Search

Objective: Mitochondrial complex‐I deficiency, nuclear type 16, is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in NDUFAF5 (C20orf7) (OMIM 618238). The aim of this study was to describe a severe early prenatal manifestation of this disorder, which was previously considered to occur only postnatally. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective case series including five fetuses from three non‐related families, which shared common sonographic abnormalities, including brain cysts, corpus callosal malformations, non‐immune hydrops fetalis and growth restriction. Genetic evaluation included chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing. Two fetuses from the same family were also available for pathology examination, including electron microscopy. Results: Chromosomal microarray analysis revealed no chromosomal abnormality in any of the tested cases. Trio exome sequencing demonstrated that three affected fetuses from three unrelated families were compound heterozygous or homozygous for likely pathogenic variants in NDUFAF5. No other causative variants were detected. The association between NDUFAF5 variants and fetal malformations was further confirmed by segregation analysis. Histological evaluation of fetal tissues and electron microscopy of the skeletal muscle, liver, proximal tubules and heart demonstrated changes that resembled postmortem findings in patients with mitochondrial depletion disorders as well as previously undescribed findings. Conclusions: Mitochondrial complex‐I deficiency and specifically biallelic mutations in NDUFAF5 have a role in abnormal fetal development, presenting with severe congenital malformations. Mitochondrial complex‐I disorders should be considered in the differential diagnosis of corpus callosal malformations and brain cysts, especially when associated with extracranial abnormalities, such as fetal growth restriction and non‐immune hydrops fetalis. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Linked article: There is a comment on this article by Finsterer. Click here to view the Correspondence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Variants of unknown significance (VUS) poses a dilemma in prenatal genetic testing and counselling. Methods Cases were selected from a cohort of 87 patients who underwent TOP for major CNS anomalies and presented VUS either in genetic assessment. [Extracted from the article]

Fetal imaging findings (US, MRI or both) of fetuses with copy number variants (CNVs) or pathogenic/likely pathogenic sequence variants (SVs) were compared to the classical phenotype described by the literature. OC01.02: Genotype-phenotype correlation in fetuses with major brain malformations using whole-exome sequencing When performing fetal ultrasound (US) we are confronted with the difficult task of finding a correlation between imaging findings, diagnosis and prognosis. [Extracted from the article]