Search

Development of candidate cancer treatments is a resource-intensive process, with the research community continuing to investigate options beyond static genomic characterization. Toward this goal, we have established the genomic landscapes of 536 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models across 25 cancer types, together with mutation, copy number, fusion, transcriptomic profiles, and NCI-MATCH arms. Compared with human tumors, PDXs typically have higher purity and fit to investigate dynamic driver events and molecular properties via multiple time points from same case PDXs. Here, we report on dynamic genomic landscapes and pharmacogenomic associations, including associations between activating oncogenic events and drugs, correlations between whole-genome duplications and subclone events, and the potential PDX models for NCI-MATCH trials. Lastly, we provide a web portal having comprehensive pan-cancer PDX genomic profiles and source code to facilitate identification of more druggable events and further insights into PDXs’ recapitulation of human tumors., Patient-derived xenograft models (PDX) have been extensively used to study the molecular and clinical features of cancers. Here the authors present a cohort of 536 PDX models from 25 cancers, as well as their genomic and evolutionary profiles and their suitability for clinical trials.

We created the PDX Network (PDXNet) Portal to provide an intuitive way for researchers to explore and understand the models, sequencing data, and bioinformatics workflows generated by NCI's PDXNet consortium for research access (https://portal.pdxnetwork.org/). The portal also provides metrics for PDXNet's activities, data processing protocols, and training materials for processing PDX data. The PDXNet Portal highlights model and data resources that include 216 new models across 29 cancer types. The most prevalent cancers represented in the PDX model dataset include invasive breast carcinoma (30.6%), melanoma (18.1%), and adenocarcinoma (14.4%). PDXNet teams have provided 2263 sequencing files from 356 samples across 204 patients, comprising whole exome (82.9%) and RNA seq files (17.1%). The most prevalent cancers represented in the PDXNet sequencing data set include Breast Pleural Effusion (27.2%), Breast Poorly Differentiated (12.5%), and Lung Adenocarcinoma (9.6%). The portal also provides access to 9492 sequencing files across 78 disease types that include 2594 samples across 463 patients uploaded from the NCI Patient-Derived Model Repository. The dataset includes both whole exomes (52.8%) and RNA seq (47.2%) data. The PDMR samples include PDX (82.7%), primary tumor (5.7%), normal germline (5.5), organoid culture (3.2), and Mixed Tumor Culture (2.9). The PDMR dataset also has multiple passages: P0 (21.8%), P1(39.5%), P2 (25.6%), and P3 (8.5%). These models and data resources support ten PDXNet Pilot activities, multiple publications, and international collaborations. PDXNet has also developed a set of 13 robust, validated, and standardized workflows for processing PDXNet whole-exome and RNA seq data. Collectively, these workflows allow for the standardized processing of PDX and complementary human tissues (normal and tumor). Our plan is to continuously update the model and data lists on the PDX portal as resources are generated. We expect that the PDXNet generated models, scheduled to grow to 1000 new models by 2022, will support multi-agent treatment studies, determination of mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance, and pre-clinical trials for example through the COMBO-MATCH program. The robust standard workflows currently processing all PDX sequencing data may also facilitate harmonizing data across studies. Lastly, we expect that the generated sequencing data will support computational approaches for studying cancer evolution and the mechanisms underlying cancer treatments. Citation Format: Soner Koc, Mike Lloyd, Steven Neuhauser, Javad Noodbakhsh, Anuj Srivastava, Xing Yi Woo, Ryan Jeon, Jeffrey Grover, Sara Seepo, Christian Frech, Jack DiGiovanna, PDXNet Consortium, Yvonne A. Evard, Tiffany Wallace, Jeffrey Moscow, James H. Doroshow, Nicholas Mitsuade, Salma Kaochar, Chong-xian Pan, Moon S. Chen, Luis Carvarjal-Carmona, Alana Welm, Bryan Welm, Michael T. Lewis, Govindan Ramaswamy, Li Ding, Shunquang Li, Meenherd Herlyn, Mike Davies, Jack Roth, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Peter Robinson, Carol J. Bult, Brandi Davis-Dusenbery, Dennis A. Dean, Jeffrey H. Chuang. Advancing PDX research through model, data, and bioinformatics with the PDXNet Portal [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 3017.

Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDXs) are tumor-in-mouse models for cancer. PDX collections, such as those supported by the NCI PDXNet program, are powerful resources for preclinical therapeutic testing. However, variations in experimental design and analysis procedures have limited interpretability. To determine the robustness of PDX studies, the PDXNet tested temozolomide drug response for three pre-validated PDX models (sensitive, resistant, and intermediate) across four blinded PDX Development and Trial Centers (PDTCs) using independently selected SOPs. Each PDTC was able to correctly identify the sensitive, resistant, and intermediate models, and statistical evaluations were concordant across all groups. We also developed and benchmarked optimized PDX informatics pipelines, and these yielded robust assessments across xenograft biological replicates. These studies show that PDX drug responses and sequence results are reproducible across diverse experimental protocols. Here we share the range of experimental procedures that maintained robustness, as well as standardized cloud-based workflows for PDX exome-seq and RNA-Seq analysis and for evaluating growth.

Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are resected human tumors engrafted into mice for preclinical studies and therapeutic testing. It has been proposed that the mouse host affects tumor evolution during PDX engraftment and propagation, affecting the accuracy of PDX modeling of human cancer. Here, we exhaustively analyze copy number alterations (CNAs) in 1,451 PDX and matched patient tumor (PT) samples from 509 PDX models. CNA inferences based on DNA sequencing and microarray data displayed substantially higher resolution and dynamic range than gene expression-based inferences, and they also showed strong CNA conservation from PTs through late-passage PDXs. CNA recurrence analysis of 130 colorectal and breast PT/PDX-early/PDX-late trios confirmed high-resolution CNA retention. We observed no significant enrichment of cancer-related genes in PDX-specific CNAs across models. Moreover, CNA differences between patient and PDX tumors were comparable to variations in multiregion samples within patients. Our study demonstrates the lack of systematic copy number evolution driven by the PDX mouse host.

Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDX) are proven models to study novel drugs or drug combinations and test hypothesis in preclinical studies. The overarching goal of the PDXNet is to coordinate the development of appropriate PDX models and methods for preclinical drug testing to advance CTEP clinical development of new cancer agents. The PDXNet is an NCI-funded consortium of six PDX Development and Trial Centers (PDTCs) and one PDCCC. Four PDTCs are responsible for developing PDXs and executing specific preclinical trials focused on cancer types including breast cancer, melanoma, and lung cancer. The other two recently awarded centers are specifically focused on minority PDX models and preclinical trials. Besides the PDTCs, the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository (PDMR) at the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR) is also providing models and data to the PDXNet. The PDCCC is responsible for coordination and developing standards for PDX generation as well as data analysis and metadata harmonization. The PDX Data Commons is built on top of existing NCI resources, leveraging the Cancer Genomics Cloud maintained by Seven Bridges Genomics, where PDXNet data is co-located with TCGA and other large-scale datasets. The PDCCC is co-led by experts from the Jackson Laboratory, providing scientific leadership in xenograft methods and cancer biology to ensure the promulgation of standards that are well-suited for the PDX community. A new portal has been set up at https://www.pdxnetwork.org/ to serve as the point of access to PDXNet resources. In addition, we established ongoing network-wide meetings to facilitate knowledge exchange, held PDXNet portal trainings, and set up working groups to tackle specific challenges. For instance, the Data Ontology working group has been working towards building a common data ontology model specifically for PDX datasets. We are in the process of annotating the very first dataset using this new ontology on the PDXNet portal. Also, the Workflows working group has been working on building and benchmarking various RNA-seq and whole exome sequencing analysis workflows to standardize data processing between PDXNet grantees and create a harmonized PDXNet dataset. These PDX models and the accompanying data will be opened to the community for data mining and/or preclinical research. The PDXNet is a strong step toward building a consensus around PDX models, so that the power for discovery can be expanded by making multi-institutional PDX cohorts a reality. As the coordination center, we are also working closely with the EuroPDX project to exchange standards and knowledge to support the PDX community with a set of standards going forward. The PDCCC is a central part of this process to systematically capture and analyze the variables most influential to PDX models and share protocols and tools to make PDXs an interchangeable research currency for preclinical discovery. Citation Format: Jacqueline Rosains, Anuj Srivastava, Wingyi Woo, Vishal Sarsani, ZiMing Zhao, Javad Noorbakhsh, Ogan D. Abaan, Christian Frech, Jack DiGiovanna, Ryan Jeon, Steve Neuhauser, Peter Robinson, Yvonne A. Evrard, Carol Bult, Jeffrey A. Moscow, Brandi Davis-Dusenbery, Jeffrey H. Chuang. The PDX Data Commons and Coordinating Center (PDCCC) for PDXNet in support of preclinical research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1074.