Search

Simple Summary: Proton therapy enables the delivery of a high radiation dose to tumors while sparing surrounding normal tissues. Inaccurate patient positioning may lead to underdosing of the targeted tumor and overdosing of nearby healthy tissues. Before a course of proton therapy, a CT scan is acquired for treatment planning with the patient in the treatment position, and this image dataset is used as a reference for patient localization at each treatment fraction. Radiation therapists perform daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) image guidance to align the patient to closely match the planning CT and minimize inaccuracies in radiation delivery. In this study, CBCT scans were systematically collected with clinical and treatment information to investigate questions related to image guidance, setup uncertainty, and patient motion during the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. Knowledge gained from this study provides a basis for designing safe and optimal proton treatments. This study quantifies setup uncertainty in brain tumor patients who received image-guided proton therapy. Patients analyzed include 165 children, adolescents, and young adults (median age at radiotherapy: 9 years (range: 10 months to 24 years); 80 anesthetized and 85 awake) enrolled in a single-institution prospective study from 2020 to 2023. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed daily to calculate and correct manual setup errors, once per course after setup correction to measure residual errors, and weekly after treatments to assess intrafractional motion. Orthogonal radiographs were acquired consecutively with CBCT for paired comparisons of 40 patients. Translational and rotational errors were converted from 6 degrees of freedom to a scalar by a statistical approach that considers the distance from the target to the isocenter. The 95th percentile of setup uncertainty was reduced by daily CBCT from 10 mm (manual positioning) to 1–1.5 mm (after correction) and increased to 2 mm by the end of fractional treatment. A larger variation existed between the roll corrections reported by radiographs vs. CBCT than for pitch and yaw, while there was no statistically significant difference in translational variation. A quantile mixed regression model showed that the 95th percentile of intrafractional motion was 0.40 mm lower for anesthetized patients ( p = 0.0016 ). Considering additional uncertainty in radiation-imaging isocentricity, the commonly used total plan robustness of 3 mm against positional uncertainty would be appropriate for our study cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To generate synthetic relative proton stopping power (sRPSP) images from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence(s) and develop an online quality assurance (QA) tool for sRPSP to facilitate safe integration of magnetic resonance (MR)‐only proton planning into clinical practice. Materials and methods: Planning computed tomography (CT) and MR images of 195 pediatric brain tumor patients were utilized (training: 150, testing: 45). Seventeen consistent‐cycle generative adversarial network (ccGAN) models were trained separately using paired CT‐converted RPSP and MRI datasets to transform a subject's MRI into sRPSP. T1‐weighted (T1W), T2‐weighted (T2W), and FLAIR MRI were permutated to form 17 combinations, with or without preprocessing, for determining the optimal training sequence(s). For evaluation, sRPSP images were converted to synthetic CT (sCT) and compared to the real CT in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) in Hounsfield units (HU). For QA, sCT was deformed and compared to a reference template built from training dataset to produce a flag map, highlighting pixels that deviate by >100 HU and fall outside the mean ± standard deviation reference intensity. The gamma intensity analysis (10%/3 mm) of the deformed sCT against the QA template on the intensity difference was investigated as a surrogate of sCT accuracy. Results: The sRPSP images generated from a single T1W or T2W sequence outperformed that generated from multi‐MRI sequences in terms of MAE (all p < 0.05). Preprocessing with N4 bias and histogram matching reduced MAE of T2W MRI‐based sCT (54 ± 21 HU vs. 42 ± 13 HU, p = 0.002). The gamma intensity analysis of sCT against the QA template was highly correlated with the MAE of sCT against the real CT in the testing cohort (r = ‐0.89 for T1W sCT; r = ‐0.93 for T2W sCT). Conclusion: Accurate sRPSP images can be generated from T1W/T2W MRI for proton planning. A QA tool highlights regions of inaccuracy, flagging problematic cases unsuitable for clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Vasculopathy (VAS) is a significant complication associated with radiation therapy in patients treated for brain tumors. We studied the type, location, severity, timing, and resolution of VAS in children with craniopharyngioma treated with proton radiation therapy (PRT) and evaluated predictors of stenosis (STN) using a novel patient and imaging-based modeling approach.Methods and Materials: Children with craniopharyngioma (n = 94) were treated with 54 Gy relative biological effectiveness PRT in a clinical trial, NCT01419067. We evaluated VAS type, location, severity, and resolution. VAS events were segmented and related to their location, operative corridor, PRT dose, and vascular territory to facilitate mixed effect logistic regression modeling of spatial predictors of STN events.Results: Forty-five (47.9%) patients had 111 instances of confirmed VAS (pre-PRT n = 37, 33.3%). The median time to post-PRT VAS was 3.41 years (95% confidence interval, 1.86-6.11). STN events were observed post-PRT in 23.4% (n = 22) of patients. Post-PRT VAS was detected by cerebral angiogram in 9.6% (n = 9), severe in 4.3% (n = 4), and compensated on perfusion in 2.1% (n = 2). Revascularization was required for 5 (5.3%) patients. Postsurgical, pre-PRT VAS, and PRT dose to unperturbed vessels were predictive of STN. The effect of PRT on STN was negligible within the surgical corridor.Conclusions: VAS often precedes PRT and was the strongest predictor of post-PRT STN. The adverse effect of PRT on STN was only apparent in unperturbed vasculature beyond the operative corridor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]