Search

The one-variable fragment of a first-order logic may be viewed as an "S5-like" modal logic, where the universal and existential quantifiers are replaced by box and diamond modalities, respectively. Axiomatizations of these modal logics have been obtained for special cases -- notably, the modal counterparts S5 and MIPC of the one-variable fragments of first-order classical logic and intuitionistic logic -- but a general approach, extending beyond first-order intermediate logics, has been lacking. To this end, a sufficient criterion is given in this paper for the one-variable fragment of a semantically-defined first-order logic -- spanning families of intermediate, substructural, many-valued, and modal logics -- to admit a natural axiomatization. More precisely, such an axiomatization is obtained for the one-variable fragment of any first-order logic based on a variety of algebraic structures with a lattice reduct that has the superamalgamation property, building on a generalized version of a functional representation theorem for monadic Heyting algebras due to Bezhanishvili and Harding. An alternative proof-theoretic strategy for obtaining such axiomatization results is also developed for first-order substructural logics that have a cut-free sequent calculus and admit a certain interpolation property., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2209.08566

The one-variable fragment of any first-order logic may be considered as a modal logic, where the universal and existential quantifiers are replaced by a box and diamond modality, respectively. In several cases, axiomatizations of algebraic semantics for these logics have been obtained: most notably, for the modal counterparts S5 and MIPC of the one-variable fragments of first-order classical logic and intuitionistic logic, respectively. Outside the setting of first-order intermediate logics, however, a general approach is lacking. This paper provides the basis for such an approach in the setting of first-order lattice-valued logics, where formulas are interpreted in algebraic structures with a lattice reduct. In particular, axiomatizations are obtained for modal counterparts of one-variable fragments of a broad family of these logics by generalizing a functional representation theorem of Bezhanishvili and Harding for monadic Heyting algebras. An alternative proof-theoretic proof is also provided for one-variable fragments of first-order substructural logics that have a cut-free sequent calculus and admit a certain bounded interpolation property.

We introduce a universal algebraic generalization of de Jongh's notion of dependence for formulas of intuitionistic propositional logic, relating it to a notion of dependence defined by Marczewski for elements of an algebraic structure. Following ideas of de Jongh and Chagrova, we show how constructive proofs of (weak forms of) uniform interpolation can be used to decide dependence for varieties of abelian l-groups, MV-algebras, semigroups, and modal algebras. We also consider minimal provability results for dependence, obtaining in particular a complete description and decidability of dependence for the variety of lattices.