Search

Hypertension is a well-known cardiovascular risk. Patients with end-stage renal diseases frequently suffer hypertension. Furthermore, daily variations of blood pressure are relatively large in patients treated with hemodialysis, partly due to ultrafiltration. Twenty hypertensive patients with end-stage renal diseases whose blood pressure was controlled by a single antihypertensive agent, either angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARB) or calcium channel blocker (CCB), were enrolled into the study. Home blood pressure measurements were also performed. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressures were similar between two agents. However, variations of systolic blood pressure during ARB treatment were greater than those of CCB, and maximal differences in daily systolic blood pressure during treatment with ARB (19±7 mmHg) were greater than those with CCB (14±6 mmHg, p<0.01). Systolic blood pressure measured after hemodialysis under ARB therapy (110±6 mmHg) was lower than that of CCB (118±6 mmHg, p<0.05). Daily variations of diastolic blood pressure were similar between ARB and CCB periods. Our results indicate that variations of systolic blood pressure during ARB treatment are larger than CCB, and suggest that CCB is useful to obtain the better quality of blood pressure control, improving blood pressure stability by preventing substantial drops in blood pressure in hypertensive patients with end-stage renal diseases.

Our previous study indicated that the exchange from an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to aliskiren reduced morning blood pressure and albuminuria in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy. We extended the above study and assessed the effects of exchanging from an ARB to aliskiren on home blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy on chronic hemodialysis. The patients who were persistently hypertensive despite antihypertensive therapy, including ARB, were considered as candidates for the exchange from the ARB to aliskiren. Patients' age and durations of diabetes and hemodialysis were averaged as 62 ± 9 years old, 15 ± 8 and 7 ± 3 years, respectively. Aliskiren decreased morning systolic blood pressure (149 ± 14 to 144 ± 13 mm Hg, n = 30, P < .01) and plasma renin activity (3.5 ± 1.1 to 1.2 ± 0.6 ng/mL/h, P < .01) without changes in serum potassium. Aliskiren also reduced interdialytic weight gain (2.7 ± 0.6 to 2.5 ± 0.5 kg/interval, P < .05) and attenuated the magnitude of intradialytic declines in systolic (-20 ± 11 to -17 ± 10 mm Hg, P < .05) and diastolic blood pressure (-9 ± 6 to -5 ± 5 mm Hg, P < .01). The exchange from an ARB to aliskiren is safe and useful to control home blood pressure in hypertensive hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy. Aliskiren reduced both intradialytic blood pressure drops and interdialytic weight gain in patients with DN.

Background: Our previous retrospective study showed that benidipine was superior to amlodipine (AM) for reducing proteinuria and preserving the augmentation index (AI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: The present study enrolled CKD patients whose blood pressure was not well controlled by an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and a calcium channel blocker other than AM or azelnidipine (AZ). Either AM (5 mg) or AZ (16 mg) was prescribed randomly. Clinical parameters, including proteinuria, serum creatinine, and AI, were measured before initiation of AM or AZ and 1 year later to assess the long-term effect on renal function and central blood pressure., Results: Brachial and central blood pressures were similarly reduced in both groups. However, pulse rate increased in the AM group, but decreased in the AZ group (+3 ± 1 vs. -2 ± 1 bpm, p < 0.0001). The reduction of proteinuria was greater in the AZ group (-29 ± 2 vs. -38 ± 3%, p < 0.01). Improvement of AI adjusted for a pulse rate of 75 bpm was larger in the AZ group than in the AM group (-4 ± 1 vs. -9 ± 1%, p < 0.05). In both groups, estimated GFR remained unchanged throughout the observation period., Conclusion: In hypertensive patients with CKD, combined treatment with AZ and an ARB decreases proteinuria and preferentially improves arterial reflection., (Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Renoprotective effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are well known. However, hypertension with chronic kidney diseases (CKDs) is usually hard to manage with a single agent, and requires the addition of either a calcium antagonist or diuretics to achieve the goal of blood pressure (BP) lowering. Retrospective study was performed among the patients who regularly visited our office, and whose BP had not reached the goal of BP despite of treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker. Clinical parameters were observed for 6 months. Comparisons of home BP and proteinuria were made between 16 patients prescribed additional calcium antagonists and 15 patients with diuretics. Patient background including age, sex BP, augmentation index, and renal function were similar between the two groups. Both calcium antagonists and diuretics considerably decreased BP. An addition of either agent resulted in similar control of home BP. While both agents reduced augmentation index (AI), calcium antagonist exerted greater improvements in AI (-7 ± 5 vs. -4 ± 3%, p < 0.01). Although urinary protein excretion in both groups was decreased, the degree of these decreases was greater among the patients treated with a calcium antagonist (-28 ± 15 vs. -11 ± 15%, p < 0.01). During observation periods, eGFR in both groups did not show any significant changes from the base line. Under the inhibition of a renin-angiotensin system, calcium antagonists elicited a greater decrease in urinary protein excretion than diuretics when BP similarly controlled. Calcium antagonists also improved AI more strongly than diuretics. Calcium antagonists appear suited for adding on renin angiotensin system inhibitors to treat hypertension with CKDs.

Hypertension is a well-known cardiovascular risk. Patients with end-stage renal diseases frequently suffer hypertension, and their blood pressure elevates in winter. However, seasonal changes in daily variations of blood pressure are poorly assessed in patients treated with hemodialysis. Thirty hypertensive patients with end-stage renal diseases were enrolled in the study. Dry weight and antihypertensive medications were altered when they were necessary. Home blood pressure measurements were performed at least for 1 week in each season; April-May 2008, July-August 2008, October-November 2008, and January-February 2009. Both morning and evening systolic blood pressures (SBPs) showed significant seasonal changes ( p < 0.01), with the highest blood pressure in winter (162 +/- 18 and 135 +/- 22 mmHg in morning and evening). Morning diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also exhibited seasonal changes ( p < 0.05), with the highest blood pressure in fall ( 78 +/- 8 mmHg). Evening DBP did not manifest seasonal deviations. Morning-evening differences in SBP and DBP were the greatest in winter (28 +/- 21 and 10 +/- 9 mmHg in SBP and DBP, p < 0.01), and the smallest in summer (16 +/- 12 and 6 +/- 5 mmHg). Daily variations of SBP and DBPs in spring (19 +/- 12 and 7 +/- 6 mmHg) and fall (20 +/- 13 and 9 +/- 8 mmHg) were between those of summer and winter. Our results indicate that not only averaged blood pressure but also variations of blood pressure in winter are larger than the other seasons, and suggest that these blood pressure variations participate in cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with end-stage renal diseases.

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a leading disease that requires renal replacement therapy. The progression of renal dysfunction in DN is faster than the other renal diseases. While antihypertensive therapy reduces albuminuria, a good indicator for the progression, hypertension in DN is treatment resistant. Among patients with DN who took angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), 27 patients who exhibited poor control of albuminuria were enrolled into the study. Angiotensin receptor blocker was exchanged to aliskiren (150-300 mg/d) and clinical parameters were followed for 6 months. Exchange to aliskiren decreased albuminuria (1.57 ± 0.68 to 0.89 ± 0.45 g/gCr, P < .01) without changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate and office blood pressure (BP). Body weight and hemoglobin A1c were not altered. Aliskiren also reduced plasma renin activity (2.0 ± 0.9 to 1.2 ± 0.6 ng/mL/h, P < .01). While evening BP was unchanged, morning systolic BP (139 ± 8 to 132 ± 7 mm Hg, P < .01) and diastolic BP (81 ± 7 to 76 ± 6 mm Hg, P < .05) were decreased significantly after 6 months. Our results indicated that aliskiren decreased BP, especially morning BP in hypertensive patients with DN. The present data suggest that aliskiren exerts renoprotective actions including reduction in albumin excretion for patients with DN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]