Search

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as one of the malignant cancers with the worst prognosis, is becoming the most urgent clinical problem. Due to the lack of early diagnosis and curable therapeutic methods, it is critical to exploit proper models that can capture the overall attributes of the primary tumor. Recently, organoid technology has emerged and flourished as a powerful tool to enable long-term culture of pancreatic tissues, including PDAC. As accumulating studies suggest, organoids can retain morphological, genetic, and behavioral traits, and have tremendous value in predicting the therapeutic response to conventional chemotherapy drugs or newfangled agents. Herein, this review comprehensively summarizes the tissue source including human fetal and adult pancreatic tissue to generate a pancreatic organoid as well as current organoids cultivate system. As PDAC organoids can be established from a small number of samples derived from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB), we also review the literature to date on EUS-FNA/FNB-based organoid constitution and its implementation in inquiring tumor behavior and evaluating therapeutic responses. By enabling the alignment of basic and clinical research platforms, the application of organoids would open up new avenues for drug discovery and maximally benefit translational medicine in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) are the most commonly used minimally invasive antireflux therapies. To date, there have not been any reports comparing ARMS and SRF. Our aim was to compare the clinical efficacies of these two therapeutic methods., Methods: We analyzed data from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, including 39 who received ARMS treatment and 30 who received SRF treatment between January 2020 and May 2021. Symptom control, gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ) score, gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) withdrawal, and PPI reduction were analyzed and compared., Results: After 6 months of follow-up, the results showed that both therapies were effective in improving symptoms and quality of life. No difference was found between the ARMS group and SRF group in GERDQ score, GERD-HRQL score, PPI withdrawal rate, or PPI reduction rate (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the PPI withdrawal rate between the two therapies among patients with gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grade II and grade III (P>0.05), but the PPI withdrawal rate in the ARMS group was significantly higher than that in the SRF group among patients with GEFV grade IV (P<0.05)., Conclusions: The clinical efficacies of ARMS and SRF 6 months postoperation were equivalent. The results showed that both ARMS and SRF treatment were acceptable for patients with GEFV grades II and III, while ARMS should be selected for patients with GEFV grade IV., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-2071/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)