Search

The aim of this study was to investigate the healing of human extraction sockets filled with β-tricalcium phosphate and type I collagen (β-TCP/Clg) cones with or without a barrier membrane. Twenty patients were divided in two groups: (A) β-TCP/Clg non-membrane and (B) β-TCP/Clg + barrier membrane. Clinical examination and biopsies from the grafted sites were collected 9 months later. Bone samples were analyzed using histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry. The horizontal dimension of the alveolar ridge was significantly reduced 9 months after socket preservation in the non-membrane group. There was bone formation with no significant differences between the two groups in the areas occupied by new bone (A = 42.4%; B = 45.3%), marrow (A = 42.7%; B = 35.7%), or residual graft (A = 9.7%; B = 12.5%). Immunohistochemistry revealed osteonectin expression in both groups. Both groups demonstrated sufficient amounts of vital bone and socket morphology to support dental implant placement after the 9-month healing period. A future trial to evaluate the alveolar outcomes at an earlier 6-month time point rather than the 9 months used in this study would be of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this prospective, single‐center randomized pilot study was to histologically evaluate and compare vital bone development in premolar and molar‐extraction sites grafted with two different bovine‐derived xenografts. The secondary outcome of interest was implant survival in the grafted sites. Materials and Methods: Adult patients in need of at least two tooth extractions were enrolled. A paired design was used; each patient received at least one of each type of graft at different sites. Each extraction site was randomized to one of two xenograft treatment groups. A resorbable membrane was always placed, and primary intention soft tissue closure was achieved. Four months later, implants were placed and a trephine drill was used to remove bone cores for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Results: Sixteen patients with 40 extraction sites were enrolled; 20 sites were grafted with one type of xenograft and 20 with another. Mean patient age was 53.5 years, and 65% of patients were male. Evaluation of bone core samples taken from grafted sites showed no significant difference in the mean value of percentage of new bone formation between the different grafted sites (33.4% and 32.4%, p =.76). Cumulative implant survival was 97.5% at the 24‐month follow‐up visit. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this pilot study, no statistically significant differences in new bone growth between sites grafted with two different types of xenograft were found. Both graft materials promoted the formation of new bone and provided osseous support for implant placement after socket grafting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]