaluated to assess the risk of complications. Results Patients who underwent OPN were found to have a higher rate of overall complications (30.3% vs 18.2%; P = 0.038), with wound complications accounting for the majority of these events (11.8% vs 1.8%; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the open approach to be an independent predictor of overall complications (odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.03–2.43; P = 0.035). Major limitations of the study include its retrospective design and potential lack of generalizability. Conclusions The open surgical approach predicts a higher rate of overall complications after partial nephrectomy for unifocal, T1a renal tumours. For experienced surgeons, the morbidity associated with nephron-sparing surgery may be incrementally improved using the robot-assisted approach.

Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation are associated with poor outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined the impact of differentiation on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in surgically treated patients with grade 4 RCC. Using our institutional database of 1176 nephrectomies from 2005 to 2013, we identified patients with grade 4 RCC or any grade and the presence of sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation. We divided the cohort based on differentiation: no differentiation, rhabdoid only, sarcomatoid only, and sarcomatoid and rhabdoid. CSS was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Of 264 patients with grade 4 RCC, 159 (60.2 %) exhibited differentiation, including 45 (28.3 %) with rhabdoid only, 87 (54.7 %) with sarcomatoid only, and 27 (16.9 %) with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid. Sarcomatoid differentiation, either alone or with rhabdoid differentiation, was associated with worse median CSS than no differentiation (1.1 vs. 3.3 years, p

OBJECTIVE To identify preoperative factors that predict positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using our institutional partial nephrectomy database, we investigated the patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for malignant tumors between January 2011 and December 2015. Patient, tumor, surgeon characteristics were compared by surgical margin status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of positive surgical margins. RESULTS A total of 1025 cases were available for analysis, of which 65 and 960 had positive and negative surgical margins, respectively. On univariate analysis, positive margins were associated with older age (64.3 vs. 59.6, p

Introduction and objective Partial nephrectomy (PN) represents the current surgical standard for T1 tumors. Renal arterial pseudoaneurysm is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication reported after PN. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with the occurrence of pseudoaneurysm after PN, specifically focusing on those requiring management with selective embolization. A literature review of the topic was performed. Methods A retrospective review of the institutional PN database was performed from January 2011 to December 2016. Patients who underwent embolization for pseudoaneurysm represented a separated cohort to be compared with other patients (controls). Patients' and tumors' characteristics were considered. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to test their eventual association with the occurrence of pseudoaneurysm. Results A total of 1417 cases were evaluated. At a median of 21 days (interquartile range = 10-34), 20 patients (1.4%) developed postoperative pseudoaneurysm. The majority of patients (70%) presented with gross hematuria. The clinical suspicion was confirmed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan with angiography. Selective embolization was performed using endovascular coils. Technical success and clinical success rates were 100% and 95%, respectively. No difference was found in percentage estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preserved between patients who underwent embolization versus controls (median 82.6% versus 86.3%, P = .35). No differences in age, baseline renal function (as assessed by glomerular filtration rate [GFR]), tumor size, and R.E.N.A.L. were found between patients who reported and did not report pseudoaneurysm. In patients who developed pseudoaneurysm, longer operative time (225.6 minutes versus 193 minutes, P = .04), and cold ischemia time (48 minutes versus 29 minutes, P = .03) were reported. Conclusion In our series, the occurrence of pseudoaneurysm was associated with longer operative and cold ischemia times. In patients who underwent selective embolization, renal function remained comparable with that of controls.

Introduction and Objective We present our robotic approach and technique to manage a large left renal tumor with inferior vena cava (IVC) Level III thrombus. The superior mesenteric artery crossing the left renal vein requires robotic docking from the left, for dissection of the left kidney followed by repositioning and re-docking the robot from the right side for dissection of the right renal vein, distal and proximal IVC, and the remaining left renal vein insertion into the IVC. Methods We present a 53-year-old man with a 10.9-cm left renal mass with IVC level III tumor thrombus. A robotic left radical nephrectomy with lymph node dissection was completed using 4 ports in a midline configuration. The dissection of the left renal vein was taken medially until the superior mesenteric artery. The patient was then repositioned in the right side flank position and the robot was re-docked using the previously placed midline ports. The right renal vein, distal and proximal IVC were then controlled using modified Rummel tourniquets. Results Operative time was 530 minutes which included patient positioning, robot re-docking. The patient did not require a blood transfusion. Hospital stay was 4 days. Final pathology showed pT3bNoM1 renal cell carcinoma, clear cell type grade 4 with necrosis, and focal rhabdoid features measuring 11 cm. The tumor invaded the renal sinus and the renal vein and was metastatic to the ipsilateral adrenal gland. Margins were negative. Conclusion Herein we present a successful outcome of a left-sided robotic radical nephrectomy with IVC level III tumor thrombectomy.

Objective To compare outcomes between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open PN (OPN) for completely endophytic renal tumours. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1 230 consecutive cases, consisting of 823 RAPNs and 407 OPNs, performed for renal mass at a single academic tertiary centre between 2011 and 2016. Of these, data on 87 RAPN and 56 OPN cases for completely endophytic renal tumours were analysed. Patient and tumour characteristics, operative, postoperative, functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. Results Apart from a higher prevalence of solitary kidney among OPN cases (RAPN, 5.7% vs OPN, 21.4%; P = 0.005), demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in tumour size (P = 0.07), tumour stage (P = 0.3), margin status (P = 0.48), malignant tumour subtypes (P = 0.51), and grades (P = 0.61) between the groups. Also, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups for warm ischaemia time (P = 0.15), cold ischaemia time (P = 0.28), and intraoperative (P = 0.75) or postoperative (Clavien–Dindo Grade I–V, P = 0.08; Clavien–Dindo Grade III–V, P = 0.85) complication rates. The patients in the RAPN group had a shorter length of stay (P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), and lower intraoperative transfusion rates (0% vs 7.1%, P = 0.02). No local recurrences occurred during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 15.2 (7–27.2) and 18.1 (8.2–30.9) months in the RAPN and OPN groups, respectively. There was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation rates between groups for the early (P = 0.26) and latest (P = 0.22) functional follow-up. Conclusion For completely endophytic renal tumours, both OPN and RAPN have excellent outcomes when performed by experienced surgeons at a high-volume centre. For skilled robotic surgeons, RAPN is a safe and effective alternative to OPN with the advantages of shorter length of stay and less blood loss.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for completely endophytic renal masses is feasible with increased robotic surgical experience. In this video we demonstrate our surgical technique for robotic partial nephrectomy, focusing on the technical variations for RPN for completely endophytic tumors. METHODS: Between June 2006 and August 2015, our institution performed 1,123 partial nephrectomies. 130 were performed for completely endophytic renal tumors. We present 2 patients with completely endophytic, central renal masses who underwent RPN, one in the left kidney and one in the right. Our approach to surgical removal of completely endophytic renal tumors includes the use of intraoperative ultrasound to delineate the margins of the mass, initial shallow angle of resection to improve visualization of the parenchymal margin and tumor base, and correction of excision trajectory at the renal sinus. This technique is described in detail in our video presentation. RESULTS: Of the 1,123 RPN performed at our institution over the last 10 years, 11.6% were performed for completely endophytic renal masses. Mean operative time, warm ischemia and estimated blood loss in this cohort were 180 minutes, 24.5 minutes, and 197 cc, respectively. Minor complicate rate in this group was 13.9%, while major complication rate was 13.9%. 7 patients in this group had positive margins (5.4%). Successfully surgical extirpation of completely endophytic renal masses is optimized by an initially shallow incision in order to obtain a clear view of the parenchymal edge and base of tumor. Once the sinus fat and collecting system are exposed, the trajectory of the excision is corrected and the sides and back of the tumor are excised in a step-wise, circumferential fashion. CONCLUSIONS: RPN for completely endophytic renal tumors is feasible and necessitates technical variations in excision in order to optimize outcomes. Excision of the tumor should be performed in a step-wise systematic fashion with a shallow initial incision to improve visualization into the renal defect and to avoid cutting into the tumor.

Experiments determined methanol removal and catalyst elutriation rates during photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) of fluidized and packed beds of various titania-based catalysts. The study developed elutriation-resistant catalysts in which TiO 2 was precipitated from solution (p-TiO 2 ), or was coated on an Al 2 O 3 support (TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 ) and compared them to Degussa P-25 TiO 2 . Although Degussa P-25 TiO 2 oxidized methanol effectively, it elutriated at a rate that was two orders of magnitude greater than those of p-TiO 2 and TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 . In addition, TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 removed methanol at a significantly greater rate than did P-25, with p-TiO 2 being the least active. Fluidized beds produced greater PCO rates than did packed beds of P-25 and TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 . Fluidization enhancers, such as vibration and incorporation of a static mixer, improved the performance of the P-25 fluidized bed, but did not change the effectiveness of TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 or p-TiO 2 . The activity of TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 decreased with increasing calcination temperature (over the temperature range 673–873 K). The optimum TiO 2 loading for TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 was 30 wt.%.

Robotic surgery in the treatment in certain urological diseases has become a mainstay. With the increasing use of the robotic platform, some surgeries which were historically performed open have transitioned to a minimally invasive technique. Recently, the robotic approach has become more utilized for ureteral reconstruction. In this article, the authors review the surgical techniques for a number of major ureteral reconstuctive surgeries and briefly discuss the outcomes reported in the literature.

Introduction: Augmentation ileocystoplasty is a common treatment in adults with low capacity bladders due to neurogenic bladder dysfunction. We describe here our technique for robotic assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty in an adult with a low capacity bladder due to neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Materials and Methods: The patient is a 35 years-old man with neurogenic bladder due to a C6 spinal cord injury in 2004. Cystometrogram shows a maximum capacity of 96cc and Pdet at maximum capacity of 97cmH2O. He manages his bladder with intermittent catheterization and experiences multiple episodes of incontinence between catheterizations. He experiences severe autonomic dysreflexia symptoms with indwelling urethral catheter. He has previously failed non operative management options of his bladder dysfunction. Our surgical technique utilizes 6 trocars, of note a 12mm assistant trocar is placed 1cm superior to the pubic symphysis, and this trocar is solely used to pass a laparoscopic stapler to facilitate the excision of the ileal segment and the enteric anastomosis. Surgical steps include: development of the space of Retzius/dropping the bladder; opening the bladder from the anterior to posterior bladder neck; excision of a segment of ileum; enteric anastomosis; detubularizing the ileal segment; suturing the ileal segment to the incised bladder edge. Results: The surgery had no intraoperative complications. Operative time was 286 minutes (4.8 hours). Estimated blood loss was 50cc. Length of hospital stay was 8 days. He did experience a postoperative complication on hospital day 3 of hematemesis, which did not require blood transfusion. Cystometrogram at 22 days post operatively showed a maximum bladder capacity of 165cc with a Pdet at maximum capacity of 10cmH2O. Conclusions: As surgeon comfort and experience with robotic assisted surgery grows, robotic surgery can successfully be applied to less frequently performed procedures. In this case we successfully performed a robotic assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty displaying improvement in measurable functional outcomes.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in urology is an ever progressing field, and boundaries are constantly broken with the aid of new technology. Advancements in instrumentation have given birth to the era of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site technique (R-LESS). R-LESS however, has not gained widespread acceptance due to technical hurdles such as adequate triangulation, robotic arm clashing, decreased access for the bedside assistant, lack of wrist articulation, continued need for an axillary/accessory port, lack of robust retraction, and ergonomic discomfort. Many innovations have been explored to counter such limitations. We aim to give a brief overview of a history and development of R-LESS urologic surgery and outline the latest advancements in the realm of urologic R-LESS. By searching PubMed selectively for relevant articles, we concluded a literature review. We searched using the keywords: robotic laparoscopic single incision, robotic laparoendoscopic single-site, single incision robotic surgery, and R-LESS. We selected all relevant articles in that pertained to single-site robotic surgery in urology. We selected all relevant articles that pertained to single-site robotic surgery in urology in a table encompassed within this article. The development of the R-LESS procedures, instrumentations, and platforms has been an evolution in progress. Our results showed the history and evolution toward a purpose-built single-port robotic platform that addresses previous limitations to R-LESS. Even though previous studies have shown feasibility with R-LESS, the future of R-LESS depends on the availability of purpose-built robotic platforms. The larger concern is the demonstration of the definitive advantage of single-site over the conventional multiport surgery.

Introduction A renorrhaphy technique which is effective for hemostasis but does not place undue tension on the branch vessels of the renal sinus remains one of the challenging steps after hilar tumor resection during robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). The published V-hilar suture (VHS) technique is one option for reconstruction after an RPN involving the hilum. The objective of this video is to show a novel renorrhaphy technique, Hilar Parenchymal Oversew that has been effective for such cases. Materials and Methods We present two cases of RPN for renal hilar tumors. The first case depicts use of the VHS renorrhaphy technique for a tumor that abuts the renal hilum along 20% of its diameter. The second case demonstrates tumor resection and reconstruction for a tumor that has >50% involvement of the hilum along its diameter. After tumor resection, individual sinus vessels can be selectively oversewn with 2-0 Vicryl suture on SH needle. The remaining exposed parenchyma is controlled using the Hilar Parenchymal Oversew technique with a #0 Vicryl on CT-1 needle. Results For the Hilar Parenchymal Oversew surgery operative time was 225 min, estimated blood loss was 140 ml, warm ischemia time was 19 minutes, and there were no intraoperative complications. Pathology was consistent with clear cell renal cancer with negative margins. Conclusion Robotic partial nephrectomy with the Hilar Parenchymal Oversew technique is a good alternative to VHS renorrhaphy in the management of renal hilar tumors “bulging” into the renal sinus with >50% of the tumor diameter abutting the hilum.

Introduction and Objectives: Robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is an alternative to open radical cystectomy. As experience is gained with the RARC approach the technique is being applied to more complex surgical cases. We describe here our technique for RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a renal transplant recipient. Materials and Methods: The patient is a 60-year old man with high-grade muscle invasive bladder cancer. He has a history of renal failure due to polycystic kidney disease and received a deceased donor renal transplant in 2008. His hospital course at time of transplant was complicated by low-level BK virus viremia. Interestingly his trans-urethral bladder tumor resection specimen at time of bladder cancer diagnosis stained positive for SV40. His native kidneys were anuric so bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in a staged fashion 2 weeks prior to RARC. Our surgical technique utilizes 6 trocars, of note a 12-mm assistant trocar is placed 1 cm superior to the pubic symphysis, and this trocar is solely used to pass a laparoscopic stapler to facilitate the excision of the ileal segment and the stapled enteric anastomosis. Surgical steps include: identification of native ureters bilaterally (removed en bloc with the bladder specimen); identification of the transplanted ureter at the right bladder dome; posterior bladder and prostate dissection along Denonvilliers’ fascia; development of the space of Retzius; ligation and transection of the bladder and prostate vascular bundles; apical prostate dissection and transection of urethra; left pelvic lymphadenectomy; ilium resection for creation of the ileal conduit; stapled enteric anastomosis; ureteroileal anastomosis; maturation of the ileal conduit stoma. Results: The surgery had no intraoperative complications. Operative time was 443 minutes (7.4 hours). Estimated blood loss was 250 cc. Length of hospital stay was 5 days. The patient did not experience any postoperative complications. The patient maintained good renal graft function with no decline in eGFR to date. Conclusions: As surgeon comfort and experience with robotic assisted surgery grows, robotic surgery can successfully be applied to less frequently performed procedures. Here we successfully performed a robotic assisted radical cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a renal transplant recipient.