Search

Copyright of Advances in Atmospheric Sciences is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Inspecting the literature, much effort has been placed on the verification of irradiance forecasts from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, as such forecasts are thought to have profound implications on the photovoltaic (PV) power forecasts, which in turn affects grid operators' confidence in integrating such power into the electricity grid. However, perhaps due to the proprietary nature of PV plants and lack of access to state-of-the-art NWP model output, only few have had the chance to conduct head-to-head comparisons of global mesoscale and regional downscaled NWP models, in terms of how their irradiance forecast inaccuracies propagate to PV power forecasts. In this regard, this work presents such a study, in which irradiance and PV power forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts' High-Resolution (HRES) and Météo-France's Application of Research to Operations at Mesoscale (AROME) models are thoroughly verified against the ground-based measurements from 32 research-grade radiometry stations and 94 actual PV plants in Hungary. A wide range of techniques and case studies concerning verification is herein considered, including variance ratio analysis, Murphy–Winkler decomposition, point-versus-areal verification, and seasonal verification. Despite that the results are too numerous to be summarized in a few sentences, the overarching observation from the verification exercise is that the performance of irradiance forecasts can only be used to infer that of PV power forecasts to a certain extent, which contrasts the conventional wisdom. • Global ECMWF outperforms regional AROME for global horizontal irradiance forecasting. • The advantage of ECMWF is reduced if photovoltaic power forecasting is concerned. • Both numerical weather prediction models have the same accuracy for regional forecasting. • Photovoltaic power forecast errors are the highest in winter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Under the two-step framework of photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting, that is, forecasting first the irradiance and then converting it to PV power, there are two chief ways in which one can account for the uncertainty embedded in the final PV power forecast. One of those is to produce probabilistic irradiance forecast through, for example, ensemble numerical weather prediction (NWP), and the other is to pass the irradiance forecast through a collection of different irradiance-to-power conversion sequences, which are known as model chains. This work investigates, for the first time, into the question: Whether pairing ensemble NWP with ensemble model chain is better than leveraging any individual method alone? Using data from 14 utility-scale ground-mounted PV plants in Hungary and the state-of-the-art global mesoscale NWP model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, it is herein demonstrated that the best probabilistic PV power forecast needs to consider both ensemble NWP and ensemble model chain. Furthermore, owing to the higher-quality probabilistic forecasts, the point forecast accuracy is also improved substantially through pairing. Overall, the recommended paring strategy achieves a mean-normalized continuous ranked probability score and a root mean square error of 18.4% and 42.1%, respectively. • New physical ensemble methods are presented for photovoltaic power forecasting. • The added value of ensemble numerical weather prediction is quantified. • Underdispersed raw ensembles can be effectively calibrated by linear quantile regression. • Improved probabilistic forecasting methods also lead to better deterministic forecasts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]