Search

Your search keyword '"Zandbelt N"' showing total 7 results
Start Over Author "Zandbelt N" Search Limiters Full Text
7 results on '"Zandbelt N"'

2. Moderators of the efficacy of a psychosocial group intervention for children with chronic illness and their parents: what works for whom?

Author

Scholten, L., Willemen, A.M., Napoleone, E., Maurice-Stam, H., Last, B.F., Dijk-Lokkart, E.M. van, Zandbelt, N., Ensink, E., Grootenhuis, M.A., Schuengel, C., Scholten, L., Willemen, A.M., Napoleone, E., Maurice-Stam, H., Last, B.F., Dijk-Lokkart, E.M. van, Zandbelt, N., Ensink, E., Grootenhuis, M.A., and Schuengel, C.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVE: To investigate psychosocial characteristics of children and parents as predictors and moderators of the effect of a group intervention for children with chronic illness and their parents. METHODS: Data from a randomized controlled trial were used, including 194 children (8-18 years) who were assigned to a child-only intervention, a parent-child intervention, or a wait-list control group. Longitudinal multilevel regression analyses were used to test effects on change in parent and child reported internalizing and externalizing behavior problems. RESULTS: For children with a more disengaged coping style or lower self-worth and for children who experienced a more secure parent-child relationship, the parent-child intervention was more effective than the child-only intervention in reducing behavior problems. CONCLUSIONS: Children who are more "at risk" appear to gain more from participating in an intervention, especially if their parents are involved as well. However, the benefit of parents' involvement may depend on the quality of the parent-child relationship.

Published
2015

4. Efficacy of psychosocial group intervention for children with chronic illness and their parents

Author

Scholten, L., Willemen, A.M., Last, B.F., Maurice-Stam, H., Dijk, E.M. van, Ensink, E., Zandbelt, N., Hoop-Mooij, A. van der, Schuengel, C., Grootenhuis, M.A., Scholten, L., Willemen, A.M., Last, B.F., Maurice-Stam, H., Dijk, E.M. van, Ensink, E., Zandbelt, N., Hoop-Mooij, A. van der, Schuengel, C., and Grootenhuis, M.A.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention for children with chronic illnesses and to test the effect of an added parent component. METHODS: Children (n = 194) and their parents participated in a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing a child-only intervention and a parent-child intervention to a wait-list control group. Primary outcomes were parent- and self-reported internalizing and externalizing problems; secondary outcomes were child disease-related coping skills (information seeking, relaxation, social competence, medical compliance, and positive thinking). Assessments took place at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Intention-to-treat mixed-model analyses were performed to test the difference in change in outcomes. RESULTS: The intervention had a positive effect on changes in parent-reported internalizing problems, child-reported externalizing problems, information seeking, social competence, and positive thinking. The additional effect of parental involvement was observed on parent-reported internalizing problems, child-reported externalizing problems, information seeking, and social competence. Illness severity and illness type did not moderate the effects. There were no intervention effects on child-reported internalizing problems, parent-reported externalizing problems, relaxation, or medical compliance. Of the families in the wait-list control group, 74% sought alternative psychological support during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT supports the efficacy of a protocol-based group intervention for children with chronic illnesses and their parents. Adding a parental component to the intervention contributed to the persistence of the effects. Future research should focus on moderating and mediating effects of the intervention.

Published
2013

6. Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure Revised II (PRISM-RII) – a novel method to assess perceived burden of illness in diabetes patients

Author

Zandbelt Noortje, de Wit Maartje, Vingerhoets Ad JJM, Klis Sandor, and Snoek Frank J

Subjects
Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7
Abstract

Abstract Background The Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) has been introduced as a visual measure of suffering. We explored the validity of a revised version, the PRISM-RII, in diabetes patients as part of the annual review. Methods Participants were 308 adult outpatients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Measures: (1) the PRISM-RII, yielding Self-Illness Separation (SIS) and Illness Perception Measure (IPM); (2) the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale, a measure of diabetes-related distress; (3) the WHO-5 Well-Being Index; (4) and a validation question on suffering (SQ). In addition, patients' complication status, comorbidity and glycemic control values(HbA1c) were recorded. Results Patients with complications did have marginally significant higher scores on IPM, compared to patients without complications. Type 2 patients had higher IPM scores than Type 1 patients. SIS and IPM showed low intercorrelation (r = -.25; p < .01). Convergent validity of PRISM-RII was demonstrated by significant correlations between IPM and PAID (r = 0.50; p < 0.01), WHO-5 (r = -.26; p < 0.01) and SQ (r = 0.36; p < 0.01). SIS showed only significant correlations with PAID (r = -0.28; p < 0.01) and SQ (r = -0.22; p < 0.01). Neither IPM nor SIS was significantly associated with HbA1c. The PRISM-RII appeared easy to use and facilitated discussion with care providers on coping with the burden of diabetes. Conclusion PRISM-RII appears a promising additional tool to assess the psychological burden of diabetes.

Published
2008
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure Revised II (PRISM-RII): a novel method to assess perceived burden of illness in diabetes patients.

Author

Klis S, Vingerhoets AJ, de Wit M, Zandbelt N, Snoek FJ, Klis, Sandor, Vingerhoets, Ad J J M, de Wit, Maartje, Zandbelt, Noortje, and Snoek, Frank J

Abstract

Background: The Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) has been introduced as a visual measure of suffering. We explored the validity of a revised version, the PRISM-RII, in diabetes patients as part of the annual review.Methods: Participants were 308 adult outpatients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes.Measures: (1) the PRISM-RII, yielding Self-Illness Separation (SIS) and Illness Perception Measure (IPM); (2) the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale, a measure of diabetes-related distress; (3) the WHO-5 Well-Being Index; (4) and a validation question on suffering (SQ). In addition, patients' complication status, comorbidity and glycemic control values(HbA1c) were recorded.Results: Patients with complications did have marginally significant higher scores on IPM, compared to patients without complications. Type 2 patients had higher IPM scores than Type 1 patients. SIS and IPM showed low intercorrelation (r = -.25; p < .01). Convergent validity of PRISM-RII was demonstrated by significant correlations between IPM and PAID (r = 0.50; p < 0.01), WHO-5 (r = -.26; p < 0.01) and SQ (r = 0.36; p < 0.01). SIS showed only significant correlations with PAID (r = -0.28; p < 0.01) and SQ (r = -0.22; p < 0.01). Neither IPM nor SIS was significantly associated with HbA1c. The PRISM-RII appeared easy to use and facilitated discussion with care providers on coping with the burden of diabetes.Conclusion: PRISM-RII appears a promising additional tool to assess the psychological burden of diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2008
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results