Search

The integrated management of water and fertilizer has been widely applied for effectively utilizing limited rainwater resources in rainfed farming systems. However, the combined effect of straw mulching and urea blended with slow-release nitrogen fertilizer (SU) on rainfed maize has seldom been studied. A two-year field experiment (2016–2017) was conducted to evaluate the effects of various agronomic practices, i.e. wheat straw mulching over the entire soil surface (QSU), wheat straw mulching over the partial soil surface (DSU), and water-retaining agent (BSU) under two N application rates (N1: 120 kg ha−1 and N2: 180 kg ha−1) on rainfed maize in northwest China. The results showed that DSUN2 delayed leaf senescence, increased chlorophyll content and photosynthesis, promoted N uptake, and increased grain yield (GY) (by 19.34%-39.91% in 2016 and 11.00%-52.57% in 2017), water use efficiency (WUE) (by 14.35%-56.21% in 2016 and 8.87%-57.44% in 2017) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) (by 12.03%-31.82% in 2016 and 0.49%-9.34% in 2017). More soil water was retained by QSU, which significantly promoted maize growth, but decreased GY compared with DSU. In conclusion, DSUN2 was the most effective agricultural management practice for improving GY, WUE and NUE of rained maize in northwest China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effects of water deficit on maize growth and physiological activities have been extensively studied. However, there are few studies about how various nitrogen (N) fertilizer types alleviate the impact of water stress on maize yield. A two-year field experiment was conducted to explore the effects of N type on maize growth, physiological characteristics and gain yield under various water-stressed conditions in 2019 and 2020. This experiment included three irrigation levels of W1 (60% ET c , ET c is crop evapotranspiration), W2 (80% ET c) and W3 (100% ET c), and three N fertilizer types of urea (U), slow-release nitrogen fertilizer (SRF) and blending U and SRF (UNS). The results showed that W1 and W2 significantly reduced maize leaf area index and leaf N content, which declined maize net photosynthetic rate (P n), transpiration rate (T r) and chlorophyll fluorescence, inhibited chlorophyll synthesis and thus reduced maize yield. W3 not only increased maize growth, P n and T r , but also enhanced the correlation between P n , chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and leaf area index/leaf N content. The application of UNS alleviated the grain yield reduction associated with water stress. Under W1 (W2), the grain yield in UNS were 3.6–22.1% (10.4–25.0%) and 4.4–24.2% (5.3–15.4%) greater than that in U and SRF, respectively. Although W3SRF obtained the highest yield grain among all the treatments, no significant difference was found between W3UNS and W3SRF. Under the same irrigation amount, UNS increased the water productivity compared with U. In conclusion, UNS could stabilize grain yield by regulating maize leaf functional traits to cope with future climate change and ensure regional food security. • LAI and leaf N content can evaluate the response of leaf development process to water deficit. • W3 increased the correlation coefficients between leaf function index and LAI/leaf N content. • UNS alleviated the negative effects of water deficit on leaf functional index of maize. • UNS could stabilize grain yield by regulating maize leaf functional traits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Agricultural production is facing the risk of severe water shortage, serious non-point source pollution and low water productivity (WP) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). It is a major challenge to achieve environmentally friendly production of maize with high WP and NUE. A two-year field experiment with three irrigation levels of W1 (60% ET c , ET c is the crop evapotranspiration), W2 (80% ET c) and W3 (100% ET c), and three nitrogen (N) fertilizer types of urea (U), slow-release N fertilizer (SRF) and urea blended with slow-release N fertilizer (UNS) was conducted in 2019 and 2020, so as to quantify their impacts on the maize dry matter, N uptake and remobilization, grain yield, WP, NUE and residual soil NO 3 −-N. The results showed that W2 and W3 significantly increased total dry matter (8.0% and 14.7%), grain yield (19.4% and 33.0%), and NUE (1.5% and 2.2%) compared with W1. Total N uptake of maize declined by 23.2% and 9.6% under W1 and W2, leading to 11.9% and 5.8% increased of soil NO 3 −-N, respectively. Compared with U, UNS increased post-silking N uptake by 19.1%, thereby enhancing grain yield by 18.3%. Compared with SRF, UNS increased N remobilization from vegetative organs to grains by 15.0%, thereby resulting in 2.3% increase in grain yield. Under the same irrigation amount, UNS and SRF improved WP and NUE compared with U. W3SRF obtained the highest grain yield, with increases in grain yield by 2.4–58.8% compared with other treatments, while there was no significant difference between W3SRF and W3UNS. More importantly, UNS significantly increased grain yield and alleviated the impact of water stress on maize production under W1 and W2. In conclusion, UNS could stabilize grain yield under water-stressed conditions, while SRF could increase grain yield under full irrigation. • W3 (100% ET c) increased maize N uptake and significantly reduced residual soil NO 3 −-N. • UNS increased post-silking N uptake by 19.1%, resulting in 18.3% increases of grain yield. • UNS enhanced N remobilization of vegetative organs by 15.0% and thus grain yield by 2.3%. • UNS can alleviate the pressure of maize yield reduction caused by water deficit through adjust N supply. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optimising the management of water and fertilizer, and fully exploiting the positive effects of the coupling of water and fertilizer, are important ways of achieving high crop yields and promoting the sustainable development of water-efficient agriculture. The objective of this study was to investigate the coupling effects of different irrigation levels and different mixing ratios of slow-release nitrogen fertilizers on the physiological growth characteristics and yield of winter wheat in Guanzhong region under drip irrigation. In this study, field experiments were conducted in two winter wheat growing seasons, 2018–2019 and 2019–2020. The study included three irrigation levels: W1 (60% ETc, where ETc is the evapotranspiration of the crop), W2 (80% ETc), and W3 (100% ETc); and four N fertilizer treatments: U (100% urea), UNS1 (urea: slow-release N fertilizer = 1:1), UNS2 (urea: slow-release N fertilizer = 1:3) and SRF (100% slow-release N fertilizer). Compared to W1 and W2, W3 prolonged the winter wheat leaf functional period, increased leaf area index and net photosynthetic rate (P n), and promoted dry matter accumulation. The total N content of winter wheat decreased by 22.67% and 9.93% under W1 and W2 conditions, respectively. The nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) decreased by 5.87% and 1.97%, respectively, leading to a decrease in yield. Slow-release nitrogen fertilizer (SRF) and its mixture treatments (UNS1, UNS2) increased post-flowering nitrogen uptake in winter wheat compared to U. At the same irrigation level, water use efficiency (WUE) was increased by 34.03%, 13.35%, and 20.86% in the UNS2 treatment compared to U, UNS1, and SRF, respectively. W3UNS2 obtained the highest grain yield: 8026.32 kg hm−2 (2018–2019) and 8993.25 (2019–2020) kg hm−2, with a 9.85–68.24% yield increase compared to other treatments. Und4er the treatments of this study, yield, WUE, and NUE of winter wheat reached 90% of the maximum at irrigation levels of 82.04–91.83% ETc and 59.18–83.67% of slow-release N fertilizer in blended fertilizer. Under water stress conditions, UNS1 and UNS2 can mitigate the effects of water deficit on plant growth and stabilize grain yield. This study provides useful information for optimising water and nitrogen management decisions for winter wheat in semi-arid climatic regions, and contributes to the promotion of sustainable development of wheat production and water-efficient agriculture. • The two-year drip trial was conducted in a sheltered canopy in GuanZhong. • Field trial address in the coupling impacts of irrigation&fertilizer on winter wheat. • Recommended irrigation volumes and mixing ratios were obtained using modelling. • Blended slow-release nitrogen fertilizer can effectively mitigate the drought effects. • 100% ETc with U:SRF = 1:3 is the most recommended irrigation and fertilization option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precise nutrient diagnosis is the basis of accurate simulation of maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield and high-efficient utilization of resources under the changing climate. However, the combined effects of supplementary irrigation and fertilizer application on plant stoichiometry of various maize cultivars in water-limited and nutrient-deficient regions are still poorly understood. A three consecutive year field experiment (2015−2017) was conducted on two maize cultivars (QL14 and ZD958) in northwest China, with two irrigation treatments (RF: rain-fed and DI: drip irrigation) and two fertilization treatments (F0: no fertilization and F1: local fertilization practice). The results showed that the radiation use efficiency for biomass yield of QL14 with fertilization under drip irrigation was increased by 7.39% than that of ZD958. DI (70.19 kg kg−1) and ZD958 (68.55 kg kg−1) obtained significantly higher physiological efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer than RF (59.52 kg kg−1) and QL14 (61.17 kg kg−1), respectively. Both plant and grain N:P ratios under F1 were higher than those under F0. QL14 had significantly higher grain N:P ratio (4.64) than ZD958 (4.26) under DIF1. Grain yield was increased obviously when grain N:P ratio and plant N:K stoichiometry were greater than 4.0 and 1.2, respectively. The newly released maize cultivar (QL14) was highly recommended as forage and cereal crops, since QL14 obtained significantly higher leaf and stem dry matter even under severe drought and low soil fertility conditions. Our study provides an opportunity to achieve high-yielding maize systems in northwest China and maybe other regions with similar environments, and the data will help inform policies and strategic plans for the effective use of water and fertilizer resources. • Nutrient stoichiometry and radiation use efficiency of two maize cultivars were explored. • There was a linear relationship between grain N and P uptake. • Grain yield was increased obviously when grain N:P ratio was greater than 4.0. • QL14 with higher leaf and stem dry matter was recommended as forage and cereal crops. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Irrigation and fertilization are the two most important measures to ensure the agricultural development in arid regions. However, there is still a lack of reasonable irrigation and fertilization strategy in Xinjiang, the largest cotton producing area in China, which causes a waste of resources and a reduction in cotton yield and pollutes the environment. This study investigated the effects of four irrigation amounts (W 0.6 : 60% ET c , W 0.8 : 80% ET c , W 1.0 : 100% ET c and W 1.2 : 120% ET c , where ET c is the crop evapotranspiration) and four nitrogen rates (N 250 -250 kg N ha-1, N 300 -300 kg N ha-1, N 350 -350 kg N ha-1 and N 400 -400 kg N ha-1) on seed cotton yield, nitrogen nutrition status and soil nitrogen residue, so as to explore the optimal water-nitrogen coupling strategy to increase cotton production and water-fertilizer use efficiency while reducing environmental pollution. The nitrogen dilution curves were built to assess the nitrogen nutrition status of cotton. The results showed that increasing irrigation amount increased dry matter and seed cotton yield, but decreased harvest index. Nitrogen application enhanced the nitrogen concentration and accumulation in cotton. Irrigation decreased the nitrogen concentration, but increased the nitrogen accumulation by increasing the dry matter. The highest total plant nitrogen accumulation was obtained under W 1.2 N 400 , 223.88 kg ha-1 in 2018 and 242.77 kg ha-1 in 2019. With the increase of irrigation amount, agronomic nitrogen utilization efficiency (aNUE) first increased and then decreased. Increasing irrigation amount increased nitrogen recovery efficiency (NRE), but reduced physiological nitrogen utilization efficiency (pNUE). pNUE and aNUE decreased with the increasing nitrogen rate, while NRE first increased and then decreased. Soil NO 3 − -N content increased with the increase of nitrogen rate. Irrigation reduced NO 3 − -N content in the surface soil (0–30 cm), while increased that in the deeper soil (40–80 cm). The optimal nitrogen nutrition status was found under W 1.0 N 300 , followed by W 1.0 N 350. Furthermore, the optimal dry matter, seed cotton yield, NRE and total nitrogen accumulation were obtained under W 1.0 N 350 , which was considered as the optimal combination of irrigation amount and nitrogen rate in this study. • Irrigation amount and nitrogen rate effects on cotton nitrogen uptake, utilization and soil nitrogen residue were explored. • A uniform critical nitrogen dilution curve was established for diagnosing cotton N nutrition status. • The best combination of irrigation amount and nitrogen rate for optimal cotton nitrogen nutrition status was put forward. • The optimal dry matter, seed cotton yield, NRE and total nitrogen accumulation were obtained under W 1.0 N 350. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]