Search

Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-29T08:32:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2021-01-01 National Institutes of Health Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Meeting the challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic requires an interdisciplinary approach. In this context, integrating knowledge of immune function with an understanding of how genetic variation influences the nature of immunity is a key challenge. Immunogenetics can help explain the heterogeneity of susceptibility and protection to the viral infection and disease progression. Here, we review the knowledge developed so far, discussing fundamental genes for triggering the innate and adaptive immune responses associated with a viral infection, especially with the SARS-CoV-2 mechanisms. We emphasize the role of the HLA and KIR genes, discussing what has been uncovered about their role in COVID-19 and addressing methodological challenges of studying these genes. Finally, we comment on questions that arise when studying admixed populations, highlighting the case of Brazil. We argue that the interplay between immunology and an understanding of genetic associations can provide an important contribution to our knowledge of COVID-19. Universidade de São Paulo Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva University of California UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences Department of Neurology Universidade Federal do Paraná Departamento de Genética Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Departamento de Patologia Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Departamento de Patologia National Institutes of Health: 1R01NS102153 CNPq: 308783/2019-0 National Institutes of Health: R01 GM075091

Several decades of research have convincingly shown that classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) loci bear signatures of natural selection. Despite this conclusion, many questions remain regarding the type of selective regime acting on these loci, the time frame at which selection acts, and the functional connections between genetic variability and natural selection. In this review, we argue that genomic datasets, in particular those generated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) at the population scale, are transforming our understanding of HLA evolution. We show that genomewide data can be used to perform robust and powerful tests for selection, capable of identifying both positive and balancing selection at HLA genes. Importantly, these tests have shown that natural selection can be identified at both recent and ancient timescales. We discuss how findings from genomewide association studies impact the evolutionary study of HLA genes, and how genomic data can be used to survey adaptive change involving interaction at multiple loci. We discuss the methodological developments which are necessary to correctly interpret genomic analyses involving the HLA region. These developments include adapting the NGS analysis framework so as to deal with the highly polymorphic HLA data, as well as developing tools and theory to search for signatures of selection, quantify differentiation, and measure admixture within the HLA region. Finally, we show that high throughput analysis of molecular phenotypes for HLA genes—namely transcription levels—is now a feasible approach and can add another dimension to the study of genetic variation.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have become the standard for data generation in studies of population genomics, as the 1000 Genomes Project (1000G). However, these techniques are known to be problematic when applied to highly polymorphic genomic regions, such as the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes. Because accurate genotype calls and allele frequency estimations are crucial to population genomics analyses, it is important to assess the reliability of NGS data. Here, we evaluate the reliability of genotype calls and allele frequency estimates of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reported by 1000G (phase I) at five HLA genes (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1). We take advantage of the availability of HLA Sanger sequencing of 930 of the 1092 1000G samples and use this as a gold standard to benchmark the 1000G data. We document that 18.6% of SNP genotype calls in HLA genes are incorrect and that allele frequencies are estimated with an error greater than ±0.1 at approximately 25% of the SNPs in HLA genes. We found a bias toward overestimation of reference allele frequency for the 1000G data, indicating mapping bias is an important cause of error in frequency estimation in this dataset. We provide a list of sites that have poor allele frequency estimates and discuss the outcomes of including those sites in different kinds of analyses. Because the HLA region is the most polymorphic in the human genome, our results provide insights into the challenges of using of NGS data at other genomic regions of high diversity.

The HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigens) genes are well-documented targets of balancing selection, and variation at these loci is associated with many disease phenotypes. Variation in expression levels also influences disease susceptibility and resistance, but little information exists about the regulation and population-level patterns of expression. This results from the difficulty in mapping short reads originated from these highly polymorphic loci, and in accounting for the existence of several paralogues. We developed a computational pipeline to accurately estimate expression for HLA genes based on RNA-seq, improving both locus-level and allele-level estimates. First, reads are aligned to all known HLA sequences in order to infer HLA genotypes, then quantification of expression is carried out using a personalized index. We use simulations to show that expression estimates obtained in this way are not biased due to divergence from the reference genome. We applied our pipeline to the GEUVADIS dataset, and compared the quantifications to those obtained with reference transcriptome. Although the personalized pipeline recovers more reads, we found that using the reference transcriptome produces estimates similar to the personalized pipeline (r ≥ 0.87) with the exception of HLA-DQA1. We describe the impact of the HLA-personalized approach on downstream analyses for nine classical HLA loci (HLA-A, HLA-C, HLA-B, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1). Although the influence of the HLA-personalized approach is modest for eQTL mapping, the p-values and the causality of the eQTLs obtained are better than when the reference transcriptome is used. We investigate how the eQTLs we identified explain variation in expression among lineages of HLA alleles. Finally, we discuss possible causes underlying differences between expression estimates obtained using RNA-seq, antibody-based approaches and qPCR., Author summary The level at which a gene is expressed can have important influence on the phenotype of an organism, including its predisposition to develop diseases. One way to estimate gene expression is by quantifying the abundance of RNA. RNA-seq has become the method of choice to provide such estimates at the genomewide scale. However, the application of RNA-seq to HLA genes —key players in the immune adaptive response— has remained a rarely explored approach. This is due to the problem of mapping bias, which causes deficient read alignment at genes which are very polymorphic and different from the reference genome. This has motivated approaches that replace the single reference genome with personalized sequences, comprised of the individual’s specific HLA genotype. Here we explore the use of computational frameworks to obtain reliable expression levels for HLA genes from RNA-seq datasets. We present a pipeline in which the quantification of HLA expression is carried out using methods which account for HLA diversity, avoiding the biases of standard approaches. We then evaluate the impact of this form of quantifying HLA expression on downstream analyses. The pipeline also allows us to integrate information on eQTLs with expression levels at the HLA allele-level, which can help disentangle different contributions to disease phenotypes and help understand the regulatory architecture at the HLA region.

Large forensic databases provide an opportunity to compare observed empirical rates of genotype matching with those expected under forensic genetic models. A number of researchers have taken advantage of this opportunity to validate some forensic genetic approaches, particularly to ensure that estimated rates of genotype matching between unrelated individuals are indeed slight overestimates of those observed. However, these studies have also revealed systematic error trends in genotype probability estimates. In this analysis, we investigate these error trends and show how they result from inappropriate implementation of the Balding–Nichols model in the context of database-wide matching. Specifically, we show that in addition to accounting for increased allelic matching between individuals with recent shared ancestry, studies must account for relatively decreased allelic matching between individuals with more ancient shared ancestry.

Large forensic databases provide an opportunity to compare observed empirical rates of genotype matching with those expected under forensic genetic models. A number of researchers have taken advantage of this opportunity to validate some forensic genetic approaches, particularly to ensure that estimated rates of genotype matching between unrelated individuals are indeed slight overestimates of those observed. However, these studies have also revealed systematic error trends in genotype probability estimates. In this analysis, we investigate these error trends and show how they result from inappropriate implementation of the Balding-Nichols model in the context of database-wide matching. Specifically, we show that in addition to accounting for increased allelic matching between individuals with recent shared ancestry, studies must account for relatively decreased allelic matching between individuals with more ancient shared ancestry.