Search

The backscatter predicted by three common surface scattering models (the Integral Equation Model (IEM), the Dubois, and the Oh models) was evaluated against fully polarized L-band airborne observations. Before any site-specific calibration, the Oh model was found to be the most accurate among the three, with mean errors between the simulated and the observed backscatter of 1.2 dB ( ±2.6 dB standard deviation of the error) and -0.4 dB ( ±2.4 dB) for HH and VV polarizations, respectively, while the IEM and Dubois presented larger errors, with a maximum of 4.5 dB ( ±2 dB) for the IEM in VV polarization. The backscatter errors were observed to be related to surface roughness, another major factor determining the electromagnetic scattering at the soil surface. An existing semiempirical calibration of the surface roughness correlation length was therefore applied to improve the mismatch between modeled and observed backscatters. The application of the semiempirical calibration led to a significant improvement of the backscatter prediction for the IEM. After calibration, the IEM outperformed the Oh model, resulting in a mean backscatter error of -0.3 dB ( ±1.1 dB) and -0.2 ( ±1.2 dB) for HH and VV polarizations, respectively. To test the robustness of the semiempirical calibration, calibration functions derived from an independent data set were applied and shown to also improve the (uncalibrated) IEM performance, suggesting that the calibration procedure is relatively robust for global application. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This paper investigated the effectiveness of frequently used parametric and nonparametric models for biomass retrieval from L-band radar backscatter. Two areas, one in Spain and one in Australia, characterized by different tree species, forest structure, and field sampling designs were selected to demonstrate that retrieval error metrics are similar for different local conditions and sampling characteristics. A mixed-model retrieval strategy was proposed to reduce the overall (i.e., across the entire biomass range) as well as by-biomass-interval errors. Significant relationships were found between aboveground biomass and radar backscatter with most of the backscatter dynamic range being limited to a fairly low range of biomass values ( t/ha) in both study areas. Biomass retrieval errors were largely similar for all parametric and nonparametric models tested. However, some parametric models consistently provided lower correlation between the observed and the predicted biomass while nonparametric models generally provided an unbiased estimation. A mixed-model retrieval strategy was shown to reduce biomass estimation errors by up to 15%. Biomass retrieval errors were highly variable within the L-band sensitivity interval, suggesting that overall accuracy estimates should be used with care, particularly for low biomass intervals ( t/ha) where surface scattering could dominate the total backscatter. Despite exhibiting the highest dynamic range, low biomass areas were characterized by the highest estimation errors (in excess of 80%). Conversely, relative estimation errors were as low as 20%-35% for the 30-75 t/ha biomass intervals, while at higher biomass levels, the estimation error increased due to signal saturation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The baseline radiometer brightness temperature ( Tb ) downscaling algorithm for NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission, scheduled for launch in January 2015, is tested using an airborne simulation of the SMAP data stream. The algorithm synergistically uses 3 km Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) backscatter ( σ ) to downscale a 36 km radiometer Tb to 9 km. While the algorithm has already been tested using experimental datasets from field campaigns in the USA, it is imperative that it is tested for a comprehensive range of land surface conditions (i.e. in different hydro-climatic regions) before global application. Consequently, this study evaluates the algorithm using data collected from the Soil Moisture Active Passive Experiments (SMAPEx) in south-eastern Australia, that closely simulate the SMAP data stream for a single SMAP radiometer pixel over a 3-week interval, with repeat coverage every 2–3 days. The results suggest that the average root-mean-square error (RMSE) in downscaled Tb is 3.1 K and 2.6 K for h - and v -polarizations respectively, when downscaled to 9 km resolution. This increases to 8.2 K and 6.6 K when applied at 1 km resolution. Downscaling over the relatively homogeneous grassland areas resulted in 2 K lower RMSE than for the heterogeneous cropping area. Overall, the downscaling error was around 2.4 K when applied at 9 km resolution for five of the nine days, which meets the 2.4 K error target of the SMAP mission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]