Search

Abstract: The development of the anti-CTLA-4 antibody (ipilimumab; marketed as Yervoy 1 [1] Yervoy is an FDA approved human anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb. ) immune regulatory therapy was based on the premise that “Abrogation of the function of CTLA-4 would permit CD28 to function unopposed and might swing the balance in favor of immune stimulation, tolerance breakdown and tumor eradication…” (). By now, the vast majority of data collected from more than 4000 patients proves that this prediction was entirely correct. Paradoxically, the successful blockade of immune checkpoints raises the question whether an anti-CTLA-4 antibody could ever become an important therapy against cancer. T cells lost their ability to discriminate between self and non-self. Thus, tolerance to self tissues was broken in ∼70% of the patients. In the recent industry-sponsored phase III clinical trial of ipilimumab, 147 (38.7%) of the patients experienced severe adverse events and 6.8% suffered dose-limiting events (8.4%, in the ipilimumab-alone group). There were 14 deaths related to the study drugs and 7 of these were associated with immune-related adverse events. In contrast, the complete response rate was only 0.2%, in one patient out of 403 who received ipilimumab plus a peptide vaccine. Promoters of ipilimumab appear to be unmindful of the clinical trial catastrophe in London. Then, a humanized “superagonist” anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody, TGN1412, which “preferentially” activated regulatory T cells, at a higher dose, also activated all CD28 positive T cells. This precipitated a “cytokine storm” leading to life-threatening multiple organ failure in the six healthy human volunteers. Neither anti-CD28 nor anti-CTLA-4 therapies rely on antigen-specificity. Both release free antibody into the body against common molecular targets that are expressed on the targeted as well as on the non-targeted T cells. At lower antibody doses specific T cells are preferentially activated. With increasing antibody dose, however, the kinetics of the interaction is pushed in favor of widespread non-specific T cell expansion. Using the law of mass action we calculated that the vast majority of the CTLA-4 receptors on all activated T cells (including melanoma specific T cells) in the phase III clinical trial of ipilimumab will have been saturated. This would explain the runaway immune response observed. The conclusions drawn by the authors of the ipilimumab trial paper could bear an independent inspection and reassessment concerning the validation of the blockade of immune checkpoints as an important therapeutic strategy against cancer. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

T-lymphocytes are believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). However, the reasons that lead to loss of tolerance and to development of autoimmunity in DLE remain unclear. In the present paper, we investigated serum levels of the regulatory cytokines transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and interleukin (IL)-10 in 25 newly diagnosed patients with DLE, 15 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 10 with psoriasis, 10 with atopic dermatitis (AD) and 20 healthy controls (HC). TGF-β serum levels were significantly lower in patients with DLE compared with patients with psoriasis and HC, while no differences were found between DLE, SLE and AD (medians: DLE: 28.49 ng/ml; psoriasis: 42.77 ng/ml; HC: 43.71 ng/ml; DLE vs. psoriasis: p < 0.05; DLE vs. HC: p < 0.05). IL-10 concentrations were reduced in DLE serum samples with respect to SLE, psoriasis, AD and HC (medians: DLE: 46.42 pg/ml; SLE: 127.64 pg/ml; psoriasis: 109.3 pg/ml; AD: 76.3 pg/ml; HC: 114.71 pg/ml; DLE vs. SLE: p < 0.05; DLE vs. psoriasis: p < 0.05; DLE vs. AD: p < 0.05; DLE vs. HC: p < 0.05). The downregulation of TGF-β and IL-10 in DLE may lead to defective immune suppression and thus to the generation of the tissue injury that is found in lupus patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OTHER ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THIS MINI-REVIEW SERIES ON Th17 CELLS Function and regulation of human T helper 17 cells in health and disease. Clin Exp Immunol 2009; doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04037.x Are T helper 17 cells really pathogenic in autoimmunity? Clin Exp Immunol 2009; doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04039.x CD4+ T helper cells: functional plasticity and differential sensitivity to regulatory T cell-mediated regulation. Clin Exp Immunol 2009; doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04040.x Development of mouse and human T helper 17 cells. Clin Exp Immunol 2009; doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04041.x Uncommitted (naive) CD4+ T helper cells (Thp) can be induced to differentiate to specific lineages according to the local cytokine milieu, towards T helper type 1 (Th1), Th2, Th17 and regulatory T cell (Treg) phenotypes in a mutually exclusive manner. Each phenotype is characterized by unique signalling pathways and expression of specific transcription factors, notably T-bet for Th1, GATA-3 for Th2, forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) for Tregs and receptor-related orphan receptor (ROR)α and RORγt for Th17 cells. Tregs and Th17 cells have been demonstrated to arise from common precursors in a reciprocal manner based on exposure to transforming growth factor (TGF)-β or TGF-β plus interleukin (IL)-6 and carry out diametrically opposing functions, namely suppression or propagation of inflammation, respectively. However, while epigenetic modifications in Th1 and Th2 differentiated cells prevents their conversion to other phenotypes, Th17 cells generated in vitro using TGF-β and IL-6 are unstable and can convert to other phenotypes, especially Th1, both in vitro and in vivo. Tregs are generated from naive precursors both in the thymus (natural, nTregs) and in the periphery (induced, iTregs). The highly suppressive function of Tregs enables them to control many inflammatory diseases in animals and makes them particularly attractive candidates for immunotherapy in humans. The stability of the Treg phenotype is therefore of paramount importance in this context. Recent descriptions of Treg biology have suggested that components of pathogens or inflammatory mediators may subvert the suppressive function of Tregs in order to allow propagation of adequate immune responses. Unexpectedly, however, a number of groups have now described conversion of Tregs to the Th17 phenotype induced by appropriate inflammatory stimuli. These observations are particularly relevant in the context of cell therapy but may also explain some of the dysregulation seen in autoimmune diseases. In this paper, we review Treg to Th17 conversion and propose some potential mechanisms for this phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The immune system of vertebrates may attack its own body and cause autoimmunity diseases. To prevent autoimmunity, regulatory T cells suppress the activity of the autoreactive effector T cells, but they also interrupt normal immune reactions against foreign antigens. In this paper, we discuss the advantage of having some regulatory T cells by considering the host''s ability of coping with foreign antigens and the harm of autoimmunity. Assumptions are as follows: the immature T cells reactive to abundant self-antigens are eliminated, those reactive to rare self-antigen will become regulatory T cells, and those that fail to interact with the antigens to which they are reactive will become effector T cells. Some self-reactive immature T cells may fail to interact with their own target antigens during the limited training period, and will later become effector T cells, causing autoimmunity. Analysis suggests that, having some regulatory T cells can never be advantageous to the host, if activated regulatory T cells suppress effector T cells at any location of the body (global suppression). In contrast, producing some regulatory T cells can be beneficial, if the body is composed of many compartments and regulatory T cells suppress the immune reactions only within the same compartment (localized suppression). This requires regulatory T cells to stop circulating once they are activated by their own target self-antigens. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The control of peripheral lymphocyte numbers is a fundamental aspect of the immune system. Regulatory T cells are involved in the suppression of autoimmune, antitumor, allergic, and other inflammatory responses, as well as in facilitating graft acceptance. In this paper, we discuss whether the control of homeostatic proliferation is another facet of the immune system that is controlled by regulatory T cells. A review of the published data connecting regulatory T cells with the control of homeostatic proliferation indicates that several key questions remain open. One of these relates to the stage at which regulatory T cells could play a role (i.e., T-cell proliferation vs. survival). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]